Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

The Situation

The software needs of the complex manufacturing industry require functional products bundled with rapid implementation resulting in quick Return-on-Investment (ROI). Complex manufacturers produce products that are of high variation, have complex features and options, and vary in end-user configuration. They consequently invest significant dollars in product design and have lengthy sales and manufacturing business processes, often requiring collaboration between the customer, sales representatives, and critical back-office experts.

These systems must facilitate the real-time transfer of information and complex product knowledge for collaboration across the extended enterprise, and should especially be suited to organizations that seek to maintain complex selling relationships, such as businesses whose sales functions rely on channel partnerships or a distributed sales force. To that end, a manual process that took anywhere from a day to several days should now be accomplished in about one minute with the appropriate use of technology.

This technology should provide the "intelligence" required to support the mass customization of products and services at the point of sale (POS). By providing intuitive rule creation and maintenance in an enterprise environment, companies could quickly and cost-effectively capture critical sales, engineering, and manufacturing knowledge for deployment across sales channels. When products or services present customers with a complex set of choices, or where product components and pricing elements are subject to rapid change, requiring sales teams to have access to up-to-date configuration and pricing information, a CRM solution for complex manufacturers comes into the picture to enable sales people and partners to establish smart sales processes worldwide.

With an "e-product" companies with complex products and services could capture and distribute critical sale and product configuration knowledge across all sales channels. It could support direct and indirect sales channels. It could also feature a comprehensive interactive selling system for both networked and mobile users. Each sales agent could organize customer, product, pricing, and external information so that it is immediately accessible by anyone involved in the sales opportunity.

The Market

Despite current seemingly never-ending difficult economic times, the growth of contract manufacturing has still continued. This expansion has been fueled by a number of factors, among them the advent and a wide adoption of the Internet and consequent rise of e-commerce, as well as the trend in manufacturing toward mass customization, all resulting with pleasing the customer and significantly reducing all elements of the lead time, but without serious sacrifices of the manufacturer. Further, while the commercial complex manufacturing industry may also suffer nowadays owing to the painful recession, it is quite the opposite case in the defense and other government-related industries, partly in light of possible confrontation with rogue countries abroad. Many enterprise applications vendors have spotted the opportunity and have lately been scrambling to address the exacting requirements of the project-based complex industries.

As already indicated, complex manufacturers, such as, e.g., aerospace & defense (A&D), high-tech or electronic manufacturers, must handle complex production processes and large, complex supplier networks. Sophisticated customer interactions (e.g., order/contract definition and management applications) are required, while customer service needs are also oriented toward hands-on contract management and cost reporting. Frequent changes force contract supplier engineers and OEM engineers to be in a constant collaborative communication throughout the design and production cycle of the unit. One of the most manual functions in a supplier organization have traditionally been the sell-side Request for Quote (RFQ) management, which usually revolves around a few key expert individuals that have direct knowledge of the product or who can manually pull together the diverse information sources into a unified document, as contract proposals include quotations, pricing, detailed product information, data sheets, and CAD drawings.

On the other hand, in almost all industrial manufacturing segments, the pressure to reduce lead times has become a constant and ever-expanding concern. Depending on product complexity, some parts/sub-assemblies might be quoted immediately, while others have to be highly specified. Developing a contract proposal requires many levels of checking and re-checking customer process requirements and facilities capabilities, as well as preliminary design work and sourcing of specific components or materials. The process typically goes through much iteration every time the customer uncovers a new requirement or constraint. The labor-intensive nature of this process has often resulted in lengthy estimating cycles, which have in turn often translated to lost business opportunities.

By harnessing an enabling technology to make everybody work smarter rather than harder, complex manufacturers could e.g., reduce the time it takes to create contract estimates so that the same number of people could generate more proposals faster and thereby handle more sales opportunities without expanding staff. The combination of outsourced manufacturing with increasingly common configure-to-order (CTO) or build-to-order (BTO) production environments is further making unit-level data management an increasingly high priority for contract manufacturers and the companies that retain them.

Winning enterprise applications will demonstrate deep industry functionality and tight integration with best-of-bread bolt-on' products in a particular vertical. Software that combines industry-specific functionality with the flexibility to accommodate each company's unique processes goes a long way toward improving the functional fit and the speed of implementation, with accompanying quick ROI. This also means adding sector-specific, fine-grained front-office capabilities such as billing for utility companies or, the provision of customer communication solutions and services, centered on the lifecycle of customer interaction, including pre-sales, ordering, fulfillment, servicing, and up-selling situations, outside of the conventional realm of an ERP system.

While the pure CRM suite vendors, particularly Interactive Selling Systems providers (e.g., Selectica, FirePond, Trilogy, Calico, Access Commerce, Pivotal, etc.) that offer some combination of CRM, Guided Selling, and Product Configuration capabilities as subsets of Order Management, have lately been re-architecting their offerings as to easily link to disparate back-office systems, several of the major ERP players have lately increased their CRM market presence mainly through the acquisition of former CRM application vendors, including Baan's acquisition of Aurum, PeopleSoft's acquisition of Vantive and J.D. Edwards' acquisition of YOUCentric (see PeopleSoft Buys CRM specialist Vantive for $433 Million and J.D. Edwards Fires Siebel, Hires YOU). In addition, Oracle, SAP, Cincom Systems and Intentia, to name only some, have painstakingly gradually introduced their own CRM application suites, which have been increasingly attaining the full-fledged CRM product statuses. With a possible exception of Cincom that has deep roots in complex manufacturing, the focus of these ERP vendors has, however, so far primarily been on providing contact and opportunity management and after-sale customer service/call center applications along with their traditional ERP offering.

Applications for customer interaction to satisfy to order' requirements have also been increasingly pursued lately, though, as very recently, mid-October, illustrated in J.D. Edwards' release of Advanced Order Configurator (AOC), the newest addition to the company's CRM product line, intended to accelerate the made-to-order (MTO) product purchase process. AOC reportedly offers automated catalog translation, compatibility with AutoCAD products, and a point-and-click Rules Manager, to provide sales representatives and customers the ability to visualize different variations of a product in real time. Additionally, AOC should enable users to review and verify product configurations from remote desktops and laptops, or via the Internet or direct enterprise network connections. The product will supposedly operate either as an independent application, or, more logically, integrated with its ERP siblings, J.D. Edwards ERP 8.0 or OneWorld Xe.

Product Configurators Are Key

From the above, one should be able to glean the high-level requirements for modern product configurators, which have become the pivotal enabling technology for simplifying complex ETO operations in the direction of mass customization, providing the ability to more easily configure individualized products and services at the point of sale with integration to back-office systems. Providing customers with exactly what they want is not exactly a new concept, but the idea of giving the customer ever expanding range of choices as early as possible has become the center of many various industries' customer-oriented activities, given that getting an accurate, customized product to the customer more quickly fosters competitiveness.

To that end, configurators strengthen the business of customer care by streamlining and accelerating the entire sales process, as well as by deploying uniform and accurate information at the point of sale. Since they facilitate the process of figuring out what customers want, they are becoming central in many traditional selling environments, as well as in e-commerce applications, since they can also be deployed over multiple channels, such as the Internet, and in LANs (local area networks), on desktop computers, or on laptops for sales personnel on the road.

While pundits have been debating whether the configuration software deserves to be a CRM module on its own, it is certainly a part of the much broader CRM class of products, which typically includes front-office applications for sales force automation (SFA), marketing automation, and field service/call center management.

In general, product configurators are software tools that streamline order entry process by asking the customer to select from a set of predefined options associated with a generic product line, and then apply predefined rules with constraints to correctly configure the particular end product. The configurator then populates the attributes of the newly configured end item (called the variant product), tests for any conflicts, and generates the variant product with appropriate bill of material (BOM), routing, and pricing based on preconceived rules and calculations.

As product configurators have evolved to include even more sales, marketing, and financial functions tangential to the product per se (e.g., pricing, cost analysis, sales commissions, available-to-promise (ATP), order status, etc.), the term "sales configurator" has increasingly been used to reflect their expanded role, as it may more accurately describe their extended role as tools that assist salespeople with not only building viable products, but performing related tasks, such as proposal and quote generation.

Common ROI goals for implementing a sales configurator include reduced lead times and unit cost, and eliminating manual intervention and errors in the order cycle, while the chasm between the front office (sales force) and back office (engineering or manufacturing), as a frequently cited business issue, is also prevented. That role is now being extended even further as configurators become linked with ERP, product lifecycle management (PLM), and other enterprise systems.

Any sound CRM strategy revolves around clear communication with the customer -- knowing what the customer wants, when he/she wants it, and what price is acceptable to both parties. In addition, configurators are crucial to sell-side of business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-consumer (B2C) eBusiness applications because they can be the foundation to self-service applications resident on a Web site and available for use by potential customers.

Summary

As a summary, the most common benefits complex manufacturers should be able to achieve by integrating configurators with their enterprise applications would be:

  • Product and/or parts reduction -- By discerning which items are being configured together, organizations can decrease inventory and remove slow-moving and non-standard items or parts from inventory, and should only stock items in high demand. Without a configurator, manufacturers would have to create an awful number of customized products straight from stock in anticipation of potential demand, which has become prohibitively impractical, while with a configurator, enterprises can have many components and raw materials identified, pre-assembled, and ready for the final assembly.

  • Efficient sales and operations planning (SOP) -- Provided integration of the configurator with other CRM and ERP applications, an organization can discern in real time the upcoming exact configurations and create more accurate forecasts and final assembly scheduling (FAS) from this data.

  • Product lifecycle management (PLM) information management -- The format/information of the product can be synchronized/unified across all disparate systems from back-end supply chain, field service, engineering and production floor to front-end sales configuration. This provides faster time-to-market capabilities given less need for training of sales force. Knowledge management might be the most important asset of the value chain, and the way it is captured and packaged must be understandable to everyone.

  • Sales process simplification and acceleration through guided interactive selling Configurators help customers navigate the complexities involved in the sales process by allowing them to understand the range of available solutions, explore alternative options, and finally configure the most suitable one. Thus, salespeople no longer need to task themselves with being intimately familiar with the complexities of option-rich product families, since all the knowledge can be contained within the software allowing sales personnel to focus rather on other aspects of customer care (e.g., cross-selling).

  • Error elimination and productivity increase -- Configurators should preempt errors by confirming that the quoted variant is a valid configuration and no wrong parts have been put together. The earlier one can preempt errors, the more it saves the company money all the way through the life cycle of the product. The configurator offers the advantage of offering the same, invariable product and/or service knowledge every time, as opposed to sending out an army of different sales representatives with varying degrees of product/service knowledge. This reduction of errors translates into big savings for a company due to product errors in the form of returns, service calls, warranty, rework, and scrap, as well as lost customers.

  • Improved market intelligence -- By integrating the configurator with marketing analysis data mining tools, an organization can better understand what drives customer decision making, as well as what the customers' preference from an option standpoint. There is also the ability to discover market patterns, customer profiling and product association, as well as pricing and product discount differentiation based on geography, customer and volume, all creating opportunities for up-selling and cross-selling. Support for the acquisition and retention of profitable customers through a personalized approach to campaign management and through blending of inbound and outbound interactions - capabilities that enable organizations to support targeted marketing campaigns and pursue up-sell opportunities.

To meet customer requirements, and fully reap return-on-investment (ROI), front-office applications must be integrated to back-end enterprise processes. This integration, plus the availability of Web-based CRM suites, has allowed many to-order' manufacturers to obtain immediate response on quotations, proposals, configurations, pricing, and in some cases, even on delivery dates. The market has long realized that CRM systems not only require integration with ERP systems to reconcile data such as customer master data, but also the bigger issue of integrated inter- and intra-enterprise business processes. For make-to-order (MTO) and ETO products, the overall process starts with capturing customer requirements at the front end that can be dynamically converted into work orders, routings, and other procedures via product configuration engines.

Furthermore, configurators increasingly are required to provide a direct link with shop floor execution to, for example, add or change an operation, change the work center where the operation is performed, change the run rate on that operation, and change the set-up time, and they also need to produce special instructions or comments on the work order, sales order, or invoice.

Caution

On a more general note, while choosing the right enabling technology is crucial, a great deal of pain remains in solving many softer', people-related issues. Because a configurator touches many aspects of the business, all affected departments should be involved in the selection of the configurator and its capabilities. When a configurator is used on a high-volume Web site, a due diligence should be conducted to ensure the configurator engine and its environment are able to handle high transaction volumes (e.g., dozen thousands of customers online all configuring their items simultaneously). Product scalability issues should be assessed early on in evaluating a configurator solution, since subsequent problems may not be easily overcome at time of deployment.

Difficulties with configurator system maintenance appear to be the most troubling issue within dynamic environments with frequent products and parts change, frequent marketing campaigns and new products introductions (NPIs). To stay current a timely transfer of such data into the configurator is critical. But such high volume changes often make the manual input of the updated information into the system imposible.

Often, configurator maintenance is too difficult for domain experts, such as marketing and engineering personnel, to grasp. Therefore, it should be a concerted effort of many different domains of expertise, since, if the expert cannot input the proper knowledge into the configurator, it becomes a futile piece of software. Even worse, a configurator that cannot be kept in sync with a changing business environment can actually be a detriment to the business rather than a benefit. Exposing this information from back-office systems to the POS configurator must be done in a way that minimizes data redundancy and supports easy maintenance as product lines and options change over time.

It is also important that the configurator tool have sufficient expression capabilities to represent the problem and solve it. Often, the use of simple and convenient graphical tools goes a long way to facilitate configurator maintenance. Even if the company manages to motivate its staff to share knowledge, the endeavor will fail if the technology behind it cumbersome and not user-frendly.

Users also need to keep in mind that not many configurator and interactive selling systems are useful in all areas of the manufacturing business, which impairs their overall effectiveness in a holistic customer facing initiative. The major challenge is the seamless conveying of information to-and-fro engineering and production environments, once one gets past the interactive guided sales experience and has successfully configured order as a result. In general, most ERP systems with native product configuration functionality do not address the above-depicted intricate needs of the front office, whereas pure CRM solutions do not yet grasp integration issues to the back office.


 
comments powered by Disqus


A Portrait of the Enterprise Software User in the Education Industry | Sword Ciboodle—One More BPM-Centric CRM Provider | ABAS Business Software—One Mid-market ERP Vendor to Watch For | Reconnecting with a Tried-and-True Manufacturing ERP Vendor | The Lesser-Known (Social) Facts about Microsoft Dynamics CRM | Meet the New (Revolutionized) Progress Software | AuraPortal: A BPM Vendor Worth Checking Out | Deltek, We Hardly Knew Ye: New Deltek at Insight 2011 | PegaWorld 2011 Revisited | Sage ERP and CRM Portfolio Update: Clarity at Last | When ERP and CRM Connect in the Cloud | Perfect Orders: Improving Customer Satisfaction and Financial Results | Business Process Management in Free and Open Source: An Overview of the Demand and the Supply | (Forgotten) CRM and ERP Kingdoms in the Making? | The Customer Relationship Management Vision: It Starts with Relationships |
Customer Data Integration: A Primer | Enterprise Resource Planning for Services: Has Software as a Service Become Service-oriented Architecture for Small to Medium Businesses? | Bolstering the Call Center with Service Resolution Management Processes | Using Demand to Modulate Consumer Packaged Goods Supply Networks | One Vendor's Exploit of Marrying Infrastructure with Selling and Fulfillment Applications | Advancing the Art of Pricing with Science | Vendor Spotlight: Agresso | Welcome to the CRM Showdown: Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs. NetSuite CRM+ | What's Holding Back Online Appointment Booking? | How to Measure Customer Satisfaction | Front-office Lean—Taking Lean Manufacturing Beyond the Shop Floor | Application Giants in Duel and Duet for Users’ Hearts, Minds … and Wallets | A Veteran Mid-market ERP Vendor with a Pragmatic Vision Chimes In | The Basics of Quote-to-order Systems | War Looms in the On-demand CRM Market (and Beyond)—But Will You Profit from It? | Customer Relationship Management Showdown: Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs. Oncontact CRM vs. SageCRM | A Lexicon for Customer Relationship Management Success | A Semi–open Source Vendor Discusses Market Trends | Quote-to-order: One Big, Lean Machine Adds High Tech to Its Mix | Quote-to-order: A Newcomer Causes a Stir in the Market | Quote-to-order: New Ingredients in the Recipe for Success | Blast Past Manufacturing Bottlenecks with Constraint-based Scheduling | Provider of B2B Price Management and Optimization Speaks Out | Knowledge Management: The Core of Service Resolution Management | Integrating Customer Relationship Management and Service Resolution Management | Data Governance: Controlling Your Organization’s Mission-critical Information | The Complexities of Quote-to-order and Possible Solutions | Social Networks: How They're Turning CRM Upside Down | The Seven Deadly Sins of Software Marketing | Customer Relationship Management: Evolution, Not Revolution | Applying the Power of Social Networks to Customer Relationship Management | The CMO–CIO Organizational Alignment Mandate | Recent Developments in One Price Management Provider's Business | How One Provider's Solution Covers the Bases of Price Optimization and Management | How One Vendor Parlays Price Variation into Profit Improvement Opportunities | BPM Showdown! Oracle's Hyperion System 9 vs. OutlookSoft vs. Cartesis Suite | What if Companies Could Use Science to Align Prices to Market and Maximize Margins? | A Dynamic Answer to Enterprise Resource Planning for Services | Customer Relationship Management and Social Networks—They're Related How, Again? | So What's the Bottom Line on Price Segmentation? | Business-to-business Price Segmentation—Outlined and Explained | Know Thy Market Segment's Price Response | How One On Demand Vendor Addresses Its Unique Challenges and Competition | On Demand Compensation Management Partnerships for Spiffed-up Success | The Compelling Capabilities of One Compensation Management Vendor's Solution | On Demand Delivery Compels a Compensation Management Vendor | Requirement Traceability—A Tester's Approach | Microsoft Dynamics AX 4.0 for Manufacturing Environments | Experiencing the Customer Experience: Listening to, Learning from, and Acting on the Voice of the Customer | Alice (or Allen) in MobileLand | Vendor Reservations, a Full-fledged SaaS ERP, and User Recommendations | Software as a Service's Functional Catch-up | Software as a Service: Not without Caveats | SOA From a Management Perspective: Part Two | SOA From a Management Perspective: Part One | The Challenges of SAP Relationship and User Recommendations | Difficult Conversations: Discussing CRM with Your CEO Part Two: Elements of the Discussion | Difficult Conversations: Positioning Your CEO in a CRM Implementation Part One: Sources of Misconception and Faulty Assumptions | Customer Relationship Management and the Next Generation Network | Delivering Adaptive Discovery for Business Process Management | Business Process Analysis versus Business Process Management | Success Keys for Proposal Automation | Seven Magic Questions: How to Improve Your Win Ratio by Selling Value Instead of Price | A New Customer Relationship Management Framework: Twenty-first Century Necessity, or Blowin' in the Wind? | Microsoft Retail Systems | A Customer Relationship Management Solution Aims To Cover all the Bases | Hosted versus On-premises Customer Relationship Management | CIO Horror Stories and What They Mean For Vendors | Benchmarking: How Am I Really Performing? | Is Your Store Customer-centric? | The Ghost in the Machine: Where Has Process Automation Left the Consumer? | Sales Force Automation, Customer Relationship Management, and Sales Training: A Fusion of Methodology and Technology | User Recommendations for Pricing Management | The Retail Battleground for Pricing Management | Applications Giants Bolster Their Pricing Management Capabilities | New Vendor Acquisition Strategies in the Enterprise Applications Field | Getting It Right: Product, Quality, Timing, and Price | Enterprise Resource Planning for Services, and Professional Services Automation: Where Do You Draw the Line? | Vision Software Brings a Solid Business Process Management Solution to the Table | Web-enabled Sales Tactics | The Web-Enabled Sales Process | Major Vendors Adapting to User Requirements | Acquisition Changes Product Lifecycle Management Landscape | Sales Force Performance | What Drives Profitability | Assessing the Drivers of Sales Performance | Software as a Service for Customer Relationship Management and Sales | How Is Business Process Management Applicable to Financial Services? | Integrating Customer Relationship Management through Software As A Service | Comparing On Demand Customer Relationship Management Service Alternatives | If There's One Thing CRM Tells Us: Don't Do PLM the Same Way | CRM Application Users Are Key to Project Success | The Market Impact of Two Powerhouses | What Do Users Want and Need? | Is 'Sage' Wiser And Better Than 'Best'? | Marquee Vendors Partner for Deepening Inherent CRM and BI Links | Why Are CRM and Analytics Intrinsically Connected? | When Customer Relationships Meets Business Intelligence Marketing Analysis and User Recommendations | SAS and Action-Oriented Business Processes: Alliances, Partnerships, and Acquisitions | SAS: Striving to Sustain Leadership | Customer Life Cycle Solutions: Strategic Alliances, Challenges, & User Recommendations | A Tectonic Shift in Communications Customer Life Cycle Management | Amdocs Overhauls Its Marketing | Business Process Management: How to Orchestrate Your Business | One Product for Large and Small Manufacturers: Challenges and User Recommendations | When EDI Goes Native, Everything Falls in Sync with IQMS | Benefits of a Single Database Solution: Improved Enterprise Quality Management from IQMS | Solving Enterprise Problems: The Fully-integrated Solution of IQMS | Why Service Matters: Enterprise Solutions, Market Differentiation, and IQMS | IQMS Prospers by Helping Enterprises Work Smarter | Channels to the Hearts and Minds--On-line 2005 | How to Avoid Becoming Another CMMS Implementation Failure Statistic | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part Four: Strategies and Case Study | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part Three: Achieving and Maintaining the Competitive Edge | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part Two: Creating Your Strategy | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part One: Changing Your Approach | Do You Know What Are the "Unintended Consequences" of Your CRM Project? | Knowing Your Prospect's Influencers | Mainstream Enterprise Vendors Begin to Grasp Content Management Part Three: Challenges | CRM: Creating a Credible Business Case and Positioning It with the CEO Part Two: Linking CRM with Organizational Direction | CRM: What Is It and Why Do It? Part One: Historical Background | CRM, Success, and Best Practices: A Wake Up Call Part Two: Modeling Success with Senior Management and CRM Culture | CRM, Success, and Best Practices: A Wake Up Call Part One: Searching and Establishing the Business Parameters of CRM | SAP's Approach to the Retail Market | The Many Flavors of Application Software Outsourcing | Maximizer Enterprise 8: A Strong Competitor on the SMB Front Line | Positioning Starts With A Message Strategy | Microsoft Business Network (MBN)--Coming of Age? Part Three: Challenges and Competition | Microsoft Business Network (MBN)--Coming of Age? Part Two: Market Impact | Microsoft Business Network (MBN)--Coming of Age? Part One: Event Summary | The Best ACT! Is Still to Come | Interface Software Expands Its CRM Functionality | "Best" of the Three CRM Solutions | Electronic Product Code (EPC): A Key to RFID | Business Strategy, Business Processes, and Business Systems | CRM ROI: Creating a Business Case | Mid-market Getting the Taste of Some Emerging Technologies | Service Chain Information will Transform the Total Chain | The Importance of Server Robustness in CRM | Instead of Discounting, Back Some Value Out of Your Proposal | Leveraging Technology to Maintain a Competitive Edge During Tough Economic Times -- A Panel Discussion Analyzed Part Two: Business Process Modeling | Marketing Automation: Coming of Age Slowly | Can the Market Sustain a Stand-Alone EMM? | Integrating All Information Assets Part Two: Why is integration an issue? | Technology Vendor--Can You Afford Credibility? | High Performance Organizations Are Driven by the Power of Enterprise Business Events | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Six: Looking to the Future | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Four: Another Step in ERP Evolution | GXS Acquires HAHT Commerce for More Synchronized Retail B2B Data Part Two: HAHT Commerce | Data Quality: Cost or Profit? | What Does the Future Hold for PRM? | CDC Software Wins the Pivotal Auction. Now What? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | CDC Software Wins the Pivotal Auction. Now What? Part Two: Market Impact | CDC Software Wins at the Pivotal Auction. Now What? Part One: Event Summary | Comparison of ERP and CRM Markets' Life cycle Snapshots | Outsourcing 101 - A Primer Part Two: Outsourcing Categories | Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP Part 1: Tutorial | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part Five: Deltek’s Major Product Lines | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part 1: Product Announcements 2003 | The Many Faces of PLM Part Two: The Future of the PLM Suite | PSA -- Still An Evolving Market | Financial Reporting, Planning, and Budgeting As Necessary Pieces of EPM Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Financial Reporting, Planning, and Budgeting As Necessary Pieces of EPM Part One: Executive Summary | The Hidden Gems of the Enterprise Application Space Part Two: Sorting and Selecting SRM Software | Evaluating Enterprise Software-Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Three: Knowledge Bases and User Recommendations | Evaluating Enterprise Software - Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Two | Evaluating Enterprise Software - Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? | Audit Considerations for Enterprise Software Implementations Part 1: Project Planning and Management | The Power of One | Generating Revenue from Service | Should Uniqueness Vouch For Marketing Automation Niche Players? | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Three: Market Impact Continued | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Two: Market Impact | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority | BPM Weaves Data And Processes Together For Real-time Revenues | Professional Services Are Catching-up With CRM | PowerTrieve, A LEAP For CRM? | Click Commerce Acquires Allegis | Who Alleges The PRM Market Consolidation? | What CRM Should Have Taught IT (although not getting the message is not entirely IT's fault) | CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure Part Two: Using A Knowledge Base To Reduce The Time, Risk And Cost Of A CRM Selection | CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure Part One: The CRM Selection Challenge | When the Bigger Fish Eats the Smaller to Become a Bigger Fish | Xchange Adds To The List Of CRM Point Solutions' Casualties Part Two: Market Impact & User Recommendations | Xchange Adds To The List Of CRM Point Solutions' Casualties | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? | What's Wrong With Application Software? Business Processes Cross Application Boundaries | CRM: The Truth, The Whole Truth And Nothing But The Truth(For A Change) | The Case of A Boutique Vendor's Benefits of Focus - IRM Corporation | Why CRM Is So Hard and What To Do About It: Data is key to making CRM work | Should You Modify an Application Product? | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in ProcessPart 3: Process PLM Requirements | CRM Analytics Brings More Profitability | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in Process Part 1 Proven in Discrete, Ready to Blossom in Process | 6 Immediate Business Improvements Offered by an Online SRM System | How Supply Chain Projects Morph Into Black Holes | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 2: Market Impact | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 4: Other Vendors, CRM, SCP & User Recommendations | Microsoft Paints CRM Landscape On Lately A ‘Still Nature’ Business Applications Scenery Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Microsoft Paints CRM Landscape On Lately A ‘Still Nature’ Business Applications Scenery | A CRM System Needs A Data Strategy | Integration is the Name of the Game in Software Systems | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 2: Implementation Key Success Factors | Should E-Business Be Inside or Outside of IT? | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 4: Challenges and User Recommendations | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 3: Target Markets, Alliances, & Competition | CRM and Technological Solutions: Be the Customer | Development of an Internet Payment Processing System | SAP Keeps Traction On Some Tires Of Its Omni-Wheel-Drive Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Keeps Traction On Some Tires Of Its Omni-Wheel-Drive Part 1 | Anatomy of a Technology Selection | Inventory Reduction: Effectively Turning Excess Into Cash | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 2: Market Impact | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 1: Recent Announcements | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 2: Market Impact | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 1: Recent Announcements | Microsoft Throws .NET At SMEs, With CRM As Bait | Facing A Selection? Try A Knowledge-Based Matchmaker Part 4: User Recommendations | Facing A Selection? Try A Knowledge-Based Matchmaker Part 3: Comparing Three ERP Vendors | Facing A Selection? Try A Knowledge-Based Matchmaker Part 2: A Timesaving Solution | Programs, Processes and Practices: Planning Implementations and Evaluating Systems | IPSec VPNs for Extranets: Not what you want to wake up next to | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 4: Challenges & User Recommendations | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 3: Market Impact | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 2: Alliances & Support | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 1: Recent Announcements | Gosh, They Kill Partnerships, Don't They? | J.D. Edwards' CEO Retires Again; This Time For Good? | User-Focused Design Principles Shape the Customer Experience | Lawson Software Braves IPO And Reports Strongly Against The Odds | PSI AG To Become More Germane Globally Via Relevant Partnership | PipeChain Adds Pragmatism Onto Simplicity | Besieged By The CRM Throne Aspirants, King Siebel Delivers "The Magic No.7" Part 2: Market Impact | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 3: Challenges & User Recommendations | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 2: Market Impact | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: PeopleSoft | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: Oracle | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 3: From R to Z | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 2: From J to Q | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 1: From A to I | E-Business Sell Side Success at H.B. Fuller | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: J.D. Edwards | E-Business Customer Service Success at H.B. Fuller Company | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Procurement, and SCM Unite! A Series Study | E-business Buy Side Success at H.B. Fuller | Pure-Play CRM Vendors: Choose an Integrated or Best-of-Breed Solution? | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 2: ERP Key Success Factors | CRM is Busting Out Of Its Britches: Operational, Analytical, and Collaborative CRM Are Born | CPR on BPR: Practical Guidelines for Successful Business Process Analysis | CPR on BPR: Long Live Business Process Reengineering Part 1: A Primer | SCT and G-Log Form Alliance For Collaborative Logistics in the Process Industries | Nortel and Clarify: Was There Ever Synergy Enough to Support this Marriage? | Identifying the ROI of a Software Application for Supply Chain Management Part 4: Just Give Us the Bottom Line | Identifying the ROI of a Software Application for SCM Part 3: Performing the Data Analysis | Identifying the ROI of a Software Application for SCM Part 2: We Are Looking for the Vendor To Tell Us | Identifying the ROI of a Software Application for SCM Part 1: We Need To Know Now | NavisionDamgaard Reverts To Navision, But In Name Only | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 2: The Implications | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 1: The News | ecFood Approaches Profitability - An Internet Trading Exchange Bright Spot | Lawson Asserts Itself, Draws A Bead On Bigger Players | Analyst / SCT Share Vision at SCT User Conference | How Great Is Great Plains' Manufacturing Offering (Did Somebody Say Microsoft)? | SCT Corporation Means (e)Business For Process Manufacturing | Formation Systems Pioneers Product Design Collaboration For The Process Industries | Sagent Improves Its Image With SAS Partnership | Business Objects Teams With TopTier For Analytics | Wrong ERP Demise Predictions Have (Only Partly) Created Skills Shortage | Customer Relationship Management for IT Professionals | Essential ERP - Its Functional Scope | Implementation Acceleration Using Integration | MicroStrategy Manages Your Customer Relationships And Its Own | Process ERP Market Loses PRISM and Protean | PurchasePro Acquires Stratton Warren | eLoyalty Enhances Its Field Service And Logistics Services | NetGenesis Predicts The Future From Mouse Trails | SPSS Has A New ShowCase | E-Procurement Is Not Electronic Purchasing - Part II | Cognos Unveils CRM Solution | CRM Vendors Cash In On The Financial Services Industry | Onyx Thinks ASP Opportunities Are A Gem | Commerce One Selects Entrada Software For Affiliate Program | Will Oracle’s Freebie Shot Hurt (Or Only Graze) Siebel? | Broadbase Continues to Expand | Great Plains – An SME Market Leader, But At What Cost? | Great Plains ASP - Evolution, Revolution, Innovation | Siebel: Great Plans for Great Plains | IBM and Partners Load the Guns in Europe | IMI Sees Red In Dawn Of Fiscal 2001 | Ultimate Connection Seeking Its US Retail Connection Through Solomon Software Partners | Oracle Applications - An Internet-Reinvented Feisty Challenger | Interelate: More on Tap Than Apps | Mortice Kern Systems Goes Vertical (Sky, that is) | PeopleSoft 8 Launched – Anything to Write Home About? | Lipstream Speaks to Kana | Merant Goes South on the Stock Market | IBM Nabs Another Application Vendor | Epicor Software Corp.: How Far From Being 'One-Stop' Shop? | Peregrine Polishes the Old In-Out-and-In-between | Mirapoint Launches Global Partner Program | Siebel Enters Smaller Markets in a Big Way | Baan Defectors – Is This Only Tip of an Iceberg? | Making Sure Your Service Provider Doesn't Fall Down on the Job | To BEA or Not to BEA: Is That the Question? | Inflation’s Demise: The Impact on Business Informa | EAI Vendor Active Software Activates Transactions | Should PeopleSoft be Overly Happy? | SAP Gives in to CRM (Part Time) Matrimony | E&Y+ASP=BSP: It’s Not Algebra, But It Adds Up To Something Big | Oracle Corporation: Flying High for Being Jack-of-All-Trades and Master of Some | Lawson Software’s CRM and ASP Moves – Wise, Bold, Injudicious, Enforced, or Something Else? | Who’s Got the Better Windows Office Suite? Corel or Microsoft? | EAI Vendor Extricity Teams with Moai to Automate E-Commerce Systems | Infinium Putting its Cards on the Table | Getting Strangers to Take Your Candy | Enlightened Self-interest Launches CRM Information Source | Essential ERP – Current Market Trends – Part II | Getting Beyond the Development Stage | Driving the Change Agenda through a Low Overhead Program Office | ERP Demand Being Re-heated | Microsoft Office 2000 SR-1 Adds Dysfunction to the Windows Family | MATRAnet Converts Confusion to Cash | Intentia Attempts to Become ‘Lean and Mean’ | Vendors Begin to Round Out Their CRM Suites | Oracle Integrates Front and Back Office with Applications 11i | Key Product Delays Take a Toll on Oracle Users | Industri-Matematik Posts 2Q00 Loss But Sells CRM | SAP Finds CRM Partner for Marketing Tools | Is Baan Clinically Dead? | PeopleSoft Completes Acquisition of Vantive; Vantive CRM Applications Integrate with PeopleSoft and Other ERP Systems | Great Plains Reports Financial Results for the Second Quarter | PeopleSoft Recuperating Slowly, Hoping to Sink 1999 into Oblivion Quickly | Siebel Sees Farther on Shoulders of Giants | Sybase and MicroStrategy Team on Vertical Market Portal Applications | Oracle Loses Again | SAP Posts Solid Q499, but Warns of Q100 | Analysis of SAS Institute and IBM Intelligence Alliance | BAAN Announces "Open World": Business-To-Business Collaboration Over The Internet | Remedy Makes CRM a Personal Matter | eMachines to Buy FreePC | JBA: Will it remain "@ctive Enterprise"? | QAD Inc.: The Art of Vertical Focus | Great Plains: Strong Channel and Microsoft focus for Dynamic(s) Growth | Getting Strategic Planning and Financial Planning in the Same Bailiwick | Q: Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Billionaire? A: Baan -- Foster Care for Its Orphans Needed As Well |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google