Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Comments: 
0
Read Comments Are ASP Applications Right for You?

<

Executive Summary   

An Application Service Provider (ASP) provides an outsourced application to a firm, freeing the firm from hardware costs, training on the system operation, installation and system operation itself. Originally, ASP applications focused on a fairly narrow functional scope, however, as the market matures, the functionality the applications address is growing. It is now possible to contract for virtually any service or group of services required by a company.

The ASP frees the client organization from many, if not all of the tasks associated with the software such as hardware procurement and upgrades, software configuration, bug fixes and enhancements. Clearly, as we move forward, ASP applications will take on a larger part of the load of suitable applications.

Virtually any application where functionality is consistent across multiple organizations is suitable for an ASP to provide, however, whether that application is suitable to be implemented by an organization is based on the requirements and operations of that organization. It's important to know not only what the application does, but who the target market is and how current customers utilize the system.

About this note:
This is a two-part note. This part discusses the decision factors in determining if an ASP application should be considered. Part Two details the criteria for making this decision.

What is an ASP?   

An Application Service Provider (ASP) provides an outsourced application to a firm, freeing the firm from hardware costs, training on the system operation, installation and system operation itself. Generally, ASPs charge for their services by business metrics specific to the application, e.g., an accounting system may charge by transactions and number of accounts in the Chart of Accounts while a CRM application may charge by the number of contacts and users. End users are responsible for internal training, data entry and integration with existing processes.

ASP applications can themselves be split into two categories, those that are true "services", (such as a shipping cost calculator) that receive and return messages to a client application without exposing interfaces to users and Applications, (such as some CRM applications) that provide a complete system with user interfaces. Applications may transmit data to and from legacy client applications on a real time or near real time basis, but for the purposes of this discussion, the key is the transparency of the use of the application.

A service provides a portion of a business process while an application provides a complete business process. Web services differentiate themselves from traditional services by using the HTTP to deliver Remote-Procedure-Calls (RPC) and standardized messaging frameworks (e.g. XML).

Data returned from a service (such as shipping cost) is displayed using the client system. The fact that an ASP was used is transparent to the end user. With an application, the ASP application itself accepts input and displays the results to the user on its own screens and/or reports.

Originally, ASP applications focused on a fairly narrow functional scope, however, as the market matures, the functionality the applications address is growing. It is now possible to contract for virtually any service or group of services required by a company.

Why ASP Applications?   

The clear advantage of ASP applications are based on development cost and implementation time. In theory, the cost of developing and operating the application is spread over a number of users, providing a direct benefit of lower development and hardware cost. Since the application exists and is in use by other firms, one can make the assumption that the system "works" substantially as intended (provided the service has at least one user in production.)

ASP applications also benefit from the expertise gained from its relatively narrow focus and scale. Very few companies have the luxury of devoting an entire development organization to shipping costs or time reporting, but an ASP, because of its narrow focus and the transaction volume of potentially many companies can develop expertise that would not otherwise be available outside of high priced, industry specific consultants.

The ASP frees the client organization from many, if not all of the tasks associated with the software such as hardware procurement and upgrades, software configuration, bug fixes and enhancements. Clearly, as we move forward, ASP applications will take on a larger part of the load of suitable applications.

What are "suitable applications"?   

Virtually any application where functionality is consistent across multiple organizations is suitable for an ASP to provide, however, whether that application is suitable to be implemented by an organization is based on the requirements and operations of that organization. For example, an accounting system may be a tremendous application for small to medium size businesses, but may not be the best solution for the CPA firm whose accounting resources and knowledge surpass those of the ASP. Therefore, it's important to know not only what the application does, but who the target market is and how current customers utilize the system.

Infrastructure systems such as expense reporting and payroll applications would seem to be prime candidates, not only because of their consistent functionality, but also because the organization can decide, with certainty, that procedural modifications be made to utilize system features and/or work around system deficiencies.

What constitutes an unsuitable application is subject to much discussion, but generally, an application that needs to be customized would be less suitable, as would outsourcing an application that represents a value added or competitive advantage to the implementing firm. Applications that expose their user interfaces to an organizations' customers may be less suitable, if failure of the system would reflect on the organization or if the inability to quickly change or customize interfaces would tend to commoditize that portion of an organization's service offering. When an organization exposes the ASP application's user interfaces to its customers, then users may infer that the service offered through this interface is a commodity (i.e., common with little value added).

Whether an application is best implemented as an ASP provided application or service, built in-house or purchased generally depends on the same criteria as what would be used for outsourcing a function or process, among them:

  • How critical is a system is to day to day business operations?

  • What are the failure recovery requirements for the system?

  • How critical are performance requirements for the application?

  • How specific its functionality is relative to the requirements of other organizations desiring the service?

  • What are the cost savings over the development period of an internal system vs. the perceived life of the system?

Each of these areas needs careful consideration and are generally addressed to some extent in the contract and/or terms of service of the ASP.

This concludes Part One of a two-part note determining if an ASP solution is right for your organization. Part Two discusses the specific criteria to be used in making this determination.

About The Author   

Miles Szczurek (miles@appenture.com) has more than 20 years experience in the Information Technology, Trading, Clearing and Risk Management areas for futures exchanges, derivatives clearing organizations, cash forward markets and B2B exchanges. He played a significant role in a number of firsts; the implementation of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange's SPAN risk management software which has become the industry standard, the implementation of the world's first international electronic trading system and implementation of the first exchange in the deregulated power industry in the US.

Miles is a founding partner of the Appenture Group (www.appenture.com), located in Chicago, Illinois. The Appenture Group is a full service Internet Technologies development organization providing software components, project management services and software development services nationwide.


 

Comments:


Outsourcing in Latin America | Distinctions and Benefits of Strategic Sourcing | Should North Americans Send More Software Development Work to China? | Global Product Development Seen as a Boon for Product Lifecycle Management Vendors | A Semi–open Source Vendor Discusses Market Trends | Human Resources for Small to Medium Businesses | The Challenges that Remain for One Aspiring Global Sourcing Vendor | Zooming into the Clothing Retailer Conundrum | No One Said Sourcing Overseas Would Be Easy | The Anatomy of Retail Sourcing Processes | The Promise (and Complexities) of Private Labels | The Blessing and Curse of Global Sourcing and Supplier Management | Off-shoring: Are You Getting Your Money's Worth? | Technology's Role in Strategic Human Resources | Outsourcing Supply Chain Planning Processes |
Enterprise Software Product Outsourcing: A Fresh Perspective for Mid-market Vendors | Selecting an Outsourcing Provider—Art or Science? | Offshore Outsourcing: Is There a Method to the Madness? Planning for Offshore Outsourcing | Remote Implementations--Why They Can Make $ense | Consumers Shop Everywhere: Understanding Multichannel Sales | Where Has All the Service Gone? | What's Your Global Market Price? | The Many Flavors of Application Software Outsourcing | International Trade Logistics Challenge Automated Global E-Trading | Program Testing Methodology Part One: Preparing for Testing | PLM Coming of Age: ERP Vendors Take Notice | Leveraging Technology to Maintain a Competitive Edge During Tough Economic Times -- A Panel Discussion Analyzed Part Three: Applications Hosting | Resilient Supply Chains: The Next Frontier | Understanding the True Cost of Sourcing | Whose ROI is it Anyway? Part One: Introduction | Justification of ERP Investments Part Three: Costs of Implementing an ERP System | Supply Chain Portfolio 2004 | Outsourcing 101 - A Primer Part Three: Approaches and Recommendations | Outsourcing 101 - A Primer Part Two: Outsourcing Categories | Outsourcing 101 - A Primer | The Strategic Importance of Asset Management Part One: Changing Attitudes | Supply Chain Decisions - Make Sure You Understand the Dollars and Sense | InsideOut Firewall Reporter Unravels the Mysteries of Your Firewall Logs | Inventory Planning & Optimization: Extending Your ERP System Part Two: How It Works | Top 10 Reasons For Having A Project Kickoff - Part II | Top 10 Reasons For Having A Project Kickoff - Part I | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in ProcessPart 3: Process PLM Requirements | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT Part 2: Market Impact | What’s All This Benchmark Stuff, Anyway? | Outsourcing Security Part 3: Selecting a Managed Security Services Provider | Outsourcing Security Part 2: Measuring the Cost | Outsourcing Security Part 1: Noting the Benefits | IPSec VPNs for Extranets: Not what you want to wake up next to | Identix Leads Biometric Authentication | Are ASP Applications Right for You? Part 2: Decision Criteria | SAPped Catalyst Warns in Wake of CEO Departure | SCT Corporation Means (e)Business For Process Manufacturing | New Dimensions in EC and SCM Part 4: Using E-Procurement to Leverage Volume | AMD Hooks Up with Transmeta – For Now | SCT Corporation: The Last Viable Process Manufacturing Vendor Standing? | Red Hat Plays 'Love You, Love You Not' with CPUs | Dell Sharpens Its Linux Focus | Prophet 21 First Quarter Revenues Suffer But Pipeline Grows | Palm to Give Developers a Leg Up | So You Want to Outsource Your Messaging? | Gates Previews Pen-Based Computer | Quantum Snaps Off Its NAS Group | eMachines to Ship Appliance | What’s in a Name? | Technology Hardware Maintenance-Acquiring and Managing Cost Effective Service | frontpath Announces Mobile Internet Appliance | Transmeta to Intel/AMD: Eat Our Dust | Ariba Holds Announcement Festival | Sun Buys Cobalt | VA Linux Releases NAS Server | How Do You Categorize Notebooks? | IMI Sees Red In Dawn Of Fiscal 2001 | Turmoil in CPU-Land | Red Hat’s Linux Domination Weakens | GNOME Will Try to Buff Up Linux | New Internet Appliances Coming from Compaq | How Do You Categorize Servers? | Compaq to Offer Co-Branded iPAQ BlackBerry Wireless E-mail Solution | Compaq Wins Supercomputer Contract, But Is It Enough? | PC Market Figures Show Compaq, Dell, and HP Lead | Computer Manufacturers Shifting Their Focus to Start-Ups | Rackmount Server Sales Surge | Manhattan Associates Completes Second Quarter On Record Pace | Red Hat Releases Clustering Software | Windows 2000 Bug Fixes Posted | Should It Be Renamed 'Unobtainium'? | Dell Drops WebPC | Agilera: Making E-Business Agile | 21st Century Fox Hunt - US vs. Microsoft | Intel Outside? | Netpliance’s 4X Price Hike - Will It Spell Boom or Doom? | HP’s LT 6000r Six-CPU Server | Handspring’s Visor Passes Pocket PC | Active Voice Adds Unified Messaging to Cisco’s CallManager | NetWare for Small Business – NetWhy? | New Storage Array from Sun | Compaq to Open Tru64 Unix? | Intraware Acquires Janus for its Extranets | Lucent Receives Engineering Award in Unified Messaging | Technology Project Selection and Management in Community Banks | Dell and Red Hat Form Alliance | At Least It Hasn’t Been Renamed Linux 2001 | Intel 820 Chipset Delays Again, Again, Again… | Cobalt Releases Linux "Clustering" Software | It Takes More Than a Fast CPU to Rule the Web | Compaq’s 'Photon' Comes into the Light | United Messaging Extends Global Reach ~ Opens Offices in London and Amsterdam | Caldera eDesktop Edges Out Microsoft Windows 2000 in Functionality – Part II | IA-64 Linux From Red Hat | Gateway & AOL Follow Crusoe’s Footprints | Bezos to McNealy: Drop Dead! | MicronPC.com, or, “Where Are They Now?” | Mirapoint Adds Web-Mail Client to Messaging Appliance Line | Network Appliance to Ship Sub-$10K Caching Hardware | Compaq Reorganizes Again | Dell Tops in Customer Satisfaction | Intel Faces 820 Chipset Problems (Again) | Intel Small Server Market | E&Y+ASP=BSP: It’s Not Algebra, But It Adds Up To Something Big | eBay Looking For Sun Block? | HP “Medals” In U.S. PC Olympics | AMD Server Plans De-Railed | Net Woes for NetWare | Intel Reorganization | It’s a Portal...AND It;s a Gateway | Cooler-running Notebooks from HP, Toshiba, et al. | Netpliance Responds Quickly to Hardware Hack | Intel Server Trends | AMD Earnings Beat the Street! Intel Earnings Beat the Street? | Desktop PCs: Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss… (Dell) | USi to Offer Managed Messaging for U.S. Feds | HP e-Vectra Product Follow-up | MCI WorldCom and Critical Path Power into Outsourced Messaging | Dell Updates Its Appliance Line | Apple Displays Its Core in Mac OS X | U.S. vs. Microsoft: Another Day of Reckoning | Why Would Anyone Need More Than 50 IP Addresses? | Will Intel Take a Loss on Each CPU, but Make It Up in Volume? | “Whistler” Beta on the Web? | HP Reorganizes Storage Group, Addresses NAS-cent Market | HP: Why Not Just Call It “e-Vectra.com”? | Compaq Streamlines Product Line | Will MS try the "Open Source" Gambit with WinCE? Why Not – Nothing Else Seems to Work | “It’s a Notebook!” “It’s a Paperweight!” “Wait - It’s Both!” | PSINet and HP ~ OpenMail as an Outsourced Global Messaging | Cisco: IPv6 is Coming, Eventually | United Messaging ~ Ready…Set…Outsource! | Gosh, There’s a Bug in Windows 98 | Wintel Tries to “Embrace and Extend” the English Language | Information/Internet Appliances | Hewlett-Packard’s NetServer Division – #3 to Get Ready, or #4 to Go? | Palm IPO: 3Com’s morning after, or “Do you know the way to San Jose?” | Does Microsoft Have Something Against 64-Bit Processors? | Acta Technology Helps Add Business Intelligence Capabilities to Major ERP Vendors | Concur's Customers Can Network Now | Rentable Procurement | Total Uptime Guarantees? It Must Be A New Millennium! | Analysis of Critical Path's Alliance with yesmail.com for Permission Email | Tentative Unification in Server I/O Architecture Battle | Dell Unveils Internet-Enabled Customer Support Strategy | Compaq, Dell Announce Eight-Way Intel Servers | Dell Takes Over the #1 Spot in the U.S. PC Market | Dell to Acquire ConvergeNet International | Gateway Drops AMD | Intel Delays Shipment of 820 Chipset | Flaw in Intel Xeon 550 Chips: Shipments Stopped | Sun to Make Solaris Source Code Available | Palm Tries to Take the Desktop in Hand | MainWin for Linux - NT Apps without NT | TurboLinux Clusters One More Step Taken | Cisco Tries to Cache In By Buying Software Start-Up Tasmania Networks | Intel Throws its "Red Hat" into Linux Ring | NEC Pulls Packard Bell PCs in US | Corel and PC Chips to Accelerate Mass Desktop Deployment of Linux | Gateway, Dell Plan Windows-free Appliances | Here Come the "Information Appliances" | Sony Picks Palm OS | Intel Invests in eSoft - "Lintel" Continues to Grow | AMD Athlon Debuts | EMC to Buy Data General | Compaq to Halt NT on Alpha Development | eMachines Considering Internet Appliance | Sun to "Community Source" Almost Everything | eMachines to Buy FreePC | Dell Jumps Into Internet PC Arena | Be Announces Software Licensing Agreement With Compaq | Acer to Jump on Internet Appliance Bandwagon | Sun's StarPortal Opens Its Gates Early | OS SmackDown! | What If They Shipped an OS and Nobody Came? | Presarios Freezing - and Not Because it's Winter | Intel's "New Best Friend" for Web Appliances is Linux | Compaq Buys a Chunk of Inacom - But Will It Help? | Gateway, Jilted by Intel, Kisses and Makes Up with AMD | Be to Be FreeB(i)e | HP Joins the Athlon Pile-On | Will Sun Burn Linux with "Free" Solaris? | HP says "When in Doubt, Buy It Out" for Server Appliances | Intel Chip Shortage Continuing | Embedded Linux for Handhelds | Linux Laptops from Dell | Come See the Softer Side of Linux? | Windows 2000: Paragon for Partisans, Skewered by Skeptics | Compaq Plans Direct Sales. DTja vu All Over Again? | Goodbye PCs, Hello Appliances? | Intel Tries to Give it Away - AMD Says "No Way" | Linux at 25% of Server OS Market - Is Redmond Hearing Footsteps? | Dell Uses its Muscle to Beat Side-Effects of Taiwan Quake | IBM to Make Cuts in PC Business Real Change, or Just Buying Time? | Micron to Push "Subscriber Computing" Rentals 'R' Us? | Compaq Partners with Red Hat in Linux Support Deal | Bristol Technology Ships Win-to-Lin Migration Tool | Compaq and Samsung in Deal to Save Alpha | Gateway Announces Server Appliances | Dell to Factory-Install Red Hat Linux on Servers | Windows 2000 Releases to Manufacturing - Finally | Catalyst International Ties Fate to SAP | Geac Computer Corporation: Mastering Growth by Acquisitions | Dell's High-End Rackmount Servers - Challenging Compaq's Wintel Dominance | Compaq's High-End Wintel-based Rack Servers - Working Hard to Stay #1 | Compaq's Alpha - Moving Toward Its Omega? | High-End Wintel-Based Rackmount Servers - The Big Get Bigger | IBM's Four-CPU Wintel-Based Rack Servers High Performance, High Cost | HP's Four-CPU Wintel-Based Rack Servers: Focusing on Reliability and Expandability | Dell's 8-CPU Intel Servers Increasing Its Enterprise Focus | Compaq's 8-CPU Intel Servers: the New "Big Iron" | Network Engines, Inc. - Double the CPUs for Web Serving | #2 Dell Tries Harder, Compaq Hurts | Server Appliances - "Caching" In on Internet's Growth |


Home  |   Careers  |   Contact Us  |   Glossary  |   Special Offers  |   Software Features & Functions  |   Software Selection Shortcuts  |   Feedback  |   Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy

©2012 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google