Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

Lawson

In early in May, a few weeks before Lawson announced its merger with Intentia, Lawson unveiled a new standards-based business applications platform at the Conference and User Exchange (CUE). Designed to increase overall application quality and improve the product lifecycle experience for current and future Lawson clients, the application encompasses construction, deployment, implementation, integration, support, and upgrades.

Codenamed Landmark, the new technology environment has been under development by a special team spearheaded by Richard Lawson, founder of Lawson. It has reportedly taken more than three years to mitigate the source of application complexity—the massive amounts of computer code, called "software bloat", which has brought business software innovation to a standstill. For more on this particular one and other problems plaguing current enterprise applications, see What's Wrong With Enterprise Applications, and What Are Vendors Doing About It?.

Part Two of the Can Java Perk Legacy Enterprise Resource Planning Systems? series.

The new model aims at dramatically reducing the necessary source coding and will ideally result in virtually error-free, consistent Java code. Lawson also intends to have Landmark-developed applications and Web services rolled out gradually and have them share the same data repository as clients' existing Lawson applications. This means that the existing customers would need to only perform an upgrade, not a migration or new implementation.

Landmark

Based on a service-oriented architecture (SOA, for more information and background, see Understanding SOA, Web Services, BPM, BPEL, and More), Landmark is designed to enable Lawson and its clients to relatively quickly and easily modify and customize business processes to accommodate specific business or technology needs. The significant reduction in code and errors and this move to an entirely open standards technology is also believed to help considerably reduce implementation times and lower total cost of ownership (TCO) in the future. Landmark will also complement Intentia's Movex suite of Java-based, enterprise scale applications that also conform to industry standards for integration, interoperability, and SOA. Landmark supports key standards such as Web Services Description Language (WSDL), extensible markup language (XML), and Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP).

With the new technology environment, Lawson will offer a backbone of Java 2 Enterprise Edition-compliant (J2EE) Web services for SOAs running on industry-standard platforms, such as IBM WebSphere. At the same time, it should also enable Lawson to more rapidly develop new services addressing industry or functional-specific business processes without the usual lengthy product development cycle, while enabling clients to incorporate Lawson applications and components into new composite applications. Lawson states that the first Landmark-generated applications are in development and can be expected some time in 2006.

Lawson Strategy Background

Landmark is Lawson's new technology platform that will eventually replace the current "environment" that allows Lawson applications to run across multiple databases and operating systems (OS). To put into perspective, although Lawson initially provided custom mainframe software for Burroughs and IBM installations, the company has continually recognized and anticipated new computing trends by broadening its platform support and adding products. For example, it added IBM System/38 in 1981, IBM AS/400 (now IBM iSeries) in 1988, UNIX in 1990, and Microsoft Windows NT in 1998. The company fully embraced open systems technology in 1985 by moving all development to a UNIX-based computer-aided software engineering (CASE) tool.

In 1993, Lawson was one of the first software application vendors to shift its market focus by delivering client/server applications. Lawson's cross-platform, open-database, component technology was incorporated into its flagship product, which was called the LAWSON INSIGHT II Business Management System in the 1990s, and lawson.insight in the early 2000s. Lawson customers can operate on a number of operating systems (such as UNIX, Windows NT and iSeries), database systems (such as IBM DB2, Microsoft SQL Server and Oracle) and hardware platforms (such as Hewlett Packard [HP], IBM, Sun, and Windows/Intel). Further, customers can access the applications through various end user devices, including personal computers (PC), wireless devices, and personal digital assistants (PDA).

Also Lawson has leapt eagerly onto the intranet and Internet bandwagon, building Web-based functionality into all its products before most of its competitors—including the larger and noisier ones. Its current Lawson 8 Series application suite features fully Web-based user interfaces (UI), while its historical iSeries user base now accounts for a minor part of revenues (up to 20 percent), partly because of the early provision of the upgrade path to UNIX. Lawson has long embraced layered, flexible, open, Web-based, and XML-accessible product architecture, with the idea of support forever changing technology standards. A good example was its early delivery of visionary, Web-addressable, and componentized products. Its Web-addressable features uses server-based application logic and data structure that can be referenced and executed via a universal resource locator (URL. It componentized products use Active Object Repository that exhibit an open architecture and support a wide range of platforms (using Business Component Integrator [BCI]).

Since 1996 Lawson has been promoting its Self-Evident Applications (SEA) initiative, with the idea to simplify the learning curve required by users, featuring Lawson Portal (a default role-based Web user interfaces) and navigational tools. The underpinning of Lawson's technologies has long been SEA, the concept of delivering application functionality to light-client, browser-based desktops. While conventional client/server applications are forms- or transaction-driven, the Self-Evident (recently renamed into Self-Service) Applications are information based, which means that users can view them on dynamic and personalized Web pages, with minimal training requirements. Another product component that was released at the end of 1990s, LAWSON INSIGHT II Open Component Solutions, allowed users to access, view and interact with enterprise information using one of the following technologies: Java, Microsoft ActiveX, Lotus Domino, or Javascript/HTML.

The Lawson product architecture has since further evolved and is currently composed of the Web Services component (that includes Lawson Portal and Internet Object Services (IOS), which are key components for deploying Lawson applications via the Internet) and of the Application Server components that include the business logic applications, active object repository, database layer and environment (workflow, security, and BCI component integrator). For more information, see Lawson Software-IPO and Several Acquisitions After.

Lawson Current Strategy

Landmark will allow Lawson's business domain experts to specify applications in a high-level, domain-specific language (DSL), which would then generate Java program code. Lawson's approach is based on the "pattern language technology", which has been a hot topic among some software engineering communities, namely among practitioners of object-oriented (OO) design and development. Landmark could thus bring some advantages to both Lawson and its customers when the first applications based on the new development framework start to rollout next year.

Eventually, Lawson's developers will do all their programming in the Landmark development environment and the associated Lawson Pattern Language (LPL), which, when combined with the IBM's Eclipse application development framework, will generate Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB). The program code that it generates will reportedly run on any J2EE-compliant application server, such as the open source Tomcat or Jboss, or proprietary servers such as those of IBM, BEA Systems, or Oracle. Software objects and EJBs created by Landmark will be enabled for Web services, allowing them to interoperate in a SOA environment.

Consequently, Lawson customers doing customization and maintenance work will soon work with LPL instead of the various 3GL languages, such as RPG and COBOL, that are generated with the proprietary fourth-generation language (4GL) used by Lawson today. To put this into context, 4GLs are programming languages, mostly used to access databases, which are closer to human languages than typical high-level programming languages.

The other four generations of computer languages are first generation (machine language), second generation (assembly language), third generation languages (3GL, high-level programming languages, such as C, C++, Pascal, and Java), and fifth generation languages (5GL), which are mainly used for artificial intelligence (AI) and neural networks. DSLs such as LPL might also be regarded as 5GLs, given they enable developers to modify specific computer programs, such as Lawson business applications, in this case. At the same time, it works at a very high level and writes very dense code. Other examples of DSLs include RosettaNet, tools Bell Labs developed for modifying telecommunication switches, and even Microsoft Excel. Accordingly, DSLs are hailed as the future of business application development by these proponents.

The advantages of Landmark should come along similar lines for Lawson and its customers. Namely, instead of 30,000 lines of an RPG or COBOL code for a given application, the Landmark version of the code will expectedly be only 2,000 lines of LPL, because it will reuse various patterns. Lawson envisions a steady 15-to-20 times reduction in the total volume of code required under Landmark and LPL, which should equate with up to 95 percent fewer lines of code. This translates into the fact that any time one can reduce the amount of coding, one should also expect to reduce the error rate by a similar amount.

For example, instead of writing an allocations application five times, and perhaps doing it five different ways for the various components and versions of Lawson's enterprise resource planning (ERP) suite, Landmark's pattern-based development should allow Lawson to write the cost allocations logic just once, and then reuse it as needed. At runtime, when one of any number of ERP components needs to perform that particular function, it would then call that single piece of code, which should, in turn, boost the consistency of Lawson code, and enable faster upgrades, better versioning and patching, and other software life cycle benefits.

Lawson believes that this approach will allow it to focus on its domain expertise and on its "drill around" audit trails, and effective dating "signature features". For instance, the drill around feature (which is not dependent on a pre-defined path, but rather is driven by the unique transaction and the attributes that the user is investigating, regardless of the application) allows users to extend their knowledge search in a point-and-click manner at every level of the application, including reports for every data element within the database. To that end, the Active Object Repository enables any authorized user to look through and around transaction data by using the drill around feature, based on the user's needs and analysis criteria.

Further, the quality of traditionally questionable software should increase because Landmark's code generation approach will supposedly reduce the number of lines of code tremendously. Reportedly, there will be a twenty times or so reduction in lines of code for Lawson's Vendor Management module, or over forty times reduction in Lawson's Employee Management module. In terms of the customer rollout, Lawson is emphasizing a co-existence approach. All new Lawson modules will be written under Landmark from now on and will coexist and interoperate with existing Lawson modules, which will be "re-factored" in Landmark. Consequently, installed base clients can move incrementally to the written versions of Landmark.

Challenges

While nobody who is familiar with the pitfalls of enterprise applications will dispute leaner, cleaner, and more consistent code, the question remains whether Lawson's current customers (some of whom have been running applications on the venerable iSeries server for twenty-five years) will be able to move to Landmark and learn the new LPL language without undergoing a major, ERP-rewrite and virtually abandoning everything they have built and their knowledge of RPG.

Incidentally, in addition to the complementary functional and geographic coverage of the Intentia and Lawson offerings, Lawson was likely attracted by Intentia's expertise in Java, and that it had created a code generation tool and a related LPL language. On the other hand, after six years of development and estimated $100 million (USD) in research and development (R&D) investments, Intentia has already ported its RPG suite to Java and created a Movex product suite that spans many platforms and is not bound tightly to the iSeries.

While Lawson has, in the past few years, renewed its commitment to the iSeries through some newer releases of its iSeries-based product, it is now moving in a direction that Intentia has already moved through. The expertise that Intentia has gained in moving the Movex suite to Java should therefore come in.

In any case, Lawson will provide its iSeries customers with tools and a metadata layer for bringing their RPG code into the Landmark integrated development environment (IDE). The move to Landmark should be regarded more like an upgrade than a full-fledged migration. RPG programmers will reportedly not have to learn Java, which does not mesh well with the traditional RPG, to work on Landmark applications. Instead they will have to learn LPL, that will be very declarative and feature an intuitive, easy-to-learn syntax. But, the programming language should not be the real issue with Landmark, since anybody who understands a company's business processes will remain valuable to an organization deploying Landmark applications, whether these may be the RPG programmers who have kept the applications up-to-date and running for nearly two decades or some other business analysts.

In terms of the EJB generation, Lawson acknowledges that Java applications typically require more hardware, including faster processors with more memory, than applications written in other popular languages. This may especially be the case with iSeries, where RPG is optimized for very efficient database access, and where a WebSphere deployment usually requires a hardware upgrade. The hope, however, is that, when Landmark is commercially available in a few years time, new technological developments will render Java more efficient. Perhaps by 2008, when computers will be running on multi-core processors with available on-chip memory stacks, and multi-threaded and 64-bit applications are put into practice, Java will have made tremendous performance gains, possibly also with the help of special Java appliances. Last but not least, maybe these performance gains will come from the expected sizeable reduction in lines of code.

At this stage, Landmark is still a mere vision, although after three years in the lab, it is certainly more than a statement of direction. The first Landmark application should be introduced in 2006 as a sourcing application for government procurement offices. At that point, the market should have a good indication whether Lawson is able to deliver. In any event, there will be no "big bang" migration to Landmark, and Lawson plans to make the transition gradually, over the next few years. On the other hand, as seen in the case of the iSeries product, Lawson is not waiting around to start writing in Landmark given it has already set the Java wheels into motion.

This concludes Part Two of a multipart note.

Part One detailed Intentia's current Java-based strategy.


 
comments powered by Disqus


Can ERP Meet Your eBusiness Needs? Part Two: ERP is the Foundation | Can ERP Meet Your eBusiness Needs? | Commerce One Conducts Its Soul-Searching Metamorphosis Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Commerce One Conducts Its Soul-Searching Metamorphosis | Cincom Acknowledges There Is A Composite Applications Environ-ment Out There Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Cincom Acknowledges There Is A Composite Applications Environ-ment Out There | Lose the Starry Eyes, Analyze: Reviewing the Ideal Candidate for a Pronto Solution | Inventory Planning & Optimization: Extending Your ERP System Part Three: Business Case for Inventory Optimization Solutions | Inventory Planning & Optimization: Extending Your ERP System Part Two: How It Works | Inventory Planning & Optimization: Extending Your ERP System | Is J.D. Edwards's CRM 2.0 (With more than 200 Enhancements) Good News? | Ramco Ships Technology And Products. Part Two: User and Vendor Recommendations | Ramco Ships Technology And Products. Is This The Future Of Enterprise Applications? | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Five: User Recommendations | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Four: Challenges |
Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Three: Market Impact | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Two: Geac & Baan | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part One: Ross Systems & SSA Global Technologies | SYSPRO - Awaiting Positive IMPACT From Its Brand Unification Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | SYSPRO - Awaiting Positive IMPACT From Its Brand Unification Part Two: Market Impact | SYSPRO - Awaiting Positive IMPACT From Its Brand Unification | Caution! Will A Traditional ERP System Help You Deliver Projects? | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? | SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry Part Two: Market Impact | SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry | Top 10 Reasons For Having A Project Kickoff - Part II | Top 10 Reasons For Having A Project Kickoff - Part I | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' Part Three: Competitive Analysis | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' Part Two: Market Impact | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' | Will Adonix Provide A Warmer Home To CIMPRO? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will Adonix Provide A Warmer Home To CIMPRO? Part Two: Market Impact | Will Adonix Provide A Warmer Home To CIMPRO? | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye Part Three: Market Impact | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye Part Two: Announcements Continued | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye | The Art Of Distributed Development Of Multi-Lingual Three-Tier Internet Applications | Requirements Definition For Package Implementations | Evaluating Alternatives: Key Questions To Ask When Considering An Alternative ERP/MRP System | Ramco Systems' Users - Winning Big And Speaking Out In Las Vegas | Made2Manage Affirms Its Technological Astuteness Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Made2Manage Affirms Its Technological Astuteness Part 2: Strategy | Made2Manage Affirms Its Technological Astuteness | Rapid Prototyping Or Simply Over-hyping | How Much Wisdom Will BRAIN Bring To Agilisys? Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | How Much Wisdom Will BRAIN Bring To Agilisys? | MAPICS To Leap Forward In A Frontstep Way Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | MAPICS To Leap Forward In A Frontstep Way Part 2: Market Impact | MAPICS To Leap Forward In A Frontstep Way | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay Part Four: Challenges & User Recommendations | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay Part Three: Market Impact | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay Part Two: Strategy | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay | Ross Systems Shows Poise in 'Big Easy' | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations. | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? Part Three: Complementary Products | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? Part Two: Market Impact | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? | Epicor Picks Clarus' Bargain At The Software Flea Market Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Epicor Picks Clarus' Bargain At The Software Flea Market | Cincom Asserts Expertise In CRM For Complex Manufacturers Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Cincom Asserts Expertise In CRM For Complex Manufacturers | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 4: Competition and User Recommendations | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 3: Challenges | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 2: Market Impact | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically | Why Systems Fail - The Dead-end of Dirty Data | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 4: User Recommendations | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 3: Challenges | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 2: Market Impact | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions | PowerCerv Finally Overpowered By The '02 Hurricane Season Part 2: Strengths and User Recommendations | PowerCerv Finally Overpowered By The '02 Hurricane Season | Data Conversion in an ERP Environment | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT Part 2: Market Impact | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation Part 4: Challenges and User Recommendations | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation Part 3: Market Impact | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation Part 2: FOCUS Announcements Continued | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation | Fourth Shift's evolution Within SoftBrands' DemandStream Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Fourth Shift's evolution Within SoftBrands' DemandStream | PeopleSoft Internationalizes Its Mid-Market Forays Part 2: Challenges & User Recommendations | PeopleSoft Internationalizes Its Mid-Market Forays | Software Piloting: How Do You Fly This Plane | Frontstep Ups The .NET Ante Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Frontstep Ups The .NET Ante | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 2: Market Impact | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' | Will Glovia Glow Again Through Its Hub And VARs? Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will Glovia Glow Again Through Its Hub And VARs? | Lose the Starry-Eyes, Analyze:An Ideal Customer for Relevant INFIMACS | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 4: Other Vendors, CRM, SCP & User Recommendations | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 3: IBM | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 2: Microsoft | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard | Beware of Legacy Data - It Can Be Lethal | Adonix Grows Roots Against The Odds Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Adonix Grows Roots Against The Odds Part 1 | The Automotive OEMs Might Soon Contract “BRAIN” Damage Part 2: The Future and User Recommendations | The Automotive OEMs Might Soon Contract “BRAIN” Damage Part I | Scala Shows Far More Than A Bit Of A Backbone Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Scala Shows Far More Than A Bit Of A Backbone Part 2: Market Impact | Scala Shows Far More Than A Bit Of A Backbone Part 1 | Two Highly Focused Vendors Team For Their Markets' Good | Integration is the Name of the Game in Software Systems | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software | Can 'Intuitive' And 'ERP' Words Be Associated? | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 4: User Recommendations | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 3: Causes of Failures | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 2: Implementation Key Success Factors | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 1: Inexorable Statistics | Fast-path Implementations - Are They Good or Bad? | Announcing Agilisys (Formerly SCT’s Process Manufacturing & Distribution Business) - Finally Fully Focused On Process Manufacturing | Datatex and Dan River Apparel Fabrics - Ten Years and Counting | Is Enterprise Market Consolidating? Exactly! | The Old ERP Dilemma - Should We Install The New Release? | Manugistics Indulges In The Open M&A Season. Part 2: Market Impact, Challenges, and User Recommendations | Manugistics Indulges In The Open M&A Season | Standardizing on One ERP System in a Multi-division Enterprise | Microsoft 'The Great' Poised To Conquer Mid-Market, Once and Again Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Microsoft 'The Great' Poised To Conquer Mid-Market, Once and Again Part 1: Recent Acquisition Announcement | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 2: Market Impact | INFIMACS Boasts MRP Relevant To MROs | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 1: Recent Announcements | Lawson Enforces Its Stronghold Part 2: Market Impact | Lawson Enforces Its Stronghold Part1: Recent Announcements | iProcess.sct Enters Golden Gate Opportunity | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 2: Market Impact | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 1: Recent Announcements | Your ERP System is Up and Running-Now What? | Stratyc's Laser-Sharp Focused Tools Retrofit Legacy Systems | Adonix Expands X3 And Its "French Connection" Part 2: The Future | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 4: Challenges & User Recommendations | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 3: Market Impact | Ross Systems – A Bright Spot On A Difficult Enterprise Application Landscape | PeopleSoft's Buying Momentum Goes On. Pageant Participants, Line Up Please! Part 2: User Recommendations | PeopleSoft's Buying Momentum Goes On. Pageant Participants, Line Up Please! Part 1: Market Impact | Feds Buckle Down on Customer Information Security | The Old ERP Dilemma: How Long Should You Pay Maintenance? | Made2Manage Offers New Functionality And A VIP Treatment Part 2: Market Impact | Made2Manage Offers New Functionality And A VIP Treatment Part 1: Announcements | Gosh, They Kill Partnerships, Don't They? | The 'Old ERP' Dilemma: Replace or Add-on | J.D. Edwards' CEO Retires Again; This Time For Good? | Lawson Software Braves IPO And Reports Strongly Against The Odds | PSI AG To Become More Germane Globally Via Relevant Partnership | J.D. Edwards On The Mend; This Time Might Be For Real | PipeChain Adds Pragmatism Onto Simplicity | Besieged By The CRM Throne Aspirants, King Siebel Delivers "The Magic No.7" Part 2: Market Impact | Ramco Systems - Diversity Marshaled Through Flexibility Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Farms More Business Out Amid Its Staff Reductions | Ramco Systems - Diversity Marshaled Through Flexibility Part 2: Market Impact | How Some ERP Vendors Demonstrated - Warts And All Part 2: Results | Ramco Systems - Diversity Marshaled Through Flexibility | How Some ERP Vendors Demonstrated - Warts and All Part 1 | Should interBiz Mean Intelligence And Prediction Beyond ERP? - Part 2: Challenges and Market Impact | Is SCT And Logistics.com Partnership A Déjà vu? | Should interBiz Mean Intelligence And Prediction Beyond ERP? | SAP Opens The ‘Miss Congeniality’ Contest | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 3: Challenges & User Recommendations | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 2: Market Impact | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically | ERP Selection Facts and Figures Case Study - Part 2: Qualitative Assessments and Analysis | ERP Selection Facts and Figures Case Study Part 1: Business Model Scenarios | Lilly Software Visualizes Its eBusiness Offering, NOW. Part 2: Market Impact | PeopleSoft Remains Rock-Hard And Economy Proof | Lilly Software Visualizes Its eBusiness Offering, NOW | Glovia On B2B Reinventing Trail | Kewill And Microsoft Great Plains To Further Mutually Complement | Soft Economy Dents SAP’s Armored Shield As Well | Syspro Hatches 'Encore' IMPACT On SME Manufacturers. Part 2: Market Impact | PRISM Users Get A Dedicated, Independent Web Community | INFIMACS Becoming Ever More RELEVANT For Project-Based Industries. Part 2: Market Impact and User Recommendations | INFIMACS Becoming Ever More RELEVANT For Project-Based Industries. Part 1: Recent Developments | Clarity of Vision: Clarify Sold to Amdocs by Nortel | Collaborative Commerce: ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: IFS - Part 2 of 2 | Way To Go, Ross Systems! | Collaborative Commerce: ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: IFS - Part 1 of 2 | Geac Awakens On Its Deathbed - Part 2: Geac's Response | What's With Oracle's And SAP's Differing Clairvoyance? | Geac Awakens On Its Deathbed - Part 1: Event Summary | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 5: Recommendations | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 4: Market Predictions | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 3: Rating The Vendors | MAPICS Unifies The Brand And Interacts For CRM Solutions | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 2: Vendor Reactions | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Aging Gracefully With The ‘New Kids On The Block’ | Shall Bifurcated Tack Reverse J.D. Edwards’ Bad Spell? | E-Business Sell Side Success at H.B. Fuller | IFS Glows Amidst The Mid-Market Gloom | Business Intelligence Success at Biomet, Inc. | Oracle Makes A U-Turn At The 'All Things To All People' Exit | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: SAP AG | Sausage Producer Packs Out the Profit with Technology | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: Baan and Parent Company, Invensys | Intentia’s Intents To Be More Fashionable | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: J.D. Edwards | Frontstep Still Awaiting Better Times | E-Business Customer Service Success at H.B. Fuller Company | Will V8 Help SSA GT Regain Lost Ground? | PeopleSoft Keeps Truckin’ On A Potholed Road Ahead | SCT Extends Into Business Intelligence | Epicor Shows Resilience When It Needs It The Most | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 2: ERP Key Success Factors | J.D. Edwards Fires Siebel, Hires YOU | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 1: ERP Trends | Single Source or Best of Breed - The Debate Continues | SAP Thrives On Competitors' Plight, In Part | Can You Add New Life To an Old ERP System? | Made2Manage Manages Throughout Soft Market | Microsoft Great Plains Procures eProcure At Last | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 5: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 4: SAP's Strategy | i2, SAP, Oracle Poised For Showdown in Q4 | SAP – A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 3: Market Impact | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 2: Expanding Functionality | Lawson Software Means Business With PSA and IPO | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 1: Alliances | PeopleSoft Supply Chain Is Music To Mid Market Ears | It Is Possible - SAP And Baan Strange Bedfellows | Oracle Claims The Worst Is Over And Turns To KISS For A Boost Part 3: The Challenge of Gaining Competitive Advantage | Oracle Claims The Worst Is Over And Turns To KISS For A Boost Part 2: The Implications | Oracle Claims The Worst Is Over And Turns To KISS For A Boost Part 1: The News | NavisionDamgaard Reverts To Navision, But In Name Only | J.D. Edwards' QUEST To End Its String Of Pyrrhic Victories Part 2: The Implications | J.D. Edwards' QUEST To End Its String Of Pyrrhic Victories Part 1: The News | Baan Achieves A Speedy Recovery Despite The Tough Times | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 2: The Implications | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 1: The News | ERP Selection Case Study Audio Conference Transcript | Fed Gives ERP A Shot In The Arm | Will QAD Finally Get The Break (-Even)? | IFS' Tamed Growth + Continued Losses + Increased Competitors' Lobby Talk = Decreased Customer Confidence | ROI Systems - A Little ERP Fellow That Gets By | PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet Part 3: Predictions and Recommendations | PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet Part 2: Strengths and Challenges | Latest Development on Epicor's Trying The Divestiture Tack | PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet Part 1: About PeopleSoft | Epicor To Try The Divestiture Tack, Too | MAPICS Clings To Its Customers' Loyalty | Is Ross Systems Up To A Hat Trick? | SAP Remains One Of The Market’s Beacons Of Hope | The Mid-Market Is Consolidating, Lo And Behold | SSA Acquires MAX Hoping To Leap From Its MIN | IBM Buys What’s Left of Informix | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 4: ASP’s and New Pricing Models | Invensys Announces New Division - Baan Process | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 3: E-Business and Mid-Market Shakeout | Geac Decomposes To Survive | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 2: Product Architecture and Web-Basing | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 1: Functional Scope and Vertical Focus | SAP Acquires TopTier To Further Broaden Its Horizons | Oracle Sails Slower In The Low Tide, But Mayday Signal Is Quite Far-Fetched | IFS Aspires To Capture North American Market Against The Low Tide | Is Intentia Truly Industry’s First In Food Traceability? | QAD Finally Breaks The Red Ink Streak, But… | Epicor Software Corp.: Completing Painstaking "e"Volution Part 2: Evaluating Epicor | J.D. Edwards Saved By SCM, Narrowly, And Only For Now | Epicor Software Corp.: Completing Painstaking "e"Volution Part 1: About Epicor | Stalled Navision + Mixed Bag Damgaard = Satisfactory NavisionDamgaard | Infinium Attempts To Better Gain Some Markets' Ear | MAPICS XA Expands BI Offering Through Partnership With Vanguard | Has Intentia Turned The Corner? Almost. | Ross Systems Closes Ranks For A (Possible) Turnaround | PeopleSoft Plays Hardball | Is Made2Manage Made2Survive? Seems So. | Frontstep (Nee Symix Systems) A Step Closer To A Turnaround | Small ERP Vendors Missing The ASP Boat | SAP Defies Economic Slowdown, For Now | Can Lilly Software Get More VISUAL? | Fourth Shift Hopes To Thrive On China’s Greener Pastures | ERP Beginner's Guide In So Many Words | PeopleSoft Joins The Hunt For SMEs | Will 2001 Be The Year Of Baan’s Miraculous Comeback?
Definitely Maybe.
| Extricity Makes a Move into IBM’s Sphere of B2B Influence | Microsoft And Great Plains – A Friendship That Turned Into A Marriage | SCT Corporation: The Last Viable Process Manufacturing Vendor Standing? | Oracle Sails Despite Market’s Low Tide; How Far Will It Go? | J.D. Edwards Reaches $1B Milestone In Another Losing Year | QAD’s Costly eTransition Continues | e-Catalysts Delivers Digital Marketplace | Made2Manage Systems, Inc.: M2M From A2Z For SMEs? | Does NavisionDamgaard Merger Mark Further Mid-Market Consolidation? | Essential ERP - Its Functional Scope | The Essential ERP - Its Genesis & Future | Ross Systems Continues To Slip, But Pledges to Fight Tooth And Claw | IFS Has A Magic Growth Formula; But What About Profitability? | SAP Claims Big Gains In The Low-End Battleground | Symix Starts New Year Under New Name, But Old Issues Remain | IBI + IBM = EAI | Baan – What Will The Future In Invensys’ Stable Bring? Part 2: Evaluating Baan | Infinium Ends Its Most Challenging Year | JuxtaComm And IBM Integrate Their Integration Products | Great Plains Unveils New E-Commerce Solution | Great Plains Taps The Web To Deliver Product Support | Epicor Delivers On Milestones, But Its Situation Remains Bleak | Onyx Software: CRM Vendor Battling For Viability | What On Earth Is Going On With SSA? | BEA Systems Has A Broad Vision For E-Business Infrastructures | Baan – What Will The Future In Invensys’ Stable Bring? Part 1: About Baan | Big ERP Players Courting Government Agencies | Intentia Possibly Seeing Daylight | Geac Lives By Acquisitions; Will It Die By An Acquisition? | SAP Q3 Results Cause Mixed Reactions | Fourth Shift Tightens Belt To Weather The Drought | PeopleSoft Delivers Oxymoron In 'Supply Chain in a Box' | PeopleSoft – Again A Force To Be Reckoned With? | Another Type Of Virus Hits The World (And Gets Microsoft No Less) | J.D. Edwards – A Collaboration Thought Leader Or A Disguised ERP Follower? Part 2: Evaluating J.D. Edwards | J.D. Edwards – A Collaboration Thought Leader Or A Disguised ERP Follower? Part 1: About J.D. Edwards | Lawson Software Expands Vertically As Well | ROI Systems Catching Up With e-Commerce | IBM Aims Renamed UNIX Server at Sun | Great Plains’ Latest Product Offering — Ready to Stampede the SME Market? | Great Plains' eEnterprise Solution 'N Sync with Microsoft's New Platforms | Navision Executes At a Slower Pace | Symix Systems Front-Steps Into Greener e-Commerce Pastures | Has SAP Found Magic Formula (One) To Learn The Ropes Of Marketing? | Is Baan Showing Signs of Life After Death? | Oracle – How to Disappoint Analysts by Doubling Profits | Ross Systems Ends Year On a Sour Note and Braces Itself For Survivor’s Game | Will Oracle’s Freebie Shot Hurt (Or Only Graze) Siebel? | Great Plains – An SME Market Leader, But At What Cost? | IFS Marches On, Although With a String of Losses | Siebel: Great Plans for Great Plains | Commerce One Holds Announcement Festival | Fourth Shift Corporation: Working Overtime To Provide Complete Customer Care | SynQuest Posts Mixed Results | J.D. Edwards’ Mixed Blessings | QAD Continues to Wade Through Red Ink | eConnections Expands Web With IPNet | Geac Trying Its Luck in Partnering | Ultimate Connection Seeking Its US Retail Connection Through Solomon Software Partners | New Release For Ariba’s Software | Thru-Put Announces Features For New APS Release | Oracle Applications - An Internet-Reinvented Feisty Challenger | American Software Has Been Starving While Delivering Innovations | Intentia Has Been Bleeding For Its Platform Independence | ERP Belle Époque Officially Ended With the Demise of Baan and SSA | PowerCerv Facing Another Stormy Season | The Pros and Cons of Collaborative Planning | MAPICS Back On Track, But Not Without Restructuring Pains | Global Vendor Negotiation Strategies | Winner Takes All – Siebel Ousts SalesLogix From Solomon’s Deal | PeopleSoft 8 Launched – Anything to Write Home About? | PeopleSoft: No More a Humble Kid From a Rough Neighborhood? | IBM Nabs Another Application Vendor | Catalyst International to Tread Water With SAP Through 2000 | Epicor Software Corp.: How Far From Being 'One-Stop' Shop? | SCT Comes Back With a Vengeance | Lawson Software Marches Over $300M Milestone | SAP Remains Solid While Transitioning | They Can Run, But You Can’t Hide | How Has Made2Manage Systems Been Managing Itself? | Baan Defectors – Is This Only Tip of an Iceberg? | Is Fourth Shift Succeeding in Providing 'Complete Customer Care'? | SAP - A Leader Under Reconstruction | How Detrimental Can a 2nd-In-Charge’s Departure Be? | Can Geac Reshuffle the ERP Standings? | More Vendors Bail on Oracle in Favor of IBM | ERP Getting a New Breath of Fresh Air in Europe | Has Market Been Too Harsh On Great Plains? | Great Plains Supply Chain Series To Be Powered By Logility | J.D. Edwards Chooses Freedom to Choose EAI | Siebel Has Done It Again – This Time with Navision | American Software - A Tacit Avant-Garde? | Ross Systems, Inc.: In Process of Renaissance | How Has MAPICS Been Extending? | PeopleSoft Manufacturing - This Time For Sure?! | i2 Technologies’ Latest Offering: J. D. Edwards OneWorld™ | SAP to Become Leaner, Meaner and More Organized | J. D. Edwards FOCUSes on Active Supply Chain | Infinium Software, Inc.: Having All the Right Cards? | Access Commerce Spices Up North American CRM Fray | No More Mr. Nice Guy With J.D. Edwards | Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Audio Conference | IFS Far Cry From Running Out of Breath | Infinium and Elcom Walk Down ASP Aisle | ROI Systems, Inc.: Will Slow and Steady Remain in the Race? | Baan Yet Another ERP Vendor to Find a Sanctuary Under Invensys’ Wing | MAPICS Red Ink Stained While Extending Its Offering | Intentia’s Growing Pains | Ross Systems’ Renaissance Yet to Happen | Epicor Continues To Bleed | Symix Systems’ Slips Into Red During Its E-Commerce Transition | Will Solomon Finally Satisfy Great Plains’ Insatiable Appetite? | Baan Sinks Deeper into Red Quicksand | Lawson Software’s CRM and ASP Moves – Wise, Bold, Injudicious, Enforced, or Something Else? | Is SAP Stumbling? Perhaps. | Yet Another ‘Big 5 ERP’ CEO Casualty | Navision Software a/s: Mid-market iNvasion | Essential ERP – Current Market Trends – Part II | Will That Wretched ERP Finally Die? Possibly, But Only the Acronym! | Yet Another ERP/CRM Partnership | Oracle Flying High on Q3 Report: Is Gold All That Glitters? | Navision Becoming More Visible | Geac Announces Q3 Results and Acquires CRM Vendor | ERP Demand Being Re-heated | ERP Vendors Venturing into PSA | Solomon Software: Breaking Away from Perception as “Best-of-Breed-Accounting” Vendor | JD Edwards’ Alliances: Is It Too Much of a Good Thing? | GLOVIA to be Resuscitated (Hopefully) | JD Edwards Reports Strong License Revenue Growth in Q1 2000, but… | Intentia Attempts to Become ‘Lean and Mean’ | Vendors Begin to Round Out Their CRM Suites | J.D. Edwards Names SynQuest Preferred Solution | Oracle Integrates Front and Back Office with Applications 11i | PeopleSoft's CEO Steps Down | SSA Seeks Support from Synquest | SAP sets up Apparel and Footwear team | Geac and JBA Join Forces to Form New ERP Giant | Computer Associates, Baan Japan and EXE Announce Strategic Alliance to Provide Total Supply Chain Management Solutions | Oracle to Enlist BPA Systems in its Mid-Market Quest | SAP Lowers Revenue Expectations | Symix Maintains Consistent Profitability Despite Y2K Market Conditions | Software Leasing Trend Slams Baan Earnings | Intentia Americas Gains Momentum with 10 New Deals Inked During Last Two Weeks | MAPICS Reports Solid Profitability Despite Dismal Fiscal 1999 4% Growth | Baan Releases New Supply Chain Products | French Government awards ERP contract to Peoplesoft | Business Software Firms Sued Over Implementation - Lawsuits Bring ERP Problems to Light | Geac Metamorphosises JBA Into Gear, but Cuts 20% of Staff | SAP Details CRM Plans | J.D. Edwards Incurs Further Losses In Third Quarter | Intentia and Dash Associates Team Up | Key Product Delays Take a Toll on Oracle Users | ERP Packages For Midsize Firms in the Works | QAD Reports Third-Quarter--Revenue Rises 56 Percent | Pronto ERP 'Coming to America' | System Software Associates Announces Fiscal Fourth Quarter Results - The Agony Continues | J.D. Edwards Closes Out Millennium on an Up Note | Boeing Expands Baan Licensing Deal | Oracle Reports Strong Profits | QAD Offers Improved E-Commerce Applications with Greater Flexibility and Customization Capabilities | Heads Roll at Consulting Giant in Wake of SEC Investigation | Is Baan Clinically Dead? | Manhattan Associates Partners with Intentia | PeopleSoft Completes Acquisition of Vantive; Vantive CRM Applications Integrate with PeopleSoft and Other ERP Systems | SAP, PeopleSoft Earnings Look Brighter; ERP Strikes Back | Great Plains on a Shopping Spree | Geac Upgrades Accounting And Human-Resources Apps -- SQL Release 6.0 Simplifies Purchasing And HR Services For Midsize Companies | MAPICS, Inc. to Acquire Pivotpoint, Expanding e-business Offerings for Mid-Sized Manufacturing Establishments | PeopleSoft Takes Aim at Foods Industry | ERP Vendors Moving to Aerospace and Defense Markets | PeopleSoft Recuperating Slowly, Hoping to Sink 1999 into Oblivion Quickly | Baan Posts $236 Million Loss and Sells Off Coda for Nearly $40M Less Than It Paid | Symix Expands Its Product Offering While Remaining Profitable | IFS Continues to Blossom | SAP Declares Victory Over Manugistics, Takes Aim at i2 | Food Producer Files $20m Lawsuit Against Oracle | Oracle Loses Again | PeopleSoft Programs Cause Headaches at Number of Universities | Hummingbird Announces Extraction and Portal Strategy for ERP | SAP Posts Solid Q499, but Warns of Q100 | Analysis of Lawson Delivering New Retail Analytic Capabilities | ERP Vendor Lawson Software Extends to IBM's DB2 Universal Database | J.D. Edwards Teams with FRx Software to Improve Reporting Solutions | SAP and HP on the Web Together | Analysis of SAS Institute and IBM Intelligence Alliance | E-Commerce Lesson: Success Gets a Yawn, Failure Takes a Beating | Oracle is Word One at Ford | SAP's New Level of e-Commerce: mySAP.com | Intentia Floats Vaporware Agent to Replace Business Planning | BAAN Announces "Open World": Business-To-Business Collaboration Over The Internet | Lawson Plays Well With Others | IBM Announces Netfinity 4000R Super-Thin Server | The "S" in SAP Doesn't Stand for Security (that goes for PeopleSoft too) | Oracle Co. - Internet Paradigm Boosts Applications Growth | SAP AG - ERP Leader with a "New Dimension" | Baan Company N.V. - Is the Worst Over? | J.D. Edwards and Numetrix Ponder the Future as One | Symix Sytems: Shifting SME's Focus to Their Customers | MAPICS: Will Customer Satisfaction be Enough? | Intentia: Java Evolution From AS/400 | SSA: Evolving into systems integrator to survive | JBA: Will it remain "@ctive Enterprise"? | Marcam Solutions: Shifting its Focus to MES | Industrial & Financial Systems, IFS AB: Thriving on Product Flexibility and Incremental Deployability | Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) Market - Dismal 1999, the New Millennium to bring Relief (for Some) | Lawson Software: Self-Evidently Thriving on Innovations | QAD Inc.: The Art of Vertical Focus | Great Plains: Strong Channel and Microsoft focus for Dynamic(s) Growth | SAP's Dr. Peter Barth on Client/Server and Database Issues with SAP R/3 | PeopleSoft on Client/Server and Database Issues | Baan E-Commerce: a Wing, a Prayer & a Single Platform | J.D. Edwards - Creating OneWorld of Mid-sized ERP Users | PeopleSoft - Are Business Intelligence and e-Commerce Enough? | Q: Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Billionaire? A: Baan -- Foster Care for Its Orphans Needed As Well | Geac Computer Corporation: Mastering Growth by Acquisitions |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google