Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

Company Issue   

H.B. Fuller (www.hbfuller.com) provides adhesive products to a variety of price sensitive markets. To stay competitive, they must continually innovate and cut costs. Because procurement represented a major expense, the company saw the need for smarter, sleeker procurement. They sought a way to increase the effectiveness of their procurement people and procedures while addressing administrative cost.

Company Problem   

Like many traditional manufacturing companies, H.B. Fuller was still using many manual and time consuming procurement processes in a digital world. Given the volume of transactions with suppliers, 20,000 purchases orders per year for direct goods, there were tremendous inefficiencies associated with faxing, paper forms, re-keying, as well as opportunities for errors.

Cutting a purchase order at H.B. Fuller North America, like at most other large companies, has typically involved many steps and numerous "hand-offs." However, because the process tends to be spread across so many people and departments throughout the enterprise, it is very difficult to understand the "fully loaded" cost of this frequent and mundane task. Typically, the true cost is underestimated. Industry averages peg the cost at between $100-$200 per purchase order. For H.B Fuller, it has been estimated that Fuller's cost per purchase order was in the range of $150.

Eliminating cost was not the only objective. James Jorde, H.B. Fuller Materials Management Manager stated, "The less time we spend pushing paper around, the more time we can think strategically about how to buy smart."

Solution   

Today, H.B. Fuller is leveraging a Private Supplier Extranet with a number of its key suppliers. H.B. Fuller first generates a purchase order in its ERP system (PRISM), where it is then "translated" and sent to the Extranet. The supplier is automatically notified of the PO via email, and then goes to the Extranet to retrieve it. Later phases will feature functionality that "pushes" the PO to the supplier and, eventually, functionality that enables the supplier to have visibility into H.B. Fuller's demand patterns to enable the supplier to produce to those forecasts on a Just-in-Time basis (vendor managed inventory). The Extranet is intended to be an interim step, prior to the ERP-to-ERP transactions to be enabled by its e-business supplier, Stratyc (www.stratyc.com).

Work is underway to define and build a direct connection from H.B. Fuller's ERP system into the backend system of one of its major suppliers as a first step to H.B. Fuller's plan to migrate most if not all of its suppliers to electronic transactions. The objective is that by the end of the year the majority of spend transactions will be in the form of ERP-to-ERP transactions. H.B. Fuller's expectations are that this will result in streamlined operations, lower costs, and fewer errors. The end result for both H.B. Fuller and its suppliers will be better information, shorter turnaround time, less manual processing, decreased holding costs and lower processing costs. The ultimate end result will be improved customer service levels, and a stronger relationship between the trading partners.

Value   

H.B. Fuller processes more than 20,000 purchase orders for direct goods each year, at an estimated fully loaded cost of $150 per. The company estimates that online procurement using the supplier extranet will eliminate at least 35% of today's tasks from the process, resulting in tremendous savings in both time and cost.

Later, when H.B. Fuller has achieved Vendor Managed Inventory, it is projected that the time spent processing purchase orders will decrease by 65%. In addition to significant savings for both H.B. Fuller and its suppliers, it will also result in a more strategic use of personnel time.

Online transactions reduce manual processing for the supplier, giving H.B. Fuller additional leverage for pricing discounts. It is estimated (conservatively) that this could result in a 3% discount on at least 10% of its purchases, translating to large overall savings potential on its single most significant expense item, directly impacting the bottom line.

H.B. Fuller's buy-side e-business applications went live in the first quarter of 2001 with payback anticipated after only 5 months. This payback period assumed a gradual supplier adoption over time. As of the summer of 2001, supplier adoption rate is on target relative to dollar volume, and this metric is doubling every month. After the initial payback period, every Purchase Order processed represents a net savings versus the previous method, translating to bottom line profit.

Future planned projects such as vendor-managed inventory (VMI) will result in added efficiencies and more strategic decisions. Fuller is committed to transforming how it does business, and recognizes that its success in this endeavor will depend on how quickly it can begin transacting online with its suppliers. This effort will be an ongoing process, but one that will have tremendous and quantifiable positive impact on bottom line results.

Lessons Learned   

Payback for an e-business project is dependent on how quickly trading partners (in this case, suppliers) are willing and/or able to adopt the new business processes and technology. To improve the success of such programs and speed return-on-investment, companies need to put in place specific programs aimed at gaining rapid adoption. The focus of these programs should be the joint savings potential that can be enjoyed by both parties. For buy side activities, working through the vendor's sales force is important, though not adequate. A program specifically targeting the VP of sales within the supplier organization is required for buy-in and timely cooperation.

The move to buy-side e-business requires investments in internal and external procedures as well as software. If H.B. Fuller had not revised internal procedures and worked with its suppliers to alter their procedures, the benefits could not have been realized.

Full integration to the ERP is key to success. Much of the benefit experienced by H.B. Fuller is the direct result of the full integration between the e-business applications and the back-end ERP system. Accurate, real-time information is able to flow via the Internet, between the ERP system and to the suppliers, for improved turnaround time and immediate issue resolution. Furthermore, it leverages the significant time and expense invested in the ERP system by allowing the data housed within to be "pushed outward" to those who need it, when they need it. As is the case for many ERP systems today, H.B. Fuller's system (PRISM)-though installed less than a decade ago- was ill-equipped to handle the new demands of e-business. Companies are then faced with the decision of scrapping the ERP and taking a large write-off, or retrofitting it for eBusiness with tools specifically designed to integrate with the ERP system ( see The "OLD ERP" Dilemma: Replace or Add-on ).

As with any project, the selection of the technology provider is key. H.B. Fuller believes the key factors of this decision include finding a supplier with knowledge of your industry and ERP systems, to ensure the solution is tailored to your specific business needs and is done right the first time. In the case of H.B. Fuller, because its technology provider (Stratyc) knew its industry and had expertise with PRISM, the solution they gained featured full integration to their existing ERP system, eliminating the need to replace it or build the integration themselves. The net result was a robust eBusiness solution, fully integrated with PRISM, in a fraction of the time it would have taken to build it in-house. There was also the added bonus of a faster ROI.

About the Author   

Olin Thompson is a frequent contributor to TEC on the subject of the Process Industry. He has over 25 years experience as an executive in the software industry with the last 17 in process industry related ERP, SCP, and e-business related segments.He can be reached at Olin@ProcessERP.com.


 
comments powered by Disqus


Web-based Solution Steps Out for Cohesive Retailer Sourcing | A Well-designed Solution for Sourcing: Its Technological Foundation and How It Works | How to Avoid Becoming Another CMMS Implementation Failure Statistic | JDA Portfolio: For The Retail Industry Part Two: JDA Portfolio 2004.1 Components | Service Chain Information will Transform the Total Chain | ERP Systems and the ETO Manufacturing Market Part Two: ETO versus Repetitive Differences | Software Evaluation, Selection, and Procurement Part Two: Recommendations for Improvement | Software Evaluation, Selection, and Procurement | Should You Modify an Application Product? | Epicor Picks Clarus' Bargain At The Software Flea Market | CRM For Complex Manufacturers Revolves Around Configuration Software | 6 Immediate Business Improvements Offered by an Online SRM System: Part 3: Other Points to Consider | Through Knowledge Base Technology Selections Deliver Value | CRM and Technological Solutions: Be the Customer | Development of an Internet Payment Processing System |
Inventory Reduction: Effectively Turning Excess Into Cash | Not all SCM Products Are Created Equal | Facing A Selection? Try A Knowledge-Based Matchmaker Part 4: User Recommendations | Facing A Selection? Try A Knowledge-Based Matchmaker Part 3: Comparing Three ERP Vendors | Facing A Selection? Try A Knowledge-Based Matchmaker Part 2: A Timesaving Solution | Programs, Processes and Practices: Planning Implementations and Evaluating Systems | SSA GT Beefs Up BPCS V8 Through Partnerships' Spree Part 2: Market Impact | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Aging Gracefully With The ‘New Kids On The Block’ | E-Business Sell Side Success at H.B. Fuller | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Procurement, and SCM Unite! A Series Study | CRM is Busting Out Of Its Britches: Operational, Analytical, and Collaborative CRM Are Born | Microsoft Great Plains Procures eProcure At Last | SCT and G-Log Form Alliance For Collaborative Logistics in the Process Industries | Identifying the ROI of a Software Application for Supply Chain Management Part 4: Just Give Us the Bottom Line | Identifying the ROI of a Software Application for SCM Part 3: Performing the Data Analysis | Identifying the ROI of a Software Application for SCM Part 2: We Are Looking for the Vendor To Tell Us | Identifying the ROI of a Software Application for SCM Part 1: We Need To Know Now | ecFood Approaches Profitability - An Internet Trading Exchange Bright Spot | Analyst / SCT Share Vision at SCT User Conference | How Great Is Great Plains' Manufacturing Offering (Did Somebody Say Microsoft)? | SCT Corporation Means (e)Business For Process Manufacturing | Invensys Announces New Division - Baan Process | i2 Buys RightWorks, Deals Blow To Ariba, Manugistics | IT Services E-Procurement | Reduce IT Procurement Time And Risk | New Dimensions in EC and SCM Part 5: E-Procurement for Process Improvement | New Dimensions in EC and SCM Part 4: Using E-Procurement to Leverage Volume | New Dimensions in EC and SCM Part 3: E-Procurement Can Broaden the Supplier Pool | New Dimensions in EC and SCM Part 2: The Efficiency Gains of E-Procurement | New Dimensions in EC and SCM Part 1: The Benefits of E-Procurement | e-Procurement Is Not Electronic Purchasing | With Commerce One, Your Reach May Be The Same As Your Grasp | Process ERP Market Loses PRISM and Protean | E-Procurement Is Not Electronic Purchasing - Part II | Let’s Be Frank: It Was A Very Good Quarter For E-Procurement | Commerce One: First SAP, then Microsoft. But What About Clarus? | Mortice Kern Systems Goes Vertical (Sky, that is) | The Wheres of Electronic Procurement | Merant Goes South on the Stock Market | Concur Gives Up The Boast | Dead Heat: Corporate Buyers Gain Analysis Tools in Leading e-Procurement Products | A Sharp ASP | Enterprise Messaging Evaluation and Procurement Audio Transcript | SAP Gives Up, Declares Victory. Again. | Inflation’s Demise: The Impact on Business Informa | Infinium and Elcom Walk Down ASP Aisle | Remedy Plots A Course To Travel And Expense Capabilities | E&Y+ASP=BSP: It’s Not Algebra, But It Adds Up To Something Big | Does Someone You Never Ever Heard Of Hold The Keys To The E-Commerce Kingdom? | New Partnerships Add to Remedy’s E-Procurement Strengths | E-Procurement in What Language? | Remedy Corporation: Poised for a Comeback? | Who’s Got the Better Windows Office Suite? Corel or Microsoft? | Driving the Change Agenda through a Low Overhead Program Office | Microsoft Office 2000 SR-1 Adds Dysfunction to the Windows Family | E-procurement: From Brilliant Innovation to Common Cliché | Catalyst International Bit by Y2K Bug | More Than 600 Customers Live on J.D. Edwards OneWorld. Dot.Com and Brick & Mortar Customers Alike Select J.D. Edwards to Achieve E-Business Agility | Is Baan Clinically Dead? | Great Plains Reports Financial Results for the Second Quarter | SCT Corp Previews New B2B Planning, Execution, and eProcurement Suite | Concur's Customers Can Network Now | Rentable Procurement | Ariba Reaches Out To The Little Guy | Commerce One to Procure for the Antipodes and Elsewhere | Procurement and Office Supply Companies Ink Deal | Oracle is Word One at Ford | Life-sciences E-commerce Supplier Grows | Charitable Giving Is How These Firms Make Their Living | AMERICAN EXPRESS Selects TRADEX To Build New Business to Business Commerce Network | Peregrine Hatches an "e-" | Ariba Goes Vertical: No Pain, Much Gain | Ariba Dances for Joy in Quarter Time | Commerce One Tries Harder | E-Procurement Energizes Energy | Commerce One Goes High, Wide and PeopleSoft | Credit Accounting Firm with E-procurement Initiative | With New Clothes and Hairdo, Clarus Asks for Pin Money | Concur Scores A Bingo | B2Big Deal for IBM, Ariba, and i2 | GE Comes to Lunch. Want to Guess Who the Appetizer Will Be? | Oracle Co. - Internet Paradigm Boosts Applications Growth | Ariba Hopes to Spark Chain Reaction | First Look: Peregrine Offers Cradle to Grave Procurement | Baan E-Commerce: a Wing, a Prayer & a Single Platform |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google