Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Comments: 
0
Read Comments <

TEC’s article series soliciting vendors’ input on a number of provocative market trend questions and observations showed Infor and IFS as the first two to respond (see Two Stalwart Vendors Discuss Market Trends). The series has since received much attention and reactions from readers and vendors alike. The next in line to voice its valued opinions was Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS), a Bedford, Massachusetts, (US)-based provider of application infrastructure software for the development, deployment, integration, and management of business applications.

Before delving into this vendor’s responses, some background on Progress Software is in order. From initially offering merely a database and accompanying fourth-generation language (4GL) applications development environment, the vendor has since (particularly during the last several years, via a string of prudent acquisitions) garnered a much broader set of infrastructure software. This portfolio spans the realms of what the vendor refers to as services infrastructure (for connecting, mediating, controlling, and monitoring services—or software components, if you will), data infrastructure (for managing, integrating, replicating, caching, and accessing data) and business application platforms (for developing, deploying, and managing business applications). Therefore, today, the Progress Software portfolio includes the following:

1) Services Infrastructure Products

  • The Progress® Sonic™ product line uses the Sonic ESB® messaging-based enterprise service bus (ESB) to provide integration of new and existing business applications across organizational boundaries and to remote sites.

  • The Progress® Actional® product line offers Web services and service-oriented architecture (SOA) management, including monitoring, analysis, security, and policy control.

  • The DataDirect® Shadow® RTE (which stands for Real-time Enterprise) enables early mainframe and legacy applications to participate in contemporary SOA and Web services production and consumption.

2) Business Application Platforms

  • The Progress® OpenEdge® platform provides development and deployment of business applications that are standards-based, service-oriented, and typically have a lower total cost of ownership (TCO).

  • The Progress® Apama® event processing platform can monitor event streams, detect patterns, and respond. The product supports event-driven applications, including business activity monitoring (BAM), algorithmic trading, transaction monitoring, market abuse detection, and radio frequency identification (RFID) applications.

  • The Progress® EasyAsk® product line provides business users and consumers the ability to find the information they need using natural language search and navigation, supporting a variety of applications ranging from customer-facing e-commerce web sites to ad hoc query.

3) Data Infrastructure Products

  • The Progress® DataXtend™ product line provides data integration for distributed applications and delivers real-time views of shared data in the form applications need. The DataXtend™ Semantic Integrator product uses a common semantic data model to create data transformations, enabling organizations to share and integrate heterogeneous data without disruption to existing applications.

  • DataDirect Technologies is the provider of software for connecting business applications to data and services, running on many platforms using proven and emerging industry standards. Developers worldwide use on these products to connect their applications to a range of data sources using standards-based interfaces such as open database connectivity (ODBC), Java Database Connectivity (JDBC), Microsoft ADO.NET (evolution of ActiveX Data Objects), XQuery, and simple object access protocol (SOAP).

OpenEdge or Cutting-edge Business Application Platform?

The main breadwinner for the vendor is the very first Progress product, currently used by over 5 million business users. The Progress OpenEdge business application platform nowadays provides a unified environment comprising development tools, application servers, application management tools, a relational database, and the capability to relatively easily connect and integrate with other applications and data sources. By being fairly open to a variety of standards, Progress has created the OpenEdge development environment, in order to isolate developers from the complexities of today's computing environments. This consequently allows developers to concentrate on what really matters: the business logic of their application. Applications built on the OpenEdge platform are reportedly portable, reliable, and scalable, yet require fewer administrative resources than other deployment platforms. In layman’s terms, users describe it as a runtime engine that just runs and can be scaled as necessary. Also, a recent Forrester Research report has rated OpenEdge superior to alternative platforms owing to findings in three areas:

  • a 42 percent lower cost of development on the Progress platform
  • a 37 percent lower cost of deployment on the Progress platform
  • a 48 percent lower cost of ongoing management on the Progress platform

The above benchmarks are likely the result of the OpenEdge development environment’s ability to promote productivity, owing to a purposed business application language called Advanced Business Language (ABL), which somewhat resembles Microsoft Visual Basic or Powersoft PowerBuilder, for faster development. In addition, the industry standard Eclipse.org-based development environment, called OpenEdge Architect, was introduced about two years ago. What possibly matters most, though, is a single environment and language for server, client, data storage, and integration logic. On the other hand, the OpenEdge deployment and management environment promotes efficiency, since the integrated environment provides simplicity, performance, and lower cost of administration, while it can readily scale from 1 to 20,000 users.

Last but not least, the platform has long exhibited support of the most commonly adopted standards (rather than dependency on a certain integration, runtime, or application platform technology) on all architectural layers. To that end, on the client side, users can expect support for Microsoft.NET, Java, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Java Message Service (JMS), Extensible Markup Language (XML), SOAP, Web Services Description Language (WSDL), Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) Connector Architecture (JCA), etc. Further, on the server side, there is support for Web services, ESB, JMS, Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), Secure HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP/S) and so on.

On the database side, beside the vendor’s own OpenEdge RDBMS (with “RDBMS” standing for relational database management system) that is JDBC-, ODBC-, and structured query language (SQL)-compliant, there is support for other databases, such as Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, and IBM DB2. Finally, the deployment platform supports many operating systems (for example, Linux, UNIX, and Microsoft Windows), while the OpenEdge Management product is simple network management protocol (SNMP)–compliant.

However, from contributing to a whopping 98 percent of total revenues in 2001, OpenEdge today contributes to “only” about 70 percent of Progress Software’s total revenue, which is nearing the $500 million (USD) mark. Still, the OpenEdge platform remains Progress Software’s Application Partners’ (APs’) primary path to market, through which the channel generates 65 percent of OpenEdge’s license revenue. This business model is apparently highly profitable for both sides, generating over 5,000 new customers every year. Currently, the platform has about 60,000 customers, which represent the combination of direct Progress customers (larger accounts) and users of APs. OpenEdge’s global market presence can be discerned from the fact that its corporate users are

  • nine of the top 10 consumer food companies
  • nine of the top 10 automotive and parts companies
  • eight of the top 10 commercial banks
  • eight of the top 10 industrial and farm equipment companies
  • eight of the top 10 pharmaceutical companies
  • eight of the top 10 semiconductor companies
  • the top six hotels, casinos, and resorts
  • the top five apparel companies

Progress Software’s primary strength and market presence today is in the manufacturing and distribution sector, which accounts for almost 40 percent of the business, followed by retail, financial services, government, and health care.

A Partner-centric Go-to-market Approach

The company’s primary target market is mid-market enterprises and divisions of large corporations. These are typically existing customers and partners, while brand new customers can be targeted opportunistically. Nurturing partners is the main mantra at Progress Software, whose stated mission is “to deliver superior software products and services that empower its partners and customers to dramatically improve their development, deployment, integration, and management of quality applications worldwide.” In other words, the vendor’s stated goal is “to maximize the benefits of information technology while minimizing its complexity and total cost of ownership.”

Progress Software’s go-to-market approach revolves around matching the selling method to buyers’ preferences, since small to medium enterprises (SMEs) prefer a local supplier that knows their lines of business (in other words, an industry specialist).

On the other hand, a partner channel provides reach for Progress, whereby the vendor has partners in regions where it does not have offices (as examples, Turkey, China, or Malaysia). Further, the partner channel provides scalability, especially in terms of more available service professionals to make Progress Software’s technology deliver on its touted potential benefits. Last but not least, a partner channel provides greater market penetration. For example, Infor has implemented Sonic ESB at over 1,000 sites, whereas Progress Sonic’s direct sale has only 400 sites in total (of course, the revenue received is also different, owing to the larger size of these 400 corporate clients that pay everything directly to Progress Software).

Thus, these individual large enterprise accounts (with revenues over $1.5 billion [USD]) Progress Software targets with its best-of-breed products for heterogeneous SOA, and in a horizontal manner, whereby these enterprises have large IT and development staffs and centralized IT objectives. On the other hand, small regional accounts (with revenues from $20 million to $100 million [USD]) and mid-market accounts (with revenues from $100 million to $1.5 billion [USD]) in some vertical sectors are targeted indirectly via APs or independent software vendors (ISVs). Such customers typically buy packaged applications that custom fit their business or industry needs, and have smaller IT and limited development staff, but require more rapid business returns on investment (ROIs).

This model is quite profitable for Progress Software, as it grows the top-line revenue for a much lower cost of sale, especially in the case of software-as-a-service (SaaS—see What is Software as a Service? ) deployments.

IDC’s report, Worldwide Top 10 ISV Partner Programs 2006 Vendor Analysis: Enabling ISV Partners for Success, describes Progress Software’s partner program as follows:

The Progress Software Partner Program is a global program … [that] has predominantly ISV membership, but is evolving to include original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and value-added resellers (VARs). ISVs in the program design, develop, sell, and support branded commercial business applications built on ... Progress Software infrastructure technologies. The program has been refined over the years to identify ISVs with growth potential and to support those partners with programs, resources, and staff…. Progress uses its Growth Stage Assessment process to evaluate the financial position, business, and technical acumen and capabilities of ISVs.

In addition to over 7,000 developers within the Progress Software Developers Network (PSDN), the same report notes that there are more than 2,000 partners in the Progress Software Partner Program of all partner types. A Progress Software press release from 2006 points out that these partners have combined Progress Software technology with their specialization in building mission-critical applications. These ISVs participate in the Progress program at one of four levels: Elite, Premier, Preferred, and Member. Resources available to an ISV are determined by the ISV’s growth stage or level. For example, the Elite partner stage targets larger customers and warrants Progress’s taking a one-to-one approach toward enrolling, engaging, empowering, and expanding the partner. Conversely, the Premier and Member partner stages that target SMEs will receive a less involved Progress approach—in other words, one-to-many and partner self-service, respectively.

The same Progress press release (see link above) Progress Software Partners (or APs mentioned above) have developed and deployed over 5,000 distinct applications, which are used in over 60,000 organizations around the world and have been deployed at more than 110,000 locations. Progress cites that it or its APs deploy applications at 10,000 new sites and add 600,000 new users every year. This growth is attributed to Progress’ partner approach being far different than other application infrastructure vendors, and is relevant to two of its major constituencies, partners and users.

First, Progress Software partners enjoy a partner program that is arguably exceptional in the industry. Similarly to other infrastructure companies, Progress provides access to its products, technical support, education and training support, as well as sales and marketing support. But unlike most of its competition, the vendor provides to these partners an extra portfolio of assistance in terms of business and technical empowerment offerings to really help them bootstrap their ability to succeed as a business (for example, helping them with such things as business planning).

This holistic partnering approach to support APs through their business life cycles to ensure joint success includes joint business, technical, sales, and marketing activities. Second, unlike many competitor infrastructure vendors that also sell application software, such as Oracle and Microsoft (and increasingly of late, IBM), that are therefore competing with their partners, Progress Software pledges to never sell application software, so that it will never compete with its partners and cannibalize their businesses.

Product Development “Secret Sauce”

Progress Software cites that OpenEdge’s product engineering focus is on balancing the needs of large end-user customers (who need constant improvements in scalability, availability, and management), application partners (who need added or enhanced productivity tools and languages, and new and more varied user-interface capabilities), and of the overall market (in terms of improved interoperability and integration capabilities, and improved support for new platforms).

To that end, the product development expense is 9 percent of total OpenEdge revenue, with research and development (R&D) staff being located both onshore and offshore (80 percent in Bedford, Massachusetts and Nashua, New Hampshire (US), and 20 percent in Hyderabad, India). The product R&D investment model is balanced with 15 percent going toward customer satisfaction, 20 percent on maintenance, 5 percent on minor enhancements, and the lion’s share of 60 percent on major enhancements or new work.

This can be best seen after analyzing OpenEdge’s historical landmarks, from which Progress Software has been striving to anticipate market trends and make new features possible, easy, and automatic. For instance, in 1993, Progress Version 7 (the previous name for OpenEdge) introduced a graphical user interface (GUI), and in 1995, Progress Version 8 introduced the n-tier client/server architecture. Then, in 1998, Progress Version 9 embraced Web-enablement. In 2004, OpenEdge 10 became SOA-compliant.

It is important to note that no new release discontinued any earlier feature, which possibly explains the uptake—meaning that 10,000 customers are already using OpenEdge 10; the platform saw a whopping 225 percent growth in 2006 over 2005. The vendor’s intention is to continue this growth trend in the future in terms of both advances in development (tools, languages, interfaces, etc.) and in deployment (scalability and manageability). To that end, OpenEdge 10.1A will feature object orientation (OO) within the OpenEdge Architect, OpenEdge 10.1B will support 64-bit storage systems, OpenEdge 10.1C will feature OO extensions for database management tools, and OpenEdge 10.2A will feature advanced GUI (to be released some time in late 2008).

This latter GUI enhancement might solve the long-standing issue of the OpenEdge platform lacking a compelling user interface (UI) for application developers, who all too often have to rely on Microsoft for a UI and are thus tempted to switch completely to the Microsoft .NET Framework. This issue should be alleviated via an in-memory bridge between Progress Virtual Machine (PVM) and Microsoft Common Language Runtime (CLR), which can then allow .NET UI to seem almost native to OpenEdge developers. Similar developments for asynchronous JavaScript and XML (AJAX) and Adobe Flex interfaces will then follow suit.

Progress Software partners claim to like OpenEdge because the vendor never takes anything away, meaning that character interfaces and coding conventions are still available if needed. Also, everything new works with everything old, such as OO with procedural languages, GUI with the character (“green screen”) interface, 4GL with XML, and so on. At the same time, Progress Software tries to keep up in terms of languages, interfaces, and platform capabilities, as well as in terms of core values that are highly valued by the market (lower TCO and higher productivity).

Of over 200 ISVs delivering SOA-based SaaS enablement, 40 percent say this model will comprise over half their business by 2010. Some notable examples of mid-market enterprise resource planning (ERP) vendors harnessing Progress’s technologies to SOA-rejuvenate and “future-proof” their products (while protecting current products and solutions, extending common components, and possibly converging to a “superset” product with best-of-breed functions from a variety of vendors) to integrate disparate products within the portfolio are Datasul, QAD, Infor, Epicor Software, Consona, and proALPHA.

While it is certainly possible to see how all of the above might benefit Progress Software’s partners, the question is how will this approach to partners benefit Progress’s direct end-users and the partners’ end-users. The answer is that by fostering an ecosystem of partners that typically cater to the mid-market and small enterprises, Progress has created an ecosystem of applications that are designed for and “fit” the needs of the target market. Sure, midsized companies can find an ecosystem of applications that are not only built on OpenEdge, but that are often not easier to manage and maintain than applications built on the Progress application infrastructure. In the manner of a witty chemist or chef, Progress Software describes its success formula:

  1. Start with the customer, who is looking for best fit, reliable, cost-effective applications.

  2. Add in the application partner with unique combinations of domain knowledge and application engineering expertise.

  3. Mix in the right enabling technology, one that’s quick to learn, easy to use, reliable in operation, and that frees the partner or customer to focus on functionality.

  4. Follow up with direct sales opportunities, and leverage low TCO with additional products and services.

On a negative note, however, all the above traits and approaches remain sort of a best-kept secret in the market. As previously noted in the October, 2007 article QAD: A Software Vendor that Has Survived (if Not Thrived) in the ERP Market,

[t]he Progress Software OpenEdge toolset has struggled to win notable market- and mind-share among a wide group of developers, though it maintains a strong ISV base. … Progress Software has always been a technology-driven company that has not invested much in raising market awareness about its abilities. This becomes an issue for its application partners when they have to explain their ongoing relationship with Progress Software and the use of its technologies. However, in most cases, the company’s product reliability and low TCO scores high points with partners and customers alike.

This is part one of the two-part series A Partner-friendly Platform Provider Discusses Market Trends. In the next part of this series, Progress Software answers several provocative questions about the current state of the market, as well as hoped-for future directions.


 

Comments:


Ramco Ships Technology And Products. Is This The Future Of Enterprise Applications? | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Five: User Recommendations | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Four: Challenges | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Three: Market Impact | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Two: Geac & Baan | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part One: Ross Systems & SSA Global Technologies | SYSPRO - Awaiting Positive IMPACT From Its Brand Unification Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | SYSPRO - Awaiting Positive IMPACT From Its Brand Unification Part Two: Market Impact | SYSPRO - Awaiting Positive IMPACT From Its Brand Unification | Caution! Will A Traditional ERP System Help You Deliver Projects? | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? | SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry Part Two: Market Impact | SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry |
Top 10 Reasons For Having A Project Kickoff - Part II | Top 10 Reasons For Having A Project Kickoff - Part I | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' Part Three: Competitive Analysis | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' Part Two: Market Impact | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' | Will Adonix Provide A Warmer Home To CIMPRO? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will Adonix Provide A Warmer Home To CIMPRO? Part Two: Market Impact | Will Adonix Provide A Warmer Home To CIMPRO? | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye Part Three: Market Impact | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye Part Two: Announcements Continued | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye | The Art Of Distributed Development Of Multi-Lingual Three-Tier Internet Applications | Requirements Definition For Package Implementations | Evaluating Alternatives: Key Questions To Ask When Considering An Alternative ERP/MRP System | Ramco Systems' Users - Winning Big And Speaking Out In Las Vegas | Made2Manage Affirms Its Technological Astuteness Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Made2Manage Affirms Its Technological Astuteness Part 2: Strategy | Made2Manage Affirms Its Technological Astuteness | Rapid Prototyping Or Simply Over-hyping | How Much Wisdom Will BRAIN Bring To Agilisys? Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | How Much Wisdom Will BRAIN Bring To Agilisys? | MAPICS To Leap Forward In A Frontstep Way Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | MAPICS To Leap Forward In A Frontstep Way Part 2: Market Impact | MAPICS To Leap Forward In A Frontstep Way | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay Part Four: Challenges & User Recommendations | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay Part Three: Market Impact | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay Part Two: Strategy | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay | Ross Systems Shows Poise in 'Big Easy' | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations. | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? Part Three: Complementary Products | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? Part Two: Market Impact | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? | Epicor Picks Clarus' Bargain At The Software Flea Market Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Epicor Picks Clarus' Bargain At The Software Flea Market | Cincom Asserts Expertise In CRM For Complex Manufacturers Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Cincom Asserts Expertise In CRM For Complex Manufacturers | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 4: Competition and User Recommendations | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 3: Challenges | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 2: Market Impact | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically | Why Systems Fail - The Dead-end of Dirty Data | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 4: User Recommendations | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 3: Challenges | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 2: Market Impact | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions | PowerCerv Finally Overpowered By The '02 Hurricane Season Part 2: Strengths and User Recommendations | PowerCerv Finally Overpowered By The '02 Hurricane Season | Data Conversion in an ERP Environment | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT Part 2: Market Impact | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation Part 4: Challenges and User Recommendations | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation Part 3: Market Impact | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation Part 2: FOCUS Announcements Continued | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation | Fourth Shift's evolution Within SoftBrands' DemandStream Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Fourth Shift's evolution Within SoftBrands' DemandStream | PeopleSoft Internationalizes Its Mid-Market Forays Part 2: Challenges & User Recommendations | PeopleSoft Internationalizes Its Mid-Market Forays | Software Piloting: How Do You Fly This Plane | Frontstep Ups The .NET Ante Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Frontstep Ups The .NET Ante | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 2: Market Impact | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' | Will Glovia Glow Again Through Its Hub And VARs? Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will Glovia Glow Again Through Its Hub And VARs? | Lose the Starry-Eyes, Analyze:An Ideal Customer for Relevant INFIMACS | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 4: Other Vendors, CRM, SCP & User Recommendations | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 3: IBM | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 2: Microsoft | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard | Beware of Legacy Data - It Can Be Lethal | Adonix Grows Roots Against The Odds Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Adonix Grows Roots Against The Odds Part 1 | The Automotive OEMs Might Soon Contract “BRAIN” Damage Part 2: The Future and User Recommendations | The Automotive OEMs Might Soon Contract “BRAIN” Damage Part I | Scala Shows Far More Than A Bit Of A Backbone Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Scala Shows Far More Than A Bit Of A Backbone Part 2: Market Impact | Scala Shows Far More Than A Bit Of A Backbone Part 1 | Two Highly Focused Vendors Team For Their Markets' Good | Integration is the Name of the Game in Software Systems | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software | Can 'Intuitive' And 'ERP' Words Be Associated? | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 4: User Recommendations | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 3: Causes of Failures | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 2: Implementation Key Success Factors | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 1: Inexorable Statistics | Fast-path Implementations - Are They Good or Bad? | IFS To Be At Customers' (Web) Service | Announcing Agilisys (Formerly SCT’s Process Manufacturing & Distribution Business) - Finally Fully Focused On Process Manufacturing | Datatex and Dan River Apparel Fabrics - Ten Years and Counting | Is Enterprise Market Consolidating? Exactly! | The Old ERP Dilemma - Should We Install The New Release? | Manugistics Indulges In The Open M&A Season. Part 2: Market Impact, Challenges, and User Recommendations | Manugistics Indulges In The Open M&A Season | Standardizing on One ERP System in a Multi-division Enterprise | Microsoft 'The Great' Poised To Conquer Mid-Market, Once and Again Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Microsoft 'The Great' Poised To Conquer Mid-Market, Once and Again Part 1: Recent Acquisition Announcement | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 2: Market Impact | INFIMACS Boasts MRP Relevant To MROs | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 1: Recent Announcements | Lawson Enforces Its Stronghold Part 2: Market Impact | Lawson Enforces Its Stronghold Part1: Recent Announcements | iProcess.sct Enters Golden Gate Opportunity | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 2: Market Impact | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 1: Recent Announcements | Your ERP System is Up and Running-Now What? | Stratyc's Laser-Sharp Focused Tools Retrofit Legacy Systems | Adonix Expands X3 And Its "French Connection" Part 2: The Future | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 4: Challenges & User Recommendations | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 3: Market Impact | Ross Systems – A Bright Spot On A Difficult Enterprise Application Landscape | PeopleSoft's Buying Momentum Goes On. Pageant Participants, Line Up Please! Part 2: User Recommendations | PeopleSoft's Buying Momentum Goes On. Pageant Participants, Line Up Please! Part 1: Market Impact | Feds Buckle Down on Customer Information Security | The Old ERP Dilemma: How Long Should You Pay Maintenance? | Made2Manage Offers New Functionality And A VIP Treatment Part 2: Market Impact | Made2Manage Offers New Functionality And A VIP Treatment Part 1: Announcements | Gosh, They Kill Partnerships, Don't They? | The 'Old ERP' Dilemma: Replace or Add-on | J.D. Edwards' CEO Retires Again; This Time For Good? | Lawson Software Braves IPO And Reports Strongly Against The Odds | PSI AG To Become More Germane Globally Via Relevant Partnership | J.D. Edwards On The Mend; This Time Might Be For Real | PipeChain Adds Pragmatism Onto Simplicity | Besieged By The CRM Throne Aspirants, King Siebel Delivers "The Magic No.7" Part 2: Market Impact | Ramco Systems - Diversity Marshaled Through Flexibility Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Farms More Business Out Amid Its Staff Reductions | Ramco Systems - Diversity Marshaled Through Flexibility Part 2: Market Impact | How Some ERP Vendors Demonstrated - Warts And All Part 2: Results | Ramco Systems - Diversity Marshaled Through Flexibility | How Some ERP Vendors Demonstrated - Warts and All Part 1 | Should interBiz Mean Intelligence And Prediction Beyond ERP? - Part 2: Challenges and Market Impact | Is SCT And Logistics.com Partnership A Déjà vu? | Should interBiz Mean Intelligence And Prediction Beyond ERP? | SAP Opens The ‘Miss Congeniality’ Contest | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 3: Challenges & User Recommendations | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 2: Market Impact | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically | ERP Selection Facts and Figures Case Study - Part 2: Qualitative Assessments and Analysis | ERP Selection Facts and Figures Case Study Part 1: Business Model Scenarios | Lilly Software Visualizes Its eBusiness Offering, NOW. Part 2: Market Impact | PeopleSoft Remains Rock-Hard And Economy Proof | Lilly Software Visualizes Its eBusiness Offering, NOW | Glovia On B2B Reinventing Trail | Kewill And Microsoft Great Plains To Further Mutually Complement | Soft Economy Dents SAP’s Armored Shield As Well | Syspro Hatches 'Encore' IMPACT On SME Manufacturers. Part 2: Market Impact | PRISM Users Get A Dedicated, Independent Web Community | INFIMACS Becoming Ever More RELEVANT For Project-Based Industries. Part 2: Market Impact and User Recommendations | INFIMACS Becoming Ever More RELEVANT For Project-Based Industries. Part 1: Recent Developments | Clarity of Vision: Clarify Sold to Amdocs by Nortel | Collaborative Commerce: ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: IFS - Part 2 of 2 | Way To Go, Ross Systems! | Collaborative Commerce: ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: IFS - Part 1 of 2 | Geac Awakens On Its Deathbed - Part 2: Geac's Response | What's With Oracle's And SAP's Differing Clairvoyance? | Geac Awakens On Its Deathbed - Part 1: Event Summary | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 5: Recommendations | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 4: Market Predictions | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 3: Rating The Vendors | MAPICS Unifies The Brand And Interacts For CRM Solutions | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 2: Vendor Reactions | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Aging Gracefully With The ‘New Kids On The Block’ | Shall Bifurcated Tack Reverse J.D. Edwards’ Bad Spell? | E-Business Sell Side Success at H.B. Fuller | IFS Glows Amidst The Mid-Market Gloom | Business Intelligence Success at Biomet, Inc. | Oracle Makes A U-Turn At The 'All Things To All People' Exit | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: SAP AG | Sausage Producer Packs Out the Profit with Technology | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: Baan and Parent Company, Invensys | Intentia’s Intents To Be More Fashionable | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: J.D. Edwards | Frontstep Still Awaiting Better Times | E-Business Customer Service Success at H.B. Fuller Company | Will V8 Help SSA GT Regain Lost Ground? | PeopleSoft Keeps Truckin’ On A Potholed Road Ahead | SCT Extends Into Business Intelligence | Epicor Shows Resilience When It Needs It The Most | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 2: ERP Key Success Factors | J.D. Edwards Fires Siebel, Hires YOU | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 1: ERP Trends | Single Source or Best of Breed - The Debate Continues | SAP Thrives On Competitors' Plight, In Part | Can You Add New Life To an Old ERP System? | Made2Manage Manages Throughout Soft Market | Microsoft Great Plains Procures eProcure At Last | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 5: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 4: SAP's Strategy | i2, SAP, Oracle Poised For Showdown in Q4 | SAP – A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 3: Market Impact | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 2: Expanding Functionality | Lawson Software Means Business With PSA and IPO | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 1: Alliances | PeopleSoft Supply Chain Is Music To Mid Market Ears | It Is Possible - SAP And Baan Strange Bedfellows | Oracle Claims The Worst Is Over And Turns To KISS For A Boost Part 3: The Challenge of Gaining Competitive Advantage | Oracle Claims The Worst Is Over And Turns To KISS For A Boost Part 2: The Implications | Oracle Claims The Worst Is Over And Turns To KISS For A Boost Part 1: The News | NavisionDamgaard Reverts To Navision, But In Name Only | J.D. Edwards' QUEST To End Its String Of Pyrrhic Victories Part 2: The Implications | J.D. Edwards' QUEST To End Its String Of Pyrrhic Victories Part 1: The News | Baan Achieves A Speedy Recovery Despite The Tough Times | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 2: The Implications | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 1: The News | ERP Selection Case Study Audio Conference Transcript | Fed Gives ERP A Shot In The Arm | Will QAD Finally Get The Break (-Even)? | IFS' Tamed Growth + Continued Losses + Increased Competitors' Lobby Talk = Decreased Customer Confidence | ROI Systems - A Little ERP Fellow That Gets By | PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet Part 3: Predictions and Recommendations | PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet Part 2: Strengths and Challenges | Latest Development on Epicor's Trying The Divestiture Tack | PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet Part 1: About PeopleSoft | Epicor To Try The Divestiture Tack, Too | MAPICS Clings To Its Customers' Loyalty | Is Ross Systems Up To A Hat Trick? | SAP Remains One Of The Market’s Beacons Of Hope | The Mid-Market Is Consolidating, Lo And Behold | SSA Acquires MAX Hoping To Leap From Its MIN | IBM Buys What’s Left of Informix | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 4: ASP’s and New Pricing Models | Invensys Announces New Division - Baan Process | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 3: E-Business and Mid-Market Shakeout | Geac Decomposes To Survive | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 2: Product Architecture and Web-Basing | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 1: Functional Scope and Vertical Focus | SAP Acquires TopTier To Further Broaden Its Horizons | Oracle Sails Slower In The Low Tide, But Mayday Signal Is Quite Far-Fetched | IFS Aspires To Capture North American Market Against The Low Tide | Is Intentia Truly Industry’s First In Food Traceability? | QAD Finally Breaks The Red Ink Streak, But… | Epicor Software Corp.: Completing Painstaking "e"Volution Part 2: Evaluating Epicor | J.D. Edwards Saved By SCM, Narrowly, And Only For Now | Epicor Software Corp.: Completing Painstaking "e"Volution Part 1: About Epicor | Stalled Navision + Mixed Bag Damgaard = Satisfactory NavisionDamgaard | Infinium Attempts To Better Gain Some Markets' Ear | MAPICS XA Expands BI Offering Through Partnership With Vanguard | Has Intentia Turned The Corner? Almost. | Ross Systems Closes Ranks For A (Possible) Turnaround | PeopleSoft Plays Hardball | Is Made2Manage Made2Survive? Seems So. | Frontstep (Nee Symix Systems) A Step Closer To A Turnaround | Small ERP Vendors Missing The ASP Boat | SAP Defies Economic Slowdown, For Now | Can Lilly Software Get More VISUAL? | Fourth Shift Hopes To Thrive On China’s Greener Pastures | ERP Beginner's Guide In So Many Words | PeopleSoft Joins The Hunt For SMEs | Will 2001 Be The Year Of Baan’s Miraculous Comeback?
Definitely Maybe.
| Extricity Makes a Move into IBM’s Sphere of B2B Influence | Microsoft And Great Plains – A Friendship That Turned Into A Marriage | SCT Corporation: The Last Viable Process Manufacturing Vendor Standing? | Oracle Sails Despite Market’s Low Tide; How Far Will It Go? | J.D. Edwards Reaches $1B Milestone In Another Losing Year | QAD’s Costly eTransition Continues | e-Catalysts Delivers Digital Marketplace | Made2Manage Systems, Inc.: M2M From A2Z For SMEs? | Does NavisionDamgaard Merger Mark Further Mid-Market Consolidation? | Essential ERP - Its Functional Scope | The Essential ERP - Its Genesis & Future | Ross Systems Continues To Slip, But Pledges to Fight Tooth And Claw | IFS Has A Magic Growth Formula; But What About Profitability? | SAP Claims Big Gains In The Low-End Battleground | Symix Starts New Year Under New Name, But Old Issues Remain | IBI + IBM = EAI | Baan – What Will The Future In Invensys’ Stable Bring? Part 2: Evaluating Baan | Infinium Ends Its Most Challenging Year | JuxtaComm And IBM Integrate Their Integration Products | Great Plains Unveils New E-Commerce Solution | Great Plains Taps The Web To Deliver Product Support | Epicor Delivers On Milestones, But Its Situation Remains Bleak | Onyx Software: CRM Vendor Battling For Viability | What On Earth Is Going On With SSA? | BEA Systems Has A Broad Vision For E-Business Infrastructures | Baan – What Will The Future In Invensys’ Stable Bring? Part 1: About Baan | Big ERP Players Courting Government Agencies | Intentia Possibly Seeing Daylight | Geac Lives By Acquisitions; Will It Die By An Acquisition? | SAP Q3 Results Cause Mixed Reactions | Fourth Shift Tightens Belt To Weather The Drought | PeopleSoft Delivers Oxymoron In 'Supply Chain in a Box' | PeopleSoft – Again A Force To Be Reckoned With? | Another Type Of Virus Hits The World (And Gets Microsoft No Less) | J.D. Edwards – A Collaboration Thought Leader Or A Disguised ERP Follower? Part 2: Evaluating J.D. Edwards | J.D. Edwards – A Collaboration Thought Leader Or A Disguised ERP Follower? Part 1: About J.D. Edwards | Lawson Software Expands Vertically As Well | ROI Systems Catching Up With e-Commerce | IBM Aims Renamed UNIX Server at Sun | Great Plains’ Latest Product Offering — Ready to Stampede the SME Market? | Great Plains' eEnterprise Solution 'N Sync with Microsoft's New Platforms | Navision Executes At a Slower Pace | Symix Systems Front-Steps Into Greener e-Commerce Pastures | Has SAP Found Magic Formula (One) To Learn The Ropes Of Marketing? | IBM Server Line Redrawn | Is Baan Showing Signs of Life After Death? | Oracle – How to Disappoint Analysts by Doubling Profits | Ross Systems Ends Year On a Sour Note and Braces Itself For Survivor’s Game | Will Oracle’s Freebie Shot Hurt (Or Only Graze) Siebel? | Great Plains – An SME Market Leader, But At What Cost? | IFS Marches On, Although With a String of Losses | Siebel: Great Plans for Great Plains | Commerce One Holds Announcement Festival | Fourth Shift Corporation: Working Overtime To Provide Complete Customer Care | SynQuest Posts Mixed Results | J.D. Edwards’ Mixed Blessings | QAD Continues to Wade Through Red Ink | eConnections Expands Web With IPNet | Geac Trying Its Luck in Partnering | Ultimate Connection Seeking Its US Retail Connection Through Solomon Software Partners | New Release For Ariba’s Software | Thru-Put Announces Features For New APS Release | Oracle Applications - An Internet-Reinvented Feisty Challenger | American Software Has Been Starving While Delivering Innovations | Intentia Has Been Bleeding For Its Platform Independence | ERP Belle Époque Officially Ended With the Demise of Baan and SSA | PowerCerv Facing Another Stormy Season | The Pros and Cons of Collaborative Planning | MAPICS Back On Track, But Not Without Restructuring Pains | Global Vendor Negotiation Strategies | Winner Takes All – Siebel Ousts SalesLogix From Solomon’s Deal | PeopleSoft 8 Launched – Anything to Write Home About? | PeopleSoft: No More a Humble Kid From a Rough Neighborhood? | IBM Nabs Another Application Vendor | Catalyst International to Tread Water With SAP Through 2000 | Epicor Software Corp.: How Far From Being 'One-Stop' Shop? | SCT Comes Back With a Vengeance | Lawson Software Marches Over $300M Milestone | SAP Remains Solid While Transitioning | They Can Run, But You Can’t Hide | How Has Made2Manage Systems Been Managing Itself? | Yahoo! Goes Mobile in Greece | Baan Defectors – Is This Only Tip of an Iceberg? | Is Fourth Shift Succeeding in Providing 'Complete Customer Care'? | SAP - A Leader Under Reconstruction | How Detrimental Can a 2nd-In-Charge’s Departure Be? | Can Geac Reshuffle the ERP Standings? | More Vendors Bail on Oracle in Favor of IBM | ERP Getting a New Breath of Fresh Air in Europe | Has Market Been Too Harsh On Great Plains? | Great Plains Supply Chain Series To Be Powered By Logility | J.D. Edwards Chooses Freedom to Choose EAI | Siebel Has Done It Again – This Time with Navision | American Software - A Tacit Avant-Garde? | Ross Systems, Inc.: In Process of Renaissance | How Has MAPICS Been Extending? | PeopleSoft Manufacturing - This Time For Sure?! | i2 Technologies’ Latest Offering: J. D. Edwards OneWorld™ | SAP to Become Leaner, Meaner and More Organized | J. D. Edwards FOCUSes on Active Supply Chain | Infinium Software, Inc.: Having All the Right Cards? | Access Commerce Spices Up North American CRM Fray | No More Mr. Nice Guy With J.D. Edwards | Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Audio Conference | IFS Far Cry From Running Out of Breath | Infinium and Elcom Walk Down ASP Aisle | ROI Systems, Inc.: Will Slow and Steady Remain in the Race? | Baan Yet Another ERP Vendor to Find a Sanctuary Under Invensys’ Wing | MAPICS Red Ink Stained While Extending Its Offering | Intentia’s Growing Pains | Ross Systems’ Renaissance Yet to Happen | Epicor Continues To Bleed | Symix Systems’ Slips Into Red During Its E-Commerce Transition | Will Solomon Finally Satisfy Great Plains’ Insatiable Appetite? | Baan Sinks Deeper into Red Quicksand | IBM Taking on Sun in Web Infrastructure? | Lawson Software’s CRM and ASP Moves – Wise, Bold, Injudicious, Enforced, or Something Else? | Is SAP Stumbling? Perhaps. | Yet Another ‘Big 5 ERP’ CEO Casualty | Navision Software a/s: Mid-market iNvasion | IBM Updates the Netfinity Line | Essential ERP – Current Market Trends – Part II | Will That Wretched ERP Finally Die? Possibly, But Only the Acronym! | Yet Another ERP/CRM Partnership | Oracle Flying High on Q3 Report: Is Gold All That Glitters? | Navision Becoming More Visible | Geac Announces Q3 Results and Acquires CRM Vendor | ERP Demand Being Re-heated | ERP Vendors Venturing into PSA | Solomon Software: Breaking Away from Perception as “Best-of-Breed-Accounting” Vendor | JD Edwards’ Alliances: Is It Too Much of a Good Thing? | GLOVIA to be Resuscitated (Hopefully) | How Many Napkins Have to Die Needlessly? A Case for Business Architecture | JD Edwards Reports Strong License Revenue Growth in Q1 2000, but… | Intentia Attempts to Become ‘Lean and Mean’ | Vendors Begin to Round Out Their CRM Suites | J.D. Edwards Names SynQuest Preferred Solution | Oracle Integrates Front and Back Office with Applications 11i | PeopleSoft's CEO Steps Down | SSA Seeks Support from Synquest | SAP sets up Apparel and Footwear team | Geac and JBA Join Forces to Form New ERP Giant | Computer Associates, Baan Japan and EXE Announce Strategic Alliance to Provide Total Supply Chain Management Solutions | Oracle to Enlist BPA Systems in its Mid-Market Quest | SAP Lowers Revenue Expectations | Symix Maintains Consistent Profitability Despite Y2K Market Conditions | Software Leasing Trend Slams Baan Earnings | Intentia Americas Gains Momentum with 10 New Deals Inked During Last Two Weeks | MAPICS Reports Solid Profitability Despite Dismal Fiscal 1999 4% Growth | Baan Releases New Supply Chain Products | French Government awards ERP contract to Peoplesoft | Business Software Firms Sued Over Implementation - Lawsuits Bring ERP Problems to Light | Geac Metamorphosises JBA Into Gear, but Cuts 20% of Staff | SAP Details CRM Plans | J.D. Edwards Incurs Further Losses In Third Quarter | Intentia and Dash Associates Team Up | Key Product Delays Take a Toll on Oracle Users | ERP Packages For Midsize Firms in the Works | QAD Reports Third-Quarter--Revenue Rises 56 Percent | Pronto ERP 'Coming to America' | System Software Associates Announces Fiscal Fourth Quarter Results - The Agony Continues | J.D. Edwards Closes Out Millennium on an Up Note | Boeing Expands Baan Licensing Deal | Oracle Reports Strong Profits | QAD Offers Improved E-Commerce Applications with Greater Flexibility and Customization Capabilities | Heads Roll at Consulting Giant in Wake of SEC Investigation | Is Baan Clinically Dead? | Manhattan Associates Partners with Intentia | PeopleSoft Completes Acquisition of Vantive; Vantive CRM Applications Integrate with PeopleSoft and Other ERP Systems | SAP, PeopleSoft Earnings Look Brighter; ERP Strikes Back | Great Plains on a Shopping Spree | Geac Upgrades Accounting And Human-Resources Apps -- SQL Release 6.0 Simplifies Purchasing And HR Services For Midsize Companies | MAPICS, Inc. to Acquire Pivotpoint, Expanding e-business Offerings for Mid-Sized Manufacturing Establishments | PeopleSoft Takes Aim at Foods Industry | ERP Vendors Moving to Aerospace and Defense Markets | PeopleSoft Recuperating Slowly, Hoping to Sink 1999 into Oblivion Quickly | Baan Posts $236 Million Loss and Sells Off Coda for Nearly $40M Less Than It Paid | Symix Expands Its Product Offering While Remaining Profitable | IFS Continues to Blossom | SAP Declares Victory Over Manugistics, Takes Aim at i2 | Food Producer Files $20m Lawsuit Against Oracle | Oracle Loses Again | PeopleSoft Programs Cause Headaches at Number of Universities | Hummingbird Announces Extraction and Portal Strategy for ERP | SAP Posts Solid Q499, but Warns of Q100 | Analysis of Lawson Delivering New Retail Analytic Capabilities | IBM and Deutsche Telecom Announce Plans for 100 Terabyte Data Warehouse | ERP Vendor Lawson Software Extends to IBM's DB2 Universal Database | J.D. Edwards Teams with FRx Software to Improve Reporting Solutions | SAP and HP on the Web Together | Analysis of SAS Institute and IBM Intelligence Alliance | E-Commerce Lesson: Success Gets a Yawn, Failure Takes a Beating | Is There a Magic Pill for Web Performance Problems? | Oracle is Word One at Ford | No Floundering About These Strategic And Tactical Acquisitions | SAP's New Level of e-Commerce: mySAP.com | Intentia Floats Vaporware Agent to Replace Business Planning | BAAN Announces "Open World": Business-To-Business Collaboration Over The Internet | Lawson Plays Well With Others | Tentative Unification in Server I/O Architecture Battle | IBM Announces Netfinity 4000R Super-Thin Server | The "S" in SAP Doesn't Stand for Security (that goes for PeopleSoft too) | Dell, IBM in $6B Services Deal | IBM to Sell Aptiva Direct | Oracle Co. - Internet Paradigm Boosts Applications Growth | SAP AG - ERP Leader with a "New Dimension" | Baan Company N.V. - Is the Worst Over? | J.D. Edwards and Numetrix Ponder the Future as One | Symix Sytems: Shifting SME's Focus to Their Customers | MAPICS: Will Customer Satisfaction be Enough? | Intentia: Java Evolution From AS/400 | SSA: Evolving into systems integrator to survive | JBA: Will it remain "@ctive Enterprise"? | Marcam Solutions: Shifting its Focus to MES | Industrial & Financial Systems, IFS AB: Thriving on Product Flexibility and Incremental Deployability | Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) Market - Dismal 1999, the New Millennium to bring Relief (for Some) | Lawson Software: Self-Evidently Thriving on Innovations | QAD Inc.: The Art of Vertical Focus | Great Plains: Strong Channel and Microsoft focus for Dynamic(s) Growth | SAP's Dr. Peter Barth on Client/Server and Database Issues with SAP R/3 | PeopleSoft on Client/Server and Database Issues | Baan E-Commerce: a Wing, a Prayer & a Single Platform | J.D. Edwards - Creating OneWorld of Mid-sized ERP Users | PeopleSoft - Are Business Intelligence and e-Commerce Enough? | Q: Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Billionaire? A: Baan -- Foster Care for Its Orphans Needed As Well | Geac Computer Corporation: Mastering Growth by Acquisitions |


Home  |   Careers  |   Contact Us  |   Glossary  |   Special Offers  |   Software Features & Functions  |   Software Selection Shortcuts  |   Feedback  |   Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy

©2012 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google