Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

Introduction
A primary challenge for many process manufacturing firms involves effective implementation and use of an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system for managing the business.  In some firms, the challenge stems from limitations in the current system such as an out-of-date or overly complex software package.  In other firms considering a new ERP package, the challenge stems from their distinctive business practices, and the need to understand how a new package would solve these requirements.   These firms are looking for more out-of-the-box functionality to help minimize custom development, increase predictability of successful implementation and usage, and provide templates for best practices.  The short list of candidate packages typically includes Microsoft Dynamics AX.  

A new book—Managing Process Manufacturing using Microsoft Dynamics AX—explains how Dynamics AX supports the business practices of process manufacturing and distribution firms. These firms handle products representing a wide spectrum of industries. Typical examples include food and beverage, chemicals, life sciences, paper, and primary metals as well as non-durable consumer packaged goods (CPG), and each niche often has specialized requirements. A subset of process firms are also involved in discrete manufacturing (aka a hybrid manufacturer), such as a producer of cleaning solvents and the associated cleaning equipment. These variations are illustrated by 70+ case studies in the book.

The book’s target audience includes those individuals implementing or considering Dynamics AX as their ERP system to manage a process manufacturing business, including those with different levels of AX expertise, in different industry types, and at different implementation stages. The book has been segmented and organized to assist the learning objectives of several groups within the target audience, as summarized below.

1. Different levels of AX expertise, ranging from novices (trying to grasp how the whole system fits together to run their business) to experienced users (trying to learn the new functionality for process manufacturing, or trying to teach novice users).
2. Different types of distribution or manufacturing environments.
3. Different types of process industries such as chemicals, food/beverage or life sciences.
4. Different stages of system implementation, such as evaluating system fit during system selection, or accelerating the learning process during implementation.

The book employs an anchor-and-adjustment learning strategy. For example, the explanation of each business process (such as sales order processing) starts with a basic model reflecting dominant business practices, which then provides a framework for explaining major variations. Another example applies to those with prior AX experience, where the book highlights incremental changes associated with the new software version for process manufacturing. 

One example of incremental change involves the definition of product structure information and the coordination of actual production activities. Product structure information is termed a bill of material (BOM) by discrete manufacturers and a formula by many process manufacturers. These terminology differences have a special significance within AX, since the item type assigned to a manufactured item impacts software functionality. The two item types—termed BOM Item and Formula Item—support different approaches for modeling product structure information. They also employ different order types—termed Production Order and Batch Order—for coordinating actual production. A process manufacturer typically employs just one item type (Formula Items), so that the differences in item types only apply to hybrid manufacturers or to those readers trying to understand the differences.

This book directly addresses the embedded conceptual models within the AX software that support various types of process environments. The information requirements and usage of these conceptual models are described in terms of the end-user experience with standard forms. The navigational details of the end-user experience may differ—whether using customized forms or web-based or hand-held applications—but the information requirements must still conform to the embedded conceptual models. An understanding of the conceptual models can lead to best practices, more effective system usage, and reduced customization. It provides the big picture of “how it all fits together to run the business” and justifies the navigational details of the end-user experience. 

The book contents represent those use cases actually tested and proven by the author, which required thousands of hands-on simulations for business process variations in process manufacturing.  The same approach was employed in my previous AX books.  Given the focus on operational and supply chain management aspects of running a business, the book contents do not attempt to address many other important aspects of system usage. For example, it does not explain the integrated applications for accounting, human resources, and customer relationship management, nor does it explain role-centered pages, alerts, and customization capabilities.  

The book builds on several years of the author’s prior research and field experience with several hundred firms. It also builds on (and summarizes) the information covered in several weeks of classroom training, as well as several thousand pages of user documentation and training materials. It is intended to provide a training tool for professionals with limited time availability and budget.

The following excerpt is from the book’s Summary Chapter, which summarizes system usage in process distribution and process manufacturing environments. 

Summary Chapter
This book focused on how Microsoft Dynamics AX 2009 provides an integrated ERP system to support the business practices of process distributors and manufacturers, including hybrid scenarios that involve discrete manufacturing. The targeted reader included those individuals implementing or considering Dynamics AX as their ERP system, as well as those providing consulting assistance. The book presented a complete walk-through of functionality related to operations and supply chain management. In particular, it described the embedded conceptual models within AX that represent the basic business processes and their variations to run a business. An understanding of these conceptual models can lead to best practices, more effective system usage, and reduced customization. An understanding provides the big picture of how it all fits together to run the business, and justifies the navigational details of the end-user experience.

These conceptual models were described in terms of the end-user experience with standard forms. The navigational details may differ when using customized forms, Web-based applications, or hand-held devices, but the information requirements must still conform to the embedded conceptual models.

The book contents can be summarized into two major sections about process distribution and process manufacturing environments. As an aid to those with prior AX experience, the following summary uses italics to highlight new functionality associated with process manufacturing.  Other readers can ignore the significance of italics.

System Usage in Process Distribution
A process distribution environment typically involves the purchase and sale of stocked material items, often with batch tracking considerations. Major factors shaping system usage include the definition of items, batch tracking policies, item costing, coordination of supply chain activities, and variations in sales, purchasing, quality management, and warehousing.

Item Definition: The identifier for a purchased item consists of an item number, although alternative identifiers may be used for supporting sales, purchasing, and intercompany orders. Other item information includes the following:

• Unique identifier based on the item number and variant code(s), such as color and size
• Authorized units of measure for sales and purchasing purposes
 Designation of catch weight items and their units of measure (for weight and pieces), and the policies for pricing and inventory tracking
• Designation of bulk items and the item numbers representing their container variations, which supports inquiries about a bulk item’s inventory balances
• Approved vendors, and the policies for enforcing approved vendors
• Extended text and documents such as Word files and images
• Physical dimensions such as weight and volume that can be used to calculate totals for a sales or purchase order
• Financial dimensions for business analytics purposes

Batch Tracking Considerations (aka Lot Tracking): Batch tracking involves one or more of the following considerations.
• Batch numbering policies, including a mask for automatic assignment of an item’s batch numbers
• Vendor batch information, including shelf life dates and country of origin 
• Shelf life dates for a batch, including the manufacturing date, expiration date, best before date, and shelf advice date
• Batch attributes, including the item’s acceptable range of values (for an attribute) and a customer-specific range of values
• Batch disposition codes, including policies concerning restricted usage
• Batch tracking history

Item Costing: An item’s cost provides the basis for valuing inventory transactions and measuring profitability. It can be based on a standard costing or an actual costing method such as FIFO, LIFO, and weighted average. If applicable, miscellaneous charges such as freight or handling fees can be assigned to purchase orders and sales orders. An item’s standard costs are site-specific, while an actual cost item can have site/warehouse-specific costs, or even batch-specific costs.

Item Replenishment Policies: Item planning data provides the basis for suggested replenishment at sites/warehouses. The basic replenishment methods include min/max, period lot size, and order driven. With the min/max method, the item’s minimum and maximum quantities can be fixed or variable, where a variable quantity can be specified for user-defined time periods such as months. The minimum can also be automatically calculated based on historical usage and the desired customer service level. With the other replenishment methods, the minimum quantity represents the safety stock requirement. Order quantity modifiers (minimum, maximum, and multiple) apply to the suggested order quantity. The suggested vendor for a planned purchase order can reflect a company-wide preference, a site/warehouse-specific preference, or planning logic based on the lowest price or delivery lead time defined in the item’s purchase price trade agreements. An item’s replenishment method can also be based on manual planning.

Coordinating Procurement Activities: Planning calculations synchronize supplies to meet demands, and provide coordination via planned orders and suggested action messages.

• Planned purchase orders. Planned purchase orders reflect site/warehouse-specific planning data for an item. The suggested vendor can reflect the item’s preferred vendor (specified as a company-wide or site/warehouse-specific vendor), or the vendor with the lowest price or delivery lead time. You can create purchase orders from planned orders, or use a firming time fence so that the system automatically creates the purchase orders.
• Planned transfer orders in a multisite operation. Planned transfer orders reflect site/warehouse-specific planning data for an item, which includes the warehouse source for the transfer. The lead time can reflect transportation time between warehouses and the calendars assigned to the warehouses and delivery mode.
• Suggested action messages. Planning calculations generate two types of suggested action messages termed actions and futures. An actions message indicates a suggestion to advance/postpone an order’s delivery date, to increase/decrease an order quantity, or to delete an order. A futures message indicates the projected completion date will cause a delay in meeting a requirement date such as a sales order shipment. For example, if you define a delay in the confirmed receipt date for a purchase order line item, a futures message can identify the impact on delayed delivery of a sales order.
• Planning calculations and consideration of shelf life expiration dates. The shelf life dates assigned to batches—for the expiration date or best before date—can be used by planning calculations to determine inventory availability to meet demand dates.

Customers: Different types of customers include one-time customers, intercompany customers, and customers requiring foreign currency and language-specific text.

Sales Orders: A normal sales order defines actual demand for an item. Other types of sales orders include blanket orders that can be used to create normal sales orders. Sales orders can reflect intercompany sales, or customer self service via the Enterprise Portal. Sales order variations in process distribution environments include the following:

• Sales order reservations can be manually or automatically assigned, with optional reservation of scheduled receipts.
• Reservations of inventory batches can be based on the customer specifications for batch attributes, or a customer’s requirements for same batch.
• Reservations of inventory batches can be based on expiration dates and first-expired-first-out (FEFO) logic, and the customer requirements for sellable days after delivery.
• Capable-to-promise logic can be used to identify expected delivery dates, and account for shelf life dates of available inventory.
• Special orders and direct orders, which generate corresponding purchase orders.
• An alternate item automatically substituted for an ordered line item.
• Restricted order entry for restricted products (based on delivery address) or for obsolete items (based on item-specific policies).
• Customer returns and RMAs, including the repair and/or replacement of the returned item.
• Service orders to install an item, or service agreements for maintaining the item.
• Customer rebates for buying selected products in order to obtain credits or payment.

Sales quotations can be defined and converted into sales orders. In defining the pipeline of expected business, the quotations can optionally act as demands based on their win probability.

Sales Pricing: An item’s standard sales price and UM represent one approach to a company-wide sales price, with optional calculation based on a markup or contribution percentage applied to the item’s inventory cost or purchase price. Other alternatives to sales pricing include the use of source documents such as sales quotations or blanket orders to create a sales order, and the use of sales trade agreements. With a sales price trade agreement, for example, an item’s sales price can reflect site/warehouse-specific pricing or other factors. The other factors include the customer type, the sales UM, quantity breakpoints, and date effectivities, as well as higher prices or a surcharge for shorter delivery lead times. Discounts off an item’s sales price can be defined in sales trade agreements that reflect these same factors. Discounts can also apply to the total order quantity of multiple line items (such as items within a product group) and to the total order value. Other forms of agreements include supplementary items and miscellaneous charges. Sales pricing for a catch weight item can be based on weight or pieces. Some manufacturing scenarios involve commodity pricing to recalculate sales price trade agreements, as described in the next section.

Sales Forecasts: Replenishment of stocked material can be based on sales forecasts. You can define multiple sets of forecast data, and also multilevel forecast models such as regional forecasts that roll-up to a companywide forecast. An item’s sales forecast can be expressed as individual quantities and dates, as a repeating pattern of a fixed or variable quantity per period (such as monthly), or as an item group forecast (aka planning bill) that spreads out a total quantity across several items based on mix percentages. An item’s sales forecast can also be imported from spreadsheets or a statistical forecasting package. The system supports forecast consumption logic to avoid doubled-up requirements.

Sales Invoicing: The system supports a separate invoice for each sales order shipment, and a summarized invoice for multiple sales order shipments. It also handles different payment terms, payment schedules, and payment fees.

Sales Commissions: The system supports commission calculations for one or more sales reps, thereby supporting split commissions. The commission amount reflects a specified commission percentage times the sales order value (such as the gross revenue or net margin). Commissions can vary by type of customer, product, and date effectivity, with calculation after posting a sales order invoice.

Sales Analysis: The system supports standard and ad hoc sales analyses. For example, the standard reports include totals for individual orders, customers, and items as well as sales analysis by customer and item. Other sales analysis approaches include business analytics, pivot tables, and data warehouses.

Vendors: Different types of vendors include one-time vendors, intercompany vendors, and vendors requiring foreign currency or language-specific text.

Purchase Orders: A normal purchase order defines a scheduled receipt for an item. Other types of purchase orders include blanket orders that can be used to create normal purchase orders, and returned orders for handling returns to vendor. Purchase orders can reflect intercompany purchases and purchases from one-time vendors. Several variations apply to purchase orders in distribution environments, as summarized below.
• Purchase of stocked material
• Purchased item reflecting a special order or drop shipment of a direct order
• Purchase requisitions and approval process
• Request for quotes (RFQs)
• Purchase of an expense item, fixed asset, or non-inventoried item

Purchase Prices: An item’s standard purchase price and UM represent one approach to a company-wide purchase price. It can be manually entered or automatically calculated based on the last purchase invoice. Other alternatives to an item’s purchase price include the use of source documents such a purchase requisition or blanket purchase order, and the use of purchase trade agreements. With a purchase price trade agreement, for example, an item’s purchase price can reflect site/warehouse-specific pricing and other factors. The other factors include the purchasing UM, quantity breakpoints, and date effectivities, as well as higher prices or a surcharge for shorter delivery lead times. Discounts off an item’s purchase price can also be defined that reflect these same factors, as well as multiline and total discounts. Other forms of agreements can define supplementary items and miscellaneous charges. Purchase prices for a catch weight item can be based on weight or pieces.

Quality Management: A broad viewpoint of quality management typically extends across every aspect of supply chain management, ranging from approved vendors and batch tracking of received material to the handling of returns. Some specific concerns include the following:

• Receiving inspection and the use of quarantine orders (to limit usage) and quality orders (to report test results). The test results can optionally update the batch attribute values for an item’s batch.
• Perform testing and record test results within different business processes (via quality orders), such as the arrival/receipt for a purchase order or the picking/shipping steps for a sales order.
• Assign a batch disposition code (for a batch controlled item) to indicate restricted usage policies.
• Generate certificates of analysis with the relevant batch attributes and their actual values (via quality orders).
• Identify and track quality problems via nonconformance reports.
• Identify hazardous materials and their MSDS documents, and ensure compliance for sending MSDS documents to customers, or receiving MSDS documents from vendors.
• Enforce restrictions on sales order processing, such as preventing order entry for restricted products or for stopped items.
• Provide regulatory reports for sales to different countries.

Warehouse Management: Stocking locations are uniquely identified by a site, warehouse, and bin location. You can track batch and serial numbers of an item’s inventory, and support the different inventory tracking approaches for catch weight items. Basic warehouse management transactions include adjustments, transfers, and physical counts as well as arrivals and shipments.

An arrival overview provides visibility of all anticipated arrivals, such as purchase orders, transfer orders, and customer returns. You can record the arrivals associated with multiple orders, and then use this information to update receipts against specific orders. In a similar fashion, you can view anticipated picking activities for sales orders and transfer orders, and create order-based or consolidated picking lists to record the actual material picked and shipped.

Transfers in Multisite Operations: Dynamics AX supports different types of multisite operations, including autonomous sites within a company, a distribution network with transfers between sites, and intercompany trading. Transfer orders coordinate movement between sites and warehouses, and track in-transit inventory. Specific batches can be reserved for transfers based on batch attributes or shelf life dates.  With intercompany trading, the purchase order in one company automatically generates the corresponding sales order in the supplying company, and vice versa. Intercompany orders may be for stocked items, or reflect special orders and direct orders. Planning calculations can be sequentially performed across a multi-company supply chain. Intercompany trading can also be supported when the trading partner is using another instance of AX or another ERP system.

System Usage in Process Manufacturing
Manufacturing environments transform purchased materials into salable end items, often with batch tracking throughout the product structure. This section focuses on manufactured items designated as a formula item (rather than a BOM item) with production activities coordinated via batch orders.  The system usage considerations cited in the previous section about process distribution also apply to these manufactured items, such as batch tracking considerations, replenishment policies, sales orders and pricing, sales forecasts, quality management, warehouse management, and transfers. Additional considerations include the definition of recipe information, sales and operations planning (S&OP) game plans, master scheduling logic, and variations in batch order processing.

Item Information for Manufactured Items: Item numbers are used to identify manufactured items. They also identify co-products and by-products, as well as planning items for disassembly purposes.

Definition of Recipe Information Using Formulas and Routings: The recipe for a manufactured item is defined by the assignment of a master formula and an optional master routing. The assignments are termed a formula version and routing version, and a manufactured item can have multiple versions of a formula and/or routing. Different versions may reflect different sites, different quantities being manufactured, planned changes based on effectivity dates, or an alternate formula or routing. An alternate formula, for example, may indicate a different yield percentage, a different formula size/multiple, or different co/by-products. An alternate routing may indicate a faster production process or the use of different equipment. Each formula version and routing version requires an approval to support subsequent use in planning, costing, and batch orders. A batch order has a separate order-dependent formula and routing that initially reflect the assigned formula version and routing version, and you can manually maintain this information.

Formula Information: An item’s formula version can be company-wide or site-specific, and it defines the ingredients and (if applicable) the co/by-products of the production process. Each ingredient defines an item and a required quantity, and other information such as the component type, source warehouse, and the corresponding operation number. Required quantities can also be expressed as a percentage of the formula size. The component type indicates whether a manufactured component is make-to-stock, make-to order, or a phantom, and whether a purchased component is buy-to-stock or buy-to-order. You can optionally define substitute ingredients for a component so that the substitutes will be considered in planning calculations when there is insufficient availability of the component. The BOM Designer provides a graphical tool for maintaining formula information.

The formula information about a co-product includes the expected output quantity and an optional cost allocation percentage for calculating the co-product’s cost. A co-product reflects a desired output that can be sold or used, whereas a by-product reflects waste that typically adds cost to a parent item. Information about a by-product also includes the expected output quantity, and an optional cost allocation amount which will be included in the costing of the parent item. With a manufactured item that represents a planning item (for disassembly purposes), 100 percent of the expected output consists of the specified co/by-products.

Routing Information: An item’s routing version must be site-specific, and it defines one or more routing operations in the production process. Each routing operation defines the operation number, the work center (or work center group), the time requirements and other information such as an operation description and operation yield percentage. Each operation also specifies a master operation identifier that can optionally provide default values. Separate work center costs can be defined for an operation’s setup time and run time, and for a piece rate. Each work center belongs to a work center group, and has a calendar of working times. It can be designated as having finite or infinite capacity for scheduling purposes. For block scheduling purposes, a work center’s calendar can indicate blocks of working time with a related property, so that similar operations are scheduled together to minimize setup times.

Cost Calculations for a Manufactured Item: A BOM calculation function uses formula and routing information, and cost data about material, labor, and overhead formulas, to calculate the costs for a manufactured item. As noted earlier, the BOM calculation can also determine a co-product item’s cost (based on a cost allocation percentage) and include the costs of a by-product item (based on the cost allocation amount or the item’s cost). Overhead formulas can reflect material-related overheads and/or routing-related overheads. The cost data for material, labor, and overhead formulas can be entered for future dates, so that projected costs can be calculated. The BOM calculation of a planned cost supports several types of simulations. For example, the simulation could reflect the last purchase price or the purchase price trade agreements for material items, and the projected labor costs and overhead formulas. The calculation of a manufactured item’s standard cost provides the basis for identifying variances on batch orders.

The BOM calculation can also calculate a suggested sales price for a manufactured item. The suggested sales price is calculated using a cost-plus markup approach with profit percentages assigned to material, labor, and overhead. In a similar fashion, an order-specific BOM calculation can calculate a manufactured item’s suggested sales price in the context of a sales quotation, sales order, or service order.

S&OP Game Plans and Master Scheduling Logic: A product’s sales and operations planning (S&OP) game plan can reflect make-to-stock or make-to-order production strategies, where the make-to-order strategy can support direct or indirect linkage to sales order demands. Direct linkage can also apply to the make-to-order manufactured components and the buy-to-order purchased components. The S&OP game plan may include use of a sales forecast and safety stock, and the previous section described the various approaches to both.

The planning calculations consist of two tasks—termed the forecast scheduling task and master scheduling task—to calculate gross and net requirements respectively. The master scheduling task generates planned orders and action messages to coordinate supply chain activities for manufactured items as well as purchased items and transfer items. The master scheduling logic includes the following considerations.

• Planned batch orders reflect the quantity-sensitive versions of formulas and routings, the yield percentage and formula size/multiple of a formula version, and the substitute ingredients for a component. A co-product of a planned batch order will be treated as a scheduled receipt.
• Unsatisfied demands for a co-product item will result in planned batch orders for a specified parent item in order to cover the demands.
• Shelf life expiration dates on batches will be used in determining available inventory to meet demands.
• Master scheduling logic calculates total requirements for a bulk item, and generates planned batch orders to optimize production factors such as quantity breakpoints for formula and routing versions, and the formula size/multiple and yield percentage of a formula version. The logic also synchronizes the planned orders for each packaging variation of the bulk material, so that the bulk can be packaged immediately to meet demand.

Coordinate Production Activities: The primary coordination tools include planned batch orders and action messages. Production schedules, Gantt charts, and load analysis by work center also act as coordination tools when routing data has been defined. Routing information can support several advanced scheduling techniques. Coordination of outside operations involves purchase orders for an associated buy-to-order component. As noted earlier, the master scheduling logic synchronizes the planned batch orders for producing a bulk item and the item numbers representing its packaging variations. You can consolidate and firm these batch orders, which will create a corresponding consolidated order that acts as a single point for coordination and reporting of production activities.

Reporting Actual Production Activities: Several types of production activities can be reported against batch orders. These activities include started quantities, component usage, and the receipt of finished quantities (for parent items and for co/by-products). The activities also include reporting of operation time and completions when routing data exists.  Auto-deduction can apply to material components and routing operations. Component usage may reflect reservations of a batch-controlled item based on the desired batch attribute values, or the shelf life expiration dates of batches.

The reporting of actual production activities provides the basis for comparing estimated and actual costs on a batch order. The completion of a batch order (with a status of ended) provides the basis for calculating an item’s actual cost, or for calculating the order variances for a standard cost item. Variances related to co/by-products are also calculated.

Additional Purchasing Considerations in Process Manufacturing: The additional considerations include purchase orders for a buy-to-order component or an outside operation linked to a batch order.

Additional Sales Considerations in Process Manufacturing: Some manufacturing scenarios involve commodity pricing, so that the sales prices within trade agreements can be automatically calculated and updated based on periodic changes to the costs of the purchased commodity.

Project-Oriented Operations: Project-oriented operations involve forecasting requirements and tracking actual costs related to material, time, and expenses. The forecasted requirements provide the basis for a project budget, and multiple budgets can be defined. External projects may also involve project-specific sales quotations and sales orders. The planning calculations can include the forecasted requirements for material and time, as well as demands stemming from the project-specific sales orders and quotations. Procurement may employ project-specific purchase orders, requisitions, and RFQs.

Service-Oriented Operations: Service orders provide coordination of field service and internal service personnel, and close integration with projects. Each service order defines the resource requirements—for material, labor, and expenses—that serve as the basis for estimated costs. Materials can also be identified for shipment to the customer. Repair history can be recorded against the bill of material for items being serviced. Detailed information can also be recorded about the symptoms–diagnosis–resolution of repair problems. Actual resource consumption drives project accounting for invoicing purposes. Service agreements define resource requirements for periodic services, and provide the basis for automatically creating the service orders to perform the services.

Concluding Remarks
When learning or implementing any ERP software package, it is important to understand its underlying conceptual models and how it supports variations in business processes. It is easy to get bogged down in the navigational details. This chapter summarized the book contents to highlight how Microsoft Dynamics AX can support the requirements of process manufacturers and distributors.

Author’s Biography

Scott Hamilton consults and teaches globally on supply chain management (SCM) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) issues. He has consulted with more than a thousand companies and conducted several hundred executive seminars, and also taught SCM/ERP as an MBA professor at leading universities in the US, Europe and the Pacific Rim. His doctorate is in information systems, specializing in manufacturing and distribution. He authored Maximizing Your ERP System and also several books about Microsoft Dynamics. Scott has won the rarely-given Microsoft MVP Award for Dynamics AX, and Microsoft’s Excellence in Innovation Award. Scott recently joined Solugenix, a Microsoft Dynamics AX partner with offices around North America and a well-known reputation as a trusted advisor for AX implementations and support. Scott can be reached at Scott.Hamilton@Solugenix.com.

1 Dynamics AX is a registered trademark of Microsoft.  The book and article employ the term “AX” for short. 

2 Dynamics AX uses the terms batch tracking and batch number because the term lot number refers to a system-assigned internal identifier for inventory transactions.

*

 

 


 
comments powered by Disqus


Increasing the Value of Your Enterprise Through Improved Supply Chain Decisions Part 3: Conclusion | Increasing the Value of Your Enterprise Through Improved Supply Chain Decisions Part 2: Financial Metrics | Increasing the Value of Your Enterprise Through Improved Supply Chain Decisions | PowerCerv Finally Overpowered By The '02 Hurricane Season Part 2: Strengths and User Recommendations | PowerCerv Finally Overpowered By The '02 Hurricane Season | 6 Immediate Business Improvements Offered by an Online SRM System: Part 3: Other Points to Consider | 6 Immediate Business Improvements Offered by an Online SRM System: Part 2: Online SRM | 6 Immediate Business Improvements Offered by an Online SRM System | How Supply Chain Projects Morph Into Black Holes | Data Conversion in an ERP Environment | Continuous Data Quality Management: The Cornerstone of Zero-Latency Business Analytics | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT Part 2: Market Impact | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT | Merger Mania At Its Extremes Part 2: Challenges & User Recommendations |
Merger Mania At Its Extremes | Fourth Shift's evolution Within SoftBrands' DemandStream Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Fourth Shift's evolution Within SoftBrands' DemandStream | Software Piloting: How Do You Fly This Plane | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 2: Market Impact | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' | What Makes Process Process? | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 4: Other Vendors, CRM, SCP & User Recommendations | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 3: IBM | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 2: Microsoft | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard | Beware of Legacy Data - It Can Be Lethal | Adonix Grows Roots Against The Odds Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Adonix Grows Roots Against The Odds Part 1 | The Automotive OEMs Might Soon Contract “BRAIN” Damage Part 2: The Future and User Recommendations | The Automotive OEMs Might Soon Contract “BRAIN” Damage Part I | Enterprise Energy Management Software - The Key to Effective Energy Utilization | Scala Shows Far More Than A Bit Of A Backbone Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Scala Shows Far More Than A Bit Of A Backbone Part 2: Market Impact | Scala Shows Far More Than A Bit Of A Backbone Part 1 | Two Highly Focused Vendors Team For Their Markets' Good | Supply Chain Planning – Issues for Continuous Chemical Companies | Integration is the Name of the Game in Software Systems | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software | Can 'Intuitive' And 'ERP' Words Be Associated? | Yantra - Leader in Distributed Order Management, But Wait There’s More | Intentia Braces For Its Ongoing Roller-Coaster Ride Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Intentia Braces For Its Ongoing Roller-Coaster Ride Part 1 | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 4: User Recommendations | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 3: Causes of Failures | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 2: Implementation Key Success Factors | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 1: Inexorable Statistics | Fast-path Implementations - Are They Good or Bad? | Appointment Scheduling - Achieving the Positive Ripple Effect Part 3: An Illustration | Appointment Scheduling - Achieving the Positive Ripple Effect Part 2: A Solution | Appointment Scheduling - Achieving the Positive Ripple Effect Part 1 | Announcing Agilisys (Formerly SCT’s Process Manufacturing & Distribution Business) - Finally Fully Focused On Process Manufacturing | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 4: Challenges and User Recommendations | Datatex and Dan River Apparel Fabrics - Ten Years and Counting | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 2: Market Impact | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 1 | Is Enterprise Market Consolidating? Exactly! | The Old ERP Dilemma - Should We Install The New Release? | Manugistics Indulges In The Open M&A Season. Part 2: Market Impact, Challenges, and User Recommendations | Manugistics Indulges In The Open M&A Season | Standardizing on One ERP System in a Multi-division Enterprise | Microsoft 'The Great' Poised To Conquer Mid-Market, Once and Again Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Microsoft 'The Great' Poised To Conquer Mid-Market, Once and Again Part 1: Recent Acquisition Announcement | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 2: Market Impact | INFIMACS Boasts MRP Relevant To MROs | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 1: Recent Announcements | Lawson Enforces Its Stronghold Part 2: Market Impact | Lawson Enforces Its Stronghold Part1: Recent Announcements | iProcess.sct Enters Golden Gate Opportunity | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 2: Market Impact | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 1: Recent Announcements | Your ERP System is Up and Running-Now What? | Stratyc's Laser-Sharp Focused Tools Retrofit Legacy Systems | Not all SCM Products Are Created Equal | Adonix Expands X3 And Its "French Connection" Part 2: The Future | IPSec VPNs for Extranets: Not what you want to wake up next to | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 4: Challenges & User Recommendations | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 3: Market Impact | Ross Systems – A Bright Spot On A Difficult Enterprise Application Landscape | PeopleSoft's Buying Momentum Goes On. Pageant Participants, Line Up Please! Part 2: User Recommendations | PeopleSoft's Buying Momentum Goes On. Pageant Participants, Line Up Please! Part 1: Market Impact | Wet Quarter Postpones Amazon's Desiccation While Kmart Drowns | Feds Buckle Down on Customer Information Security | The Old ERP Dilemma: How Long Should You Pay Maintenance? | Made2Manage Offers New Functionality And A VIP Treatment Part 2: Market Impact | Made2Manage Offers New Functionality And A VIP Treatment Part 1: Announcements | Gosh, They Kill Partnerships, Don't They? | The 'Old ERP' Dilemma: Replace or Add-on | J.D. Edwards' CEO Retires Again; This Time For Good? | Supplier Logistics Management (SLM) Part 3 | Supplier Logistics Management (SLM) Part 2 | Supplier Logistics Management (SLM) Part 1 | Lawson Software Braves IPO And Reports Strongly Against The Odds | J.D. Edwards On The Mend; This Time Might Be For Real Part 2: Market Impact | PSI AG To Become More Germane Globally Via Relevant Partnership | J.D. Edwards On The Mend; This Time Might Be For Real | PipeChain Adds Pragmatism Onto Simplicity | Besieged By The CRM Throne Aspirants, King Siebel Delivers "The Magic No.7" Part 2: Market Impact | Enterprise Financial Application Software: How Some of the Big ERP Vendors Stack Up | How Some ERP Vendors Demonstrated - Warts And All Part 2: Results | How Some ERP Vendors Demonstrated - Warts and All Part 1 | The Retail Industry: Improving Supply Chain Efficiency Through Vendor Compliance - Part 2 An Andersen Point Of View | Optimizing The Supply Chain Network And Reducing Distribution Costs - Part 2 An Andersen Point Of View | Should interBiz Mean Intelligence And Prediction Beyond ERP? - Part 2: Challenges and Market Impact | Is SCT And Logistics.com Partnership A Déjà vu? | Should interBiz Mean Intelligence And Prediction Beyond ERP? | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 3: Challenges & User Recommendations | The Retail Industry: Improving Supply Chain Efficiency Through Vendor Compliance - An Andersen Point Of View | Optimizing The Supply Chain Network And Reducing Distribution Costs - An Andersen Point Of View | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 2: Market Impact | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: PeopleSoft | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: Oracle | ERP Selection Facts and Figures Case Study - Part 2: Qualitative Assessments and Analysis | ERP Selection Facts and Figures Case Study Part 1: Business Model Scenarios | Soft Economy Dents SAP’s Armored Shield As Well | PRISM Users Get A Dedicated, Independent Web Community | Logistics.com Might Prove An Internet Success Story After All- Part 2: Market Impact | Logistics.com Might Prove An Internet Success Story After All | Geac Awakens On Its Deathbed - Part 2: Geac's Response | What's With Oracle's And SAP's Differing Clairvoyance? | Geac Awakens On Its Deathbed - Part 1: Event Summary | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 5: Recommendations | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 4: Market Predictions | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 3: Rating The Vendors | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 2: Vendor Reactions | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Aging Gracefully With The ‘New Kids On The Block’ | Shall Bifurcated Tack Reverse J.D. Edwards’ Bad Spell? | E-Business Sell Side Success at H.B. Fuller | Business Intelligence Success at Biomet, Inc. | Sausage Producer Packs Out the Profit with Technology | Intentia’s Intents To Be More Fashionable | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: J.D. Edwards | E-Business Customer Service Success at H.B. Fuller Company | Does Supply Chain Management Software Make Sense in Wholesale Distribution? Part 3: Meeting the Objectives | Does Supply Chain Management Software Make Sense in Wholesale Distribution? Part 2: The Critical Objectives | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Procurement, and SCM Unite! A Series Study | Does Supply Chain Management Software Make Sense in Wholesale Distribution? | SCT Extends Into Business Intelligence | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 2: ERP Key Success Factors | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 1: ERP Trends | Single Source or Best of Breed - The Debate Continues | Can You Add New Life To an Old ERP System? | Manugistics Envisions Supplier Relationship Management Solution | Lawson Software Means Business With PSA and IPO | Identifying the ROI of a Software Application for Supply Chain Management Part 4: Just Give Us the Bottom Line | Identifying the ROI of a Software Application for SCM Part 3: Performing the Data Analysis | SupplyChain.Oracle.com And The 20-Day Implementation | Identifying the ROI of a Software Application for SCM Part 2: We Are Looking for the Vendor To Tell Us | Identifying the ROI of a Software Application for SCM Part 1: We Need To Know Now | NavisionDamgaard Reverts To Navision, But In Name Only | J.D. Edwards' QUEST To End Its String Of Pyrrhic Victories Part 2: The Implications | J.D. Edwards' QUEST To End Its String Of Pyrrhic Victories Part 1: The News | Entrada Brings New MOTIVAtion to Market | HighJump Software Guarantees Fixed Prices | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 2: The Implications | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 1: The News | ERP Selection Case Study Audio Conference Transcript | Fed Gives ERP A Shot In The Arm | Trigo Helps Suppliers Connect | IFS' Tamed Growth + Continued Losses + Increased Competitors' Lobby Talk = Decreased Customer Confidence | Latest Development on Epicor's Trying The Divestiture Tack | i2 Now Serving B2B Suppliers | Is Ross Systems Up To A Hat Trick? | The Mid-Market Is Consolidating, Lo And Behold | i2 Bleeds In Shark-Infested Waters | McHugh Software’s DigitaLogistix Built On Strong Foundation | SAPped Catalyst Warns in Wake of CEO Departure | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 4: ASP’s and New Pricing Models | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 3: E-Business and Mid-Market Shakeout | Geac Decomposes To Survive | Formation Systems Pioneers Product Design Collaboration For The Process Industries | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 2: Product Architecture and Web-Basing | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 1: Functional Scope and Vertical Focus | Nike Blames i2 For Finish In Losers Bracket | Stalled Navision + Mixed Bag Damgaard = Satisfactory NavisionDamgaard | i2 Buys RightWorks, Deals Blow To Ariba, Manugistics | IT Services E-Procurement | Industri-Matematik Joins The Portal Market | NAPM Puts The Spotlight On Change | Manugistics and Agile Make it Official on Valentine’s Day | FreeMarkets’ Surprise Acquisition of Adexa Leaves Many Heads Shaking | Business Objects Teams With TopTier For Analytics | New Dimensions in EC and SCM Part 5: E-Procurement for Process Improvement | New Dimensions in EC and SCM Part 4: Using E-Procurement to Leverage Volume | Small ERP Vendors Missing The ASP Boat | New Dimensions in EC and SCM Part 3: E-Procurement Can Broaden the Supplier Pool | New Dimensions in EC and SCM Part 2: The Efficiency Gains of E-Procurement | New Dimensions in EC and SCM Part 1: The Benefits of E-Procurement | ERP Beginner's Guide In So Many Words | Will 2001 Be The Year Of Baan’s Miraculous Comeback?
Definitely Maybe.
| Provia Gets Nod From BMG Distribution | SCT Corporation: The Last Viable Process Manufacturing Vendor Standing? | WAM Systems Offers Supply Chain Planning Packaged Solution For Chemicals | With Commerce One, Your Reach May Be The Same As Your Grasp | QAD’s Costly eTransition Continues | Does NavisionDamgaard Merger Mark Further Mid-Market Consolidation? | Essential ERP - Its Functional Scope | The Essential ERP - Its Genesis & Future | Andersen Gives Yantra a Vote of Confidence | Logility Unveils Voyager Select For Total Landed Cost | Symix Starts New Year Under New Name, But Old Issues Remain | Prophet 21 First Quarter Revenues Suffer But Pipeline Grows | Manugistics Lays Groundwork For Talus Integration | PurchasePro Acquires Stratton Warren | What On Earth Is Going On With SSA? | BEA Systems Has A Broad Vision For E-Business Infrastructures | Big ERP Players Courting Government Agencies | Aspen Technology Evolves Into Digital Marketplace Provider | Geac Lives By Acquisitions; Will It Die By An Acquisition? | Manhattan’s Footprint Grows With Intrepa Acquisition | Aspen’s Step Backward in the First Quarter Part of Familiar Dance | Lawson Software Expands Vertically As Well | Data Mining: The Brains Behind eCRM | i2 Third Quarter Results Are The Usual Story | Great Plains’ Latest Product Offering — Ready to Stampede the SME Market? | Great Plains' eEnterprise Solution 'N Sync with Microsoft's New Platforms | Hubspan is in Suppliers’ Corner | Optum’s ConnectStream: First the Pieces Now the Glue | Logistics.com Becomes Transportation Service Provider For Commerce One | Navision Executes At a Slower Pace | Texas Instruments Tells War Stories At i2 Planet | Symix Systems Front-Steps Into Greener e-Commerce Pastures | i2 Will Come Out Ahead In Kmart Deal | Has SAP Found Magic Formula (One) To Learn The Ropes Of Marketing? | J.D. Edwards Touts Leadership in Collaboration and Flexibility -- There Seems to be Some Notable Functionality Too | i2 Technologies Lives Life In The Fast Lane | Demantra Secures More Venture Financing | Is Baan Showing Signs of Life After Death? | i2 e-Business Strategy Services Not For Everyone | Commerce One Selects Entrada Software For Affiliate Program | Provia Software Rises To The Challenge | They Know When You Have Gas | Oracle – How to Disappoint Analysts by Doubling Profits | Ross Systems Ends Year On a Sour Note and Braces Itself For Survivor’s Game | Syncra Systems Helps Kimberly-Clark Clean Up | Will Oracle’s Freebie Shot Hurt (Or Only Graze) Siebel? | Great Plains – An SME Market Leader, But At What Cost? | IFS Marches On, Although With a String of Losses | Siebel: Great Plans for Great Plains | Commerce One Holds Announcement Festival | Fourth Shift Corporation: Working Overtime To Provide Complete Customer Care | SynQuest Posts Mixed Results | J.D. Edwards’ Mixed Blessings | QAD Continues to Wade Through Red Ink | eConnections Expands Web With IPNet | Geac Trying Its Luck in Partnering | IMI Sees Red In Dawn Of Fiscal 2001 | Ultimate Connection Seeking Its US Retail Connection Through Solomon Software Partners | EXE and i2 Advance Relationship | The New Manugistics Faces A New Millennium | New Release For Ariba’s Software | Thru-Put Announces Features For New APS Release | Oracle Applications - An Internet-Reinvented Feisty Challenger | American Software Has Been Starving While Delivering Innovations | Intentia Has Been Bleeding For Its Platform Independence | ICARUS Ends Solo Flight With Aspen | ERP Belle Époque Officially Ended With the Demise of Baan and SSA | PowerCerv Facing Another Stormy Season | The Pros and Cons of Collaborative Planning | Logility FY 2001 Comes In Like a Lamb | MAPICS Back On Track, But Not Without Restructuring Pains | Global Vendor Negotiation Strategies | Winner Takes All – Siebel Ousts SalesLogix From Solomon’s Deal | Aspen Technology Built Success From The Ground Up | PeopleSoft 8 Launched – Anything to Write Home About? | PeopleSoft: No More a Humble Kid From a Rough Neighborhood? | IBM Nabs Another Application Vendor | Epicor Software Corp.: How Far From Being 'One-Stop' Shop? | i2 Paints Broad Strokes at eDay | SCT Comes Back With a Vengeance | More Marketplace Success For Manugistics? | Lawson Software Marches Over $300M Milestone | SAP Remains Solid While Transitioning | They Can Run, But You Can’t Hide | How Has Made2Manage Systems Been Managing Itself? | Lasership.com Looks To Descartes For Same-Day Delivery Help | Baan Defectors – Is This Only Tip of an Iceberg? | Manhattan Associates Completes Second Quarter On Record Pace | Is Fourth Shift Succeeding in Providing 'Complete Customer Care'? | SAP - A Leader Under Reconstruction | How Detrimental Can a 2nd-In-Charge’s Departure Be? | Can Geac Reshuffle the ERP Standings? | Logistics.com Solutions Target A Grand Scale | EXE Technologies Begins Life In The Public Eye | ERP Getting a New Breath of Fresh Air in Europe | True to its Texas Roots, i2 Does Everything Big | Has Market Been Too Harsh On Great Plains? | Never Was A Story Of More Woe Than This Of RJR And Nabisco | Manhattan Partnership With E3, MarketMAX Strikes Compromise | Aspen - To Netfinity and Beyond | J.D. Edwards Chooses Freedom to Choose EAI | SCT Fygir To Lubricate Valvoline’s Supply Chain | Siebel Has Done It Again – This Time with Navision | American Software - A Tacit Avant-Garde? | Optum Unveils Tradestream For Collaborative Fulfillment | Ross Systems, Inc.: In Process of Renaissance | License Revenue Up At The New Manugistics | How Has MAPICS Been Extending? | PeopleSoft Manufacturing - This Time For Sure?! | Logility Collaborative Planning Solutions Offer Sound Proposition | Oracle Proud To Be Number Two | i2 Technologies’ Latest Offering: J. D. Edwards OneWorld™ | SAP to Become Leaner, Meaner and More Organized | J. D. Edwards FOCUSes on Active Supply Chain | Infinium Software, Inc.: Having All the Right Cards? | Access Commerce Spices Up North American CRM Fray | No More Mr. Nice Guy With J.D. Edwards | Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Audio Conference | i2 To Power Best Buy | IFS Far Cry From Running Out of Breath | Descartes Plots A Record Course In New Millennium | Supply Chain Management Audio Conference Transcript | ROI Systems, Inc.: Will Slow and Steady Remain in the Race? | AspenTech Completes Another Piece of the Refining Puzzle With Petrolsoft | HK Systems Gives Birth To Software Company, irista™ | Baan Yet Another ERP Vendor to Find a Sanctuary Under Invensys’ Wing | MAPICS Red Ink Stained While Extending Its Offering | Manugistics To Help Amazon.com In Global Expansion | Intentia’s Growing Pains | After Strong Game, Logility Suffers Fourth Quarter Loss | Ross Systems’ Renaissance Yet to Happen | Ariba Gains Legs Courtesy of Descartes | Adexa Reports Record First Quarter Results | Epicor Continues To Bleed | Symix Systems’ Slips Into Red During Its E-Commerce Transition | i2 Technologies Gets Reporting Help From Hyperion | Saltare.com Prepares LEAP Into B2B Fray | ChemicalsWorld.com Debuts On The Web | Adexa Prepares To Step Into The Spotlight | Will Solomon Finally Satisfy Great Plains’ Insatiable Appetite? | Baan Sinks Deeper into Red Quicksand | Spring Brings New Growth To Manhattan Associates | Catalyst Emerges Strong in 2000 | Lawson Software’s CRM and ASP Moves – Wise, Bold, Injudicious, Enforced, or Something Else? | Is SAP Stumbling? Perhaps. | i2 Enlists Honeywell in Process Industry Play | Yet Another ‘Big 5 ERP’ CEO Casualty | NeoModal Launches Corporate Ship On Promising Journey | Navision Software a/s: Mid-market iNvasion | SynQuest, Ford Deliver a Novel Application for Inbound Logistics | SynQuest Teams With InterWorld for Internet Sales and Fulfillment | IMI Hopes Vivaldi Plays Well for Reverse Auctioneer | Essential ERP – Current Market Trends – Part II | Will That Wretched ERP Finally Die? Possibly, But Only the Acronym! | Go Fygir! SCT Defeats Incumbent AspenTech at Texaco, Shell Venture | Yet Another ERP/CRM Partnership | Internet Makes SCP All That It Can Be | Symix Launches eSyte Supply Chain | Is J. D. Edwards’ xtr@ Ordinary? | Oracle Flying High on Q3 Report: Is Gold All That Glitters? | Navision Becoming More Visible | Geac Announces Q3 Results and Acquires CRM Vendor | Cyclone Untangles Digital Partnerships | ERP Demand Being Re-heated | SynQuest Ships Manufacturing Software for AS/400 | Manugistics: An Old Dog Learns New Tricks | Logility, IBM to Offer Mid Market Solutions on AS/400 | i2’s Aspect Acquisition Not Overpriced | ERP Vendors Venturing into PSA | Solomon Software: Breaking Away from Perception as “Best-of-Breed-Accounting” Vendor | Komatsu Employs “Mod Squad” For Logility Implementation | JD Edwards’ Alliances: Is It Too Much of a Good Thing? | GLOVIA to be Resuscitated (Hopefully) | Supply Chain Planning in 2000: The Brains Behind Internet Fulfillment | IMI, IBM Take First Step in Third Quarter | Commerce One and Adexa Build Castles in the Air | JD Edwards Reports Strong License Revenue Growth in Q1 2000, but… | Intentia Attempts to Become ‘Lean and Mean’ | i2 Adds More Verticals To Ra-b2b-it Stew | Acquisition Places Descartes Before E-Transport | Vendors Begin to Round Out Their CRM Suites | J.D. Edwards Names SynQuest Preferred Solution | Manugistics Takes Another Hit on Earnings as CFO Resigns | Descartes Systems Group Makes D&T Growth List | Catalyst International Secures French Connection with Steria | i2 Announces e-Business Strategy | Oracle Integrates Front and Back Office with Applications 11i | PeopleSoft's CEO Steps Down | SSA Seeks Support from Synquest | Catalyst International Bit by Y2K Bug | SAP sets up Apparel and Footwear team | Geac and JBA Join Forces to Form New ERP Giant | Optum Gets a Hand From Categoric | Computer Associates, Baan Japan and EXE Announce Strategic Alliance to Provide Total Supply Chain Management Solutions | New Management at Manhattan Associates | Oracle to Enlist BPA Systems in its Mid-Market Quest | SAP Lowers Revenue Expectations | i2 Technologies Garners Semiconductor Award | Aspen Technology Posts First-Quarter Loss but Beats Estimates | Symix Maintains Consistent Profitability Despite Y2K Market Conditions | Software Leasing Trend Slams Baan Earnings | Hershey's Halloween Nightmare All Too Common for Supply Chain Implementations | Intentia Americas Gains Momentum with 10 New Deals Inked During Last Two Weeks | MAPICS Reports Solid Profitability Despite Dismal Fiscal 1999 4% Growth | Baan Releases New Supply Chain Products | French Government awards ERP contract to Peoplesoft | Business Software Firms Sued Over Implementation - Lawsuits Bring ERP Problems to Light | Geac Metamorphosises JBA Into Gear, but Cuts 20% of Staff | Deloitte & Touche Alliance with SynQuest Largely Symbolic | Logility Surges on Second Quarter Earnings Announcement | More Than 600 Customers Live on J.D. Edwards OneWorld. Dot.Com and Brick & Mortar Customers Alike Select J.D. Edwards to Achieve E-Business Agility | SAP Announces Investment in Catalyst International | Fortune Smiles on i2 Technologies | Baan Acquisition Expands Product Set and Integration Issues | J.D. Edwards Incurs Further Losses In Third Quarter | Intentia and Dash Associates Team Up | Key Product Delays Take a Toll on Oracle Users | Descartes Evolution Yields Revenue Growth But No Profits | ERP Packages For Midsize Firms in the Works | QAD Reports Third-Quarter--Revenue Rises 56 Percent | Cap Gemini Eyeing Ernst & Young Business Unit | Industri-Matematik Posts 2Q00 Loss But Sells CRM | Pronto ERP 'Coming to America' | Andersen Consulting to Grab a Piece of the Internet Pie | System Software Associates Announces Fiscal Fourth Quarter Results - The Agony Continues | Aspen Technology Signs Pact with PWC | Boeing Expands Baan Licensing Deal | SAP Highlights Supply Chain Management Tools | Oracle Reports Strong Profits | Manugistics Posts Third Quarter Loss But Sees License Growth | QAD Offers Improved E-Commerce Applications with Greater Flexibility and Customization Capabilities | PeopleSoft, Lawson To Resell Integration Tools | Heads Roll at Consulting Giant in Wake of SEC Investigation | Is Baan Clinically Dead? | Manhattan Associates Partners with Intentia | PeopleSoft Completes Acquisition of Vantive; Vantive CRM Applications Integrate with PeopleSoft and Other ERP Systems | Analysis of Manhattan Associates' New Partnership with CommercialWare | SAP, PeopleSoft Earnings Look Brighter; ERP Strikes Back | Great Plains on a Shopping Spree | Geac Upgrades Accounting And Human-Resources Apps -- SQL Release 6.0 Simplifies Purchasing And HR Services For Midsize Companies | Logility Signs First ASP Deal with ebaseOne | Aspen Follows Good Quarter With Internet Launch | EXE Latest Vendor to Join IBM Supply Chain Club | AspenTech Launches e-Business InitiativeFinally | MAPICS, Inc. to Acquire Pivotpoint, Expanding e-business Offerings for Mid-Sized Manufacturing Establishments | PeopleSoft Takes Aim at Foods Industry | ERP Vendors Moving to Aerospace and Defense Markets | SCT Corp Previews New B2B Planning, Execution, and eProcurement Suite | PeopleSoft Recuperating Slowly, Hoping to Sink 1999 into Oblivion Quickly | Baan Posts $236 Million Loss and Sells Off Coda for Nearly $40M Less Than It Paid | Symix Expands Its Product Offering While Remaining Profitable | Company Makes Good On B2B Collaboration | IFS Continues to Blossom | Siebel Sees Farther on Shoulders of Giants | SAP Declares Victory Over Manugistics, Takes Aim at i2 | G-Log Offers New Start For CEO, Management Team | Food Producer Files $20m Lawsuit Against Oracle | Oracle Loses Again | PeopleSoft Programs Cause Headaches at Number of Universities | Hummingbird Announces Extraction and Portal Strategy for ERP | The New Manugistics Debuts eBusiness Products | SAP Posts Solid Q499, but Warns of Q100 | Analysis of Lawson Delivering New Retail Analytic Capabilities | What's in a Name for Supply Chain Vendors? | i2 Technologies: Is the Boom Over? | ERP Vendor Lawson Software Extends to IBM's DB2 Universal Database | J.D. Edwards Teams with FRx Software to Improve Reporting Solutions | SAP and HP on the Web Together | Analysis of SAS Institute and IBM Intelligence Alliance | E-Commerce Lesson: Success Gets a Yawn, Failure Takes a Beating | SAP's New Level of e-Commerce: mySAP.com | BAAN Announces "Open World": Business-To-Business Collaboration Over The Internet | Lawson Plays Well With Others | B2Big Deal for IBM, Ariba, and i2 | Compaq Buys a Chunk of Inacom - But Will It Help? | The "S" in SAP Doesn't Stand for Security (that goes for PeopleSoft too) | i2 Technologies at the Front of the Supply Chain | AspenTech Searching for Definition in FY2000 | Manugistics Faces Uncertain Future | Oracle Co. - Internet Paradigm Boosts Applications Growth | J.D. Edwards and Numetrix Ponder the Future as One | SAP APO: Will it Fill the Gap? | Symix Sytems: Shifting SME's Focus to Their Customers | MAPICS: Will Customer Satisfaction be Enough? | Intentia: Java Evolution From AS/400 | SSA: Evolving into systems integrator to survive | JBA: Will it remain "@ctive Enterprise"? | Industri-Matematik Faces Uphill Climb | Advanced Planning and Scheduling: A Critical Part of Customer Fulfillment | Marcam Solutions: Shifting its Focus to MES | Industrial & Financial Systems, IFS AB: Thriving on Product Flexibility and Incremental Deployability | Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) Market - Dismal 1999, the New Millennium to bring Relief (for Some) | Descartes Systems Group: Small Company With Large Ambition | Logility: Voyager in B2B Collaborative Commerce | Lawson Software: Self-Evidently Thriving on Innovations | QAD Inc.: The Art of Vertical Focus | Great Plains: Strong Channel and Microsoft focus for Dynamic(s) Growth | SAP's Dr. Peter Barth on Client/Server and Database Issues with SAP R/3 | Baan E-Commerce: a Wing, a Prayer & a Single Platform | J.D. Edwards - Creating OneWorld of Mid-sized ERP Users | Catalyst International Ties Fate to SAP | Q: Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Billionaire? A: Baan -- Foster Care for Its Orphans Needed As Well | Geac Computer Corporation: Mastering Growth by Acquisitions | Surf's Up at Akamai |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google