The relationship between the two software powerhouses, Microsoft and SAP, has been intriguing to put it mildly, at least since Microsoft's entry into the enterprise applications arena in late 2000 (see Microsoft 'The Great' Poised to Conquer Mid-market, Once and Again ). While the relationship has been depicted by many through a myriad of antonyms, such as "on-off", "hot-cold", or "love-hate", currently, it can best be described as "mutually civil". One can even find some uncanny similarities between the two, such as the occasional involvement in intellectual property lawsuits (whether as plaintiffs or defendants) or through the relatively recent, almost coinciding departures of technological visionaries, Satya Nadella and Shai Agassi, respectively (although Nadella was merely transferred within Microsoft, to the search and ad group that will hope to fend off Google's undeniable threat).
Microsoft and SAP then entered a "strange bedfellows" or co-opetion phase in their relationship, by dallying in business applications. Acting like two high-profile on-again, off-again celebrities, the two were dismissive about questions from the press and analysts about the inevitable competition this partnership would create (i.e., responding "We do target different sizes of companies"). Nonetheless, this stance become moot owing to SAP's forays into small business via SAP Business One and Microsoft's propping up of Microsoft Dynamics AX, as an upper mid-market solution. Then came a perceived snub by SAP for opting for Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) as a primary development environment for its infrastructure and development platform (while there is, nonetheless, some lesser valuable interface options for the counterpart Microsoft .NET Framework environment). However, SAP's move was quite logical given the still lingering perception of Java's better fit for larger enterprises (see Understand J2EE and .NET Environments Before You Choose ).
Any hard feelings between SAP and Microsoft were short lived, as we found out in 2004 when the two were engaged in secret (and startling) merger talks, which was quickly put ad acta before the news broke (whether for good remains to be seen). For most of that year, both vendors had to spend time explaining their separate forays into developing next-generation, service oriented architecture (SOA)-enabled products. Then 2005 seemed to be the year of bliss, where the two expressed mutual respect, and even worked jointly on a commercially available product featuring best of both worlds. Specifically, SAP and Microsoft joined together to leverage the openness of the SAP NetWeaver and Enterprise Service Architecture (ESA) blueprint (see Multipurpose SAP NetWeaver ) with the .NET-based architecture of Microsoft Office desktop applications suite (see Subtle [or Not-so-subtle] Nuances of Microsoft .NET Enablement ). The result was the joint product code-named Project Mendocino (the name of a town halfway between the companies' respective US headquarters) that promised to deliver familiar Microsoft Office desktop management and productivity tools as the façade for the heavy-duty lifting processes of SAP's enterprise applications. In other words, Project Mendocino extended and automated selected business processes from SAP ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) through the familiar Microsoft Office user interface (UI), by providing role-relevant displays of information while retaining SAP applications' process context and the necessary collaboration and analytic tools.
The product is an extension to the SAP Enterprise Portal and other SAP entry points, such as SAP Web Dynpro or the recently unveiled NetWeaver Business Client, (formerly known as Project Muse), which is still needed for power users to gain full access to more advanced SAP business applications and processes. However, for casual information workers that require quick access to simple repetitive processes, such as billable time entry, leave request, or budget monitoring, Project Mendocino came in handy, because it eliminated the reliance on power users and business application experts. At the same time, it also connected business process applications with commonly used productivity applications more seamlessly. The product's capabilities included personalization, object synchronization, report distribution, alerts or notifications, a form-based approval process, and offline functionality. Through these capabilities employees and managers had the potential to realize greater efficiency and flexibility within a number of self-service processes. Other potential benefits revolved around higher productivity, better decision-making, audit traceability and transparency, and faster user adoption.
More information on the initial product's processes, capabilities, and benefit can be found in Major Vendors Adapting to User Requirements and in the book Enterprise SOA: Designing IT for Business Innovation, by Dan Woods and Thomas Mattern (2006 O'Reilly Media). For now, it suffices to say that Project Mendocino initially enabled information workers to perform tasks, such as time management, budget monitoring, organization management, and leave management via their desktops, using features like extended application menus, an SAP-specific smart panel, and business analytics delivered via Microsoft Excel, smart business documents in Microsoft Word, and synchronization Microsoft Outlook between Microsoft Exchange Server and SAP ERP processes.
Both Microsoft and SAP pledged to sell and support the product, which was first released to fifty pilot customers in late 2005 before it was made generally available (GA) in mid-2006 with its official name: Duet. At the time critics were quick to note that the product covered only a handful of simple business processes and that it was more "eye candy" than an "order winner". However, they did see that the product would also be a decisive factor for prospective customers to implement the entire SAP ERP suite (or, for existing SAP users to migrate to its latest release). Critics also expressed caveats of necessary technological prerequisites and hidden costs for Duet. Namely, the client machine runs on Microsoft Windows XP with Microsoft Office 2003 installed, while the Duet hub (which will be detailed later in this report) requires Microsoft Windows Server 2003 or higher and Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 or higher, including Microsoft Active Directory 2000 (however, there are no additional installation, software, or hardware requirements for existing Microsoft Exchange Server landscapes). Moreover, on the SAP side, users have to be on SAP ERP 2004 (including NetWeaver) or higher, while some most recent Duet implementations require additional SAP modules, such as Employee Self-Service, SAP CRM (Customer Relationship Management) 4.0, SAP SRM (Supplier Relationship Management) 5.0, or SAP BW (Business Warehouse) 3.5. The early product release also ran only in English and within Outlook (as opposed to Word or Excel).
More Than Meets the Eye
In addition to disseminating useful SAP data among knowledge workers (outside of its traditionally limited power-user dispatch list), Duet has been crucial for being a "proof of concept" model illustrating the potential development and adoption of composite applications, especially when the result of a joint collaboration between two software giants and market influencers.
Indeed, Duet is one of the first examples of a tangible SOA-based composite application product. While several tools use SOA conceptually, in ways that are sometimes hard to grasp, this tool is based on consuming services in concrete ways that benefits almost every information worker. Duet showed how SOA can be applied to the user experience through familiar desktop applications, and for some users, it will deliver functionality that supersedes the need to work directly with any line-of-business (functional department) or back-office enterprise applications. By exposing functionality and giving even the most casual users an easier way to update data that normally resides only in the back-office system, Duet embraced the innovative potential of SOA services. It exposes features from underlying ERP systems in new ways that create more value. And these services can be used together, even though they were probably written for a system that was designed before SOA was someone's figment of imagination.
This fulfills one of SAP's short-term goals for ESA (SAP's variant of the SOA blueprint) adoption—to create simple services (software components, if you will) that work on top of legacy applications already used by organizations. In the future, the entire stack which encompasses ERP, CRM, and all other SAP Business Suite solutions will eventually evolve to use business objects as their underlying application. Instead of having a rigid and unwieldy monolithic set of applications, SAP is creating a collection of business objects that can be applied in more flexible ways. By late 2007, there will be more services to choose from than the ones used to support Duet, since ESA follows the SOA format of "model once, run anywhere". Namely, instead of hard-coding multiple solutions that apply to different domains, ESA employs business objects or services that are modeled in a way that allows them to handle different solutions. Duet is just one of many client-side solutions that ESA will enable.
To understand how Duet is in tune with SOA, it is important to become familiar with the new stack defined by SAP ESA, and to understand what a composite application is. Webopedia defines a composite application as an application that consists of more than one type of service delivered from an SOA environment. It can range from functionality to entire applications. Services are generated through "local" application logic that controls how services interact with each other. For more information, see Understanding SOA, Web Services, BPM, and BPEL.
As a composite application, Duet overlaps with nearly every part of the new SOA stack:
User screens. Duet uses the familiar Microsoft Office desktop interface, which is achieved not by hard-coding the UI, but through backend modeling and deploying it to the client.
Process orchestration. Duet uses a communications hub referred to as the Duet Extensions to route data to and within the ERP system.
Process integration. Using the aforementioned extensions, Duet translates data from Microsoft Office applications such as Excel into a format that is easily understood by existing ERP tools and their respective enterprise services.
Process workflow. All of the usual workflow processes within SAP ERP take place within the context of Microsoft Office's desktop tools.
Distributed data. The ability to cache data for working online or offline also plays an important part in the functionality.
Other applications being created by SAP will use different parts of the stack to enable different solutions. However, other services created for Duet should indirectly benefit all SAP ESA users by increasing the total pool of objects in the SAP Enterprise Services Repository. Also, every service and application being created for Duet is designed so they can be used by other applications within the ESA environment. For instance, timesheet entry services are part of the Cross Application Time Sheet (CATS) feature that will be used by many applications that rely on timesheet recording and account assignment.
The Duet Architecture Outlined
Despite seemingly simple processes that Duet enables, the product exemplifies how serious an undertaking a commercially available composite application can be. When the goals of Project Mendocino (now Duet) were first formulated, it reportedly became clear that two very different architectures needed to be brought together. On the one side was the ubiquitous client application, which required local data storage, while on the other side was the proverbially complex SAP ERP environment. The different technologies in this case reportedly made it quite easy to select Web services as the interface technology, since both camps added standards-based Web services support in their last releases. However, in this case, simply connecting these two worlds using Web services did not offer a comprehensive enough solution. Namely, the goals required more extensibility, because SAP wanted to enable a model-driven environment on the client side, which would allow Duet to push additional screens and updates to the user without the need to continuously run through an installation and reinstallation whenever business needs changed.
On top of that, Microsoft Office currently works in online as well as offline modes. This capability had to be maintained in Duet as well, since users had to be able to trigger activities while being offline which would later have to be automatically resynchronized once their machines went back online. At the time, Microsoft and SAP also realized that the involved disparate system components (i.e., Microsoft Exchange Servers, Microsoft Office, and SAP ERP systems) are of such a high value to customers that massively updating those environments (and exposing the existing system landscape to any unnecessary disruption) would be unacceptable. SAP and Microsoft weighed these requirements carefully and realized that there was a the need for a communications hub that would sit in the middle of the two existing environments and "mediate" communication and processes. The hub collects various configurations from the back-end system, determines the objects that should be exposed, and decides which activities the user can trigger and how all of that ties together within the user screen. The communications hub is also referred to as the Duet Extensions, which are connected with the Microsoft Office client and the SAP ERP system. The result is that there are three primary parts to Duet's architecture: 1) the Duet Extensions; 2) the Microsoft Office Add-On; and 3) SAP ERP foundation.
The Role of Duet Extensions (the Hub)
The Duet Extensions are implemented in the Microsoft .NET Framework and use the J2EE technology. They act as a hub between the client side and the SAP ERP systems on the server side and enable these two to talk with each other. They also include the application description in the form of metadata (or "data about data") and cater the metadata to the client side. The major components of the Duet Extensions include 1) metadata repository interface and storage; 2) Microsoft Exchange handler; and 3) service bundling.
The metadata repository stores metadata, authorizes access, and enforces the consistency of stored data, whereby the metadata storage component is a relational database built on top of Microsoft SQL Express 2005. This metadata describes objects that are exposed within Microsoft Office and their related UIs and associated actions, and is being pulled by the client, based on the user and his or her role(s) within the organization. The Microsoft Exchange handle, on the other had provides an application-friendly and user-friendly view of messages in Microsoft Exchange. It addresses the conversion of standardized messages from the backend server into Outlook objects, such as IPM.Note. The handler provides an independent layer to different versions and formats of messages, so that calling components do not have to address the versions and formats of Office objects or command messages for the client add-on. The Exchange handler provides interfaces to the most important objects within Microsoft Office, including e-mail (IPM.Note), e-mail attachments, the calendar, tasks, and contacts.
Last but not least, the service bundling component hides the implementation details and distributes incoming calls to Duet-specific Web services or SAP ESA services, or any combination thereof. The criteria that determine which component will be used during implementation is based on the method that can best support the respective use cases within the application. The service bundling component also implements a method to resolve any Duet-specific IDs toward SAP item IDs where necessary. It is anticipated that the vast majority of these services will be executed synchronously for functionality, such as data validation and displaying information in action panes. In case of asynchronous calls, the service bundling component will always reply with an acknowledgment confirmation and then route the reply through the Exchange handler back to the client. An example of such an asynchronous call can be found in team management when requesting all organization contacts for a given user.
In addition to these components, Duet Extensions also include a number of so-called "pluggable services" that interact with existing technology to enable user roles, authentication, security, and reporting, and provide a set of tools for configuration and customization. The pluggable services enable integration with preexisting technologies and provide functionality, such as user roles, authentication, security, and reporting. Since these capabilities are not Duet-specific, customers should be able to deploy any of these services from different vendors that support these standardized interfaces. It should also be possible to reuse existing solutions already installed on site.
Apparently, Duet Extensions can handle all communication between the client and the underlying SAP ERP system, because Duet Extension can gather the context and define the objects that are exposed to the user. Thus, those extensions invoke the relevant underlying SAP ESA services to talk to the underlying applications within the SAP ERP environment. As described previously in some cases, the responses may be handled asynchronously. To accomplish this, Duet Extensions transmit the data back to the local client through the Exchange handler, which completes a simple round trip of data from the UI within an action pane to the SAP ERP system and back.
The metadata that is available on the client resides within Duet Extensions, whose server also acts as a consolidation engine. Most businesses have an IT landscape using a number of different SAP systems, such as an SAP BW, SAP ERP, SAP CRM, SAP SCM (Supply Chain Management), or any number of non-SAP solutions. The Duet Extensions server unites one or more of these backend systems, by taking the metadata from various underlying systems and combining them based on the user and the user's role within the organization, and pushing it down to the client. As the users might not always be online, Duet must be careful in the way it communicates information back to the client, and additional queuing and caching may be required in the Extensions. The data is communicated from SAP ERP into the Exchange handler, which properly formats the information into an extensible markup language (XML) document (or a format that the client can then understand).
If a report is needed, information needs to be converted into a hypertext markup language (HTML)-based email, maybe with some kind of attachment. It also requires flagging the report with specific metadata that is not visible to the end user, but is rather attached to the e-mail body. This enables certain kinds of processes once it reaches the client environment. The client then interprets the metadata and dynamically combines it into the UI screen before presenting the notification of the report to the user (e.g., the final budget status notification). The rules gathered from the back-end system are converted into metadata that the client can understand, and the gap between the two systems is bridged. Because Duet is role sensitive, information presented and executions available to the end user depend on the user's role within the organization (whether the user is an employee or a manager, for example).
The Role of Microsoft Office Add-On
Further, the Microsoft Office Add-On enables communication between the local Microsoft Office client with the Duet Extensions and the SAP system through a metadata portal and storage interface. In other words, the Office Add-On, also known as the Duet Client, represents the Office screen add-ons based on metadata, since it uses the master data for drop-down menus or business rules and then triggers activities in the principal SAP system through either synchronous or asynchronous Web services calls. Metadata descriptions of the various applications are interpreted through the engine, which supports integration with various kinds of host software. The engine also provides Outlook integration, personalization, Excel integration, InfoPath (recently renamed into Windows Workflow Foundation [WF]) integration, and metadata-defined forms. Duet also supports SAP Business Workflows through Microsoft Outlook.
In order to illustrate how data is routed through the Duet architecture, one needs to understand that a typical Microsoft Office user often creates status reports of one kind or another. Using Duet, this process is accelerated since the Office interface already shows which reports an information worker can subscribe to, and offers templates for creating new ones (e.g., a budget report needs to be delivered every Monday morning at 9 a.m., or the project manager wants an alert only after the project has reached 80 percent of total budget consumption). All of these kinds of activities can be done using the local client, in which case it is Microsoft Office combined with Duet.
The Client or Office Add-On is responsible for representing the UI, based on metadata and other kinds of desktop information. For this purpose, the Client/Add-On is separated into three major parts: 1) runtime engine; 2) cashing mechanism; and 3) output queue.
The runtime engine interprets metadata in order to understand which business object is being exposed (a budget report, leave request or time entry, for example). Through these exposed objects, the Office Add-On is able to create subclasses of the existing objects within Microsoft Office. For instance, a "time entry" would then be treated as a subclass of an "appointment" object, and these classes would be exposed through the UI within the action pane environment. In addition to describing objects, the metadata also describes the UI screen and actions that can be triggered from within the user screen. This additional metadata, available on the client side, includes both generalized personalization data and some master data. The generalized personalization data, for example, determines which fields become available in the action pane, whereas the master data, for example, determines which project's budget is being assessed or the default status report profile. The engine's metadata form definition component is the primary method used to customize Duet forms and dialogs, whereby administrator users, using a metadata definition, can customize the action pane, custom dialogs, or Outlook custom forms. This level of customization also enables easy text replacement and user screen fields localization.
The caching mechanism is responsible for maintaining the proper metadata on the client machine, and is based on the user's role and supplies the functionality to store a user's metadata based on user role and data instances. It also stores metadata in a secure manner, and provides access to metadata when disconnected from the Duet server. Furthermore, the cache includes deployment capabilities that deliver application assemblies proactively to a user's machine. Last but not least, the cache provides offline data retrieval for the Duet by switching between the offline store or to the online Duet server when accessing data by using hints from either metadata parameters or other configuration information. The cache component also provides the first-time provisioning and deployment of reference data, reference data expiration refresh rules, and local data storage. In summary, the caching component ensures that metadata, master data, and additional files and objects are kept available locally and are up-to-date. The component is able to store this data on the local client without the need to continuously synchronize and resynchronize with the backend SAP ESA services. And by inserting a validity period into that, Duet can always keep the data cache up-to-date with regards to changes from the back-office system. It is not so much a push for updated information, but rather a pull from it, which should also speed up the end-to-end communication by preloading some of the data that the underlying system will request.
The third component of the Client, the output queue, provides the functionality to enable users to initiate actions while being offline, which are then invoked whenever a connection becomes available. The output queue component is invoked when a user triggers an activity, such as saving a time entry. It then takes the selected business object and triggers activities in the underlying SAP ERP system through either synchronous, or asynchronous Web services calls, which then come into the SAP environment within the Duet Extensions, through the abovementioned service bundling component. This component allows the Duet to compose multiple underlying Web services into a single one for, say, performance improvement, or for using the result of a first call for a second call.
Queued actions are serviced as soon as possible. If online, these calls are serviced in short time intervals; if off-line, the calls are stored for invocation later. Logically, the output queue is used only for asynchronous calls, and to support this functionality, the output queue provides interfaces to be able to "flush the queue" when the backend server is available. Calls made by the output queue to the service bundling component in the backend system will generally respond synchronously with acknowledge confirmation. Duet supports the deployment of applications to the client machine as complete units containing the metadata, assemblies, additional required client components, and reference data required to execute the application. This will occur automatically through a deployment mechanism and includes upgrade control in the form of versioning.
Links to SAP Applications
The Web services calls from the Office Add-On are relayed into the SAP environment, which also occurs within the Duet Extensions through the service bundling component. The engine on the client loads assemblies and metadata from the cache and interprets the metadata descriptions of applications to execute service calls, execute business logic, and construct and display the UI screen based on metadata, and interact with host software. The runtime engine uses an Outlook services library (using the standard programming features of Outlook) to integrate the following features and services:
Action pane. The Duet action pane will mimic the behavior of the Office programmable task pane.
Toolbar buttons. Custom buttons can be added to the application-level toolbar, and these buttons will trigger the execution of metadata-based actions.
Context menu items. Custom context menu items can be added to folder and item context menus to trigger the execution of metadata-based actions.
Outlook events. Selected standard Outlook events and behaviors are extended to automatically activate metadata-defined actions.
Custom calendar views. Outlook tabbed forms and action panes are defined via metadata.
Contact management. Additional tabs are added to contact objects for server-maintained data.
As for the security issues, the challenge Duet faces with authentication is that authentication needs to be separated from the authentication within the system. For authentication within the system, Duet reuses the authentication of the local user in the Microsoft Windows environment. This is generally implemented using Windows NT LAN (Local Area Network) Manager or Microsoft Active Directory, which most users are familiar with. Within Duet, SAP security experts have developed a module that is able to take the user token from the Windows environment and map it to the proper SAP user. In doing so, Duet is able to issue a single sign-on ticket enabling the client to communicate in a with the web services on the SAP side in a secure manner.
Once authentication is secured, standard SAP guidelines and principles take effect and the access is granted based on authorization profiles associated with the user in the underlying SAP system. For example, each profile is associated with a only a few of the cost centers that exist in the underlying system. A user can have access only to his or her own personal information based on service scenarios, while a manager is granted access only to his or her organizational unit within the entire system, and so on.
The Recent Duet Uptake
In any case, Duet's highly involved collaborative architecture that has shown the major "pains and gains" of SOA. (For more information, see SOA from a Management Perspective ). And it has resulted in a commercial product that is unequivocally priced (approximately, $125 [USD] per user, though this price does not include Microsoft Office and SAP licenses, but only for Duet functionality), that is sold and supported under no uncertain terms. With the most recent Duet 1.5 release, some drawbacks of Duet 1.0 have also been addressed, such as the number of supported languages, which has been extended to 16: Simplified Chinese, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, Italian, Korean, Polish, Russian, Swedish, Hungarian, Norwegian, and Traditional Chinese. These are in addition to English, German, French, Japanese, Spanish, and Portuguese in Duet 1.0. A few more scenarios were added too (e.g., recruitment management, travel management, purchasing management, workflow approvals and reports and analytics), some of which run within a Excel UI screen too (as opposed to only within Outlook in the Duet 1.0 scenarios). One should imagine the inclusion of data from other back-end systems beside those of SAP, down the track.
In a particularly peculiar position was Microsoft, which certainly could not complain about royalties from 400,000 deployments (or at least acknowledgements) of Office, Exchange or Windows Server. However, the Microsoft Dynamics business applications group and the accompanying partner ecosystem probably didn't share the same enthusiasm, by any respect. To appease these constituencies, Microsoft released Microsoft Dynamics Snap applications n mid-2006. Microsoft Dynamics Snap, which, beside UI familiarity and simplicity for users, also provided in-context business data lookup in Microsoft Office programs. At the time, Microsoft pointed out that Dynamics Snap was a "shared source" initiative, because the vendor wanted to encourage its partners to build and customize these solutions for their customers, either for specific roles and verticals or to contribute in helping Microsoft build more solutions that enhance productivity and empower information workers. Microsoft emphasized its approach of doing this in a community environment, by distributing the Snap programs under a shared source license to enable people from other companies to modify and extend the programs at no charge. Since then, there have been reported over 18,000 downloads of Snap along with nearly 1,500 individual developers and companies that have joined the Dynamics shared source community. Although this continues to be a great way for Microsoft to understand the dynamics of a Web 2.0-style community (social networks) environment as it applies to business management software, there has been confusion about licensing to customers and what other products customer need to make use of the MS Dynamics Snap.
Even the developers from SAP Labs often express their love for the idea of mash-ups, which, according to Webopedia, is a term derived from the hip-hop music practice of mixing songs together. Mash-ups refer to a new breed of Web-based applications created (unfortunately) by hackers and programmers (typically on a volunteer basis) to mix at least two different services from disparate, and even competing, Web sites. A mash-up, for example, could overlay traffic data from one source on the Internet over maps from Yahoo, Microsoft, Google, or any content provider. Creating a mash-up from multiple sources into one dynamic entity is considered by many to represent the promise of the Web service standard and of on-demand computing (see SaaS-ing the Manufacturing Opportunity ). However, this business model has yet to create viable intellectual property and revenue streams for participants (given the dynamic nature of new product releases and versions), and especially in terms of a structured support and maintenance, which seems to be well spelled out in case of Duet.
Microsoft—Making the Point of Sharing
However, hardly anyone's heart should be crying for Microsoft. As the old adage says, "still water runs deep" , and Microsoft has at least used the Duet and Snap experience to bide time to come up with an even more encompassing solution. Before that, the giant had to conduct some serious soul-searching, such as whether to conclude "Project Green", which sought synergy across its ERP product lines.. Considering this hindsight, it is no longer that important to know whether Microsoft merely toyed with the product convergence idea or if it was the wishful thinking of the news-hungry press and eager analysts (some of which are now gloating about the idea's abandonment). Most likely, the temptation was there (who, after all, wouldn't be tempted to deal with only one product line, as opposed to four?), but a deeper analysis of acquired products has likely caused Microsoft to conclude that each product line has some distinctive technical and functional aspects. This, in conjunction with the partner ecosystem, would make doing anything injudiciously and precipitously (such as imposing unfamiliar tools and technologies) result in the alienation of the existing customers and partners.
But, Microsoft certainly did not panic, and has meanwhile rather spent time on figuring out how it can parlay its desktop supremacy (with an estimated 400 million Office users worldwide) into attracting enterprise applications users, and possibly changing some enterprise applications paradigms. Microsoft operating systems and desktop products have traditionally defined the user experience for most types of applications (with some challenges coming from the simplicity and intuitiveness of Web browser and portals). But, from the vendor's perspective, there is much more to Office integration than the several simple scenarios enabled by Duet and Snap. As Office evolves into a system that supports deeper and contextual business intelligence (BI), workflow, search, document management, and enhanced collaboration through products like Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft has come up with a composite architecture that quite exceeds the one of Duet. It builds on the long-espoused idea of providing users with more integrated and contextual working environment (see What Do Users Want and Need? ). Perhaps the best example is the successful Microsoft Dynamics CRM 4.0 product that features native Outlook UI and its accompanying, instantly familiar experience. Indeed, anyone who wants to see what comprehensive integration between a business management application and Office looks like, should check out the user experience of Microsoft Dynamics CRM, where the entire application "lives inside" of Microsoft Outlook. For more information, see War Looms in the On-demand CRM Market (and Beyond)—But Will You Profit from It?.
When it comes to design time, Microsoft Dynamics developers have been religious about keeping the development metadata driven. This was to mitigate the traditional difficulties within competitive development environments when it comes to enabling the extensibility of their products (e.g., adding entities, adding a couple of fields, relating these relationships, adding some form, writing some logic, exposing the underlying business logic as a Web service, creating a Really Simple Syndication [RSS] feed out of it, etc). Conversely, Microsoft touts its metadata driven modeling tools as a key to how to achieve and maintain simplicity (which is the key driver for the partners' productivity too) for the most complex of customization tasks, while still adding new runtime capability like workflows, process, role-tailored user experience, etc.
Such new easily deployed and reasonably priced packages are aimed at helping customers improve the situation they face today. On average 85 percent of employees do not have direct access to critical information, such as data on customers, costs, orders, and schedules, contained in their ERP application. Microsoft argues that many users want to work exclusively in one Office environment or the other, rather than in pesky proprietary ERP screens. To that end, in March 2007, during the Microsoft Convergence 2007 user conference, Microsoft announced the upcoming availability of a new offering that should help customers further extend the power, insights, and process control of their Microsoft Dynamics ERP applications to most of their employees via familiar business productivity tools in the Microsoft Office system. The new Office-based client is intended to make the ERP capabilities available to a vast majority of employees, in comparison to customarily only extending this to those employees who have purchased ERP seats.
This new package, was somewhat awkwardly named (compared to Duet) as Microsoft Dynamics Client for Microsoft Office and SharePoint Server (MOSS), and contains a collection of up to 12 self-service applications that are built into the Microsoft Office release and SharePoint products and technologies. It also has a license for the recently released Office SharePoint Server 2007. These applications, such as Time and Attendance for Microsoft Dynamics GP, Project Time and Expense for Microsoft Dynamics SL, Microsoft Dynamics Snap Business Data Lookup for Microsoft Dynamics AX, and FRx WebPort and DrillDown Viewer, are expected to simplify access to business information and help connect employees more closely with their company's business processes. Also included in this new offering are licensing rights for customers or industry partners to build their own Office Business Applications (OBA), a new category of programs where Microsoft Office becomes the front-end for accessing the back-end ERP functionality of Microsoft Dynamics. For more information, see Microsoft's Underlying Platform Parts for Enterprise Applications: Somewhat Explained.
This new package has been priced to facilitate companywide deployment, as the price for Microsoft Dynamics Client for Microsoft Office and Windows SharePoint Services is $195 (USD) per user and Microsoft Dynamics Client for Microsoft Office and SharePoint Server is $395 (USD) per user. Microsoft Dynamics Client for Microsoft Office is available to Microsoft Dynamics Business Ready Licensing Advanced Management customers for Microsoft Dynamics GP 10.0, Microsoft Dynamics AX 2009, Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009 and Microsoft Dynamics SL 7.
SharePoint Does It?
Over the last few years, Microsoft Office has evolved from a suite of standalone personal productivity tools into a more tightly integrated set of programs, servers, and services. These new offerings contribute toward Microsoft's above-espoused OBA strategy, in which Microsoft Office becomes the front-end for a business process system and delivers data and process information in a format that is familiar to regular people. Although the best value proposition might come from using all of the components together, Microsoft's new business productivity infrastructure is certainly getting a great deal of attention in the corporate market—in fact, far more than that generated by the long-awaited Windows Vista. On the client side, familiar Microsoft Office applications, such as Word, Outlook, and Excel, have been updated with a new look-and-feel with the aim of unlocking more of the value contained within these desktop productivity tools. Early indicators based on users' feedback suggest that Microsoft's UI designers may have finally gotten these tools right with the nifty features like Banners (that obviate drop-down menus), contextual Action Panes and Action Tabs, FastTabs (for much easier traversing and navigating the system), Fact Boxes (with contextual key performance indicators [KPIs]), Quick Path (to enable commonly used processes), etc.
On the server side, Windows SharePoint Services version 3.0 technology upgraded the basic file-sharing capabilities of Windows Server 2003 to provide a platform for team and workgroup collaboration at small businesses and workgroups within larger businesses, including its recent capability to handle wikis and blogs and improved document versioning. With earlier versions, SharePoint client portals were like a central store, an extension to Office, merely reducing the need for sending information back and forth via e-mail multiple times and helping with version control. Moreover, this technology also provides the foundation services for Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007, the enterprise edition of Microsoft's corporate portal offering and the framework for its BI, business forms, enterprise content management (ECM), and enterprise search (within the corporate network) initiatives. Last fall Microsoft dropped the word "portal" from the Office SharePoint Server as it extended its collaboration and intranet capabilities beyond portal, document management, and enterprise search to include BI and business process management (BPM). SharePoint enables work groups to set up a protected repository of these shared resources with improved manageability and security. It also provides the ability to re-use spreadsheet models by using a scalable server-based calculation service and interactive Web-based user interface.
Time will only tell whether SharePoint is that future "killer application set" that will "nail it" for Microsoft, and nicely tie up the applications with infrastructure. The UI familiarity role is being used by Microsoft in the SharePoint Server, and the vendor also talks of using SharePoint to develop composite applications, where the portal will enable users to draw data from a variety of different applications, such as word processing, spreadsheets, and applications software. Taken as a sum of all the parts, SharePoint adds up to quite a competitive and compelling information worker technology stack, despite the fact that most of its individual parts are hardly outstanding or revolutionary. However, not only has it been used as a "good enough, poor man's groupware solution" (even at some renowned Java shops), but also the opportunities for third-party developers and independent software vendors (ISVs) are such that we may well see many astonishing offerings coming to market over the coming months. For instance, Microsoft Dynamics Client for Microsoft Office also provides Microsoft partners with a powerful set of tools to offer innovation for customers. The business productivity capabilities of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007, combined with access rights to the ERP functionality of Microsoft Dynamics applications, promote partner development of their own OBA's to meet industry- or customer-specific needs. Given SAP Enterprise Portal or Oracle Portal's containment to mainly these vendors' install bases, and given IBM WebSphere Portal's price and complexity, one could definitely realize how, by leveraging SharePoint, Microsoft Dynamics Client for Office and partners' OBA's can go well beyond Duet's capabilities.
Even some Microsoft Dynamics' competitors like Epicor Software have nonetheless harnessed Microsoft's technologies for enhanced connectivity, collaboration, and productivity in and around its ERP systems. To that end, Epicor Portal is a SharePoint-based platform for building informational Web parts and sharing them inside and outside the organization in a personalized, secured portal environment (see Portal Strategy: One Vendor's Story and What It Means to You). Further, Epicor Information Worker is a new desktop productivity solution that will deliver Epicor's ERP applications on the 2007 Microsoft Office system, providing information workers improved access to business data. As to produce many more like examples, it will likely take Microsoft some time to penetrate this market and to overcome the lingering market perception that SharePoint is mainly suitable for low-end, departmental document sharing.
Role-based User Experience
In any case, to mitigate the estimates that as much as 85 percent of the employees in organizations that have deployed an ERP system are not licensed to use the data and information managed by these systems (AMR Research), Microsoft Dynamics is by unlocking data and information for everyone in an organization and helping people realize greater productivity by allowing employees easier access, by making it part of their "daily grind" jobs. Moreover, Microsoft has been quite keen on building more intimate and real-world connections between people and processes. Namely, the giant is strongly convinced that the entire discussion for the market segment is shifting away from "the cold, abstract world of pure business process automation to the human world of real people with real jobs who are trying to use computers and software to get their work done". In other (possibly blunt) words, for the last few decades, ERP vendors have largely ignored users' needs as people. And, most have paid the price in terms of their popularity, because many users simply do not particularly like their ERP software. In fact, many hate it, because the screens are complex, customization is costly, and the artificial "processes" within the software packages have little to do with the work that people actually do in their companies. Given this, Microsoft seems content with the fact that conversation about its market is shifting to the human factors of usability, desirability, accessibility, employee productivity, and personal confidence—because solving these types of problems is in its DNA. In other words, the fervent Microsoft Dynamics' hope is that the market is breaking in its direction and that Microsoft, with its latest endeavor is quick in pursuit.
Thus, another offering that should help people connect to their critical processes is RoleTailored Design, a new user-experience design approach that builds on the next-generation look-and-feel of Windows Vista and the 2007 Microsoft Office system. This new approach to the user experience aims at making business application navigation, collaboration, and insight an integrated and easy part of the software, thereby helping to increase the relevance of business applications for all employees in a company
The RoleTailored design approach involved in-depth research from the Microsoft Dynamics Research Team and its Global User Experience Group (with teams in the US and Denmark). The RoleTailored method is intended to cover the entire Microsoft Dynamics line, and to ensure the applications are tailored to the user-specific and company needs. The research team conducted hundreds of site visits and thousands of interviews and observations at a number of company locations. The team further leveraged lab studies, cognitive walk-throughs, and participatory design and experiential learning seminars at its North American and EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa) Convergence Conferences to develop this product. A summary of Microsoft's process is available through its fact sheet.
Some Illustration, Please?
To satisfy the "show me", inquisitive, or doubtful minds, at Convergence, we witnessed the RoleTailored design process for the role of a sales and marketing executive within the Microsoft Dynamics AX product, whose tasks might include creating marketing plans, overseeing budgets and expenses, analyzing trends and product pricing, and interacting with vendors regarding contracts and services.
The user is first asked to take a look at the "Business Overview" section of the UI screen. The functionality in this area is designed to allow the user to compare amounts or record counts for a selected period of time (such as current month versus last month, or current week versus last week). Details are available by clicking on the value in the "current" or "previous" period columns, or by drilling down from the measure to an inquiry or list that will display the detailed records that make up the record count or total. The user is presented with a list of potential measures which will be available to add to the page, as he or she desires. Thus, the user is kindly asked to indicate (by marking a line through) which, if any, of the measure would not be of benefit to the role of sales and marketing executive (S&ME). The offered metrics are sales; average sales margin; average days to close; average service margin opportunity; Win Rate; Leads; Opportunities; Service Orders; Average Days To Close; Payables Lead Time; Product Returns; Opportunities Closed; Expenses ; New Customers; Receivables; Purchase Orders, etc. The user is also asked to list any other measures that the user would want or expect to be available for the role as S&ME.
Then, the UI area below the Business Overview labeled "My Links" reflects links to Dynamics AX forms or lists, making it easy to navigate to the tasks S&ME uses most frequently. The user is then asked to cross off any links that would not likely be required within the Role Center. The offered choice of hyperlinks are Customers; Sales Forecast; Vendors; Active Campaigns; Purchase Orders; Active Opportunities; Active Leads; Competitors; and On-Hand Item Stock Inquiry. Further, in addition or in place of the links defined in the sample, the user is asked to list any other areas that a S&ME would want quick access too. Afterwards, on the right side of the role UI is the "Key performance indicator (KPI) List" area, and the functionality in this section allows users to compare amounts or record actual values against goals and discern trends. Again, the user is offered a list of potential KPIs, which will be available to add to the page as required. The user is asked to indicate (by marking a line through) which, if any, of the measure would not be of benefit to the role of Sales and Marketing Executive. The offered KPIs are Active Leads; Opportunities Closed; Expenses; Average Sales per Campaign; New Customers; Average Sales Margin; Average Service Margin; Average Days to Close Opportunity; New Leads; Service Orders; Payables; Returns; Receivables; Win Rate; Active Opportunities; Average Days to Close Lead; Purchase Orders; etc. Like with the other areas, the user is again asked to list any other indicators that he of she would want or expect to be available for the role of S&ME.
Another part on the right side of the UI is a chart displaying the "Monthly Sales and Margins". In addition to the chart that is defaulted on the page, a set of charts can also be made available. To that end, the user is asked to mark a line through any of the charts that would not assist the S&ME role. For a list of charts, see table 1.
List of Charts
Receivables Aging; Top 5 Customers by Year Date (YTD) Sales;
Top 5 Customers by Profitability;
Top 5 Vendors by YTD Purchases;
Top 5 Overdue Customers;
Daily Cash Receipts; Opportunity Pipeline;
Top 5 Campaigns;
Top 5 Lead Sources;
Top 5 Opportunity Sources
Top 5 Opportunities by Estimated Revenue
Top 5 Sales Representatives
Top 5 Items
YTD Product Sales
Comparative Sales Trend
Comparative Win Ratio
New versus Existing Customers
Sales Loss Analysis
Comparative Sales Loss Analysis
Campaign Response Analysis
Top 5 Competitors
Rolling Average Sales and Margins
Comparative Rolling Average Sales and Margins, etc
Table 1. List of Charts - On the other hand, the user is solicited to suggest any other charts that he or she would want or would expect to be available for the role as S&ME.
The last area on the screen is the are indicating outstanding work items, which is labeled "Notifications". Logically, this area displays notifications based on alerts defined for the S&ME role. The alerts that will be enabled for this role are listed, and the user is asked to strike a line through any alert that would not be helpful. The alerts offering includes Stalled Opportunity; Stalled Lead; High-value Opportunity Created; High-value Opportunity Postponed; High-value Opportunity Canceled; Customer Put On Hold; Customer in Collection Process; Customer Credit Limit Increase; Customer Credit Limit Decrease; New Vendor Created; Vendor On Hold; Vendor Credit Limit Increase; and Vendor Credit Limit Decrease. As above, the user is solicited to suggest any other types of events that should be made available for the S&ME. Users are also welcome to come up with any additional pertinent content. Similar processes are applied to many other roles (e.g., accounts payable coordinator, sales manager, sales representative, accounts receivable administrator, etc.) and within any Microsoft Dynamics product.
Bringing It Together Within Major New Releases
The above innovative and advanced features (with the ultimate idea of information finding users rather than the other way around) have all been wrapped up in the current releases of Microsoft's Dynamics product line, combining enhancements in usability, contextual BI, connectivity, and Web integration. Making this connected business vision a reality through the support of the initiatives discussed thus far are major new product releases of Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Microsoft Dynamics GP 10.0, and Microsoft Dynamics SL 7.0. This new generation of Microsoft Dynamics products is designed to work seamlessly with Microsoft Windows Vista, Microsoft Office 2007, and Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 and lays the foundation for new levels of business productivity. It is certain that from now on technologies like SharePoint Server 2007, Windows Communication Foundation (WCF, formerly code-named Indigo), WF, and Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF, formerly code-named Avalon) will undoubtedly be the center of the Microsoft Office Universe, with Exchange Server now playing only a behind the scenes role.
To that end, Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009, was just launched at Convergence Copenhagen 2008, and offers personalizable Role Centers corresponding to 21 key job functions,sophisticated BI capabilities based on the new SQL Server database layer, and .NET Web services which allow partners and customers to integrate data and business logic from Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009 into other applications to support a wide range of scenarios. Microsoft Dynamics GP 10.0 includes more than 100 new core application features, a new UI similar to that of Windows Vista and the 2007 Microsoft Office system, enhancements to BI, a new workflow engine, and integrated structured and unstructured search capabilities based on the Microsoft Dynamics Client for Microsoft Office. Microsoft Dynamics SL 7.0, upgrades its development and configuration tools to Microsoft Visual Studio 2005, making it a thoroughly native .NET application and providing new options for connecting business processes. It also includes new application features, such as QuickSend for automated electronic communication with vendors and customers, a new user interface similar to that of the Microsoft Office system, and RoleTailored BI views for managers that can analyze up to 900 business activities.
Thus, Dynamics SL and GP users are probably sighing with relief, given some pundits' speculations that these, primarily North American products, will be subsumed by their more globally used siblings Dynamics NAV and AX. This is certainly not going to happen any time soon (if ever), given the enhancements to their interfaces, their solid accounting structures, and the fact that these solutions are integrated, adaptable business management solutions that help executives, managers, and staff more easily access information that is meaningful to their specific role and responsibilities. More than any other peer mid-market ERP or accounting solution, Microsoft Dynamics GP has embodied the value of Microsoft SQL Server and the power of Microsoft Office. It is delivered with 21 role-based user templates, over 220 Web services interfaces, contextual BI tools, and integration with Microsoft CRM. In addition to a familiar Microsoft Office UI, other new features include Business Analysis Cubes for Microsoft Excel, expanded scope and functionality around Windows SharePoint Services, and a Visual Studio 2005 development environment for extending Microsoft Dynamics GP forms and business logic. Connecting through Web services using standard XML templates is another notable feature. The Excel Services within Office SharePoint Server (the license which is included in the Microsoft Dynamics Client for Microsoft Office and SharePoint Server) will likely solve the proverbial problem of loose spreadsheets and their proliferation, which results in the lack of a formalized process, centralized data and collaborative aspects of enterprise BI and performance management applications. See Vendors Harness Excel (and Office) to Win the Lower-end of Business Intelligence Market.
Throwing a Usability Gauntlet to SAP
Last but not least, and possibly to rival SAP's initial success of Duet, Microsoft Dynamics recently engaged in a popularity contest challenge. Namely, as reported in a recent study on the impact of enterprise software applications on individual business productivity, Microsoft Dynamics users on average scored Microsoft Dynamics 18 percent higher than SAP users scored SAP applications. These were the findings of a recent study into how end users across S&M, finance, and operations departments describe the impact of ERP applications on their business productivity. The study was conducted by Keystone Strategy (www.keystonestrategy.com), an independent research firm with offices in Boston, Massachusetts; San Francisco, California; and Salt Lake City, Utah, (US) and was supervised by Dr. Marco Iansiti, the David Sarnoff Professor of Business Administration at the Harvard Business School. Keystone Strategy is focused on business strategy, technology, operations management, and expert witness testimony.
The business productivity framework was generated as a result of exhaustive research into ERP user roles, responsibilities, and common tasks. Additionally, this study used the Software Usability Measurement Inventory (SUMI) approach to evaluate user perceptions of ERP applications. SUMI is an industry standard usability methodology developed and refined over the past 15 years by software usability experts at the Human Factors Research Group at the University College Cork, Ireland. The study defined six drivers of business productivity: usability, familiarity, transactional efficiency, flexibility, business insight, and collaboration (see Figure 1).
As depicted in the figure 1, Transactional Efficiency measures the user's perception of how easy it is to execute common and repetitive tasks, of the efficiency of the application as it pertains to those common tasks, and of the speed and reliability of the software. Business Insight measures the user's perception of how well the software provides the user with visibility into real time information, helps him or her interpret data, and gauge the impact of their business decisions. Usability measures the user's perception of how easy the applications are to use, how "in command" of the application a user feels, how easy it is to navigate in the software, and how much the user enjoys using the software.
Then, Collaboration measures the user's perception of how the software helps him or her work and communicate with colleagues, share and review work, and communicate with suppliers, partners, and customers. Familiarity measures the user's perception of how intuitive the application feels, how easy it is to learn, how quickly he or she can become proficient with the application, and how comfortable he or she feels using it. Finally, Flexibility measures the user's perception of how easy it is to execute infrequent or unusual tasks in the application, how easily the software can be adapted to specific business needs, and how agile the software is in handling problems that arise unexpectedly.
Figure 1. Business Productivity Measurement Framework (source, Keystone Strategy)
Users of ERP applications at approximately 100 companies (randomly selected) were asked about their experiences with Microsoft and SAP applications across the above six categories of business productivity. Participants responded to statements about each of the categories using a standard, seven point Likert scale (7=Strongly agree, 4=Neither agree/disagree; 1=Strongly disagree). The final score measured the extent that users felt the applications impacted their business productivity. Microsoft not only scored higher overall, but also scored higher in each of the six business productivity dimensions (see Figure 2). In all six dimensions of business productivity measured, Microsoft scored higher than SAP. The Microsoft average score was 18 percent higher than SAP and as much as 27 percent higher in some categories (e.g., flexibility).
Figure 2. Business Productivity Study Results (source Keystone Strategy)
Certain questions from the survey included statements describing challenges users faced when using the software. On such questions, Microsoft respondents frequently scored more favorably than SAP users. For the example questions in the Table 2, respondents reacted to the statements on a seven point scale:
|Challenges with the Software in tune with the SUMI methodology
||Average Microsoft Score
||Average. SAP Score
|It takes too long to learn how to work with this software.
|This software is very awkward to use.
|I sometimes don't know what to do next with this software.
Table 2. Responses to Statements on Challenges with the Software (source Keystone Strategy)
Likewise, Microsoft Dynamics respondents rated Microsoft more favorably on questions from the survey inquiring as to the strengths of the software. In the Table 2, respondents reacted to the following statements on the same seven point scale:
|Strengths of the Software
||Average Microsoft Score
||Average SAP Score
|It is easy to share my comments and provide feedback on the work of others in the software.
|My company is able to change how we use the software as our business changes.
|The software enables me to create comprehensive forecasts for my department.
|It is easy for me to submit work to my supervisor for review or approval.
|The software makes it easy to manage problems and exceptions that arise in my day to day work
|I can easily gain visibility into sales, operational, and financial data across divisions and locations in this software.
Table 3. Responses to Statements on Strengths of the Software (source Keystone Strategy)
Point Well Made, But …
While the Microsoft's application usability challenge to SAP (and to any other ERP competitor, for that matter) is refreshingly laudable and certainly in the interest of users, we would like to take a sort of "not so fast" approach here. Namely, many more qualifications in the above "experiment" would ideally have been needed as to avoid the possibility of comparing "apples with oranges". In other words, more variables are required to give a more balanced comparison. For one, SAP has never been "accused of" a leadership in usability and its UI appeal, but working with the latest SAP ERP release featuring Duet, Project Muse and other redesigned UIs might have helped SAP a bit in the study.
Also, there were not many details about which products were comparatively rated. For example, were the compared enterprises (hopefully of similar size and in similar industries) using the adequate SAP and Microsoft Dynamics products? In other words, were larger enterprises rated comparatively while using SAP ERP and Microsoft Dynamics AX? Were smaller enterprises express the same sentiment when describing their experiences with SAP Business One (which certainly has much better usability than the larger sibling) and Microsoft Dynamics NAV (or GP or SL)? Was scalability and systems' performance (volume benchmarks) also rated (or at least kept on par between the two camps)? Ideally, the same enterprise should have used both the appropriate SAP and Microsoft software for a significant amount of time, but we all know that it is practically impossible. Still, without the opportunity to "kick the tires" of both systems, users' horizons will always be undermined. In other words, they might like (or hate) the current system for not knowing how better (or worse) other systems work elsewhere, and the exposure to another system's experience might give them an additional insight and appreciation for what is here and there. Moreover, given that, similar to political poll numbers, almost any conclusion can be drawn based on how the survey questions are asked (designed). While the intention of this study is admirable, there will always be taint of "what if", and the blight of "apples and oranges" on this study.
Vendors' One-upmanship = Users' Benefit
Ultimately, such challenge should simply benefit users, since both vendors (and their competition) will only continue to push the delivery of better technology, with improved usability and an expanded user base in mind. For instance, like its Dynamics Client counterpart, Duet is currently bringing two very different worlds together: 1) the client-side user experience and 2) the SAP environment, which required a number of enhancements in many of the underlying modules to expose all of the enterprise services, such as enhancements to the reporting functionality and the alerts and notification functionality. SAP will certainly continue— possibly even more aggressively now—to push forward to get all of those pieces in place until, eventually, they all seamlessly become part of NetWeaver.
By making almost all of Duet's baseline functionality an integral part of NetWeaver, SAP could ensure that the total cost of ownership (TCO) for its customers will continue to drop (i.e., an easier-to-use system equals lower training costs, which currently often amount up to 40 percent of the TCO), while at the same time providing more services. It should also allow SAP to open up the Duet suite of applications to application developers outside of SAP to create their own metadata and push that out to the client side to provide the same user experience for their relevant applications as well. The future releases of Duet will feature these capabilities as well as improved tools that can be used by third-party application developers along with those of SAP. The product will be split into two different tracks over time: 1) the underlying infrastructure (the framework and the tools), and 2) the application layer, which is pretty much along the lines of Microsoft Dynamics Client for Office.
Some of the additional applications under consideration for enhancement include employee self-service and manager self-service applications and CRM scenarios. Just as Duet can now make an internal meeting request, it is capable of scheduling a customer meeting as well, and once that meeting is scheduled, a travel request and the budget for that request could be triggered, too. A contact within Outlook is a customer contact, even a business partner's contact at the customer site. Additionally, although an Excel spreadsheet can already be used for reporting in the current release, current release offers scenario analysis as part of a customer's supply-chain modeling. The Duet architecture offer additional possibilities with regard to exposing additional business scenarios, such as use on mobile devices, as well. Duet also now includes a lot of sales-specific functionality such as tracking customer meetings, store e-mail communications, generating sales reports, managing customer information, etc.
During the recent SAP Analyst (Influencers) Summit, we saw a preview of the Duet-enabled Legal Contract Authoring application as a part of the upcoming SAP SRM suite's new major release, which uses Microsoft Word as the word processing UI that is linked to corresponding SAP ESA components. During the demonstration, the Duet Legal Contract Authoring tool was invoked through a contracts folder in Microsoft Outlook. The Contract Authoring application screen displayed two vertical panes side-by-side, a Word document on the left and a Duet interface with accompanying pull-down menus on the right. The pull-down menus include options to automate contract attributes, such as effective date of the contract, spend categories, currency of record, etc. This nifty functionality has the potential of simplifying quite a complex and yet important process within the global sourcing and procurement arena.
External factors that contribute to complex business processes, such as globalization, shorter economic cycles and lead times, mergers and acquisitions (M&As), vertical industry-specific regulatory requirements, etc. beg the question whether a more intuitive UI and usability will suffice and eliminate the need to radically revamp the back-end systems. Namely, if one checks the key success factors as expressed in Driving Factors in the Enterprise Applications Market, the front-end applications like Duet and Microsoft Dynamics Client can help with user-friendliness (such as eliminate training) and the quest for ever-lower TCO, bundling in document or content management, and associated workflow that supports internal processes (see Business Process Management: A Crash Course on What It Entails and Why to Use It) in a great part with regulatory compliance requirements, such as to the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) See Thou Shalt Comply (and More), or Else: Looking at Sarbanes-Oxley ). True, while companies may have many business processes seemingly similar to one another, it is the subtle variations in those processes, the ability to keep the data in those processes current or accurate, and the user authorizations and permissions associated with those processes, that gives one company the competitive edge over another, where the system front-end can come in handy. It is important to realize that many vendors, including Microsoft and SAP, are seriously driving toward more productive businesses through worker productivity and improved quality of decisions (among others).
However, it is a sound functional and scalable backend system that enables the ongoing demand for extended-ERP functionality beyond the user enterprise's four walls, and the ability to integrate business systems with business-critical processes currently not captured by such systems, and the proverbial need for specifically designed solutions for the particular vertical sector. Business complexity and the coupling of applications to satisfy complex, industry-specific processes are increasing and dramatically new approaches, well beyond role-based user productivity, and are necessary for the simplification of such supporting systems. The issues of pricing, integration complexity depending on the degree of legacy software customization currently in place, and the need for a joint support structure, leave many to wonder when more involved processes will be delivered as the composite applications that can be layered on top of Office or ERP foundations. Many also wonder if these will also handle both structured and unstructured information. For example, complex, but possibly rewarding business processes to support global trade management (GTM), sales and operations planning (S&OP), market campaign management, consignment, or vendor-managed inventory (VMI) certainly come to mind. Vertical functionality should also be easier to build because users and partners can not only create new types of data objects but also create relationships between them. In terms of management, users and partners could create objects, while the master enterprise application create and manage the metadata (data about data).
True Modernization "Down Under" Remains Critical
Even the most functional vendor, SAP—which, thanks to its Industry Value Network (IVN) initiative, has a dozen of endorsed independent software vendors (ISV) providers for the upper-end of the market (e.g., MCA Solutions for spare parts inventory optimization, ClickSoftware for field service workforce optimization, OpenText for enterprise content management (ECM), Vendavo for pricing execution, SmartOps for inventory optimization, Callidus for incentive management, etc.)—reveals the complexity of processes these intertwined products are trying to solve. Moreover, it is really impressive that many are even on SAP's price lists, with joint selling and profit-sharing efforts. The heavy lifting at the back-end therefore remains. Thus, while we agree with the Microsoft marketing executive's blog which states that "… for some ERP vendors, the ones who have been shipping incomprehensible software for 20 years, well, making the transition to this new world of work will be a challenge similar to the one faced by the guy who decides he wants to lose 40 pounds the night before his high school reunion", by the same token, trying to leverage most current Microsoft Dynamics solutions at large enterprises would still resemble a nerdy kid working out feverishly for a week to beat a school bully. In other words, it is still unlikely that a large multinational financial institution, manufacturing conglomerate, or a petrochemical company would opt for Microsoft Dynamics in favor of SAP Business suite merely on the basis of a more dazzling and familiar user screens.
In fact, via the Industry Builder initiative, Microsoft has garnered a number of renowned ISV partners and industry solutions atop Dynamics AX. Granted, there have also been relationships with the large consultancies like Tata, Capgemini, BearingPoint, in addition to the longstanding partners like Avanade, Tectura, and Columbus IT (see How Are the Market Leaders Navigating the World of Value-added Resellers?). However, one fact about these consulting setups has been that they cannot really go to user companies and charge a hefty consulting fees to implement no-brainer solutions, which Microsoft tries to deliver via the Dynamics Client (i.e., via predefined role-based screens, KPIs, etc.).
In any case, almost every vendor has to make further inroads into modifiability (adaptability) of customers' existing processes almost on the fly, so that operations do not necessarily have to be ineffectively adapted to rigid systems (see What's Wrong With Application Software? Business Changes, Software Must Change with the Business). To be fair, the SOA and composite applications concepts do indeed facilitate standardization, allow for a measure of integration (even with legacy products) and improved user experience, and accommodate customization, but these are not a panacea, at least not in its current state. It is a fallacy to expect the mere concept to turn, almost overnight, rigid products written in ancient code, into flexible, change-accommodating business tools. To radically change, the underlying product architecture has to either be properly designed from the ground up, or it has to be totally rewritten in new, modern languages and technologies. The reason being is that without true modernization of underlying applications, SOA becomes (and our apologies for the crude metaphor and colloquialism), no more than "putting a lipstick on a pig". Needless to say, the impending rewriting feat is a gut-wrenching effort for all vendors. For more information, see The Modeling Approach to Post-implementation Agility in Enterprise Systems and Microsoft .NET-managed Code Enablement: Examples and Challenges.
Conclusion and User Recommendation
In short, vendors popularity contests should benefit users in general. However, uncovering the real business value of both vendors' blossoming product sets (and accompanying moving parts) both on the platform or infrastructure and applications level should be given an abundance of time and thought. Thus, all affected and interested user enterprises should scrutinize SAP and Microsoft's new offerings to discern what exact enterprises business needs they meet. We encourage customers do a thorough comparison between all the viable products and make an informed decision. Vendors should be prodded for proof of concepts and value comparisons as to discern what is really a tangible benefit versus "pies in the sky".
While both Duet and Microsoft Dynamics Client for Office are notable products and licensing packages (respectively), users should verify whether these offerings truly stem from the idea of allowing customers to better use the software that they have already paid for or from another vendor's ploy to sell more software licenses. Enterprises should have good answers to the dilemmas like what value is there in paying for and implementing a Duet add-on on for the client side, a Duet Hub (server), and Duet-related changes to the SAP system, when they already have an SAP server (and similar for any equivalent "gotchas" in case of Microsoft Dynamics Client for Office). Prospective and existing SAP and Microsoft users should enquire about the ongoing costs for Duet and Dynamics Client for Office, how much time or money it might cost the enterprise to modify the already-delivered, best practices or scenarios to the business, and whether the company can achieve the same (or similar) functionality of these client-side solutions without these additional expenditures.
One thing is for sure—Microsoft SharePoint and Windows Vista are here to stay, and they will greatly contribute to major changes in how users will regard, use, fine-tune, and extend ERP and other enterprise applications in the future. As a result, enterprises should carefully evaluate the impact of new products on their infrastructure and hardware requirements, as to verify the alignment of their corporate strategies with Microsoft's technology blueprint. This is especially true of many conservative manufacturing environments, where systems may not have been kept up to date, while the product mix tends to be much more diverse.
1 Adapted from Dan Woods and Thomas Mattern, Enterprise SOA: Designing IT for Business Innovation (O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol: California 2006), chapter 9.
2 According to Webopedia, asynchronous communication (or start-stop communication) transmits information intermittently, much akin to a telephone conversation, where both parties can talk whenever they like, without having to wait for each other. To distinguish between valid data and noise, computers use a special start bit and stop bit at the beginning and end of each piece of data.