Epicor Claims The Forefront Of CRM.NET-ification
Part
2: Market Impact and User Recommendations
P.J.
Jakovljevic & L. Talarico
- June
12, 2002
Event
Summary
On May 21, Epicor Software Corporation (NASDAQ: EPIC), one of leading
providers of integrated enterprise and e-Business and collaborative commerce
software solutions solely for the mid-market, announced Clientele Customer
Support 8.0, the first application of the Clientele CRM.NET Suite
that is completely built on the architecture of the Microsoft .NET
Platform. Clientele Customer Support 8.0 is envisioned to provide
a "hands/administrator free" deployment model allowing the application
to be distributed from a single Web site.
By
harnessing .NET possibly more zealously than its creator Microsoft's Great
Plains and Navision enterprise counterparts amid still difficult market
situation, Epicor might be showing us that 'a brave heart and wise mind'
might keep it in the mid-market leadership race amongst a slew of formidable
opponents.
The
company has recently also made attempts to logically group and brand an
unwieldy number of its products. In manufacturing, which would be approximately
half of its customer base, Epicor has Vantage and Avante
as its major ERP products while the 'e by Epicor' is an umbrella
brand name for a number of products (as eIntelligence, eFrontOffice,
eCommerce, eBackOffice, eProject, ePortal,
eCentre, etc) that cater to both non-manufacturing industries and
the manufacturing ERP offerings. The iSolutions group, which includes
the Avante, DataFlo, ManFact and InfoFlo products
and the eManufacturing group, which includes the Vantage and Vista
ERP products remain strategic to Epicor and will continually be enhanced
both with core ERP functionality and with extended-ERP components such
as enterprise portals and Web storefronts. The release of the Web-enabled
eFrontOffice product and its integration to back office solutions
including eBackOffice, eManufacturing (Vantage) and iSolutions
(Avante) products, speak in that regard. As for specialization, Vantage
remains the preferred system for make-to-order (MTO), job shop enterprises,
while Avante leans towards complex manufacturing and project work environments;
Vista, on its hand, is the low-end product for much smaller discrete manufacturing
enterprises.
This
is Part Two of a two-part analysis of recent announcements from Epicor.
Part One detailed the recent announcements.
Appealing
to SMEs
Coming
back to the announcement of Clientele, Epicor seems to have positioned
itself well for the impending gold rush into the SME CRM market segment,
which has been largely underserved so far. The needs of SMEs like having
solutions that are scalable and reliable but cost-effective, functional
but easy to deploy and customize, and open but have a relatively low barrier
to entry (TCO), have yet to be met completely. The likes of Siebel
Systems and big ERP CRM wannabe's are overkill and cost/time prohibitive.
On the other hand, recently announced Microsoft CRM might likely
not have all the needed functionality. Given the high prevalence of Microsoft
technology in the SME market, Clientele's early .NET embracement should
be attractive to Microsoft-inclined customers evaluating CRM options.
Web services' have potential to offer interoperability at an acceptable
cost, while satisfying companies' need to use existing technology and
skills.
The move should further bolster legitimacy of the .NET platform and the
concept of Web services, which many still consider to be hype and a strategy
in flux. Since Web services will likely become an enterprise applications
integration (EAI) integration facilitation tool, .NET-based applications,
like Clientele offer a prospect to meld more easily with third-party and
legacy applications.
Epicor's
CRM (Clientele, a.k.a. Epicor eFrontoffice) solution enables SMEs to manage
their entire customer lifecycle by enabling businesses to gather, organize,
track, and share prospect, customer, competitor, and product information
into a single database capable of dispensing critical data throughout
entire organization. The product might appeal to companies that need more
advanced CRM capabilities or must manage customer relationships through
diverse lines of business (LOBs). These customers would most likely require
extensive customization, for example building workflow-managed processes
to align sales teams by territory, product line or campaign.
Clientele
also offers a multitude of out-of-the box sales process reports such as
Open Calls by Hour, Marketing Activity Analysis, Return Material Authorization
(RMA) Detail, Account Manager Opportunity, Continent Pipeline by Product,
Follow-ups by User/Due Date, etc. Although the product could long have
been implemented incrementally in a component-fashion or all at once,
its flexibility and enhancements extensibility (even by third parties)
should be significantly bolstered by its new .NET architecture platform.
Also, having long been in the market, the product is not a me-too CRM
newcomer product, but rather a product that capitalizes on the melded
experiences of its CRM and ERP focused erstwhile parent companies.
Epicor
thereby remains a prominent mid-market leader, with ~180 million in revenues,
950 employees and 15,000 customers worldwide (with over 3,000 CRM customers).
In addition to its focus and understanding of the mid-market, the company
has established a solid global infrastructure and localized product capabilities,
as well as a vertical focus for some industries. Still, while the long
awaited porting of Epicor's products onto Microsoft SQL Server as well
as continued focus on .NET framework should significantly relieve the
company's R&D burden and improve its general competitiveness, the remaining
work of making all the above product portfolio .NET compliant remains
colossal.
Existing
3,000 Clientele customers, will sooner or later have to migrate from the
current non-.NET application, although Epicor is committed to supporting
these customers indefinitely, which will draw on its duplicated R&D and
support resources. One should imagine the magnitude of the effort when
the plethora of its above-mentioned products, some with extensive customer
bases on non-Microsoft technologies, should follow the Clientele's path.
Executing these initiatives without significantly increasing its top line
will be a notable challenge. Although its fierce competitors, Microsoft
Great Plains/Navision, Onyx, Pivotal, Interact Commerce/Best
Software, and FrontRange, to name some in the CRM space (without
mentioning a slew of ERP competitors) are not in any better conundrum
regarding existing customer base migration, Epicor's stronger financial
situation and/or brand recognition might make prospects more amenable
to believe that their success is more plausible.
User
Recommendations
Epicor's ability to enhance its products and its determination on executing
product and technology strategies deserves commendation. Current users
are advised to follow Epicor's new product introductions and keep an eye
on its future product strategy. The positive sign is the company's more
manageable and narrower focus, as demonstrated by its most recent results.
Small
and medium size businesses with less than $50 million annual revenues
using either Epicor back office applications or other Microsoft-centric
enterprise applications, and that have solid CRM product needs (sales
& marketing automation, and customer service activities) should react
positively to this news. They should evaluate the above CRM functional
enhancements as a way to add value to their existing applications although
bearing in mind that other vendors currently offer mature and strong products
as well. These companies should consider adding the announced functionality
to their requirements list, as to secure value in terms of both cost savings
and increased efficiency.
However,
enterprises that have integration needs outside of the Microsoft environment,
with multiple-platform and strong scalability requirements, or need complex
CRM functions such as product configuration, content management, personalization
and relationship optimization, might want to look at more sophisticated
offerings.
Mid-market
companies with up to $500 million in revenues that are within Epicor's
industries of focus (e.g., Internet startups, hospitality & food service,
financial services, software & computer services, metal fabrication, capital
equipment manufacturing, and electronics) and companies with a need for
a single-source functionality beyond core ERP scope, should benefit from
including Epicor in the short list of potential candidates for the enterprise
applications selection. As for manufacturing segment, Epicor targets mid-market
manufacturers across the board, covering discrete mixed-mode, make to
order (MTO), make to stock (MTS), configure to order (CTO), engineer to
order (ETO) and project manufacturing. Key vertical industries are aerospace,
automotive, furniture/windows/doors, capital equipment, job shops and
metal fabrication. Users from industries not mentioned above may benefit
from evaluating some stand-alone Epicor product components (e.g., CRM,
APS, e-commerce, and business intelligence application suite) on an opportunity-by-opportunity
basis. This as well as obtaining Epicor's implementation guarantee could
be leveraged against other vendors in a selection.
Existing
users of Epicor products that face stabilization and/or discontinuation
may benefit from querying the company's future product migration path,
service & support, and/or scalability strategy. As for the newly added
and/or anticipated functionality, users are advised to ask for firm assurances
on the availability and future upgrades timeframes, and more detailed
scope of enhanced product functionality. Any organization evaluating Epicor
should consider existing functionality only, and, in the case of final
selection, should inquire and negotiate incorporation of new applications
components now at negotiated license fees, given its recent and forthcoming
new product introductions. They should also inquire about any possible
impact (or benefits) of migrating towards more advanced offering. Taking
stock of current resources VB and C++ skill sets and assessing the effort
to train these into VB.NET and C# is highly recommendable at this stage.
More
comprehensive recommendations for both current and potential Epicor users
can be found in Epicor
Software Corp.: Completing Painstaking "e"Volution. Also, very detailed
information about flagship Vantage and e by Epicor products is contained
in the ERP Evaluation
Center.
A Portrait of the Enterprise Software User in the Education Industry | Sword Ciboodle—One More BPM-Centric CRM Provider | Ventyx—Utilities’ One-Stop-Shop Provider? | A Product Note: Attensity and the Voice of the Customer | The Lesser-Known (Social) Facts about Microsoft Dynamics CRM | Reconnecting with Cincom Systems | PegaWorld 2011 Revisited | A Leader in Service Management Tackles Multidimensional Growth | Good Customer Service Is Simple | Minimizing the Total Cost of Technical Support for Enterprise Applications | The Customer Relationship Management Vision: It Starts with Relationships | Bolstering the Call Center with Service Resolution Management Processes | Knowledge Management: The Core of Service Resolution Management | Integrating Customer Relationship Management and Service Resolution Management | Experiencing the Customer Experience: Listening to, Learning from, and Acting on the Voice of the Customer |