What Is Benchmarking?
Do you remember when you were in grammar school or high school, and at the end of every semester you received your "report card"? Some dreaded that day and some welcomed it! Either way, it was the method that the school used to tell us and our parents how well (or not so well) we were doing in our job of getting an education. The report card was really just a benchmarking report! Benchmarking, as defined by the dictionary, is "a standard against which something can be measured or assessed." But it is actually much more than the dictionary definition suggests.
All of us wonder how we are really performing: Are we doing a better job than others? Or are we not doing as well as others? Most importantly, are we doing the best we can be doing? It is a natural and proper question to ask, and the answer to the question is contained in our report card. And just like in school, that report card helped us to focus on what needed improvement. In school, however, we often had only five or six subjects that we were graded on. In our retail business, we can easily find hundreds of "subjects" that we can be graded on, but to try to measure all of these is not only impossible, but also very foolish.
Almost every category of retail today does some benchmarking, including the National Sporting Goods Association (NSGA), the National Jewelry Association (NJA), the National Shoe Retailers Association (NSRA), and many more. These associations recognize that giving their members benchmarks to strive for helps the entire industry. As independent retailers, we often do not have a large head office to set our objectives and plan our business. We are the head office! Benchmarking is like having a large corporation behind us: it gives us direction and helps us do what we need to do.
What Does Benchmarking Do?
Benchmarking simply means that we measure our performance against a standard. This standard can be almost anything, but it is much more meaningful if we measure our performance in relation to our peers, and to other stores of similar size and type. Benchmarking gives us a goal to achieve. It helps us focus our day-to-day work on the important things that can help our business. The key thing to remember is that the end product of benchmarking is happy and satisfied customers and staff.
Why Should I Do It?
The most compelling reason to benchmark our activities is that it will help us be better retailers. This will help us improve our customer service and our sales. We have an obligation to do as well as we can, so that the store does not just survive but thrives.
What Do I Benchmark?
So what benchmark measures should we consider? As we said, there are hundreds of choices available, but in reality there are only a handful that can make a real change in our business. Another thing to remember is that benchmarks are often not absolute numbers. For example, imagine if we told you that a good sales benchmark is $900,000. What would that tell you if you were operating a small store with only 800 square feet of selling space? It is almost impossible for a store that size to achieve sales of $900,000! A more realistic number for an 800-square-foot store would be sales of $400,000. So using the total sales number is really not a very good idea. A better way is to make the measure more fair is by using sales per square foot. This benchmark equalizes performance no matter what size the store is.
The best benchmarks to use for independent stores are the following:
- average transaction (AT)
- items per transaction (IPT)
- conversion rate (CR)
- sales per square foot (SPSF)
- inventory turnover (IT)
- sales per employee (SPE)
All of the above benchmarks (measures) are directly related to productivity—that is, our ability to do more with what we have. We have a saying in retail that "what gets measured gets done." If you're not aware of and measuring your store's productivity, then—surprise, surprise—it doesn't increase! For almost every store, the first thing we should focus on and improve is selling more of what we have, to the customers we already have. The first three productivity benchmarks mentioned above are the most powerful tools that we have in retailing: AT, IPT, and CR. The other three measures are also very critical, but they only make real sense when we look at them over a twelve-month period.
How Do I Start?
The first three measurements need to be looked at every day. Make your staff aware of the figures. Then, set goals and have employee contests to increase these figures. To calculate your AT, you simply take your total sales for the day (excluding sales tax), and divide the total sales dollars by the number of transactions. For example, if your sales for the day were $820 and you had 50 transactions, your AT would be $16.40 ($820 divided by 50).
To calculate IPT, take the total number of items sold for the day, and divide by the number of transactions. For example, if you sold 200 items and you had 50 transactions, your IPT would be 4 (200 divided by 50).
To calculate CR, take the total transactions for the day, and divide by the number of customers who entered the store. For example, if you had 50 transactions, and 300 customers entered the store, your CR would be 16.6 percent (50 divided by 300). CR tells us how many shoppers we turn into buyers. It can be tracked by installing a traffic counter at the door. The technology costs about $800 (USD) (http://www.storetraffic.com/), and pays for itself in approximately three months. Many stores tell me that their traffic is really down. I ask, "How do you know that? Is it down 10 percent, 20 percent, 30 percent?" Without a traffic counter, they don't really know.
With these three measurements in place, we can then measure our performance against a standard (benchmark). For example, a well-performing store should be increasing AT, IPT and CR every week. The important thing is not so much where you are today, but the fact that you are improving these numbers every week. If these numbers are not increasing, it may be due to lax staff, too many or not enough staff, the wrong merchandise mix, high pricing, poor category management, lack of advertising, signage, or the store's layout or location. Pinpointing the exact cause is not easy, but a low AT or IPT often signals that we are not suggestion-selling our customers, while low CR is often caused by not approaching customers properly, or by an incorrect mix of merchandise (out-of-stock for best sellers, or no-stock for key desired items).
The best way to increase AT and IPT is through suggestion, or what I often call "education selling." This happens when a sales associate engages the customer and determines what their real need is. For every customer, the need will be different. If we are not there to help them then why are we there? If we are just there to be self-serve stores, then we really do not need anyone in the store except for a cashier, as in a grocery store. Benchmarking AT and IPT allows us to measure how well our staff is really educating and serving our customers. If my staff are truly engaged with a customer, and fully understanding of their needs, then my AT and IPT will increase. These two benchmarks are invaluable in reminding every sales associate how important it is to fully engage and educate customers so that we can share our knowledge with them and make their purchases even better.
Suggestion selling has to be practiced all the time and become part of the culture (DNA) of the store. I suggest that owners pick up an item (when customers are not around) and ask their staff, "Give me five! Five additional items you would suggest to a customer who likes this item." It is only when we constantly practice it that it becomes second nature to know right away what will help our customer. This is not easy: there are so many items in our stores, and so many that can enhance others. Our sales associates have to be constantly practicing and learning in order to make this a reality in our store. It does not come easily, and will not happen through wishful thinking. Establishing the benchmarks of AT and IPT will focus each sales associate on each individual customer. It is powerful. And do not forget that "what gets rewarded gets done." Once I start to measure these two benchmarks, I have to reward my staff when they improve them. The most powerful reward of all is praise. Every time I hear one of my sales associates practicing suggestion or education selling, I need to tell that associate, "I just heard you helping that customer. I want you to know that you really made a difference in their life—what you just suggested to them will not only improve their performance, but it could also save them from an injury. You did a great thing, thank you!" This praise, immediately following a sale, will not only make your associates feel better about themselves, but it will also increase the likelihood that they will do it with every customer. Contests are also motivating, but do group contests. Tell all your staff that if we can get the AT up by $2 this week, everyone will get a gift certificate to a local restaurant, or you will make a donation to their favorite charity, or you will wash their cars in the parking lot! It does not have to be a big prize, just something that says "great job." Don't forget having contests and praise for IPT and CR too!
SPSF is the next benchmark that we need to examine. The formula to calculate this number is our total selling area (this is our total store, excluding the stock room, office, receiving room, and behind the cash register) divided into our total annual sales. For example, if our store has 800 square feet of selling area and our annual sales are $140,000, then $140,000 divided by 800 equals $175 per square foot. We always calculate this over the time frame of a year. What it measures is how productive we are in the space that we have. If the SPSF figures are too low, it tells us that we most likely have too much space: we are paying rent on that excess, as well as often filling it up with inventory, which is also expensive. Benchmarks for SPSF are relatively universal for stores. Consider that Wal-Mart has SPSF numbers in excess of $300. The rule of thumb is that for an independent sporting goods store, if your SPSF are less than $200, you have a problem; if they are between $200 and $300, you are moderately productive; $300 to $500 is very good; over $500 is outstanding; and in excess of $800, you probably need to move to a bigger store!
IT is the next benchmark, and like SPSF it is calculated on an annual basis. The formula for calculating this is to divide total annual sales by average inventory at retail value. For example, if your year's sales are $140,000 and your average inventory at retail value was $85,000 (calculated by adding each month's beginning inventory at retail value and the last month's ending inventory at retail value, and dividing by 13), then your IT would be $140,000 divided by $85,000, which equals 1.65 stock turns. Just like SPSF, there are industry standards for this measure. If your stock turns are less than 3, you are not being productive; from 3 to 5 turns is good performance; and over 5 turns, you are really doing a great job. Inventory turnover affects so many parts of our business. When turnover is low, we also often have cash flow problems, old and obsolete inventory, and not enough of what is selling. When turnover is higher, we have better cash flow (since we can pay our bills from what is selling), we always have new items to show our customers, and we use less space in the store. The best way to improve IT is to buy less! Ask yourself before you write an order, "How long will it take me to sell this?" Remember it is easy to write 48 on a purchase order, but it is often difficult to find 48 customers in a month that want that specific item. Try to just buy what you can sell in sixty days (thirty is even better).
The last benchmark that we will discuss is SPE. This measure tells us how productive we are with our people on an annual basis. This benchmark is completely internal, as it can vary widely from store to store. The formula for calculating this is to divide total annual sales by the number of full-time equivalent employees (FTEs). (FTEs are calculated by taking the entire number of hours worked by everyone in the store for a year, and dividing that number by 2,080). For example, if my annual sales were $180,000, and the total number of hours that everyone in the company worked that year was 6,200, then the FTE would equal 6,200 divided by 2,080, or 2.98, which I would then divide into $180,000. This would give me $60,402 as my SPE. What is important is not the absolute number, but rather that it increase each year. It is not a good thing if I add employees while my SPE are declining. Eventually I will go out of business if the decline continues. Have your accountant calculate it for the past five years, and see what your trend is.
How Can It Help Me?
Benchmarking can make a substantial difference in the way you operate your store. The first three measures we discussed can significantly increase your customer satisfaction and sales, while the other three can improve your operating results. The combination of all six will make you a better retailer!
About the Author
Jim Dion is founder and president of Dionco Inc., Chicago (US). He is an internationally known consultant, keynote speaker, trainer, author, and one of North America's leading experts on retail technology, retail selling and service, merchandising, operations, and consumer trends.
Dion has taught at Laurier University, Ryerson University, and the International Academy of Fashion Merchandising and Design in Chicago. He also authored the retail selling manual Retail Selling Ain't Brain Surgery, It's Twice As Hard. In addition, he co-authored Start and Run a Retail Business for Self-Council Press. He can be reached at jimdion@dionco.com.
AuraPortal: A BPM Vendor Worth Checking Out | Sage ERP and CRM Portfolio Update: Clarity at Last | When ERP and CRM Connect in the Cloud | (Forgotten) CRM and ERP Kingdoms in the Making? | The Customer Relationship Management Vision: It Starts with Relationships | Customer Data Integration: A Primer | Enterprise Resource Planning for Services: Has Software as a Service Become Service-oriented Architecture for Small to Medium Businesses? | Bolstering the Call Center with Service Resolution Management Processes | Using Demand to Modulate Consumer Packaged Goods Supply Networks | Rising Elephant Creates Euphoria: India's Growing Markets Are a Boon for SCM Vendors | One Vendor's Exploit of Marrying Infrastructure with Selling and Fulfillment Applications | Retailers, Consumers, and the Recession: Weathering the Storm | Advancing the Art of Pricing with Science | Welcome to the CRM Showdown:
Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs. NetSuite CRM+ | What's Holding Back Online Appointment Booking? |
How to Measure Customer Satisfaction | Front-office Lean—Taking Lean Manufacturing Beyond the Shop Floor | A Veteran Mid-market ERP Vendor with a Pragmatic Vision Chimes In | The Basics of Quote-to-order Systems | War Looms in the On-demand CRM Market (and Beyond)—But Will You Profit from It? | Customer Relationship Management Showdown: Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs. Oncontact CRM vs. SageCRM | A Lexicon for Customer Relationship Management Success | A Semi–open Source Vendor Discusses Market Trends | Quote-to-order: One Big, Lean Machine Adds High Tech to Its Mix | Quote-to-order: A Newcomer Causes a Stir in the Market | Quote-to-order: New Ingredients in the Recipe for Success | Blast Past Manufacturing Bottlenecks with Constraint-based Scheduling | Provider of B2B Price Management and Optimization Speaks Out | Retail Merchandising Showdown! Lawson Software vs. Epicor vs. Aldata Solution | Knowledge Management: The Core of Service Resolution Management | Integrating Customer Relationship Management and Service Resolution Management | Data Governance: Controlling Your Organization’s Mission-critical Information | The Complexities of Quote-to-order and Possible Solutions | Social Networks: How They're Turning CRM Upside Down | Case Study: Small Retail Chain Gears Up for Rapid Growth | The Seven Deadly Sins of Software Marketing | Customer Relationship Management: Evolution, Not Revolution | Applying the Power of Social Networks to Customer Relationship Management | Zooming into the Clothing Retailer Conundrum | No One Said Sourcing Overseas Would Be Easy | The Anatomy of Retail Sourcing Processes | The Promise (and Complexities) of Private Labels | Merchandising Showdown!
Lawson vs. Epicor/CRS vs. Aldata | The CMO–CIO Organizational Alignment Mandate | Recent Developments in One Price Management Provider's Business | How One Provider's Solution Covers the Bases of Price Optimization and Management | How One Vendor Parlays Price Variation into Profit Improvement Opportunities | What if Companies Could Use Science to Align Prices to Market and Maximize Margins? | A Dynamic Answer to Enterprise Resource Planning for Services | Customer Relationship Management and Social Networks—They're Related How, Again? | So What's the Bottom Line on Price Segmentation? | Business-to-business Price Segmentation—Outlined and Explained | Know Thy Market Segment's Price Response | How One On Demand Vendor Addresses Its Unique Challenges and Competition | On Demand Compensation Management Partnerships for Spiffed-up Success | The Compelling Capabilities of One Compensation Management Vendor's Solution | On Demand Delivery Compels a Compensation Management Vendor | Requirement Traceability—A Tester's Approach | Microsoft Dynamics AX 4.0 for Manufacturing Environments | Experiencing the Customer Experience: Listening to, Learning from, and Acting on the Voice of the Customer | Alice (or Allen) in MobileLand | Vendor Reservations, a Full-fledged SaaS ERP, and User Recommendations | Software as a Service's Functional Catch-up | Software as a Service: Not without Caveats | The Challenges of SAP Relationship and User Recommendations | Difficult Conversations: Discussing CRM with Your CEO
Part Two: Elements of the Discussion
| Difficult Conversations: Positioning Your CEO in a CRM Implementation
Part One: Sources of Misconception and Faulty Assumptions | Food and Beverage "Delights" | Customer Relationship Management and the Next Generation Network | Retail Applications Vendor Provides a Solid "Platform" | Success Keys for Proposal Automation | Seven Magic Questions: How to Improve Your Win Ratio by Selling Value Instead of Price | A New Customer Relationship Management Framework: Twenty-first Century Necessity, or Blowin' in the Wind? | Microsoft Retail Systems | A Customer Relationship Management Solution Aims To Cover all the Bases | Hosted versus On-premises Customer Relationship Management | CIO Horror Stories and What They Mean For Vendors | Is Your Store Customer-centric? | The Ghost in the Machine: Where Has Process Automation Left the Consumer? | Sales Force Automation, Customer Relationship Management, and Sales Training: A Fusion of Methodology and Technology | User Recommendations for Pricing Management | The Retail Battleground for Pricing Management | Applications Giants Bolster Their Pricing Management Capabilities | New Vendor Acquisition Strategies in the Enterprise Applications Field | Getting It Right: Product, Quality, Timing, and Price | Enterprise Resource Planning for Services, and Professional Services Automation: Where Do You Draw the Line? | Point of Sale: To Stand Alone or Not? | Web-enabled Sales Tactics | The Web-Enabled Sales Process | Major Vendors Adapting to User Requirements | Sales Force Performance | What Drives Profitability | Assessing the Drivers of Sales Performance | Software as a Service for Customer Relationship Management and Sales | Retail Systems: A Primer | Sales Is from Mars, Marketing Is from Venus | A Unique Product Lifecycle Management Tool for Private Label Retail | Integrating Customer Relationship Management through Software As A Service | Comparing On Demand Customer Relationship Management Service Alternatives | If There's One Thing CRM Tells Us: Don't Do PLM the Same Way | CRM Application Users Are Key to Project Success | The Market Impact of Two Powerhouses | What Do Users Want and Need? | Is 'Sage' Wiser And Better Than 'Best'? | Marquee Vendors Partner for Deepening Inherent CRM and BI Links | Why Are CRM and Analytics Intrinsically Connected? | When Customer Relationships Meets Business Intelligence Marketing Analysis and User Recommendations | SAS and Action-Oriented Business Processes: Alliances, Partnerships, and Acquisitions | SAS: Striving to Sustain Leadership | Customer Life Cycle Solutions: Strategic Alliances, Challenges, & User Recommendations | A Tectonic Shift in Communications Customer Life Cycle Management | Amdocs Overhauls Its Marketing | Merging Disparate IT Systems and Exploiting Multichannels | Challenging the Competition: Mega-mergers and Supply Chain Technology | One Product for Large and Small Manufacturers: Challenges and User Recommendations | When EDI Goes Native, Everything Falls in Sync with IQMS | Benefits of a Single Database Solution: Improved Enterprise Quality Management from IQMS | Solving Enterprise Problems: The Fully-integrated Solution of IQMS | Why Service Matters: Enterprise Solutions, Market Differentiation, and IQMS | IQMS Prospers by Helping Enterprises Work Smarter | Channels to the Hearts and Minds--On-line 2005 | Customer Relationship Management Strategies
Part Four: Strategies and Case Study | Customer Relationship Management Strategies
Part Three: Achieving and Maintaining the Competitive Edge | Customer Relationship Management Strategies
Part Two: Creating Your Strategy | Customer Relationship Management Strategies
Part One: Changing Your Approach | Do You Know What Are the "Unintended Consequences" of Your CRM Project? | Knowing Your Prospect's Influencers | CRM: Creating a Credible Business Case and Positioning It with the CEO
Part Two: Linking CRM with Organizational Direction | CRM: What Is It and Why Do It?
Part One: Historical Background | CRM, Success, and Best Practices: A Wake Up Call
Part Two: Modeling Success with Senior Management and CRM Culture | CRM, Success, and Best Practices: A Wake Up Call
Part One: Searching and Establishing the Business Parameters of CRM | SAP's Approach to the Retail Market | Lawson's Approach to the Retail Market | Maximizer Enterprise 8: A Strong Competitor on the SMB Front Line | The Best ACT! Is Still to Come | Interface Software Expands Its CRM Functionality | "Best" of the Three CRM Solutions | CRM ROI: Creating a Business Case | The Importance of Server Robustness in CRM | Instead of Discounting, Back Some Value Out of Your Proposal | Marketing Automation: Coming of Age Slowly | Can the Market Sustain a Stand-Alone EMM? | Technology Vendor--Can You Afford Credibility? | Data Quality: Cost or Profit? | What Does the Future Hold for PRM? | CDC Software Wins the Pivotal Auction. Now What?
Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | CDC Software Wins the Pivotal Auction. Now What?
Part Two: Market Impact | CDC Software Wins at the Pivotal Auction. Now What?
Part One: Event Summary | Comparison of ERP and CRM Markets' Life cycle Snapshots | Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP
Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP
Part 1: Tutorial | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains
Part Five: Deltek’s Major Product Lines | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains
Part 1: Product Announcements 2003 | PSA -- Still An Evolving Market | Generating Revenue from Service | Should Uniqueness Vouch For Marketing Automation Niche Players? | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority
Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority
Part Three: Market Impact Continued | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority
Part Two: Market Impact | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority | BPM Weaves Data And Processes Together For Real-time Revenues | Professional Services Are Catching-up With CRM | PowerTrieve, A LEAP For CRM? | Click Commerce Acquires Allegis | Who Alleges The PRM Market Consolidation? | What CRM Should Have Taught IT
(although not getting the message is not entirely IT's fault) | CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure
Part Two: Using A Knowledge Base To Reduce The Time, Risk And Cost Of A CRM Selection | CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure
Part One: The CRM Selection Challenge | When the Bigger Fish Eats the Smaller to Become a Bigger Fish | Xchange Adds To The List Of CRM Point Solutions' Casualties
Part Two: Market Impact & User Recommendations | Xchange Adds To The List Of CRM Point Solutions' Casualties | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond?
Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? | CRM: The Truth, The Whole Truth And Nothing But The Truth(For A Change) | The Case of A Boutique Vendor's Benefits of Focus - IRM Corporation | Why CRM Is So Hard and What To Do About It:
Data is key to making CRM work | CRM Analytics Brings More Profitability | CRM For Complex Manufacturers Revolves Around Configuration Software | How Supply Chain Projects Morph Into Black Holes | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard
Part 4: Other Vendors, CRM, SCP & User Recommendations | Microsoft Paints CRM Landscape On Lately A ‘Still Nature’ Business Applications Scenery
Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Microsoft Paints CRM Landscape On Lately A ‘Still Nature’ Business Applications Scenery | A CRM System Needs A Data Strategy | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software
Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch
Part 4: Challenges and User Recommendations | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch
Part 3: Target Markets, Alliances, & Competition | CRM and Technological Solutions: Be the Customer | SAP Keeps Traction On Some Tires Of Its Omni-Wheel-Drive
Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Keeps Traction On Some Tires Of Its Omni-Wheel-Drive
Part 1 | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops
Part 2: Market Impact | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops
Part 1: Recent Announcements | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion
Part 2: Market Impact | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion
Part 1: Recent Announcements | Microsoft Throws .NET At SMEs, With CRM As Bait | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally
Part 4: Challenges & User Recommendations | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally
Part 3: Market Impact | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally
Part 2: Alliances & Support | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally
Part 1: Recent Announcements | Gosh, They Kill Partnerships, Don't They? | J.D. Edwards' CEO Retires Again; This Time For Good? | Lawson Software Braves IPO And Reports Strongly Against The Odds | PSI AG To Become More Germane Globally Via Relevant Partnership | PipeChain Adds Pragmatism Onto Simplicity | Besieged By The CRM Throne Aspirants, King Siebel Delivers "The Magic No.7"
Part 2: Market Impact | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: PeopleSoft | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: Oracle | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 3: From R to Z | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 2: From J to Q | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 1: From A to I | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: J.D. Edwards | E-Business Customer Service Success at H.B. Fuller Company | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Procurement, and SCM Unite! A Series Study | Pure-Play CRM Vendors: Choose an Integrated or Best-of-Breed Solution? | CRM is Busting Out Of Its Britches: Operational, Analytical, and Collaborative CRM Are Born | CPR on BPR: Practical Guidelines for Successful Business Process Analysis | CPR on BPR: Long Live Business Process Reengineering
Part 1: A Primer | Nortel and Clarify: Was There Ever Synergy Enough to Support this Marriage? | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 2: The Implications | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 1: The News | Sagent Improves Its Image With SAS Partnership | Business Objects Teams With TopTier For Analytics | Wrong ERP Demise Predictions Have (Only Partly) Created Skills Shortage | Customer Relationship Management for IT Professionals | MicroStrategy Manages Your Customer Relationships And Its Own | PurchasePro Acquires Stratton Warren | eLoyalty Enhances Its Field Service And Logistics Services | NetGenesis Predicts The Future From Mouse Trails | SPSS Has A New ShowCase | Cognos Unveils CRM Solution | CRM Vendors Cash In On The Financial Services Industry | Onyx Thinks ASP Opportunities Are A Gem | Commerce One Selects Entrada Software For Affiliate Program | Will Oracle’s Freebie Shot Hurt (Or Only Graze) Siebel? | Broadbase Continues to Expand | Great Plains – An SME Market Leader, But At What Cost? | Great Plains ASP - Evolution, Revolution, Innovation | Siebel: Great Plans for Great Plains | IBM and Partners Load the Guns in Europe | IMI Sees Red In Dawn Of Fiscal 2001 | Ultimate Connection Seeking Its US Retail Connection Through Solomon Software Partners | Oracle Applications - An Internet-Reinvented Feisty Challenger | Interelate: More on Tap Than Apps | PeopleSoft 8 Launched – Anything to Write Home About? | Lipstream Speaks to Kana | IBM Nabs Another Application Vendor | Epicor Software Corp.: How Far From Being 'One-Stop' Shop? | Peregrine Polishes the Old In-Out-and-In-between | Mirapoint Launches Global Partner Program | Siebel Enters Smaller Markets in a Big Way | Baan Defectors – Is This Only Tip of an Iceberg? | Should PeopleSoft be Overly Happy? | SAP Gives in to CRM (Part Time) Matrimony | Oracle Corporation: Flying High for Being Jack-of-All-Trades and Master of Some | Lawson Software’s CRM and ASP Moves – Wise, Bold, Injudicious, Enforced, or Something Else? | Infinium Putting its Cards on the Table | Getting Strangers to Take Your Candy | Enlightened Self-interest Launches CRM Information Source | MATRAnet Converts Confusion to Cash | Intentia Attempts to Become ‘Lean and Mean’ | Vendors Begin to Round Out Their CRM Suites | Oracle Integrates Front and Back Office with Applications 11i | Key Product Delays Take a Toll on Oracle Users | Industri-Matematik Posts 2Q00 Loss But Sells CRM | SAP Finds CRM Partner for Marketing Tools | Is Baan Clinically Dead? | PeopleSoft Completes Acquisition of Vantive; Vantive CRM Applications Integrate with PeopleSoft and Other ERP Systems | PeopleSoft Recuperating Slowly, Hoping to Sink 1999 into Oblivion Quickly | Siebel Sees Farther on Shoulders of Giants | Sybase and MicroStrategy Team on Vertical Market Portal Applications | Oracle Loses Again | SAP Posts Solid Q499, but Warns of Q100 | Analysis of SAS Institute and IBM Intelligence Alliance | BAAN Announces "Open World": Business-To-Business Collaboration Over The Internet | Remedy Makes CRM a Personal Matter | eMachines to Buy FreePC | QAD Inc.: The Art of Vertical Focus | Great Plains: Strong Channel and Microsoft focus for Dynamic(s) Growth | Q: Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Billionaire? A: Baan -- Foster Care for Its Orphans Needed As Well |