Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

TEC’s previous article Demystifying “Vendor Shootout for ERP” Events talked about our attendance of the Vendor Shootout for ERP event that took place in Boston in mid-August 2011. We were able to experience this co-opetitive gathering of eight solution providers and several dozen end users seeking new solutions firsthand as a neutral (and yet very active) observer. The follow-up blog post series described abas-USA as a dark horse vendor and the event’s moral winner of sorts.

ABAS’ progenitor Abakus was founded by Peter Forscht, Werner Strub (current chief executive officer [CEO]), and three other fellow students in 1980. The company is located in Karlsruhe, Germany, and started as a custom programming firm for manufacturing enterprises, and had its name changed to ABAS shortly after its inception in 1980. In 1993, ABAS introduced its first complete enterprise resource planning (ERP) package, built from the manufacturing side and rounded out with financial, cost accounting, and planning/scheduling modules. The company first exhibited at CeBit in 1993 and founded its first German sales subsidiaries in the same year in Alzenau and Berlin.

In 1996, the company joined with its sister company Systems III, which was formed to develop exclusively for ABAS, and founded what is known today as ABAS Business Software AG. In the early 1990s, the vendor had a major rewrite and componentization of its initial monolithic product. Every line of code has been internally developed and supported. Each year, ABAS reviews 33 percent of the source code and includes it in an annual upgrade (the vendor guarantees a 24-hour–upgrade process). Initially written in C and C++, more and more of the new code is in Java. Currently, ABAS has more than 900 employees and 56 subsidiaries with 72 locations in 30 countries. The public company reported nearly $100 million (USD) in revenue in 2010.

 

Going Transatlantic
abas-USA
was formed in the early 2000s as a separate profit-and-loss (P&L) subsidiary with headquarters in Sterling, Virginia. During the mid-1990s, abas-USA cofounder Marko Becker worked part time for ABAS’ Berlin partner. He later went on to work for many years at the former Baan Germany (ending as the presales manager), before coming to the United States (USA) and working with a Baan partner in the USA, where he met Alan Salton, abas-USA’s current president and co-owner.

Salton joined Deltek Systems in early 2000, and hired Becker to work in the company’s manufacturing group. When ABAS Business Software contacted Becker to start the US subsidiary, Becker called Salton. Both left Deltek to start abas-USA in late 2002. The long-term business model has been that the parent company is a dedicated development house and the subsidiaries do all customer-facing activities. The US subsidiary has more than 100 small to medium enterprise (SME) customers and undertakes part of the product development for the entire corporation (the major development center remains in Karlsruhe).

ABAS offers the following three major products:

  1. abas ERP for production companies
  2. abas Distribution for sales and service companies
  3. abas eBusiness, the integrated Web-based e-commerce solution

abas ERP for production companies makes up about 70 percent of the company’s sales. The system includes all functions from master files, to sales, purchasing, production, scheduling, financial accounting, group accounting, cost accounting, fixed assets, service, customer relationship management (CRM), and forecasting. The company’s revenues come from more than 2,750 customers at 3,200 sites. A reported 93 percent of companies that purchased abas ERP since the company’s inception in 1980 are still customers today.

The typical customer has $20 to $150 million (USD) in annual revenues, but customers range from those with under $1 million (USD) to those with more than $1 billion (USD) in annual revenues. The average number of concurrent users is 25–50 per site. A typical customer is a midsize manufacturer, assemble-to-order (ATO), make-to-order (MTO), or engineer-to-order (ETO), especially in machine manufacturing, electronics, automotive, fabrication, and assembly. In addition, ABAS has a distribution ERP configuration that is especially effective for strong post-sales service or repair requirements.

 

Not a Typical Mid-Market ERP Vendor
The vendor has never used resellers and consultants, as it prefers to provide direct contact and service to customers. Still, ABAS works with partners to fill the required technology footprint of its customer base, which includes human resources (HR)/payroll providers such as ADP, sales tax services from Avalara, or rules-based configurators such as CAP by Arge Betriebsinformatik (ABi). ABAS also partners with open source solutions tailored for ABAS, such as Liferay Portal, Jaspersoft, and Red Hat, to provide the most cost-effective solution on the market.

ABAS believes that its most important feature is the total flexibility that comes from owning the technology stack, including the embedded database. That flexibility allows the vendor to upgrade seamlessly. It also gives ABAS a major advantage in product development planning and innovation, allowing the vendor to plan and develop to whatever end goal it needs, incorporating teams for graphic user interface (GUI), database, application, and technology resources. As mentioned earlier, ABAS also engages with the open source community to incorporate products and services that can create value to its customers. The open application programming interface (API) layer is also important, as it allows for computer aided design (CAD) integration and integration into Web services, such as Avalara for sales tax, or ADP for HR.

In addition to providing APIs to major CAD systems (e.g., SolidWorks by Dassault Systèmes), abas ERP includes an impressive document management system with optical character recognition (OCR)–based search through multimedia documents. Other capabilities that do not usually come bundled within an ERP system are abas ERP’s computer telephony integration (CTI), mobile solutions, and embedded business intelligence (BI) via Jaspersoft reports. In addition, an e-learning tool is built in to the software and tracks users’ progress as they interactively train on abas ERP modules.

abas Business Software is quite platform agnostic, as it supports Microsoft Windows 2000, 2003, and 2008, as well as Linux (the Red Hat, SuSE, and Debian) servers. The product can be deployed in both single-tenant and multi-tenant software-as-a-service (SaaS) models. abas ERP can work on Windows personal computers (PCs), ASCII terminals, Linux PCs, and Apple Mac PCs. Data collection is done via barcode scanners, radio frequency identification (RFID) readers, smartphones, and badge readers. Last but not least, abas Business Software can be integrated with Microsoft Office, OpenOffice.org (OOo), and Google Docs. And customers can use the 40 additional tables in the system database to tailor the solution to their needs.

 

abas-USA President Explains Further
What follows now is our candid discussion with Alan Salton, president, abas-USA. Our prodding questions and Salton’s straight-shooting answers are as follows:

TEC: What are some of abas Business Software’s capabilities that you are particularly proud of?
AS: abas technology has the following two outstanding capabilities:

  1. The API layer allows for real-time integration with almost any third-party package, service, or Web application provider. This tool allows the integration at the system, module, table, or field level, with full workflow capability.
  2. The abas Business Software multi-tiered architecture is designed for a near complete modification without hindering the upgrade path. This allows customers to incorporate virtually any business rule into the system without being locked into any single version. We guarantee our US customers a 24-hour version upgrade, including the porting over of any of their unique changes in the system.

TEC: Has your competitive landscape changed of late and how?
AS: The continual contraction in the ERP market has changed the field significantly. Well, we are one of the last independents out there—self-financed, employee owned, and debt free. We are focused heavily on customer satisfaction, with a niche in discrete manufacturing, particularly ETO, ATO, and MTO, and some consider us to be a boutique solution in those markets.

It is easy now to be overshadowed by the “big boys,” owned by venture capital firms that value shareholder return over customer satisfaction. So we continue to try to build a differentiation as a true solution provider, but the capital available to our competitors makes out-marketing them an impossible task. The consolidation and acquisitions in the marketplace have created a lot of concern and uncertainty for continuity in support, development, and relationships—a nice contrast to our position.

TEC: How do you manage (and have you managed) to survive and thrive in SAP's backyard?
AS: We are a company that differs from SAP in its market and approach. We sometimes thrive as a comparison package with SAP: our strategy, product focus, and direction contrast those of SAP, while our clear evolutionary path, vendor-direct model, and especially mid-market heritage and focus help us tremendously.

TEC: What is your strategy toward social (E2.0) tools and roles-based user experience, and their deployment for your target customers?
AS: We are actively pursuing an E2.0 strategy, incorporating social networks into our portal, allowing for collaboration portals, ratings, and user feedback in our eBusiness solution, and put together wikis in both our ERP portal and our eBusiness solution. We have the potential to incorporate user and customer collaboration into expert knowledge bases in the system. We believe that E2.0 will allow for real-time behavior analysis and feedback for planning and transactions, and interaction through tools such as Short Message Service (SMS) and social networks.

Our development plan for the next two years includes a completely user-defined interface into the system based on roles and responsibilities. In all honesty, the mid-market manufacturing segment has been slow to adopt these practices, but we see the interest out there and hope to lead best practices to our client base.

TEC: What were the major highlights and messages from your recent user conference and industry events?
AS: Mobility, collaboration, and information transparency are our themes this year. Our user conference this year, which ended several weeks ago, was entitled abas 360˚ 2011, indicating that we believe that our system can be the center of a holistic approach to business processes and enterprise information. The four walls of an enterprise are coming down, and business is being done with real-time information on the shop floor, at the customer site, or in transit. abas Business Software needs to support this virtual office environment.

TEC: What is your mobility strategy (technology and platforms supported)?
AS: Our first solution is now in general release, supporting smart devices for sales and CRM functions. Our remote service application will be delivered in Q1 of 2012. We are currently delivering a Web-based solution developed for smart devices, but we are reviewing options for next-generation solutions, so it’s a little early to declare anything about our future technology and platform support. We see that in the near term, countless mobile devices will be in the economy, from smart cars, to smart appliances, to smart vending machines, to medical devices—all need to be able to communicate to the enterprise business platform in real time, and we want that business logic level to be abas ERP.

TEC: What issues or challenges are still keeping you awake at night? What trends are you seeing in the market?
AS: The economy is obviously a concern, as is the manufacturing base in the West. We think we are well positioned to support the ETO, ATO, and MTO businesses that will continue to depend on innovation. Technology life cycles are accelerating and we have to be certain that we invest in technologies with sustainability and application to our clients. The biggest challenge is to find great people, innovators, and those able to execute.

TEC: Given your huge research and development (R&D) investment and few marketing investments, how do you ensure that your business is sustainable over the long term?
AS: Quality, business planning, customer focus—that’s how we have done it for 31-plus years, and it is part of our corporate culture. We sell heavily through reference selling. When I left Deltek and came to ABAS, I asked them how they sell their products, and they said, “we take the prospect to the customer site, and come back a couple of hours later,” and it is true. We are debt free, and we carefully plan and control the business, and set realistic goals and targets that allow us to continue to succeed. Sometimes sex & sizzle sells, but sometimes the genuine solution (product, people, technology, and know-how) is a better sell.

TEC: Is there anything that you are at liberty to divulge on the company's future moves?
AS: We had a strategy session in late October, where we looked at a number of new features and functions: project management integration into production and procurement planning; a tablet-like interface that would allow users to drag and drop screens, fields, and tables into custom user interfaces; more mobile features for distributed functions, etc.

Incidentally, ABAS has a unique structure, with the parent company strictly involved in development and subsidiaries facing customers throughout the world. It is the closest thing to a private community as I have seen, with sharing and collaboration among all subsidiaries. It also has allowed us to build a very detailed project management structure, for both national and global projects, using a collaboration portal we call Domino. As we are all one network, we cooperate and collaborate, and leverage our clients’ investment across borders.

 

ABAS Log Database: A Worthwhile Deep Dive
One apparent differentiation is ABAS’ proprietary object-oriented (OO) database dubbed Log, which is self-contained and requires no database administrator (DBA) per se. At the aforementioned Shootout event, Alan Salton showed how end users can edit table fields in a casual manner with no need for structured query language (SQL) programming and stored procedures. 

TEC: How do you manage to have a self-maintainable database? 
AS: We designed the database to be self-maintaining, as most mid-market companies don’t have the luxury of a DBA. Below is a detailed description of the database functions.

 

The Database Engine
Since version 2003, abas Business Software has been equipped with a Log database in the standard. This technology not only comes at no additional charge (i.e., no need to buy a separate license to a Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, or IBM DB2 database), but also differs fundamentally from conventional relational database concepts. As of the 2003 release, existing data objects can no longer be modified, but new data objects can be created, and the existing database object will be labeled as no longer valid and subsequently removed from the database using the "garbage collector." Compared with traditional database strategies, this process has the following advantages:

  • Online data backup—Data backup can be carried out without any interruption to the ongoing operation.
  • Increased write performance—As the database files are written only in a sequential manner, a gain in performance compared with conventional database systems is achieved—i.e., the performance of the processor of the used computer is increased.
  • Shadow database—i.e., a simultaneous copy of the real client (instance) can be maintained on a different hard disk, even on a different computer. As the copying process only has to move the same amount of data as the proper write process on the real client, the strain on the network is drastically reduced, so that the shadow database can, e.g., also be utilized on the other side of the firewall for Web applications. The Web applications are therefore not operating on the real client, but always on a current copy. Moreover, we plan to pass on the data selectively—e.g., without financial accounting. By running a shadow database, it is possible to continue to operate on the copy, without any loss of data since the last data backup (high availability).
  • Parallel processing of read processes—As only new data objects are created, it is not possible that part of a data object has already been altered, and another has part not. The database process for read and write access no longer has to run in sync, but can be divided into many read processes and one write process. Modern multiple processor installations are therefore able to process the read and write processes on different processors in parallel, and thus we expect to see an improvement in performance, especially with a larger number of users.
  • Copying a database in an instant—A logical copy of the database, e.g., to test particular procedures or for simulation, can be created in an instant, independent of the size of the data set.
  • Transactions can be virtually any size—When using conventional procedures, the size of the transaction is limited by the main memory.
  • Versioning—This concept allows versioning, i.e., archiving of previous states of a data object. For example, the change history of an order can be traced and an UNDO function with reset to the nth status is provided.
  • Online upgrades—The Log database supports the ability for upgrades during ongoing operations. A change of the data model therefore does not require any reorganization runs during which no work can be carried out, but can be implemented during ongoing operations. Extensive evening, night, and weekend upgrade operations no longer need to be carried out.

 

Other Features of the abas ERP Database
Object definition of the database—abas ERP knows very complex data objects: e.g., a product, including its production list, is a single data object in a database table (and not, as is the case in a relational database, recorded in at least two tables). If a production list is changed, no complex transaction is required, as the lock of the single involved data object is sufficient.

The database recognizes polymorphic references—A single reference can therefore refer to different data objects. The operation can be significantly simplified. Example: In financial accounting, the following data objects can be entered as references:

  • Customers
  • Vendors
  • Employees
  • General Ledger (G/L) accounts

The user, however, only sees one field, into which the various data objects can be entered.

Database administration—With the administration tools of the database, the following options are available (even if data has already been integrated):

  • Change existing formats of database fields (e.g., instead of 30 characters of text, 60 characters are required or the number of whole number places is insufficient), without the field content being lost.
  • Extend database tables by new fields.
  • Use new database tables for your own purposes.
  • Insert references to one's own new database tables from standard tables and vice versa.
  • Adapt screens or create new screens.
  • Export data directly to OpenOffice (e.g., Open Calc) or to Microsoft products (e.g., Excel) or Web-based services (e.g., Google Apps). For this, programming knowledge is not necessary, even if database tables have to be linked using joins.
  • Add individual keys. The key may consist of several fields that are not connected. The keys can then be used again in one's own selections.

The database can be accessed via a number of interfaces, either in read or write mode. These include the open database connectivity (ODBC) interface, the Java API, the EDP interface (ERP data access log; abas Business Software’s interface is similar to ODBC but faster), as well as the ActiveX interface.

During write operations, both the methods available by abas ERP in the standard and those added by the user are run. This is essential in order to maintain a consistent data set. The chosen technology of write interfaces automatically ensures this.

 

Enter the FO Language
The proprietary Flexible User Interface (FO) syntax enables the user or the supporting software company to add individual, project-specific adjustments. Adjustments are carried out by means of Flexible User Interface Programs (FOPs). An uncomplicated script language is available, which can be easily learned even by persons that are not computer savvy. For complex adjustments, Java can also be used as the programming language. Script language FOPs can be called from Java programs as well.

In the script language, as well as in Java, the user can define transactions, which are linked to the standard transactions of abas ERP. An example: The saving of one's own data objects together with the saving of a sales order can run in the same transaction. This ensures that either both the sales order and one's own data objects or none are saved.

These FOPs as well as the Java FOPs can be coupled to events, which are called Event Controlled Flexible User Interface Programs (EFOPs). Events can be as follows:

  • Screen entry (the call of a screen, e.g., to set default values)
  • Screen validation (status: abas ERP has not yet completely checked and completed, the object is not yet on the hard drive, and the transaction is still open)
  • Screen exit (status: abas ERP has checked and is 'content,' the object is on the hard drive, and the transaction is still open)
  • Screen cancelling (status: user has canceled action, and the transaction still open)
  • Filling in the field (status: entry in the field has not been checked yet by abas ERP; used, e.g., for the entry of "MAX" into a numerical field, and then an EFOP is to determine the maximum value permitted and enter it)
  • Field verification (status: content checked by abas ERP, an EFOP can carry out a more rigorous check and reject the content, as the case may be—e.g., customer has exceeded his limit and is not allowed to issue another order)
  • Field exit (used for follow-up actions such as entry into another field of the screen owing to the entry just made, e.g., an individual price finding)
  • Before and after pressing a button
  • Before and after inserting, deleting, or moving a line

Further database administration tools enable the following:

  • Menu design
  • Creation of new, user-specific, and user group-specific menus
  • Integration of charts into screens
  • Display of data in user-defined screens and providing data with drill-down functions (Infosystem in ABAS’ lingo)

And the decisive point: with all the adjustments made in the database using FOPs and EFOPs, the instance still remains upgradeable. In spite of the extensive adjustments, we are still able to make the most up-to-date version of abas ERP available to the user, leaving the individual, project-specific applications unharmed.

 


 
comments powered by Disqus


QAD Explore 2012: Only Good Things Can Come from Talking to the Customer | Assessing FinancialForce.com’s Early Years | When Is Talent Management Really Right for Your Business? | What’s Up with xTuple—and Open Source ERP? | Epicor Retail: Behind the Counter | Logility: Supply Chain Innovator and Workhorse | Social Media in Your Supply Chain Keeps Everyone in the Loop | Dassault Systèmes—Expanding Product Development and the 3D Experience | A Portrait of the Enterprise Software User in the Education Industry | Siemens Product Development Solutions for Process Industries | SAP SCM—Stepping Out of Obscurity | Cloud ERP for Manufacturing: 6 Considerations | What’s Microsoft’s Retail Play? | Should You Keep or Replace Your Legacy ERP Software? Here’s How to Decide | ToolsGroup—Going Back to Its SCP Roots |
SYSPRO—Taking a Quantum Leap or Simply Becoming Smarter? | Two Vendor Execs Discuss the Current B2B Pricing Market (and its Future) | Emptoris: Powered Up to Empower Global 2000 Users | A Portrait of the Enterprise Software User in the Pharmaceutical Industry | SAP as a Retail Market Force: More Fact Than Fiction | RedPrairie: Enabling End-to-End Supply Chains (from Manufacturer to Retail Shelf) | PTC Windchill Version 9 versus Version 10: Is Version 10 the Most Significant Windchill Release in PTC’s History? | Reconnecting with a Tried-and-True Manufacturing ERP Vendor | What Have Epicor and Activant Been Up To (Post-Merger)? | The Lesser-Known (Social) Facts about Microsoft Dynamics CRM | The (Underappreciated) Value of B2B Pricing Software | Reconnecting with Cincom Systems | Demystifying "Vendor Shootout for ERP" Events | AuraPortal: A BPM Vendor Worth Checking Out | Ariba's 15-Year Journey into the B2B Commerce Cloud | Financial Reporting—Who Needs It? | Infor Gains Financials Elite Club Status | Sage ERP and CRM Portfolio Update: Clarity at Last | Using ERP to Deliver E-commerce for Engineer-to-order Companies | Infor Joins the S&OP Fray | Cloud Assets: A Guide for SMBs—Part 3 | A Leader in Service Management Tackles Multidimensional Growth | Workforce Scheduling and Optimization: The Missing Link on the Shop Floor? | Cloud Assets: A Guide for SMBs—Part 2 | S&OP Newcomer Asserts Notable Domain Expertise | Analytics Leader Voices Its Opinions on S&OP State of Affairs | Cloud Assets: A Guide for SMBs—Part 1 | When ERP and CRM Connect in the Cloud | Lean as a Response to Global Outsourcing Challenges | Perfect Orders: Improving Customer Satisfaction and Financial Results | A Candid Conversation with a Field Service Workforce Management Leader | Preactor: Predict and React on the Shop Floor | Thou Shalt Manage (and Cherish) Thy (Best) Suppliers | A SaaS Start-up Cautionary Tale: The Makana Experience (Or: How You Can Create a Great Product and Still Hit the Wall) | TEC Spotlight Report: Pronto Software | PLM Migration: Migrate Your Mind First | Reference Guide to Supply Chain Management (SCM) Features and Functions | ERP for Green Supply Chain Management in Manufacturing | Reference Guide to Discrete Manufacturing ERP Software Functions and Features | (Forgotten) CRM and ERP Kingdoms in the Making? | Preparing for Product Development in Process Manufacturing | As the Economy Rebounds, Will Your Organization Be Ready for New and Increasing Demand? A Summary of the 2009 APICS Conference | Nine Ways to Use ERP to Make the Manufacturing Supply Chain Lean | The Blurry Line between ERP and PLM in Engineer-to-order (ETO) Manufacturing | The Customer Relationship Management Vision: It Starts with Relationships | Customer Data Integration: A Primer | Getting It Right: ERP Solutions for Mixed-mode Manufacturers | Your Reference Guide to SMB Accounting Software Features | Enterprise Resource Planning for Services: Has Software as a Service Become Service-oriented Architecture for Small to Medium Businesses? | Bolstering the Call Center with Service Resolution Management Processes | Using Demand to Modulate Consumer Packaged Goods Supply Networks | EAM versus CMMS: What's Right for Your Company | Warehouse Management for Manufacturers: Why Extended ERP Might Be the Right Choice | From Manufacturing to Distribution: The Evolution of ERP in Our New Global Economy | One Vendor's Exploit of Marrying Infrastructure with Selling and Fulfillment Applications | Advancing the Art of Pricing with Science | Today's Discrete ERP Landscape: Trends, Challenges, and Solutions | Welcome to the CRM Showdown: Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs. NetSuite CRM+ | What's Holding Back Online Appointment Booking? | Weather the Recession with Project ERP | How to Measure Customer Satisfaction | Off-loading Some Green Compliance Burdens: Can Enterprise Applications Meet the Challenge? | A Primer on Lean Manufacturing Using Microsoft Dynamics AX: Case Studies | Managing Customer Returns and RMAs Using Microsoft Dynamics AX | Managing Customer Returns and RMAs | Front-office Lean—Taking Lean Manufacturing Beyond the Shop Floor | Advanced Front Office Lean with Business Modeler Software | A Veteran Mid-market ERP Vendor with a Pragmatic Vision Chimes In | Attribute-based Demand Planning: A Powerful Tool for Process Manufacturers | The ERP Ecosystem | A Guide to Software Test Tools | The Basics of Quote-to-order Systems | Leveraging 3-D for Sales Automation | War Looms in the On-demand CRM Market (and Beyond)—But Will You Profit from It? | Customer Relationship Management Showdown: Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs. Oncontact CRM vs. SageCRM | A Lexicon for Customer Relationship Management Success | A Semi–open Source Vendor Discusses Market Trends | The Web-based Sales Portal—A Catalyst for Business Transformation | Manufacturing Software for an Integrated Steel Plant | Audit Your Message Strategy by Answering Three Questions | Service Level Agreements for Manufacturers and Software Vendors in the Supply Chain | Quote-to-order: One Big, Lean Machine Adds High Tech to Its Mix | Quote-to-order: A Newcomer Causes a Stir in the Market | Quote-to-order: New Ingredients in the Recipe for Success | Cash Management 101 | Blast Past Manufacturing Bottlenecks with Constraint-based Scheduling | How Supply Chain Management Helps Today's Engineer-to-order Companies | Welcome to ERP Showdown: Infor ERP LN 6.1 vs. Epicor Vantage vs. Lawson M3 Discrete Manufacturing Solutions | Welcome to ERP - Distribution Showdown! Epicor Enterprise vs. JDA Supply Chain Planning & Optimization Suite vs. Pronto Xi | Provider of B2B Price Management and Optimization Speaks Out | From Local to Hosted: The Story of One Company’s Migration to On-demand ERP | Supply Chain 101: The Basics You Need to Know | The Challenges of Integrating Enterprise Resource Planning and Manufacturing Execution Systems | What Are Manufacturing Execution Systems? | How to Evaluate a Sales and Operation Planning System | Knowledge Management: The Core of Service Resolution Management | Integrating Customer Relationship Management and Service Resolution Management | Data Governance: Controlling Your Organization’s Mission-critical Information | The Sweet Spot of One Merging ERP Vendor | Quote-to-order Solutions and Key Performance Indicators | Quote-to-order: The Major Players in the Manufacturing Arena | Q2O Systems: Solutions for Quotation Management and Pricing Configuration | The Essential Components of Quote-to-order Application Suites | The Complexities of Quote-to-order and Possible Solutions | Stemming the Loss of Knowledge Capital: A Business Fix for Manufacturers | Social Networks: How They're Turning CRM Upside Down | The Seven Deadly Sins of Software Marketing | QAD: A Software Vendor That Has Survived (if Not Thrived) in the ERP Market | Customer Relationship Management: Evolution, Not Revolution | Applying the Power of Social Networks to Customer Relationship Management | A Primer on Lean Manufacturing Using Microsoft Dynamics AX | Eeny, Meeny, Miny, Moe: Software Selection, Its Pitfalls, and How to Avoid Them | Two Stalwart Vendors Discuss Mid-market Issues | The CMO–CIO Organizational Alignment Mandate | Two Stalwart Vendors Discuss Platform Approaches (Wars) | Two Stalwart Vendors Discuss Market Trends | Is There a Way to Avoid Lengthy Catalog Numbers? | Can We Intelligently Use Part Numbers to Configure and Order the Right Products? | Recent Developments in One Price Management Provider's Business | How One Provider's Solution Covers the Bases of Price Optimization and Management | How One Vendor Parlays Price Variation into Profit Improvement Opportunities | What if Companies Could Use Science to Align Prices to Market and Maximize Margins? | A Dynamic Answer to Enterprise Resource Planning for Services | Customer Relationship Management and Social Networks—They're Related How, Again? | So What's the Bottom Line on Price Segmentation? | Business-to-business Price Segmentation—Outlined and Explained | Know Thy Market Segment's Price Response | How One On Demand Vendor Addresses Its Unique Challenges and Competition | On Demand Compensation Management Partnerships for Spiffed-up Success | The Compelling Capabilities of One Compensation Management Vendor's Solution | On Demand Delivery Compels a Compensation Management Vendor | Requirement Traceability—A Tester's Approach | Microsoft Dynamics AX 4.0 for Manufacturing Environments | Microsoft Dynamics AX 4.0 for Distribution Environments | Conviction is the Intangible in a Successful Positioning Process | ERP Showdown: Deltek Costpoint vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Oracle E-Business Suite | Experiencing the Customer Experience: Listening to, Learning from, and Acting on the Voice of the Customer | Alice (or Allen) in MobileLand | A Positioning Process Helps Product Marketing Managers Do More | Challenges and Future Plans of a Product Inventory Disposition Vendor | Is There a Smarter Way to Handle Excess Active and Obsolete Inventory? | Let the (Excess) Inventory Flow! | A Veteran Enterprise Resource Planning Vendor Makes a SaaS-y Statement | Supplier Relationship Management: Benefits and Challenges | Vendor Reservations, a Full-fledged SaaS ERP, and User Recommendations | Software as a Service's Functional Catch-up | Software as a Service: Not without Caveats | The Challenges of SAP Relationship and User Recommendations | Difficult Conversations: Discussing CRM with Your CEO Part Two: Elements of the Discussion | Difficult Conversations: Positioning Your CEO in a CRM Implementation Part One: Sources of Misconception and Faulty Assumptions | Customer Relationship Management and the Next Generation Network | Success Keys for Proposal Automation | Seven Magic Questions: How to Improve Your Win Ratio by Selling Value Instead of Price | A New Customer Relationship Management Framework: Twenty-first Century Necessity, or Blowin' in the Wind? | Cut-to-size/shape Industries | Microsoft Retail Systems | Drop-Shipping—Internet Retailers' "Little Helper"? | A Customer Relationship Management Solution Aims To Cover all the Bases | Impressive Enterprise Resource Planning Solution Gets A Little Help From Its Friends | Hosted versus On-premises Customer Relationship Management | CIO Horror Stories and What They Mean For Vendors | Benchmarking: How Am I Really Performing? | Is Your Store Customer-centric? | The Ghost in the Machine: Where Has Process Automation Left the Consumer? | Yes, We Have No Bananas: Consumer Goods Manufacturers Serve Demanding Customers | Sales Force Automation, Customer Relationship Management, and Sales Training: A Fusion of Methodology and Technology | User Recommendations for Pricing Management | The Retail Battleground for Pricing Management | Applications Giants Bolster Their Pricing Management Capabilities | New Vendor Acquisition Strategies in the Enterprise Applications Field | Getting It Right: Product, Quality, Timing, and Price | Enterprise Resource Planning for Services, and Professional Services Automation: Where Do You Draw the Line? | Web-enabled Sales Tactics | The Web-Enabled Sales Process | Major Vendors Adapting to User Requirements | Sales Force Performance | What Drives Profitability | Assessing the Drivers of Sales Performance | Software as a Service for Customer Relationship Management and Sales | Extended Enterprise Resource Planning Vendor Shows Its Lean Side | Reflections on Lean Philosophy and the Theory of Constraints | The Theory of Constraints Enters the Lean Manufacturing Arena | The TEC Quick Case for Made2Manage | Enterprise Resource Planning Vendors Address Lean Manufacturing | Manual versus Information Technology Enabled Lean Manufacturing | How to Achieve Lean Manufacturing | Lean Tools and Practices that Eliminate Manufacturing Waste | Lean Manufacturing: A Primer | Extending Quality's Reach to Manage Quality in the Supply Chain | ERP Plus and Beyond | The Strengths of a Vertically Centric Enterprise Software Provider | Integrating Customer Relationship Management through Software As A Service | Comparing On Demand Customer Relationship Management Service Alternatives | The Exacting Needs of Metal Service Centers | Inventory Control Is Perhaps the Most Powerful Tool You Have for Containing Your Warehousing Costs | If There's One Thing CRM Tells Us: Don't Do PLM the Same Way | What Plant-level Systems Can Do for the Enterprise Market | Plant-level Systems: Facing and Dealing with Obstacles | The Importance of Plant-level Systems | CRM Application Users Are Key to Project Success | Enterprise Resource Planning: Bridging the Gap between Product Vision and Execution | Stability and Functionality for Process and Discrete Manufacturers | The Market Impact of Two Powerhouses | What Do Users Want and Need? | Is 'Sage' Wiser And Better Than 'Best'? | Marquee Vendors Partner for Deepening Inherent CRM and BI Links | Why Are CRM and Analytics Intrinsically Connected? | When Customer Relationships Meets Business Intelligence Marketing Analysis and User Recommendations | SAS and Action-Oriented Business Processes: Alliances, Partnerships, and Acquisitions | SAS: Striving to Sustain Leadership | Customer Life Cycle Solutions: Strategic Alliances, Challenges, & User Recommendations | A Tectonic Shift in Communications Customer Life Cycle Management | Amdocs Overhauls Its Marketing | $40 Billion Is Being Wasted by Companies without Product Information Management Strategies—How Is Yours Coming Along? | Remote Implementations--Why They Can Make $ense | One Product for Large and Small Manufacturers: Challenges and User Recommendations | When EDI Goes Native, Everything Falls in Sync with IQMS | Benefits of a Single Database Solution: Improved Enterprise Quality Management from IQMS | Solving Enterprise Problems: The Fully-integrated Solution of IQMS | Why Service Matters: Enterprise Solutions, Market Differentiation, and IQMS | IQMS Prospers by Helping Enterprises Work Smarter | The Role of PIM and PLM in the Product Information Supply Chain: Where is Your Link? | Channels to the Hearts and Minds--On-line 2005 | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part Four: Strategies and Case Study | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part Three: Achieving and Maintaining the Competitive Edge | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part Two: Creating Your Strategy | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part One: Changing Your Approach | SAP Bolsters NetWeaver's MDM Capabilities Part Five: Challenges and User Recommendations | Do You Know What Are the "Unintended Consequences" of Your CRM Project? | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part Five: Challenges and User Recommendations | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part Four: Market Impact | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part Three: QRS Background | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part Two: QRS Marketing | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part One: Event Notes | Knowing Your Prospect's Influencers | Mainstream Enterprise Vendors Begin to Grasp Content Management Part Three: Challenges | Mainstream Enterprise Vendors Begin to Grasp Content Management Part Two: Background & Lessons Learned | Mainstream Enterprise Vendors Begin to Grasp Content Management Part One: PCM System Attributes | CRM: Creating a Credible Business Case and Positioning It with the CEO Part Two: Linking CRM with Organizational Direction | CRM: What Is It and Why Do It? Part One: Historical Background | Not All Acquisitions Happen: JDA and QRS Part Two: Market Impact | Not All Acquisitions Happen: JDA and QRS Part One: Event and Market Impact | CRM, Success, and Best Practices: A Wake Up Call Part Two: Modeling Success with Senior Management and CRM Culture | CRM, Success, and Best Practices: A Wake Up Call Part One: Searching and Establishing the Business Parameters of CRM | CRM Testing Throughout Implementation | SAP's Approach to the Retail Market | Maximizer Enterprise 8: A Strong Competitor on the SMB Front Line | The Best ACT! Is Still to Come | Process Manufacturers--Great Batch, Every Batch | Interface Software Expands Its CRM Functionality | Program Testing Methodology Part Two: Running Tests and Getting Approval | Program Testing Methodology Part One: Preparing for Testing | "Best" of the Three CRM Solutions | PeopleSoft Revamps World for Its Mid-Market "Express" Conquest Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | PeopleSoft Revamps World for Its Mid-Market "Express" Conquest Part Three: Strengths | PeopleSoft Revamps World for Its Mid-Market "Express" Conquest Part Two: Market Impact | CRM ROI: Creating a Business Case | Is MAPICS Getting the Magic of PLM? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Is MAPICS Getting the Magic of PLM? Part One: Recent Events and Market Impact | Can Webplan Reconcile Planning and Execution? Part Three: Market Impact Continued | Intuitive Manufacturing Systems Shows Maturity in Adolescent Age Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Intuitive Manufacturing Systems Shows Maturity in Adolescent Age Part Three: Market Impact Continued | Intuitive Manufacturing Systems Shows Maturity in Adolescent Age Part Two: Market Impact | Intuitive Manufacturing Systems Shows Maturity in Adolescent Age Part One: Company Overview | The Importance of Server Robustness in CRM | Instead of Discounting, Back Some Value Out of Your Proposal | Rewrite or Wrap-Around Old Software? Part One: Event Summary | Process Manufacturing: Industry Specific Requirements Part One: Introduction | Encompix--Thriving on Encompassing Complexity Part One: Event Summary | Marketing Automation: Coming of Age Slowly | SoftBrands to Institute Fourth Shift for SAP Business One Manufacturing Work-Plan Part Five: Challenges and User Recommendations | SoftBrands to Institute Fourth Shift for SAP Business One Manufacturing Work-Plan Part Four: SoftBrands | SoftBrands to Institute Fourth Shift for SAP Business One Manufacturing Work-Plan Part Three: Market Impact | SoftBrands to Institute Fourth Shift for SAP Business One Manufacturing Work-Plan Part Two: SoftBrands | SoftBrands to Institute Fourth Shift for SAP Business One Manufacturing Work-Plan Part One: Event Summary | Can the Market Sustain a Stand-Alone EMM? | ERP Systems and the ETO Manufacturing Market Part Three: User Recommendations | Technology Vendor--Can You Afford Credibility? | GXS Acquires HAHT Commerce or More Synchronized Retail B2B Data Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations. | GXS Acquires HAHT Commerce for More Synchronized Retail B2B Data Part Three: Market Impact | GXS Acquires HAHT Commerce for More Synchronized Retail B2B Data Part Two: HAHT Commerce | Data Quality: Cost or Profit? | What Does the Future Hold for PRM? | CDC Software Wins the Pivotal Auction. Now What? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | CDC Software Wins the Pivotal Auction. Now What? Part Two: Market Impact | CDC Software Wins at the Pivotal Auction. Now What? Part One: Event Summary | Comparison of ERP and CRM Markets' Life cycle Snapshots | PeopleSoft Gathers Manufacturing and SCM Wherewithal Part Three: The Manufacturing Industry | Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP Part 1: Tutorial | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part Five: Deltek’s Major Product Lines | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part 1: Product Announcements 2003 | PSA -- Still An Evolving Market | Audit Considerations for Enterprise Software Implementations Part 2: Applying Controls and Audit Emphasis | Generating Revenue from Service | Should Uniqueness Vouch For Marketing Automation Niche Players? | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Three: Market Impact Continued | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Two: Market Impact | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority | BPM Weaves Data And Processes Together For Real-time Revenues | Professional Services Are Catching-up With CRM | PowerTrieve, A LEAP For CRM? | Click Commerce Acquires Allegis | Who Alleges The PRM Market Consolidation? | What CRM Should Have Taught IT (although not getting the message is not entirely IT's fault) | CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure Part Two: Using A Knowledge Base To Reduce The Time, Risk And Cost Of A CRM Selection | CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure Part One: The CRM Selection Challenge | When the Bigger Fish Eats the Smaller to Become a Bigger Fish | Xchange Adds To The List Of CRM Point Solutions' Casualties Part Two: Market Impact & User Recommendations | Xchange Adds To The List Of CRM Point Solutions' Casualties | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? | CRM: The Truth, The Whole Truth And Nothing But The Truth(For A Change) | The Case of A Boutique Vendor's Benefits of Focus - IRM Corporation | Why CRM Is So Hard and What To Do About It: Data is key to making CRM work | CRM Analytics Brings More Profitability | CRM For Complex Manufacturers Revolves Around Configuration Software | How Supply Chain Projects Morph Into Black Holes | Hosting Horrors! | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 4: Other Vendors, CRM, SCP & User Recommendations | Microsoft Paints CRM Landscape On Lately A ‘Still Nature’ Business Applications Scenery Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Microsoft Paints CRM Landscape On Lately A ‘Still Nature’ Business Applications Scenery | A CRM System Needs A Data Strategy | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software | Team With Business Management to Drive Out IT Cost | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 4: Challenges and User Recommendations | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 3: Target Markets, Alliances, & Competition | CRM and Technological Solutions: Be the Customer | SAP Keeps Traction On Some Tires Of Its Omni-Wheel-Drive Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Keeps Traction On Some Tires Of Its Omni-Wheel-Drive Part 1 | Inventory Reduction: Effectively Turning Excess Into Cash | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 2: Market Impact | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 1: Recent Announcements | CA Unloads interBiz Collection Into SSA GT's Sanctuary Part 1: Recent Announcement | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 2: Market Impact | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 1: Recent Announcements | QAD Seemingly Nearing The Corner | Microsoft Throws .NET At SMEs, With CRM As Bait | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 4: Challenges & User Recommendations | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 3: Market Impact | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 2: Alliances & Support | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 1: Recent Announcements | Gosh, They Kill Partnerships, Don't They? | J.D. Edwards' CEO Retires Again; This Time For Good? | Lawson Software Braves IPO And Reports Strongly Against The Odds | PSI AG To Become More Germane Globally Via Relevant Partnership | It Isn't the Fall, It's the Sudden Stop | PipeChain Adds Pragmatism Onto Simplicity | Besieged By The CRM Throne Aspirants, King Siebel Delivers "The Magic No.7" Part 2: Market Impact | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: PeopleSoft | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: Oracle | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 3: From R to Z | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 2: From J to Q | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 1: From A to I | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: J.D. Edwards | E-Business Customer Service Success at H.B. Fuller Company | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Procurement, and SCM Unite! A Series Study | Pure-Play CRM Vendors: Choose an Integrated or Best-of-Breed Solution? | CRM is Busting Out Of Its Britches: Operational, Analytical, and Collaborative CRM Are Born | CPR on BPR: Practical Guidelines for Successful Business Process Analysis | CPR on BPR: Long Live Business Process Reengineering Part 1: A Primer | Nortel and Clarify: Was There Ever Synergy Enough to Support this Marriage? | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 2: The Implications | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 1: The News | Sagent Improves Its Image With SAS Partnership | Seagate Software 'Crystallizes' Its New Name: Crystal Decisions | Business Objects Teams With TopTier For Analytics | Wrong ERP Demise Predictions Have (Only Partly) Created Skills Shortage | Customer Relationship Management for IT Professionals | MicroStrategy Manages Your Customer Relationships And Its Own | Web Testing Has Changed the Testing Landscape | PurchasePro Acquires Stratton Warren | eLoyalty Enhances Its Field Service And Logistics Services | NetGenesis Predicts The Future From Mouse Trails | SPSS Has A New ShowCase | Cognos Unveils CRM Solution | CRM Vendors Cash In On The Financial Services Industry | Onyx Thinks ASP Opportunities Are A Gem | Commerce One Selects Entrada Software For Affiliate Program | Will Oracle’s Freebie Shot Hurt (Or Only Graze) Siebel? | Broadbase Continues to Expand | Great Plains – An SME Market Leader, But At What Cost? | Great Plains ASP - Evolution, Revolution, Innovation | Siebel: Great Plans for Great Plains | IBM and Partners Load the Guns in Europe | IMI Sees Red In Dawn Of Fiscal 2001 | Ultimate Connection Seeking Its US Retail Connection Through Solomon Software Partners | Oracle Applications - An Internet-Reinvented Feisty Challenger | Interelate: More on Tap Than Apps | PeopleSoft 8 Launched – Anything to Write Home About? | Lipstream Speaks to Kana | IBM Nabs Another Application Vendor | Epicor Software Corp.: How Far From Being 'One-Stop' Shop? | Peregrine Polishes the Old In-Out-and-In-between | Mirapoint Launches Global Partner Program | Siebel Enters Smaller Markets in a Big Way | Baan Defectors – Is This Only Tip of an Iceberg? | J.D. Edwards Chooses Freedom to Choose EAI | How Has MAPICS Been Extending? | PeopleSoft Manufacturing - This Time For Sure?! | Oracle Proud To Be Number Two | i2 Technologies’ Latest Offering: J. D. Edwards OneWorld™ | SAP to Become Leaner, Meaner and More Organized | J. D. Edwards FOCUSes on Active Supply Chain | Infinium Software, Inc.: Having All the Right Cards? | SAP Gives Up, Declares Victory. Again. | Baan Yet Another ERP Vendor to Find a Sanctuary Under Invensys’ Wing | MAPICS Red Ink Stained While Extending Its Offering | Intentia’s Growing Pains | After Strong Game, Logility Suffers Fourth Quarter Loss | Question: When is Six Sigma not Six Sigma? Answer: When it's the Six Sigma Metric!!© | Ariba Gains Legs Courtesy of Descartes | Adexa Reports Record First Quarter Results | They Test Web Sites, Don’t They? | i2 Technologies Gets Reporting Help From Hyperion | Should PeopleSoft be Overly Happy? | SAP Gives in to CRM (Part Time) Matrimony | Oracle Corporation: Flying High for Being Jack-of-All-Trades and Master of Some | Lawson Software’s CRM and ASP Moves – Wise, Bold, Injudicious, Enforced, or Something Else? | Voice-Over-Broadband Standards on the Horizon | Infinium Putting its Cards on the Table | Getting Strangers to Take Your Candy | Enlightened Self-interest Launches CRM Information Source | Go Fygir! SCT Defeats Incumbent AspenTech at Texaco, Shell Venture | Segue Software is First to Provide the Capability to Load Test Wireless Applications | MATRAnet Converts Confusion to Cash | Brio Technology Expands Support for WML and XML | GLOVIA to be Resuscitated (Hopefully) | Intentia Attempts to Become ‘Lean and Mean’ | Vendors Begin to Round Out Their CRM Suites | Oracle Integrates Front and Back Office with Applications 11i | Oracle to Enlist BPA Systems in its Mid-Market Quest | Deloitte & Touche Alliance with SynQuest Largely Symbolic | Key Product Delays Take a Toll on Oracle Users | Industri-Matematik Posts 2Q00 Loss But Sells CRM | SAP Finds CRM Partner for Marketing Tools | Is Baan Clinically Dead? | PeopleSoft Completes Acquisition of Vantive; Vantive CRM Applications Integrate with PeopleSoft and Other ERP Systems | AspenTech Launches e-Business InitiativeFinally | PeopleSoft Takes Aim at Foods Industry | PeopleSoft Recuperating Slowly, Hoping to Sink 1999 into Oblivion Quickly | Siebel Sees Farther on Shoulders of Giants | Sybase and MicroStrategy Team on Vertical Market Portal Applications | Oracle Loses Again | SAP Posts Solid Q499, but Warns of Q100 | Sterling Software Sees the Light with Eureka:Intelligence | Analysis of SAS Institute and IBM Intelligence Alliance | Total Uptime Guarantees? It Must Be A New Millennium! | BAAN Announces "Open World": Business-To-Business Collaboration Over The Internet | Remedy Makes CRM a Personal Matter | eMachines to Buy FreePC | SAP APO: Will it Fill the Gap? | Symix Sytems: Shifting SME's Focus to Their Customers | Industrial & Financial Systems, IFS AB: Thriving on Product Flexibility and Incremental Deployability | Transition for Manhattan Associates Necessary for Long Term Growth | Logility: Voyager in B2B Collaborative Commerce | QAD Inc.: The Art of Vertical Focus | Great Plains: Strong Channel and Microsoft focus for Dynamic(s) Growth | Q: Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Billionaire? A: Baan -- Foster Care for Its Orphans Needed As Well |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google