Make smart and accurate
software selection decisions
Podcasts, Webinars, and Videos
Interactive Case Studies
ERGO Decision Support System
Private Label Partnerships
TEC Case Studies
Software Evaluation Reports
Meet TEC's Experts
News and Press Releases
Working at TEC
Partner with TEC
Vox Populi: Is The Use of Polygraph Testing In Human Resources Ethica...
Vox Populi: Is The Use of Polygraph Testing In Human Resources Ethical or Useful?
If you do a search on the famous phrase “
You can’t handle the truth!
” from the movie
A Few Good Men
, you will find it in a list of
useless movie quotes
. Ironically, it was also voted as the twenty-ninth greatest movie quote of all time by the
American Film Institute
My point is that one should be very careful when handling the truth—especially if you’re a human resource (HR) professional. That being said, the use of polygraph (better known as a lie detector) testing in HR can be quite controversial. Obviously, in such sensitive fields as national security, the benefits of its usage are apparent. But how far should you go in other, less sensitive professions?
In North America, polygraph testing is very rarely used in HR and employers or recruiters that do use it need to thoroughly justify its use. The
Polygraph Protection Act
clearly states: “
Employers are generally prohibited from requiring or requesting any employee or job applicant to take a lie detector test
”. Refusing to take such a test should not impact the recruiter’s decision to hire someone nor should it be used as a basis to fire an individual when they are part of a criminal investigation. Furthermore, when people agree to take the test and fail, the results should not be used by the company to take actions against the employee. The results of the test can only be used as evidence when legal actions against the employee are initiated.
Things are quite different in other parts of the world. In Eastern Europe for instance, I found two HR consulting companies that use polygraph testing for both recruiting and employee assessment. In both cases, it is unclear what the rights are of the people being tested: the privacy of the employee/candidate seems to be at jeopardy.
The first company I reviewed is
. One of the advantages of using polygraph testing, as mentioned on its Web site, is that it can “
estimate employees’ loyalty, motivation, and their personal features
.” I wonder how this works. Does the company use the polygraph test when the candidate says that they would like to spend the rest of their life working for a company and share its values, vision, blah, blah, blah?
The second company I reviewed,
, seems to be a bit more innovative. It offers its customers the option to “
use computerized polygraph called KRIS even in open air conditions!
” So, the next time you take your employees out for a picnic, take a polygraph with you—it’s going to be much more fun and you can find out which employees are the most motivated!
There are no HR consulting companies in North America doing polygraph testing. When required, recruiters or HR professionals use the services of specialized companies (see the
American Polygraph Association
). From the same
, we also learn that “
To date, there has been only a limited number of research projects on the accuracy of polygraph testing in the pre-employment context, primarily because of the difficulty in establishing ground truth
In conclusion, the use of polygraph testing in HR can prove to be useful under very specific circumstances (national security agencies, companies dealing with confidential data, lawsuits, etc.)—and it can be even ethical if we consider that the nation’s security is more important than the privacy of the individual.
What do you think? Please use the poll below to vote or use the comment field to share your thoughts with us.
comments powered by Disqus.
comments powered by
Interested in a better way to make software decisions?
Give us a call now: 1-800-496-1303 ext:404
Software Requirements Sets and Comparison Reports
Click here to leverage the experience of our 360 industry perspective