02/11/2000 Linux cornered 25% of the server operating system market last
year, according to preliminary data from International Data Corp. (IDC).
But in terms of revenue share, Linux remains a tiny fraction of the market.
Microsoft Corp.'s Windows NT system held steady at 38% of the server operating
system market last year, while Novell Inc. finished at 19%. Meanwhile,
all of the combined versions of Unix garnered 15% of the market.
IDC analyst Dan Kusnetzky warned against reading too much in these numbers.
All server operating systems, especially NT, are continuing to experience
very strong growth, but the unusual Linux growth numbers are obscuring
that fact. Another trend is that Unix users, in particular, are buying
fewer but more powerful servers, said Kusnetzky, thus generating healthy
revenue in that space.
"We are trying to measure Linux with the same techniques we use for other
products, but that's increasingly difficult," said Kusnetzky. For example,
users can buy a single copy of Linux and install it multiple times. Still,
because of the low cost of installing Linux systems, some users often
buy several different Linux distributions to try out but end up using
only one. In addition, Linux users sometimes buy the server product but
use it as a workstation.
the total revenue stream for Linux-based systems remains tiny compared
with other server operating systems. IDC estimates worldwide Linux revenue,
covering all clients and servers combined, at a mere $63 million for 1999.
forward, IDC still expects that Windows 2000, not Linux, will be the dominant
server operating system by 2003. On the desktop, the Windows 9x line and
Windows NT/2000 are expected to seize a combined 88% of the market in
2003, roughly the same as today. Kusnetzky said he does expect Linux to
score well with non-PC devices such as network appliances and wireless
Despite Microsoft's efforts to marginalize Linux, the server market appears
to be willing to embrace Linux for the time being. As described in the
Event Summary, it is difficult to get apples-to-apples figures for the
"true" sales volumes. Assuming constant counting methodology, the steady
growth of Linux (three years now) is a good trend indicator, and Microsoft
will likely respond with greater force than it has in the past.
As we have discussed previously, having server market share is good for
Linux, but a credible desktop presence is required before Linux can have
a hope of competing seriously with Windows.
Linux keeps racking up these numbers, more fence-sitters will actually
try Linux. Once this happens, the Linux market should grow even further.
To further this process, there may need to be a Linux consolidation. Although
Red Hat currently dominates the Linux market with a 65% market share,
there are enough other distributors to make it confusing to the general
market. Reduction of this confusion is the other key barrier to more widespread
This announcement should provide more reassurance for those customers
who think they are fighting City Hall by selecting (or at least trying)
Linux. Although Linux will almost certainly not duplicate the market shift
that occurred when CDs overtook vinyl LPs, its credibility as an alternative
OS is increasing.
both current and potential, should try to exert pressure on the key vendors
to overcome the "58 varieties" syndrome, as well as improving the user-friendliness.
Although a number of Linux distributors have been working on improving
the ergonomics, this practice must proliferate further. One possible consequence:
Linux has long been the domain of the propeller heads, we can foresee
a backlash when the mystical power of Linux is taken from the shaman and
given to the masses.
a more practical/cynical note: any event (or series of events) which forces
Microsoft to become more customer-friendly is not a bad thing. Although
we do not expect Microsoft to open their source, nor to give away Windows,
they may realize that "Halloween" and "Linux myths" memos are not working,
and they may try a "kinder, gentler" tack.