Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments
R. Garland - August 23, 2001

CPR ON BPR: Long Live Business Process Reengineering

As mentioned in Part 1: A Primer, companies should never lead with technology when trying to solve business process problems. They should review their business goals and objectives, examine, and refine or replace business processes, and then, and only then, should they find the technology that matches their business goals, objectives, and processes, to support those processes. In this Part, we discuss some practical steps for actually performing business process analysis and fostering change in your company.

The Phased Approach 

I've practiced the art of BPR (Business Process Reengineering) in a phased approach, each with a set of deliverables, to show progress toward the ultimate goal of improving the customer experience, improving the daily work experience for your employees, increasing profits, or, preferably, all three.

  • In Phase 0, both the BPR consultants and upper management meet and get familiar with each other.

  • In Phase 1, the team building begins.

  • In Phase 2, data about how things currently exist and how processes are currently conducted are collected.

  • In Phase 3, you go through the re-design process, and document it.

  • In Phase 4, technology needs are considered, the team goes through the technology selection process. Both new processes and new technologies are implemented and rolled out to the company.

Phase 0: "Why is Change So Important?" 

Key upper management team members who will be supporting the change process meet with the consultants. This is the getting to know each other step. In this Phase, the consultants needs to discover the following about the company:

  • What industry are they in?

  • What are their key differentiators?

  • What is the corporate vision and corporate goals?

  • How is the company organizationally structured to deliver to that vision and those goals? What, if any, technology solutions are in place to support the delivery of the businesses' products or services?

  • How strong a need does upper management feel to change the way they do business? What do they see as "broken" that needs to be fixed?

The consultants also need to communicate some information, and establish that there is a real need for their work. They explain what reengineering is and isn't, and check the necessary conditions for their work; namely:

  • Is there real pain, either current or anticipated? What is the pain? Are sales suffering? Has the company lost market share? Is quality declining? Is morale in the company low? Are processes taking too long? Are customers unhappy? Most change is pain driven, and pain creates a readiness for change.

  • Will senior management be actively involved in the change process? This is crucial. "Indispensable" staff will feel threatened; departments will feel threatened. The very existence of an outside consulting force examining the company and pushing for change will induce fear and anxiety. Only the corporate leadership can deal with those who see it in their interest to resist change. An Advisory Group composed of senior management members will need to be established.

  • Is there a strategy for major change? When employees see a need for change, when they believe a credible strategy is in place to foster the change, when they know not only what sacrifices need to be made but also what they will get in its place, and when they know they can be part of the change process, they can be very supportive. Without it, they won't be.

Phase 1: "Getting Organized"  

"To mobilize, organize, energize, and inform the people who will perform reengineering."

Step 1: Secure executive team buy-in and their corporate communication

As mentioned above, this is critical. The executive team must not only buy in to the notion of change, but they must be the ones communicating the need for change, and the steps that will be taken toward change. Outside consultants, lacking initial credibility, can't do this.

Step 2: Who will be part of the effort?

Process Improvement Team (PIT).

  • A representative group of people who actually work in the process is essential. An information technology guru is needed. An outsider or "maverick" helps the team. This is usually a person who works in another area in the client organization. The maverick has the advantage of having no vested interest in the process and hence can be totally objective. The outside consultants often perform this role.

Step 3: How will the PIT be trained on BPR?

Acquaint the team with reengineering and the process. The consultants conduct formal training sessions to educate the PIT.

Step 4: How will the PIT be organized?

Start-up responsibilities include identifying subprocesses, determining where to start the reengineering process, developing challenge goals, and deciding which customers and employees to interview. A Project Champion will remove obstacles needs to be identified. Define project parameters regarding schedule, cost, and risk.

Phase 2: "Getting Data" 

Key Questions to be Answered:

  • What are our major business processes?

  • How do these processes interface with customer and supplier processes?

  • What are our strategic, value-adding processes?

  • Which processes should we reengineer within three months, six months, one year, and subsequently?

  • What organizations and jobs are involved in the processes? What pieces of work are done by each job?

  • What policies apply to the performance of the processes? In which piece of work does each policy apply?

  • What technology is used in the processes? In which piece of the work is the technology used?

Step 1: Identifying the Processes to Redesign

Consider the following characteristics in choosing which processes to redesign:

  • High customer requirement, but low performance (customers complain)

  • Some things just take too long

  • High cost of poor quality (errors, rework, mistakes, scrap)

  • The company throws people at the problem, but things don't get better

  • High internal frustration factor and low morale

  • Process spans several functions and there is finger pointing and blaming

  • Process is not being measured, high variability in output or results

  • Excessive information exchange, data redundancy, and re-keying of data

  • Inventory, buffers, and other assets sitting idle

  • High ratio of checking and control to value adding

  • Complexity, exceptions, and special cases

  • No one is responsible for the process

Step 2: Customer Interviews

Who are your customers?

The customers of the process are interviewed to discover what they think of the current process, what they like about it and what they do not like about it. External customers, internal suppliers, and internal staff members who work in the process but are not part of the Process Improvement Team are also interviewed to get their ideas, comments and suggestions.

Step 3: Internal "As Is" flowcharting

Map the current processes in detail. Document: time, cost of poor quality, and where frustration occurs. The bottlenecks, delays, areas of poor quality and high frustration are ranked and prioritized.

As-Is Flowchart 

At each step in the flowchart, ask team members to identify their level of frustration experienced (H = high; M = medium; L = low). Write a brief description of what the frustration is so that you can go back and specifically redesign out those areas that are most troublesome.

Advantages to doing As-Is Flowcharts:

  • People see the whole process, often for the first time

  • Problem areas become easily visible

  • People can vent about parts of the process that frustrate them

  • People begin to offer improvement ideas after frustrations and problems are identified.

  • The problems point to which process redesign principles are not being used

  • Creates a shared understanding

This phase produces definitions of customers and their performance expectations, processes, and performance measures; identifies value-adding processes; produces process maps, and; designates and orders the processes to reengineer.

Phase 3: "Getting Reengineered" 

Step 1: First-cut Redesigns

Done with a clean sheet of paper. Ask: "If we were to invent this process today with what we know, what would it look like?" Looking for "out-of-the-box" thinking and innovative ideas.

Ask these four questions about the things you are doing:

  • Is the customer willing to pay for this activity?

  • Does it add to the quality of our product or service?

  • Does it help us to respond faster to our customers?

  • Does it help us use our resources (people and inventory) more effectively?

Step 2: Share first-cuts with Customer

Gather actionable feedback for new designs.

Step 3: Create second-cut Redesigns

These are based on the feedback from Step 2.

Step 4: Share second-cuts with Advisory Group and Staff

If there are controversial elements or major capital outlays, the Advisory Group (from the Executive Committee) needs to review and approve the plan.

Share redesign with the rest of the people that work within the process to get their ideas, comments, and suggestions.

Step 5: Final Redesigns and Technology Considerations

Document the final redesigns, which should include considerations for the type of technology that will be needed to support the new processes.

Phase 4: Beyond BPR: Getting the Technology and Implementing the Plan 

With the new business objectives and processes in hand, and technology requirements documented, enter the technology selection process. Typically, by working with consultants who are using a product like TEC's TESS, the selection list can quickly be limited to two or three vendors that come fairly close to your ideal solution. The technological gaps between your needs and each of the two or three solutions is documented, and then the vendors are brought in and asked to run their software through your business process scenarios to give you both a general feel for the software, and a truer understanding of their software's ability to deliver against your needs. Be sure to consider such key factors as:

  • Vendor viability

  • Vendor's ability to implement, on time and within budget, what they demonstrate

  • Vendor's on-going support programs

  • Vendor's costs: Initial, maintenance fees, and support fees

Interview past customers to understand their happiness with the software, the implementation process, and their on-going experience with the vendor.

Remember: You'll be laying out a lot of money on both the software and the implementation and rollout of the software (usually in a ratio of about 1 to 2 or 1 to 3, software to implementation). Take your time and be thorough.

Later articles in this series will address the steps of Implementation, Change Management, and On-going Continuous Improvement.

Final Thoughts 

This all sounds painful and difficult. It is. Don't let anyone fool you. But often, process and technology changes become essential to not only the success but the very existence of companies as their competitors progress and improve rapidly. Undertake the work with determination and enthusiasm for the health of the company, and keep focused. This kind of work is always beyond the defined job descriptions of anyone in the company. Make this work a measurable (and rewarded) part of the participants' work, and document and publicize successes. Everyone will feel good about the changes.


 
comments powered by Disqus


A Portrait of the Enterprise Software User in the Education Industry | Sword Ciboodle—One More BPM-Centric CRM Provider | ABAS Business Software—One Mid-market ERP Vendor to Watch For | Reconnecting with a Tried-and-True Manufacturing ERP Vendor | The Lesser-Known (Social) Facts about Microsoft Dynamics CRM | Meet the New (Revolutionized) Progress Software | AuraPortal: A BPM Vendor Worth Checking Out | Deltek, We Hardly Knew Ye: New Deltek at Insight 2011 | PegaWorld 2011 Revisited | Sage ERP and CRM Portfolio Update: Clarity at Last | When ERP and CRM Connect in the Cloud | Perfect Orders: Improving Customer Satisfaction and Financial Results | Business Process Management in Free and Open Source: An Overview of the Demand and the Supply | (Forgotten) CRM and ERP Kingdoms in the Making? | The Customer Relationship Management Vision: It Starts with Relationships |
Customer Data Integration: A Primer | Enterprise Resource Planning for Services: Has Software as a Service Become Service-oriented Architecture for Small to Medium Businesses? | Bolstering the Call Center with Service Resolution Management Processes | Using Demand to Modulate Consumer Packaged Goods Supply Networks | One Vendor's Exploit of Marrying Infrastructure with Selling and Fulfillment Applications | Advancing the Art of Pricing with Science | Vendor Spotlight: Agresso | Welcome to the CRM Showdown: Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs. NetSuite CRM+ | What's Holding Back Online Appointment Booking? | How to Measure Customer Satisfaction | Front-office Lean—Taking Lean Manufacturing Beyond the Shop Floor | Application Giants in Duel and Duet for Users’ Hearts, Minds … and Wallets | A Veteran Mid-market ERP Vendor with a Pragmatic Vision Chimes In | The Basics of Quote-to-order Systems | War Looms in the On-demand CRM Market (and Beyond)—But Will You Profit from It? | Customer Relationship Management Showdown: Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs. Oncontact CRM vs. SageCRM | A Lexicon for Customer Relationship Management Success | A Semi–open Source Vendor Discusses Market Trends | Quote-to-order: One Big, Lean Machine Adds High Tech to Its Mix | Quote-to-order: A Newcomer Causes a Stir in the Market | Quote-to-order: New Ingredients in the Recipe for Success | Blast Past Manufacturing Bottlenecks with Constraint-based Scheduling | Provider of B2B Price Management and Optimization Speaks Out | Knowledge Management: The Core of Service Resolution Management | Integrating Customer Relationship Management and Service Resolution Management | Data Governance: Controlling Your Organization’s Mission-critical Information | The Complexities of Quote-to-order and Possible Solutions | Social Networks: How They're Turning CRM Upside Down | The Seven Deadly Sins of Software Marketing | Customer Relationship Management: Evolution, Not Revolution | Applying the Power of Social Networks to Customer Relationship Management | The CMO–CIO Organizational Alignment Mandate | Recent Developments in One Price Management Provider's Business | How One Provider's Solution Covers the Bases of Price Optimization and Management | How One Vendor Parlays Price Variation into Profit Improvement Opportunities | BPM Showdown! Oracle's Hyperion System 9 vs. OutlookSoft vs. Cartesis Suite | What if Companies Could Use Science to Align Prices to Market and Maximize Margins? | A Dynamic Answer to Enterprise Resource Planning for Services | Customer Relationship Management and Social Networks—They're Related How, Again? | So What's the Bottom Line on Price Segmentation? | Business-to-business Price Segmentation—Outlined and Explained | Know Thy Market Segment's Price Response | How One On Demand Vendor Addresses Its Unique Challenges and Competition | On Demand Compensation Management Partnerships for Spiffed-up Success | The Compelling Capabilities of One Compensation Management Vendor's Solution | On Demand Delivery Compels a Compensation Management Vendor | Requirement Traceability—A Tester's Approach | Microsoft Dynamics AX 4.0 for Manufacturing Environments | Experiencing the Customer Experience: Listening to, Learning from, and Acting on the Voice of the Customer | Alice (or Allen) in MobileLand | Vendor Reservations, a Full-fledged SaaS ERP, and User Recommendations | Software as a Service's Functional Catch-up | Software as a Service: Not without Caveats | SOA From a Management Perspective: Part Two | SOA From a Management Perspective: Part One | The Challenges of SAP Relationship and User Recommendations | Difficult Conversations: Discussing CRM with Your CEO Part Two: Elements of the Discussion | Difficult Conversations: Positioning Your CEO in a CRM Implementation Part One: Sources of Misconception and Faulty Assumptions | Customer Relationship Management and the Next Generation Network | Delivering Adaptive Discovery for Business Process Management | Business Process Analysis versus Business Process Management | Success Keys for Proposal Automation | Seven Magic Questions: How to Improve Your Win Ratio by Selling Value Instead of Price | A New Customer Relationship Management Framework: Twenty-first Century Necessity, or Blowin' in the Wind? | Microsoft Retail Systems | A Customer Relationship Management Solution Aims To Cover all the Bases | Hosted versus On-premises Customer Relationship Management | CIO Horror Stories and What They Mean For Vendors | Benchmarking: How Am I Really Performing? | Is Your Store Customer-centric? | The Ghost in the Machine: Where Has Process Automation Left the Consumer? | Sales Force Automation, Customer Relationship Management, and Sales Training: A Fusion of Methodology and Technology | User Recommendations for Pricing Management | The Retail Battleground for Pricing Management | Applications Giants Bolster Their Pricing Management Capabilities | New Vendor Acquisition Strategies in the Enterprise Applications Field | Getting It Right: Product, Quality, Timing, and Price | Enterprise Resource Planning for Services, and Professional Services Automation: Where Do You Draw the Line? | Vision Software Brings a Solid Business Process Management Solution to the Table | Web-enabled Sales Tactics | The Web-Enabled Sales Process | Major Vendors Adapting to User Requirements | Acquisition Changes Product Lifecycle Management Landscape | Sales Force Performance | What Drives Profitability | Assessing the Drivers of Sales Performance | Software as a Service for Customer Relationship Management and Sales | How Is Business Process Management Applicable to Financial Services? | Integrating Customer Relationship Management through Software As A Service | Comparing On Demand Customer Relationship Management Service Alternatives | If There's One Thing CRM Tells Us: Don't Do PLM the Same Way | CRM Application Users Are Key to Project Success | The Market Impact of Two Powerhouses | What Do Users Want and Need? | Is 'Sage' Wiser And Better Than 'Best'? | Marquee Vendors Partner for Deepening Inherent CRM and BI Links | Why Are CRM and Analytics Intrinsically Connected? | When Customer Relationships Meets Business Intelligence Marketing Analysis and User Recommendations | SAS and Action-Oriented Business Processes: Alliances, Partnerships, and Acquisitions | SAS: Striving to Sustain Leadership | Customer Life Cycle Solutions: Strategic Alliances, Challenges, & User Recommendations | A Tectonic Shift in Communications Customer Life Cycle Management | Amdocs Overhauls Its Marketing | Business Process Management: How to Orchestrate Your Business | One Product for Large and Small Manufacturers: Challenges and User Recommendations | When EDI Goes Native, Everything Falls in Sync with IQMS | Benefits of a Single Database Solution: Improved Enterprise Quality Management from IQMS | Solving Enterprise Problems: The Fully-integrated Solution of IQMS | Why Service Matters: Enterprise Solutions, Market Differentiation, and IQMS | IQMS Prospers by Helping Enterprises Work Smarter | Channels to the Hearts and Minds--On-line 2005 | How to Avoid Becoming Another CMMS Implementation Failure Statistic | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part Four: Strategies and Case Study | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part Three: Achieving and Maintaining the Competitive Edge | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part Two: Creating Your Strategy | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part One: Changing Your Approach | Do You Know What Are the "Unintended Consequences" of Your CRM Project? | Knowing Your Prospect's Influencers | Mainstream Enterprise Vendors Begin to Grasp Content Management Part Three: Challenges | CRM: Creating a Credible Business Case and Positioning It with the CEO Part Two: Linking CRM with Organizational Direction | CRM: What Is It and Why Do It? Part One: Historical Background | CRM, Success, and Best Practices: A Wake Up Call Part Two: Modeling Success with Senior Management and CRM Culture | CRM, Success, and Best Practices: A Wake Up Call Part One: Searching and Establishing the Business Parameters of CRM | SAP's Approach to the Retail Market | The Many Flavors of Application Software Outsourcing | Maximizer Enterprise 8: A Strong Competitor on the SMB Front Line | Positioning Starts With A Message Strategy | Microsoft Business Network (MBN)--Coming of Age? Part Three: Challenges and Competition | Microsoft Business Network (MBN)--Coming of Age? Part Two: Market Impact | Microsoft Business Network (MBN)--Coming of Age? Part One: Event Summary | The Best ACT! Is Still to Come | Interface Software Expands Its CRM Functionality | "Best" of the Three CRM Solutions | Electronic Product Code (EPC): A Key to RFID | Business Strategy, Business Processes, and Business Systems | CRM ROI: Creating a Business Case | Mid-market Getting the Taste of Some Emerging Technologies | Service Chain Information will Transform the Total Chain | The Importance of Server Robustness in CRM | Instead of Discounting, Back Some Value Out of Your Proposal | Leveraging Technology to Maintain a Competitive Edge During Tough Economic Times -- A Panel Discussion Analyzed Part Two: Business Process Modeling | Marketing Automation: Coming of Age Slowly | Can the Market Sustain a Stand-Alone EMM? | Integrating All Information Assets Part Two: Why is integration an issue? | Technology Vendor--Can You Afford Credibility? | High Performance Organizations Are Driven by the Power of Enterprise Business Events | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Six: Looking to the Future | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Four: Another Step in ERP Evolution | GXS Acquires HAHT Commerce for More Synchronized Retail B2B Data Part Two: HAHT Commerce | Data Quality: Cost or Profit? | What Does the Future Hold for PRM? | CDC Software Wins the Pivotal Auction. Now What? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | CDC Software Wins the Pivotal Auction. Now What? Part Two: Market Impact | CDC Software Wins at the Pivotal Auction. Now What? Part One: Event Summary | Comparison of ERP and CRM Markets' Life cycle Snapshots | Outsourcing 101 - A Primer Part Two: Outsourcing Categories | Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP Part 1: Tutorial | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part Five: Deltek’s Major Product Lines | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part 1: Product Announcements 2003 | The Many Faces of PLM Part Two: The Future of the PLM Suite | PSA -- Still An Evolving Market | Financial Reporting, Planning, and Budgeting As Necessary Pieces of EPM Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Financial Reporting, Planning, and Budgeting As Necessary Pieces of EPM Part One: Executive Summary | The Hidden Gems of the Enterprise Application Space Part Two: Sorting and Selecting SRM Software | Evaluating Enterprise Software-Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Three: Knowledge Bases and User Recommendations | Evaluating Enterprise Software - Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Two | Evaluating Enterprise Software - Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? | Audit Considerations for Enterprise Software Implementations Part 1: Project Planning and Management | The Power of One | Generating Revenue from Service | Should Uniqueness Vouch For Marketing Automation Niche Players? | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Three: Market Impact Continued | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Two: Market Impact | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority | BPM Weaves Data And Processes Together For Real-time Revenues | Professional Services Are Catching-up With CRM | PowerTrieve, A LEAP For CRM? | Click Commerce Acquires Allegis | Who Alleges The PRM Market Consolidation? | What CRM Should Have Taught IT (although not getting the message is not entirely IT's fault) | CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure Part Two: Using A Knowledge Base To Reduce The Time, Risk And Cost Of A CRM Selection | CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure Part One: The CRM Selection Challenge | When the Bigger Fish Eats the Smaller to Become a Bigger Fish | Xchange Adds To The List Of CRM Point Solutions' Casualties Part Two: Market Impact & User Recommendations | Xchange Adds To The List Of CRM Point Solutions' Casualties | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? | What's Wrong With Application Software? Business Processes Cross Application Boundaries | CRM: The Truth, The Whole Truth And Nothing But The Truth(For A Change) | The Case of A Boutique Vendor's Benefits of Focus - IRM Corporation | Why CRM Is So Hard and What To Do About It: Data is key to making CRM work | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in ProcessPart 3: Process PLM Requirements | CRM Analytics Brings More Profitability | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in Process Part 1 Proven in Discrete, Ready to Blossom in Process | CRM For Complex Manufacturers Revolves Around Configuration Software | 6 Immediate Business Improvements Offered by an Online SRM System | How Supply Chain Projects Morph Into Black Holes | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 2: Market Impact | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 4: Other Vendors, CRM, SCP & User Recommendations | Microsoft Paints CRM Landscape On Lately A ‘Still Nature’ Business Applications Scenery Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Microsoft Paints CRM Landscape On Lately A ‘Still Nature’ Business Applications Scenery | A CRM System Needs A Data Strategy | Integration is the Name of the Game in Software Systems | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 2: Implementation Key Success Factors | Should E-Business Be Inside or Outside of IT? | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 4: Challenges and User Recommendations | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 3: Target Markets, Alliances, & Competition | CRM and Technological Solutions: Be the Customer | SAP Keeps Traction On Some Tires Of Its Omni-Wheel-Drive Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Keeps Traction On Some Tires Of Its Omni-Wheel-Drive Part 1 | Anatomy of a Technology Selection | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 2: Market Impact | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 1: Recent Announcements | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 2: Market Impact | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 1: Recent Announcements | Microsoft Throws .NET At SMEs, With CRM As Bait | IPSec VPNs for Extranets: Not what you want to wake up next to | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 4: Challenges & User Recommendations | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 3: Market Impact | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 2: Alliances & Support | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 1: Recent Announcements | Gosh, They Kill Partnerships, Don't They? | J.D. Edwards' CEO Retires Again; This Time For Good? | User-Focused Design Principles Shape the Customer Experience | Lawson Software Braves IPO And Reports Strongly Against The Odds | PSI AG To Become More Germane Globally Via Relevant Partnership | PipeChain Adds Pragmatism Onto Simplicity | Besieged By The CRM Throne Aspirants, King Siebel Delivers "The Magic No.7" Part 2: Market Impact | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 3: Challenges & User Recommendations | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 2: Market Impact | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: PeopleSoft | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: Oracle | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 3: From R to Z | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 2: From J to Q | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 1: From A to I | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: J.D. Edwards | E-Business Customer Service Success at H.B. Fuller Company | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Procurement, and SCM Unite! A Series Study | Pure-Play CRM Vendors: Choose an Integrated or Best-of-Breed Solution? | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 2: ERP Key Success Factors | CRM is Busting Out Of Its Britches: Operational, Analytical, and Collaborative CRM Are Born | CPR on BPR: Long Live Business Process Reengineering Part 1: A Primer | Nortel and Clarify: Was There Ever Synergy Enough to Support this Marriage? | NavisionDamgaard Reverts To Navision, But In Name Only | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 2: The Implications | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 1: The News | Lawson Asserts Itself, Draws A Bead On Bigger Players | Formation Systems Pioneers Product Design Collaboration For The Process Industries | Sagent Improves Its Image With SAS Partnership | Business Objects Teams With TopTier For Analytics | Wrong ERP Demise Predictions Have (Only Partly) Created Skills Shortage | Customer Relationship Management for IT Professionals | Essential ERP - Its Functional Scope | Implementation Acceleration Using Integration | MicroStrategy Manages Your Customer Relationships And Its Own | PurchasePro Acquires Stratton Warren | eLoyalty Enhances Its Field Service And Logistics Services | NetGenesis Predicts The Future From Mouse Trails | SPSS Has A New ShowCase | E-Procurement Is Not Electronic Purchasing - Part II | Cognos Unveils CRM Solution | CRM Vendors Cash In On The Financial Services Industry | Onyx Thinks ASP Opportunities Are A Gem | Commerce One Selects Entrada Software For Affiliate Program | Will Oracle’s Freebie Shot Hurt (Or Only Graze) Siebel? | Broadbase Continues to Expand | Great Plains – An SME Market Leader, But At What Cost? | Great Plains ASP - Evolution, Revolution, Innovation | Siebel: Great Plans for Great Plains | IBM and Partners Load the Guns in Europe | IMI Sees Red In Dawn Of Fiscal 2001 | Ultimate Connection Seeking Its US Retail Connection Through Solomon Software Partners | Oracle Applications - An Internet-Reinvented Feisty Challenger | Interelate: More on Tap Than Apps | PeopleSoft 8 Launched – Anything to Write Home About? | Lipstream Speaks to Kana | IBM Nabs Another Application Vendor | Epicor Software Corp.: How Far From Being 'One-Stop' Shop? | Peregrine Polishes the Old In-Out-and-In-between | Mirapoint Launches Global Partner Program | Siebel Enters Smaller Markets in a Big Way | Baan Defectors – Is This Only Tip of an Iceberg? | Making Sure Your Service Provider Doesn't Fall Down on the Job | To BEA or Not to BEA: Is That the Question? | EAI Vendor Active Software Activates Transactions | Should PeopleSoft be Overly Happy? | SAP Gives in to CRM (Part Time) Matrimony | E&Y+ASP=BSP: It’s Not Algebra, But It Adds Up To Something Big | Oracle Corporation: Flying High for Being Jack-of-All-Trades and Master of Some | Lawson Software’s CRM and ASP Moves – Wise, Bold, Injudicious, Enforced, or Something Else? | EAI Vendor Extricity Teams with Moai to Automate E-Commerce Systems | Infinium Putting its Cards on the Table | Getting Strangers to Take Your Candy | Enlightened Self-interest Launches CRM Information Source | Essential ERP – Current Market Trends – Part II | Getting Beyond the Development Stage | ERP Demand Being Re-heated | MATRAnet Converts Confusion to Cash | Intentia Attempts to Become ‘Lean and Mean’ | Vendors Begin to Round Out Their CRM Suites | Oracle Integrates Front and Back Office with Applications 11i | Key Product Delays Take a Toll on Oracle Users | Industri-Matematik Posts 2Q00 Loss But Sells CRM | SAP Finds CRM Partner for Marketing Tools | Is Baan Clinically Dead? | PeopleSoft Completes Acquisition of Vantive; Vantive CRM Applications Integrate with PeopleSoft and Other ERP Systems | PeopleSoft Recuperating Slowly, Hoping to Sink 1999 into Oblivion Quickly | Siebel Sees Farther on Shoulders of Giants | Sybase and MicroStrategy Team on Vertical Market Portal Applications | Oracle Loses Again | SAP Posts Solid Q499, but Warns of Q100 | Analysis of SAS Institute and IBM Intelligence Alliance | BAAN Announces "Open World": Business-To-Business Collaboration Over The Internet | Remedy Makes CRM a Personal Matter | eMachines to Buy FreePC | JBA: Will it remain "@ctive Enterprise"? | QAD Inc.: The Art of Vertical Focus | Great Plains: Strong Channel and Microsoft focus for Dynamic(s) Growth | Getting Strategic Planning and Financial Planning in the Same Bailiwick | Q: Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Billionaire? A: Baan -- Foster Care for Its Orphans Needed As Well |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google