Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments
P.J. Jakovljevic - January 4, 2001

Vendor Summary

Made2Manage Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: MTMS) is a provider of enterprise-wide software solutions for small and midsize discrete manufacturing operations. Founded in 1986 with headquarters in Indianapolis, IN, USA, Made2Manage generated $31.1 million in revenue in fiscal 1999. Approximately 56% of the company's sales come from consulting, maintenance, and other support services, while almost its entire revenue is derived from the North American market. Made2Manage Systems went public in 1997.

Its flagship product, Made2Manage, is designed to meet the needs of small and midsize discrete manufacturers engaged in engineer-to-order (ETO), make-to-order (MTO), assemble-to-order (ATO), make-to-stock (MTS), and mixed styles of production. The product is an application suite designed to be the only business software these manufacturers need to effectively manage their operations. It includes applications in sales and marketing, engineering, materials management, production, quality management (through a partnership with Powerway, Inc.), finance and accounting, human resources (through a partnership with Best Software) and web-based applications for customer and supplier collaboration. The Made2Manage solution also offers advanced planning & scheduling (APS) and decision support-executive information system (EIS) capabilities.

Since its founding, Made2Manage Systems has evolved its product while remaining committed to Microsoft technology. With the release of Made2Manage for Windows in late 1995, Made2Manage became an early adopter of Windows NT and was the first manufacturing software application to receive the "Designed for Windows 95" endorsement. In 1998, Made2Manage acquired Bridgeware Inc. to deliver advanced planning and scheduling capabilities.

Vendor Trajectory and Strategy

Made2manage began with a vision to produce business management software that was very intuitive and, therefore, easy to use and implement. Realizing early the importance of business use of the Internet, Made2Manage was in 1997 one of the first ERP suppliers to offer web-based applications for small and midsize manufacturers. During 1999 it embarked on a strategy to provide e-commerce solutions for its target market. Made2Manage has been completing its evolution from a vendor of traditional MRP software to a provider of holistic business applications, including integrated front office, back office, business intelligence and e-business capabilities for its target market - small-to-medium manufacturing enterprises (SME).

Made2Manage has shown a good understanding of the needs of its customers, who typically wish to acquire most of their business applications from a single source while coping with very limited IT resources. To that end, Made2Manage still offers its core ERP solution, which has recently been enhanced with extended enterprise capabilities like advanced planning & scheduling (APS) through the Bridgeware acquisition, and customer relationship management (CRM), both through in-house development and the partnership with Interact Commerce. The company has also made a notable effort to provide e-business solutions with the launch of m2mEport site in March 2000, a Web-based community offering information, tools, and services to meet the e-business requirements of SME manufacturers. Recently, the following three separate portals have supplanted the m2mEport.com site, each providing a more focused set of functionality:

  • m2mvip.com - provides manufacturers with customer relationship, collaboration and e-commerce applications

  • m2mexpert.com - provides 24x7 customer support, education, and information

  • m2mexpress.com - provides a subscription-based hosted service for smaller customers

In addition to improving Internet usability of its products, Made2Manage has also begun an international expansion by opening its first overseas subsidiary in the UK in 1999. By the end of 1999, the company had more than 1,300 customers, primarily North American discrete manufacturing SME organizations. The company distributes its products and services through a multi-channel sales and marketing approach that encompasses both a direct sales force and a network of business partners (VARs) throughout North America and the recently added distribution for Europe.

We expect Made2Manage to continue its focus on the lower-end of the ERP mid-market (companies with $5 million - $100 million in revenues), by rounding-up the functionality of its solution. The product might be enhanced also through third-party alliances in the area of Distribution Requirements Planning (DRP) & Transportation, Plant Maintenance, and Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES).

We also expect the company to further pursue alliances for business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce, Internet trade exchanges and supply chain collaboration within its industries of interest like its recent alliance announcement with Click Commerce, Inc. (for more information, see How Has Made2Manage Systems Been Managing Itself?). Additionally, Made2Manage will invest more aggressively in marketing, international business expansion through distributors, and will seek to become more vertically focused. It is very likely that it will also start pursuing alliances with more ASPs to further its penetration into this increasingly popular marketplace.

ANALYSIS

Vendor Strengths

  • Made2Manage has from its early days had a sole focus on the low-end of the ERP discrete manufacturing market. The company has long demonstrated a deep understanding of this market dynamics and its requirements of inexpensive products, fast and simple implementations, and good service and support. These risk-averse requirements have traditionally been entry barriers for larger vendors. Made2Manage has been quite competitive in speed of implementation and total cost of ownership (TCO). It has also achieved good experience with its indirect channel, which is an important criterion for long-term success in the SME market segment.

  • The company has, gradually, either developed in-house or incorporated through partnerships a line of integrated e-business, customer relationship management (CRM), business intelligence, and advanced planning and scheduling (APS) components within its core ERP solutions. It also embarked early on web-enabling its product and recognized the need for hosted applications within its target niche. This promotes it as one of the first of the smaller ERP vendors with the ability to embrace customer and supplier activities tied to a core transactional back-office system. Made2Manage can, therefore, often offer one-stop-shop functionality for small assembly-to-order (ATO) or make-to-stock (MTS) discrete manufacturers.

  • Made2Manage has long embraced concepts of component technology in designing its product. The object-oriented product architecture has been devised entirely from scratch in-house within the Microsoft context, which provides for flexibility and ongoing agility. End users of smaller enterprises have also been impressed with its intuitive user interface, which provides ease of system navigation ("Navigator" feature) and of information retrieval ("Locator" feature), and with underlying workflow & messaging system capabilities ("Notifier" feature).

  • Possibly differentiating Made2Manage from its main competitors is the company's readiness to provide smaller discrete manufacturers with the above-mentioned portals that offer a broad range of collaborative, interactive, and communications applications including collaborative engineering design, tools, trading exchanges, and access to information resources. Made2Manage has also been proactive in service and support cost reduction by harnessing the latest technology, like CBT, to deliver inexpensive users' training. The www.m2mexpert.com site hosts a full range of education, consulting and support services, and includes a virtual classroom capability for delivering instructor-led classroom education over the Web. While manufacturers usually prefer to keep their ERP systems in-house, many may opt to use Made2Manage hosted applications for collaborative commerce, which is available through www.m2mexpress.com portal.

Vendor Challenges

  • The company's strong growth has all but stalled since the second half of 1999 (See Figures 1 & 2). This has put it in the difficult position of working with constrained resources, while executing a visionary strategy. Moreover, an increasingly competitive market and declining market growth caused the company to post disappointing results for five consecutive quarters (See Figure 2). The company has eroded its financial position in the last 15 months due to the combined effects of decreased license revenue and ongoing R&D, although the 86% growth of license revenues in the last quarter is encouraging.

    Made2Manage's low market capitalization of approx. $12 million, which is almost a third of its revenues, makes the Company a very attractive acquisition target, while its low available cash resources ($4.7 million) do not provide for any real expansion and defensive corporate initiatives. The corporate viability metrics expressed as revenue per all groups of employees, (R&D, sales and marketing, etc.) have been much below the market's respective averages. Particularly disconcerting is the low revenue per sales and marketing employee ($0.43M vs. $0.84M market average in 1999) owing to its large direct sales force, which we consider as a cost ineffective sales approach within the SME market segment. Also disappointing is the low revenue per R&D employee ($0.37M vs. $0.75M market average in 1999), which illustrates the difficulties smaller vendors have keeping up with the latest market requirements to deliver advanced product functionality.

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

  • Made2Manage's native core ERP functionality across the board, particularly multi-site planning and distribution functionality has not been recognized as a differentiator in the market. While the latest product version (3.2) promises significant functionality enhancements in that regard, Made2manage is still perceived as a strong contender mainly for less-complex single-site enterprises. In addition to the above product functionality gap, the company does not exhibit much of a vertical focus.

    Given the fact that its bigger competitors offer a sharp vertical focus even to the precision of single Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes within an industry, Made2Manage's fast and cheap implementation track may soon be emulated. Furthermore, its product does not provide many standard interfaces to other packages, which limits its ability to penetrate the customer base of bigger competitors.

  • Owing to its confinement to small discrete manufacturers, Made2Manage has only a small market presence in general, reflecting insignificant brand awareness and an undeveloped channel outside of the North American market. This is further aggravated by the fact that its product exhibits minimal multi-national capabilities and supports only the English language. A result may be a number of missed opportunities as companies are increasingly seeking global providers for its supply chain management and collaboration requirements.

  • The company has long depended on less sophisticated database and development technology (Visual FoxPro), which has served the purpose of simplicity but has recently become a liability for the reason of scalability and integration issues for the higher end of the SME market. While its recently released MS SQL Server version of the product may mitigate these concerns, it might also exhibit problems related to its product immaturity. Furthermore, its continued two-pronged product database strategy will inevitably create some duplication of its R&D and Service and Support resources. Also, while the company's focus on Microsoft's proprietary technology and integration standards as its sole product technology standard has benefits on one hand, on the other hand it can be an impediment for future scalability and interconnectivity with other vendors' components requirements.

    Moreover, as digital market places and e-business transactions follow a path similar to EDI (endorsing specific EDI standards to transmit data), Made2Manage faces the challenge of overcoming the notion of suppliers adapting to multiple standards in order to support multiple customers. To make things even more complicated, different marketplaces indeed describe their transactions differently and cover different verticals and industries.

  • Made2Manage faces the challenge of delivering multi-site and supply-chain management (SCM) functionality footprint extension, and delivery of vertical solutions as planned. Executing these initiatives with its ever-thinning resources will be a notable challenge. Any hiccups and delays in its product development execution, possibly bundled with continued poor sales execution, may put further significant strain on the company's performance.

BOTTOM LINE

Vendor Predictions

  • Fiscal 2000 will continue to be challenging for Made2manage. We predict flat revenues or only a minor growth (less than 10%) as the best scenario, with a return to profitability in fiscal 2001 (60% probability). We also believe that, within the next 12 months, the company will put less emphasis on technological development and more on functionality enhancement of its product suite (60% probability).

  • Made2Manage's service and support revenue will contribute more than 60% of its total revenue within the next 4 fiscal years (60% probability), based on the company's readiness to integrate its customers to Internet exchanges. For the next two years, more than 70% of license revenue will come from its existing customers, who will want either to replace an old DOS-based product or add new modules to an existing Made2Manage instance (70% probability). Within the next 3 years, more than 95% of Made2Manage's revenues will come from the North American market (60% probability).

  • Despite its low market value, we believe that the company is an unlikely candidate for acquisition (30% probability) by a competitor within the next 2 years because of its awkwardly broad functional scope, the result of recent product alliances. No major acquisitions by the company are expected in the foreseeable future either (30% probability). Instead, the focus will be on interfacing with partnered applications, as well as on expanding its own product functionality and offering new vertical industry solutions.

Vendor Recommendations

  • Made2Manage should further fortify itself within the lower-end ERP market in the following ways:

    • Expand business in its existing customer base, by upgrading older versions of software and by offering new extended ERP components.

    • Further expand its global presence, both by opening new subsidiaries and by developing new affiliate partnerships.

    • Deliver more focused and pre-configured vertical solutions for industries, and vigorously market its differentiating ASP and portals value proposition to make Made2Manage attractive to resource-constrained small enterprises.

  • Made2Manage must remain committed to ambitious new product introductions and enhancements (e.g., multi-site capabilities and transportation) and take more decisive steps regarding its e-commerce vertical marketplaces delivery, possibly through product alliances.

  • Made2Manage must conduct ongoing cost and organization scrutiny and identify opportunities for further improvements. In fiscal 1999, the sales and marketing personnel count, as a percentage of a total number of employees, was very high, 27%, compared to the industry average of 21%. Therefore, Sales and Marketing and General and Administrative costs as a percentage of net sales in 1999 were at exorbitant 51%, whereas the industry average was 38%. The company should, therefore, nurture and expand its indirect resellers network.

  • Made2Manage should promptly resolve product interconnectivity issues with other vendors' products in order to attract divisions of large global companies. It should also ensure the full Web-enablement of its entire product portfolio and significantly enhance its multi-national capabilities.

User Recommendations

  • Made2Manage's target market, general single-site discrete manufacturing companies and their divisions with up to $100 million-a-year revenue range and up to 100 concurrent users per site, should consider the company's value proposition, but avoid selecting it without looking at what the other vendors have to offer. We generally recommend including Made2Manage in the long list of vendors considered for an enterprise application selection by the lower-end of mid-market companies. These companies generally have a limited IT budget, a conservative IT strategy, and less complex discrete job shop manufacturing, CRM and B2B e-commerce collaboration requirements. The industries that would most likely benefit from using its products are electronics, instrumentation, machinery, fabricated products, and transportation equipment.

  • Multi-national, fast growing, and companies looking for a deeper ERP functionality may benefit from evaluating other products at this stage. Organizations seeking a Web-based solution and out-of-box functionality with little or no re-engineering effort may want to inquire about the company's ASP offering. Support, connectivity, ease of use, security, acceptance, and scalability are only a few of the regular considerations. Companies with more intricate business processes may want to inquire how Made2Manage would deal with the issues of customizations and 3rd-party products bundling in an ASP setup.

  • Existing users of earlier DOS-based product releases that face stabilization or discontinuation may benefit from querying the company's future product migration path, service and support, and scalability strategy.

  • Customers should insist on a contractual timeframe for delivery of a solution, and seek reference sites (preferably in their vertical market space), which have been successful with the product suite. Each e-business component should be put through its paces using a well-documented set of requirements, scripted scenario demonstrations, and rigorous reference checking. As for the new added functionality through partnerships, users are advised to ask for firm assurances on the availability and future upgrades timeframes, and more detailed scope of combined product functionality.


 
comments powered by Disqus


The Cha(lle)nging World of Value-added Resellers | Application Portfolio Management: Are You Getting the Most from your Enterprise Software? | No Yawn Intended: Enterprise Applications Giant Introduces a Mid-tier Support Choice | Supply Chain Management Vendor Finds Balance for Service Supply Chains | User Recommendations for Pricing Management | The Retail Battleground for Pricing Management | Applications Giants Bolster Their Pricing Management Capabilities | Recommendations for Users of Acquired Enterprise Resource Planning Systems | Acquisitions Fuel Vendor Growth in the Enterprise Applications Field | The Impact of the 'Assembler Strategy' in the Enterprise Applications Field | New Vendor Acquisition Strategies in the Enterprise Applications Field | Contributing to the Rejuvenation of Legacy Systems in the Enterprise Resource Planning Field | The Enterprise Applications 'Arms Race' To Be Number Three | Vendor Articulates Message and Vision for Product Lifecycle Management | A Small Enterprise Resource Planning Vendor: The Vision and the Challenges |
Getting It Right: Product, Quality, Timing, and Price | The Formula for Product Success: Focus on Flexibility and Cooperation | Jeeves—Thriving Organically as a Humble Servant | Product Lifecycle Management Agility Founded on Innovation | Enterprise Resource Planning for Services, and Professional Services Automation: Where Do You Draw the Line? | Vision Software Brings a Solid Business Process Management Solution to the Table | Using Business Intelligence Infrastructure to Ensure Compliancy with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | Aligning Information Technology with Corporate Strategy | Competition from a Small Vendor | Major Vendors Adapting to User Requirements | Acquisition Changes Product Lifecycle Management Landscape | Business Engine: Driving Project Portfolio Management for IT Departments in the Enterprise Market | Software as a Service beyond Customer Relationship Management and Sales | Software as a Service for Customer Relationship Management and Sales | What Is Software as a Service? | Software as a Service Is Gaining Ground | Vendor Feels the Heat in Hot Product Lifecycle Management Market | Comparing Business Intelligence and Data Integration Best-of-breed Vendors' Extract Transform and Load Solutions | On-demand Product Life Cycle Management: Not Just for Small to Medium Businesses Anymore | Enterprise Application Provider May Deepen Market Impact | Vendor Extends Welcome Mat for Hospitality Industry | Extended Enterprise Resource Planning Vendor Shows Its Lean Side | Classic Enterprise Resource Planning Solution Shifts Over | SoftBrands' Recovery Softens the AremisSoft Bankruptcy Blow | E-learning Course Design | Reflections on Lean Philosophy and the Theory of Constraints | The Theory of Constraints Enters the Lean Manufacturing Arena | The TEC Quick Case for Made2Manage | Enterprise Resource Planning Vendors Address Lean Manufacturing | So What: The Big Test of Your Positioning Strategy | Manual versus Information Technology Enabled Lean Manufacturing | How to Achieve Lean Manufacturing | Lean Tools and Practices that Eliminate Manufacturing Waste | Microsoft's Dynamic New Approach to Professional Services Automation | Globalization Has a Profound Impact on the Supply Chain and Supporting Information Technology | IDeWeb Provides Best-of-breed Product Portfolio Management Functionality for the Manufacturing Sector | Enterprise Resource Planning Vendor Gains Connectivity through Acquisition of Plant Intelligence Provider | Has SAP Nailed Plant Level Leadership with Lighthammer? | Where is Oracle in the Product Lifecycle Management Software Market? | SAP NetWeaver Background, Direction, and User Recommendations | Multipurpose SAP NetWeaver | Pelion Systems Champions Manufacturing Process Optimization | Enterprise Resource Planning Giants Eye the Shop Floor | As Hype Becomes Reality, a Radio Frequency Identification Ecosystem Emerges Part Two: The Middleware Dilemma, Partnerships, and What Next? | As Hype Becomes Reality, a Radio Frequency Identification Ecosystem Emerges | Extending Quality's Reach to Manage Quality in the Supply Chain | SSA Global finds Little Known SCM Gems in Filling Out its Solution Portfolio | Exact Faces Challenges | Exact Acquires Vanguard Solutions Group | A Single Software Solution That Enables Business Process Management | Global Software Aspirations | Exact Software Continues with Its Share of Judicious Acquisitions | Project Portfolio Management for New Product Development: Tracking the Project Cycle from Idea to Launch | What Are Your Competitors Telling You? A Case Study: SAP's New Advertising Campaign | Working Toward Truly Strategic Partnerships | How Is Business Process Management Applicable to Financial Services? | Project Portfolio Management for Service Organizations: Bridging the Gap between Project Management and Operations | Easy ERP: A Challenge to Conventional Thinking | Predictive Analytics; the Future of Business Intelligence | New Approaches to Software Pricing | Enterprise Software Service and Maintenance Alternatives | Plant Intelligence as Glue for Dispersed Data? | A Unique Product Lifecycle Management Tool for Private Label Retail | ERP Plus and Beyond | The Strengths of a Vertically Centric Enterprise Software Provider | IT Governance: Maximizing the Business Investment | Supply Chain Vendor Morphs into SCEM with Response Management Vision | Business Process Management: A Crash Course on What It Entails and Why to Use It | Records Management Becoming More Important Due to Compliance Regulations | Integrating Customer Relationship Management through Software As A Service | Comparing On Demand Customer Relationship Management Service Alternatives | Enterprise Software Product Outsourcing: A Fresh Perspective for Mid-market Vendors | The Exacting Needs of Metal Service Centers | What Plant-level Systems Can Do for the Enterprise Market | Plant-level Systems: Facing and Dealing with Obstacles | The Importance of Plant-level Systems | Parametric Technology Corporation's Bold Vision Drives Growth and Innovation | Prepackaged SAP Best Practices—Are They for You? | Best-of-breed Approach to Finance and Accounting | Joining the Sarbanes-Oxley Bandwagon; Meeting the Needs of Small and Medium Businesses | Composing Collaborative Financial Applications | Global Trade Management Software Vendors Under-Perform, But Were Predictions Overly Optimistic? | Using Visibility to Manage Supply Chain Uncertainty | Supply Chain Management Is Evolving toward Interdependent Supply Networks | Partnerships with Vendors and Independent Software Vendors: Rejuvenating Legacy Systems | Server Platform Revitalization in the Enterprise Applications Space | The Challenges of the Lawson-Intentia Merger | Market Impact of Lawson-Intentia Merger | Intentia Prepares for Merger with Lawson | 'New' Lawson Software's Transatlantic Extended Enterprise Resource Planning Intentions | Critical Components of an E-PLM System | Retalix Strives for Leadership in Retail Food Segment | Vendors Strive for Segment Pack Leader Status; Does Retalix Measure Up? | Looking For Software—The Expectations of Small and Medium Enterprises | SCM in a New Flavor: Real Time and Demand Driven | Enterprise Resource Planning: Bridging the Gap between Product Vision and Execution | Stability and Functionality for Process and Discrete Manufacturers | Aligning Java-based Application Strategies | A New Platform to Battle Software Bloat? | Can Java Perk Legacy Enterprise Resource Planning Systems? | Portal Strategy: One Vendor's Story and What It Means to You | Epicor To Give All Its Applications More Than A Pretty Facelift | A New Model for Evaluating Third Party Logistics Providers: Enter Service Oriented Architecture | Product Architecture for Product Endurance? | Programming for Business Analysts? The Promise of Simplified Web Services Implementation and Access | Niche Software at Its Best | Portals: Necessary But Not Self-sufficient | ERP and Warehouse Management: Technology, Challenges, and User Recommendations | Responding to Warehouse Management Needs | Mid-Market Strategy: International Enterprise Solutions | Adonix' Mid-Market FORMULA – Adopting Best of Both 'Organic Growers' and 'Aggressive Consolidators' Worlds | The Blessing and Curse of Rejuvenating Legacy Systems | Technology Enablers for the Lean Supply Chain | Rapidly Consolidating Enterprise Applications Market: The Worlds of 'Organic Growers' and 'Aggressive Consolidators' | Demand-driven Manufacturing and Warehousing: Challenges and User Recommendations | The Impact of Demand-Driven Technology in the SCM Market: IBS | Supply Chain Operations Reference and Other Features in ASW | IBS–Slow but Steady (and Demand-Driven) May Win the SCM Race | Essential ERP—Its Underpinning Technology | Mid-sized SCE Buys Small SCP: No Sure Bet on Short Term Profits | Warehousing Management: Yard Management, Competitive Analysis, and Challenges | Who Needs Warehousing Management and How Much Thereof? | The Technology Choices | Global versus Local Channel Approach, Who Will Win? | The Market Impact of Two Powerhouses | Addressing Channels and the Low-End Market | What Do Users Want and Need? | Technical Staff Management Systems for the Aviation Industry | Marquee Vendors Partner for Deepening Inherent CRM and BI Links | Why Are CRM and Analytics Intrinsically Connected? | Three Cs of Successful Positioning: The Competition | When Customer Relationships Meets Business Intelligence Marketing Analysis and User Recommendations | SAS and Action-Oriented Business Processes: Alliances, Partnerships, and Acquisitions | SAS: Striving to Sustain Leadership | Customer Life Cycle Solutions: Strategic Alliances, Challenges, & User Recommendations | A Tectonic Shift in Communications Customer Life Cycle Management | Amdocs Overhauls Its Marketing | Supply Chain Management Systems for Service and Replacement Parts: Players, Benefits, and User Recommendations | Avoid the Perils of Service Parts Planning in Supply Chain Management | Lucrative but "Risky" Aftermarket Business—Service and Replacement Parts SCM | Interview with Louis Suárez-Potts of OpenOffice.org and CollabNet | Interview with Karl Fogel of Subversion and CollabNet | Interview with Jeff Bates of SourceForge.net, Slashdot, and the OSTG | Concerted Disruption, Climb Aboard | Competitive Challenges for Vanguard | A Demand-driven Approach to BI | Has the Mid-market Found Vanguard BI Solutions? | Integration and Consolidation of Business Intelligence within Business Performance Management | Business Intelligence Status Report: Recommendations | Access to Critical Business Intelligence: Challenging Data Warehouses? | Business Intelligence Vendors | Business Intelligence Corporate Performance Management Market Landscape | Business Process Management: How to Orchestrate Your Business | New Data Triggers for International Supply Chain Finance | Manufacturing Environments and Integration with Other Functions | Managing Your Supply Chain Using Microsoft Navision | Attaining Real Time, On-demand Information Data: Contemporary Business Intelligence Tools | Business Intelligence for SMBs: MBS Excel Applications and Competitive Analysis | Vendors Harness Excel (and Office) to Win the Lower-end of Business Intelligence Market | Unifying Global Trade Management: Challenges and User Recommendations | Dealing with Global Trade Management Complexity | Market Leaders of Global Trade Management | Managing Global Trade Flows | Fighting Terrorism with Global Trade Management | Selecting a CMMS System | Global Trade Solutions: Competition, Challenges, and User Recommendations | Confronting Core Global Trade Problems: Order, Shipment, and Financial Settlement | Tackling the International Supply Chain | Confronting International Regulatory Compliance: Web-based GTM Solution | TradeBeam Keeps on Rounding Out Its GTM Set | How to Cope When Your Service Provider is Acquired | Enterprise Software Migration Alert: Is SAP the Alternative? | Oracle's Product Future: What Can the Past Tell? | Battle Booty from Oracle's Victory Over PeopleSoft | Offshore Outsourcing: Is There a Method to the Madness? Planning for Offshore Outsourcing | When Small Business Packages Have Enterprise Appeal | Employee Performance Management Problems | The Oracle/PeopleSoft Reality Check | What's Ahead for Users on the Enterprise Infrastructure Battlefront? | Competition Heats Up in ERP Market: Oracle Merger, and SAP and Microsoft Reacts | While Oracle and PeopleSoft Are to Fuse, Competitors Ruse--Leaving Customers (Somewhat) Bemused | A New Development Framework on iSeries or i5/OS: Architecture | GTM Solutions--Always Watch Out for SAP | Global Trade Regulatory Software: Vendor Obstacles and User Recommendations | Navigating Global Trade Waters | The Future of SOA-based Applications and Infrastructure | SOA as a Foundation for Applications and Infrastructure | SOA-based Applications and Infrastructure--The Next Frontier? | Customer Choices for Achieving Growth | Competitive Advantage in a Saturated Market: How Will the Big Few Do It? | Achieving Growth: New Accounts versus Up-selling to Existing Accounts | Merging Disparate IT Systems and Exploiting Multichannels | Enterprise Application Alternatives: What You Should Be Asking Oracle and SAP | Enterprise Application Players Keep Refining Value Propositions | Why Open Source is Important to You | Linking Planning and Execution Systems for Retailers’ Nirvana--Improved Visibility and Fulfillment | One Product for Large and Small Manufacturers: Challenges and User Recommendations | When EDI Goes Native, Everything Falls in Sync with IQMS | Benefits of a Single Database Solution: Improved Enterprise Quality Management from IQMS | Solving Enterprise Problems: The Fully-integrated Solution of IQMS | Why Service Matters: Enterprise Solutions, Market Differentiation, and IQMS | IQMS Prospers by Helping Enterprises Work Smarter | The Players of Software-as-a-Service Business Models and Finding the Best Value Propositions | Disruptive Innovations? On-demand Pricing Models and Vendors | Get on the Grid: Utility Computing | Trends in Delivery and Pricing Models for Enterprise Applications: Pricing Options | Oracle Further Orchestrates Its SOA Forays Part Six: Weaknesses and User Recommendations | Oracle Further Orchestrates Its SOA Forays Part Five: Collaxa Acquisition | Oracle Further Orchestrates Its SOA Forays Part Four: SOA and Web Services | Oracle Further Orchestrates Its SOA Forays Part Three: Strategy Shifts | Oracle Further Orchestrates Its SOA Forays Part Two: Strategy | Oracle Further Orchestrates Its SOA Forays Part One: Event Summary and Market Impact | A Spoonful of SugarCRMCase Study and Review of an Open Source CRM Solution | Atrion User Conference Highlights Need for Regulatory Compliance in PLM | The Name and Ownership Change Roulette Wheel for Marcam Stops at SSA Global Part Four: What SSA Global Gets | SSA Global Forms a Strategic Unit with an Extended-ERP Savvy Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | TEC Talks to OpenMFGFree and Open Source Software Business ModelsPart Two: OpenMFG | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Eight: Challenges and User Recommendations | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Seven: WMS Market Impact | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Six: Market Impact | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Five: 3PL Support and SCE Optimization | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Four: Global Availability | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Three: Provia and Viastore Systems Alignment | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Two: RFID Compliance | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part One: Recent Annoucements | RFID Case Study: Gillette and Provia Part Two: Challenges and Lessons Learned | RFID Case Study: Gillette and Provia Part One: Background | PeopleSoft Revamps World for Its Mid-Market "Express" Conquest Part One: Recent Annoucements | Encompix--Thriving on Encompassing Complexity Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Exact Software--Working Diligently Towards the "One Exact" Synergy Part One: Event Summary | 3M Wraps Up HighJump, While Retalix Shops OMI International Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Onyx/Pivotal Rivalry Through Thin Rather Than Thick | I-Impact Predicts Your Customer Retention! | Microsoft Keeps on Rounding up Its Business Solutions Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Microsoft Keeps on Rounding up Its Business Solutions Part One: Event Summary | Autodesk to Bring Microsoft Business Solutions Closer to PLM | Lawson Software-IPO and Several Acquisitions After Part Five: Challenges and User Recommendations | Lawson Software-IPO and Several Acquisitions After Part Four: Strengths Continued | Lawson Software-IPO and Several Acquisitions After Part Three: Market Impact | Lawson Software-IPO and Several Acquisitions After Part Two: Retail and Professional Service Initiatives | Lawson Software-IPO and Several Acquisitions After | Ramco to Its Customers-Let's Get Personal! Part Two: Commitment and Recommendations | Ramco to Its Customers - Let's Get Personal! | Surado! A Rising Mid-market CRM Provider | Analyzing MAPICS' Further Steps After Frontstep Part Five: Challenges and User Recommendations | Analyzing MAPICS' Further Steps After Frontstep Part Four: Market Impact Continued | Analyzing MAPICS' Further Steps After Frontstep Part Three: Market Impact | Analyzing MAPICS' Further Steps After Frontstep Part Two: More Recent Events | Analyzing MAPICS’ Further Steps After Frontstep | chinadotcom in the "Process" of Acquiring Ross Systems Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | chinadotcom In The "Process" of Acquiring Ross Systems | SSA GT to EXE-cute (Yet) Another Acquisition Part Four: Challenges, and User Recommendations | SSA GT to EXE-cute (Yet) Another Acquisition Part Three: Impact on SSA GT | SSA GT to EXE-cute (Yet) Another Acquisition Part Two: EXE | SSA GT To EXE-cute (Yet) Another Acquisition | QAD Pulling through, Patiently but Passionately Part Six: User Recommendations | QAD Pulling Through, Patiently But Passionately Part Five: Challenges | QAD Pulling Through, Patiently But Passionately Part Four: Market Impact Continued | QAD Pulling through, Patiently but Passionately Part Three: Market Impact | QAD Pulling Through, Patiently But Passionately Part Two: Company Background | QAD Pulling Through, Patiently But Passionately | PeopleSoft Strategy a Good Deal for JD Edwards Customers | Battery Power Shakes Up Made2Manage Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Battery Power Shakes Up Made2Manage | IBM is Serious About SMB | Solomon Stands the Test of Time Despite Changing Masters Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Solomon Stands the Test of Time Despite Changing Masters Part Three: Product Differentiators | Solomon Stands the Test of Time Despite Changing Masters Part Two: Market Impact | Solomon Stands the Test of Time Despite Changing Masters | Scala and Microsoft Become (Not So) Strange CRM Bedfellows Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Scala and Microsoft Become (Not So) Strange CRM Bedfellows Part Two: Market Impact Continued | Scala and Microsoft Become (Not So) Strange CRM Bedfellows | Epicor Conducts Its Own ROI Acquisition Rationale Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Epicor Conducts Its Own ROI Acquisition Rationale Part Two: Market Impact | Epicor Conducts Its Own ROI Acquisition Rationale | Lose the Starry Eyes, Analyze: Reviewing the Ideal Candidate for EMR Innovations ProcessPro | RTI's CRM Applications Rivals The Major League Providers | IBM Express-es Its Candid Desire For SMEs Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | IBM Express-es Its Candid Desire For SMEs Part Two: Market Impact | IBM Express-es Its Candid Desire For SMEs | Best Software Delivers More Insights To Its Partners (As Well As To The Market) Part Five: Challenges and User Recommendations | Best Software Delivers More Insights To Its Partners (As Well As To The Market) Part Four: Market Impact Continued | Best Software Delivers More Insights To Its Partners (As Well As To The Market) Part Three: Market Impact | Best Software Delivers More Insights To Its Partners (As Well As To The Market) Part Two: Event Summary Continued | Best Software Delivers More Insights To Its Partners (As Well As To The Market) | Baan And SSA GT Merge To Form A Mid-Market Empire With An ''Iron Side'' Part Four: Market Impact Summary and User Recommendations | Baan And SSA GT Merge To Form A Mid-Market Empire With An ''Iron Side'' Part Three: Market Impact On SSA GT | Baan And SSA GT Merge To Form A Mid-Market Empire With An ''Iron Side'' Part Two: Market Impact On Baan | Baan And SSA GT Merge To Form A Mid-Market Empire With An ''Iron Side'' | To Gain Market Share in the Mid-Market, SAP Leaves No Stone Unturned | Welcome to the CRM Mid-Market Abyss-PeopleSoft | Frantic Merger-Mania Spiced Up With Vendettas Leaves Customers Anxious | Lose the Starry Eyes, Analyze: Reviewing the Ideal Candidate for Metasystems ICIM | Epicor Reaches Better Vista From This Vantage Point Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Epicor Reaches Better Vista From This Vantage Point Part Two: Market Impact | Epicor Reaches Better Vista From This Vantage Point | A User Centric WorkWise Customer Conference | ROI Systems Defies The Odds Through Delighted Customers Part Three: Strengths, Challenges and User Recommendations | ROI Systems Defies The Odds Through Delighted Customers Part Two: Market Impact | ROI Systems Defies The Odds Through Delighted Customers | Adonix + CIMPRO = A Feature-Rich Process ERP Product, But With Challenges | SCE Leaders Partner To See Beyond Their Portfolio Part Two: Market Impact | Baan Seeking A New Foster Home -- A Déjà vu Or Not Quite? Part Three: Market Impact and User Recommendations | Baan Seeking A New Foster Home -- A Déjà vu Or Not Quite? Part Two: Baan Under Invensys | Baan Seeking A New Foster Home -- A Déjà vu Or Not Quite? | Microsoft Convergence 2003 portrayed an Enterprise Solutions crossroad! | Commerce One Conducts Its Soul-Searching Metamorphosis Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Commerce One Conducts Its Soul-Searching Metamorphosis | Cincom Acknowledges There Is A Composite Applications Environ-ment Out There Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Cincom Acknowledges There Is A Composite Applications Environ-ment Out There | Lose the Starry Eyes, Analyze: Reviewing the Ideal Candidate for a Pronto Solution | Is J.D. Edwards's CRM 2.0 (With more than 200 Enhancements) Good News? | Ramco Ships Technology And Products. Part Two: User and Vendor Recommendations | Ramco Ships Technology And Products. Is This The Future Of Enterprise Applications? | SYSPRO - Awaiting Positive IMPACT From Its Brand Unification Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | SYSPRO - Awaiting Positive IMPACT From Its Brand Unification Part Two: Market Impact | SYSPRO - Awaiting Positive IMPACT From Its Brand Unification | SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry Part Two: Market Impact | SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' Part Three: Competitive Analysis | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' Part Two: Market Impact | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' | Will Adonix Provide A Warmer Home To CIMPRO? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will Adonix Provide A Warmer Home To CIMPRO? Part Two: Market Impact | Will Adonix Provide A Warmer Home To CIMPRO? | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye Part Three: Market Impact | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye Part Two: Announcements Continued | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye | Ramco Systems' Users - Winning Big And Speaking Out In Las Vegas | Made2Manage Affirms Its Technological Astuteness Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Made2Manage Affirms Its Technological Astuteness Part 2: Strategy | Made2Manage Affirms Its Technological Astuteness | MAPICS To Leap Forward In A Frontstep Way Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | MAPICS To Leap Forward In A Frontstep Way Part 2: Market Impact | MAPICS To Leap Forward In A Frontstep Way | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay Part Four: Challenges & User Recommendations | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay Part Three: Market Impact | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay Part Two: Strategy | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay | Ross Systems Shows Poise in 'Big Easy' | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations. | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? Part Three: Complementary Products | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? Part Two: Market Impact | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? | Epicor Picks Clarus' Bargain At The Software Flea Market Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Epicor Picks Clarus' Bargain At The Software Flea Market | Cincom Asserts Expertise In CRM For Complex Manufacturers Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Cincom Asserts Expertise In CRM For Complex Manufacturers | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 4: Competition and User Recommendations | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 3: Challenges | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 2: Market Impact | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 4: User Recommendations | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 3: Challenges | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 2: Market Impact | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation Part 4: Challenges and User Recommendations | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation Part 3: Market Impact | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation Part 2: FOCUS Announcements Continued | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation | PeopleSoft Internationalizes Its Mid-Market Forays Part 2: Challenges & User Recommendations | PeopleSoft Internationalizes Its Mid-Market Forays | Frontstep Ups The .NET Ante Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Frontstep Ups The .NET Ante | Will Glovia Glow Again Through Its Hub And VARs? Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will Glovia Glow Again Through Its Hub And VARs? | Lose the Starry-Eyes, Analyze:An Ideal Customer for Relevant INFIMACS | Ramco Systems - Diversity Marshaled Through Flexibility Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Farms More Business Out Amid Its Staff Reductions | Ramco Systems - Diversity Marshaled Through Flexibility Part 2: Market Impact | Ramco Systems - Diversity Marshaled Through Flexibility | SAP Opens The ‘Miss Congeniality’ Contest | Lilly Software Visualizes Its eBusiness Offering, NOW. Part 2: Market Impact | PeopleSoft Remains Rock-Hard And Economy Proof | Lilly Software Visualizes Its eBusiness Offering, NOW | Glovia On B2B Reinventing Trail | Kewill And Microsoft Great Plains To Further Mutually Complement | Syspro Hatches 'Encore' IMPACT On SME Manufacturers. Part 2: Market Impact | INFIMACS Becoming Ever More RELEVANT For Project-Based Industries. Part 2: Market Impact and User Recommendations | INFIMACS Becoming Ever More RELEVANT For Project-Based Industries. Part 1: Recent Developments | Clarity of Vision: Clarify Sold to Amdocs by Nortel | Collaborative Commerce: ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: IFS - Part 2 of 2 | Way To Go, Ross Systems! | Collaborative Commerce: ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: IFS - Part 1 of 2 | MAPICS Unifies The Brand And Interacts For CRM Solutions | IFS Glows Amidst The Mid-Market Gloom | Oracle Makes A U-Turn At The 'All Things To All People' Exit | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: SAP AG | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: Baan and Parent Company, Invensys | Frontstep Still Awaiting Better Times | Will V8 Help SSA GT Regain Lost Ground? | PeopleSoft Keeps Truckin’ On A Potholed Road Ahead | Epicor Shows Resilience When It Needs It The Most | J.D. Edwards Fires Siebel, Hires YOU | SAP Thrives On Competitors' Plight, In Part | Made2Manage Manages Throughout Soft Market | Microsoft Great Plains Procures eProcure At Last | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 5: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 4: SAP's Strategy | i2, SAP, Oracle Poised For Showdown in Q4 | SAP – A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 3: Market Impact | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 2: Expanding Functionality | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 1: Alliances | PeopleSoft Supply Chain Is Music To Mid Market Ears | It Is Possible - SAP And Baan Strange Bedfellows | Oracle Claims The Worst Is Over And Turns To KISS For A Boost Part 3: The Challenge of Gaining Competitive Advantage | Oracle Claims The Worst Is Over And Turns To KISS For A Boost Part 2: The Implications | Oracle Claims The Worst Is Over And Turns To KISS For A Boost Part 1: The News | Baan Achieves A Speedy Recovery Despite The Tough Times | Will QAD Finally Get The Break (-Even)? | ROI Systems - A Little ERP Fellow That Gets By | PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet Part 3: Predictions and Recommendations | PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet Part 2: Strengths and Challenges | PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet Part 1: About PeopleSoft | Epicor To Try The Divestiture Tack, Too | MAPICS Clings To Its Customers' Loyalty | SAP Remains One Of The Market’s Beacons Of Hope | SSA Acquires MAX Hoping To Leap From Its MIN | IBM Buys What’s Left of Informix | Invensys Announces New Division - Baan Process | SAP Acquires TopTier To Further Broaden Its Horizons | Oracle Sails Slower In The Low Tide, But Mayday Signal Is Quite Far-Fetched | IFS Aspires To Capture North American Market Against The Low Tide | Is Intentia Truly Industry’s First In Food Traceability? | QAD Finally Breaks The Red Ink Streak, But… | Epicor Software Corp.: Completing Painstaking "e"Volution Part 2: Evaluating Epicor | J.D. Edwards Saved By SCM, Narrowly, And Only For Now | Epicor Software Corp.: Completing Painstaking "e"Volution Part 1: About Epicor | Infinium Attempts To Better Gain Some Markets' Ear | MAPICS XA Expands BI Offering Through Partnership With Vanguard | Has Intentia Turned The Corner? Almost. | Ross Systems Closes Ranks For A (Possible) Turnaround | PeopleSoft Plays Hardball | Is Made2Manage Made2Survive? Seems So. | Frontstep (Nee Symix Systems) A Step Closer To A Turnaround | SAP Defies Economic Slowdown, For Now | Can Lilly Software Get More VISUAL? | Fourth Shift Hopes To Thrive On China’s Greener Pastures | PeopleSoft Joins The Hunt For SMEs | Extricity Makes a Move into IBM’s Sphere of B2B Influence | Microsoft And Great Plains – A Friendship That Turned Into A Marriage | Oracle Sails Despite Market’s Low Tide; How Far Will It Go? | J.D. Edwards Reaches $1B Milestone In Another Losing Year | e-Catalysts Delivers Digital Marketplace | Ross Systems Continues To Slip, But Pledges to Fight Tooth And Claw | IFS Has A Magic Growth Formula; But What About Profitability? | SAP Claims Big Gains In The Low-End Battleground | IBI + IBM = EAI | Baan – What Will The Future In Invensys’ Stable Bring? Part 2: Evaluating Baan | Infinium Ends Its Most Challenging Year | JuxtaComm And IBM Integrate Their Integration Products | Great Plains Unveils New E-Commerce Solution | Great Plains Taps The Web To Deliver Product Support | Epicor Delivers On Milestones, But Its Situation Remains Bleak | Onyx Software: CRM Vendor Battling For Viability | Baan – What Will The Future In Invensys’ Stable Bring? Part 1: About Baan | Intentia Possibly Seeing Daylight | SAP Q3 Results Cause Mixed Reactions | Fourth Shift Tightens Belt To Weather The Drought | PeopleSoft Delivers Oxymoron In 'Supply Chain in a Box' | PeopleSoft – Again A Force To Be Reckoned With? | Another Type Of Virus Hits The World (And Gets Microsoft No Less) | J.D. Edwards – A Collaboration Thought Leader Or A Disguised ERP Follower? Part 2: Evaluating J.D. Edwards | J.D. Edwards – A Collaboration Thought Leader Or A Disguised ERP Follower? Part 1: About J.D. Edwards | ROI Systems Catching Up With e-Commerce | IBM Aims Renamed UNIX Server at Sun | Catalyst International to Tread Water With SAP Through 2000 | More Vendors Bail on Oracle in Favor of IBM | Great Plains Supply Chain Series To Be Powered By Logility | Infinium and Elcom Walk Down ASP Aisle | SAP Details CRM Plans | J.D. Edwards Closes Out Millennium on an Up Note | Oracle is Word One at Ford | Intentia Floats Vaporware Agent to Replace Business Planning | IBM Announces Netfinity 4000R Super-Thin Server | SAP AG - ERP Leader with a "New Dimension" | Baan Company N.V. - Is the Worst Over? | PeopleSoft on Client/Server and Database Issues | PeopleSoft - Are Business Intelligence and e-Commerce Enough? |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google