Make smart and accurate
software selection decisions
Podcasts, Webinars, and Videos
Interactive Case Studies
ERGO Decision Support System
Private Label Partnerships
TEC Case Studies
Software Evaluation Reports
Meet TEC's Experts
News and Press Releases
Working at TEC
Partner with TEC
CAD-centric PLM, ERP-centric PLM, and Organic PLM: What's Right for Y...
CAD-centric PLM, ERP-centric PLM, and Organic PLM: What's Right for You? - Part 1
March 7 2012
In this day and age of globalization, ever-shorter new product introduction (NPI) cycles and overall product lifecycles, partner collaboration, and whatnot,
product lifecycle management (PLM)
software solutions have lately increased their strategic significance to enterprises. In his
blog post contribution,
’s CEO Jim Heppelmann touts PLM as a new path to shareholder value
. He argues that
the PLM repository of data should be an enterprise system of record rather than mundane transactional enterprise resource planning (ERP) data
recently leapfrogging its once seemingly untouchable competitors via innovation and delivery of cherished products as well as with the rebirth of
General Motors (GM), Chrysler
via innovation and a departure from their former gas guzzlers with numerous quality issues, it is difficult to debate the importance of product development and its enabling technologies. But not all PLM solutions are created equal, especially given their different origins.
The first and possibly the most prominent PLM group are the so-called “Big Three PLM” solutions that come from stalwart computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) providers:
Siemens PLM Software, Dassault Systemes
, and PTC. From their expertise in the CAD and computer-aided engineering (CAE)-related product data management (PDM) realm, these vendors have expanded into the collaborative PLM realm by acquiring one or more PLM solutions and are currently selling them under the
PLM brands, respectively.
would be additional prominent CAD providers that have recently joined the PLM fray.
The Pros of CAD-based PLM Solutions
Indisputably, CAD-based PLM vendors have thorough knowledge of product design and product development processes. This is especially true with regards to inter-disciplinary system engineering (i.e., managing mechanical, electronic, and software components and requirements). Engineering departments and/or manufacturing operations typically drive the evaluation and selection of the CAD-based PLM solution when these vendors win over other PLM alternatives.
Until recently, these PLM solutions were software toolsets rather than packages and these vendors provided the most extensive customization tools. This is a dated strategy in this age of do-it-yourself (DIT) consumerized IT and so-called “business IT,” but it still has influence since many large discrete manufacturing companies have large PLM IT staffs and therefore heavy customization needs.
Another advantage of these PLM solutions is their stronger standard CAD system integration capabilities. This is especially true when the PLM and CAD product pairs come from the same house, i.e., Teamcenter and
by Siemens, ENOVIA and
by Dassault Systemes, and Windchill and
) by PTC. In addition, due to their back-office systems agnosticism, these solutions seem to do well in environments with multiple ERP systems and/or multiple customized instances of ERP systems (even if they come from the same vendor and brand).
Moreover, given Siemens’ automation origins and slew of related plant-level software acquisitions over the years as well as Dassault Systemes’ more recent acquisitions in the manufacturing execution system (MES) arena, even more emerging advantages bode well for these PLM providers. Standard integration between these vendors’ PLM, CAD, CAM, and MES solutions improves their capability to provide digital factory simulation and validation in the virtual world before the need to invest in costly physical assets (machines centers, robots, etc.).
The Cons of CAD-based PLM Solutions
On the downside, these engineering-heavy vendors lack the experience and capabilities in transactional processes within an enterprise and outside the enterprise’s four walls. Given that their ERP and supply chain management (SCM) process integration and savvy are also basic, these providers cannot really say: "Yes, we can meet all (or even most of) of your enterprise software needs."
These solutions come with higher cost and time to implement or upgrade, especially in those enterprises with multi-CAD and -CAE solutions in place (a matter of course in large global corporations). Moreover, as said earlier, these PLM solutions are not really configurable applications and possess rather elaborate data structures, often referred to as “vaults.” Over time, this custom-made deployment issue will diminish, but not for some time to come. Finally, the aforementioned extensive customization tools come with the curse of high customization costs and future upgrade cost and time ramifications.
The Pros of ERP-based PLM Solutions
Eager to extend collaborative PLM functions (both inter- and intra-enterprise) is the second PLM group of Big Three ERP vendors:
. While SAP has developed its discrete and process manufacturing PLM capabilities in-house, Oracle and Infor have made a number of PLM acquisitions.
would be an ERP and PLM combination in the fashion/apparel industry.
Needles to say, these large ERP vendors have a raft of capabilities pre-packaged into their PLM offering, e.g., product-related analytics, regulatory compliance, sustainability requirements, quality management, sourcing and supplier relationship management (SRM), product portfolio management (PPM), etc. While being shallow in product design and engineering per se, they know a lot more about the entire business acumen (beyond the design bureaus) than the aforementioned engineering-heavy PLM providers.
Experience has taught us that companies choosing SAP, Infor, or Oracle for PLM consider manufacturing or supply chain resource planning to be much more important to their businesses than product development. CIOs and/or IT managers typically drive the evaluation and selection of the PLM solution when ERP vendors win over alternatives. Bidirectional ERP and application level integrations as well as the possibly minimized number of required IT application and infrastructure components are the apparent reasons cited by CIOs. In the case of SAP and Oracle, the standard integration to their MES capabilities (which have lately become more than basic in some industries) is another attractive point.
The Visual Enterprise Strategy
’s mid 2011 article entitled
“Has SAP Become a PLM Factor to be Reckoned With?”
analyzed the current state of affairs of the
SAP PLM 7.x
suite. Soon after,
for its 3D visualization capabilities and as the linchpin of SAP’s “Visual Enterprise” strategy to put the product development (engineering), manufacturing, sales & marketing, and aftermarket service departments on the same page
. For its part, through the acquisition of former
(which had previously acquired
), Oracle also owns the popular
visualization software, which is often used by many other CAD and PLM providers.
SAP and Oracle want to create a center of product information with business data consistency, combined visual and business data analysis, and fully enabled mobile devices to deliver information. In this context,
facilitates better decision making, and
enables flexibility. The strategy of these ERP vendors’ is to enable better and faster decision making by combining 3D visual information with relevant data from their vast ERP suites.
The approach is all about optimizing processes and compressing time to decision. In other words, ERP vendors aim to improve productivity and process efficiency by providing visual navigation and query of product information and graphical animation of procedures. The idea is to reduce information and process complexity, increase comprehension, enable a faster learning curve, and ensure accurate quality operations execution with reduced ambiguity.
SAP and Oracle are not the only game in town here, as Siemens will soon release its
offering, which will be
the entry point of its “High Definition PLM (HD-PLM)” approach
. Along similar lines, Dassault Systemes has the
offering within ENOVIA, and one can put these products/concepts in the same group: 3D Live, HD-PLM, and SAP Visual Enterprise. Basically, they all provide combinations of enterprise data and content from different applications such as PLM, CAD, ERP, SCM, enterprise asset management (EAM), etc.
PTC and Infor are working on this concept as well. PTC Windchill can plug into multiple enterprise applications to find and look at information with its
Windchill Web Parts for SharePoint
module. In the case of Infor, within the
platform strategy the vendor is doing this in a few ways.
, it is leveraging portal capabilities to get to the right application that a user may need from a single home page. Other examples are via the
Lifecycle Analyzer, ION Vault
capabilities within the Infor10 framework. Look for more information on Infor’s PLM offering in a separate article.
Part 2 of this series will analyze the typical shortcomings of ERP-based PLM systems and whether there is a generally more viable solution.
blog post sheds more light on the characteristics of ERP and PLM systems.
In the meantime, your views, comments, opinions, etc. about the PLM, CAD, and ERP software are welcome as usual. We would also be interested in your experiences with these software categories if you are an existing user and with your current (possibly ineffective) product development practices. What PLM solution have you selected and why?
comments powered by Disqus.
comments powered by
Interested in a better way to make software decisions?
Give us a call now: 1-800-496-1303 ext:404
Software Requirements Sets and Comparison Reports
Click here to leverage the experience of our 360 industry perspective