Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

Introduction

Based on the increased demand for information technology (IT) in the retail industry, Microsoft offers two retail packages: Microsoft Retail Management System (RMS) and Microsoft Point of Sale (POS). Microsoft Retail Management System provides small and midsize business retailers with an integrated point of sale solution to manage operations within one store or across a chain of stores. Microsoft Point of Sale provides single-store retailers with an application that helps with daily business tasks. To promote its offerings, in March 2006 Microsoft expanded its business relationship with Best Buy for Business, whereby Best Buy became the only official retail sales channel for the Microsoft POS solution (Microsoft RMS is available through Microsoft's certified sales partners).

The following article will highlight the main difference between Microsoft POS and Microsoft RMS, and examine the strengths and challenges of the products, as well as competitors. The article will then provide user recommendations.

Retail Management System versus Point of Sale

Although Microsoft POS is targeted to one-store retailers, it includes the main core functionalities and some of the non-core functionalities of a POS system (for more information about POS core and non-core functionalities please see Point of Sale: To Stand Alone or Not?). Microsoft POS includes transaction management, price management, register management, inventory management, customer relationship management (CRM), and report and inquiries modules. Non-core functionalities include modules for price changes and purchase orders.

Despite Microsoft's late entry into the mature retail software market, it will likely compete against known, established, and leading retail software vendors such as Intuit, Raymark, Synchronics (a division of Radiant Systems), Fujitsu, and Retail Anywhere. By offering a stand-alone POS system and using Best Buy for Business as its only retail sales channel to date, Microsoft becomes a possible direct competitor of Intuit's QuickBooks Point of Sale. More retail sales channels will be announced in the fourth quarter of 2006. Intuit and Microsoft both offer point-for-point functionalities, and one-store retailers can obtain the products off the shelf. Hence, an owner of a store can procure either solution within the same point of purchase.

In addition, the Counterpoint SQL Express solution from Synchronics is another main competitor of Microsoft. Similarly, Synchronics offers a one-store POS solution for retailers, and targets the same market. Having similar functionalities and price points, one-store retailers can consider evaluating Synchronics and Microsoft. Nevertheless, Synchronics does not have the same sales channel as Microsoft, since Counterpoint SQL Express is only available from value-added service partners. A small retailer thus has better accessibility to Microsoft POS, as it can buy it off the shelf, whereas to acquire Counterpoint SQL Express, retailers must go through a long sales process with vendor briefings and demos.

Microsoft RMS includes functionalities from Microsoft POS and more (please refer to table 1 for a comparison of Microsoft POS and Microsoft RMS). The prominent feature of Microsoft RMS is the ability to obtain inventory and customer information across multiple stores. Having the ability to support multiple stores and increased visibility on inventory allows Microsoft to target a larger market. Microsoft also delivers additional management and tracking tools for small and medium retailers. These added features allow Microsoft to compete with vendors such as Raymark, Fujitsu, and Retail Anywhere. These vendors have the same sales process, and retailers need to set up vendor briefings and demos before purchasing one of these solutions. Since the core functionalities are similar from solution to solution, retailers need to evaluate the additional value for each provider's offerings. Each of these vendors has different pricing structures, upgrade paths, maintenance plans, and company recognition. The retailer needs not only to evaluate the solution according to its unique business needs, but also to evaluate the software vendor's reputation. Retailers that spend a considerable investment on a new POS system need the security of a support and upgrade path for the future.

Table 1. Comparison: Microsoft Point of Sale and Microsoft Retail Management

Features and benefits Microsoft POS Microsoft RMS
Efficiently manages and tracks inventory within a particular store X X
Automatically generates purchase orders based on reorder points and restock levels X X
Imports item, customer, and supplier information from Microsoft Excel X X
Views sales and inventory information in immediate, modifiable reports X X
Prints labels for items, shelves, customer mailers, and more X X
Integrates sales information with Microsoft Office Small Business Accounting X X
Integrates sales information with QuickBooks accounting software X X
Uses a touch screen to speed transactions X X
Tracks customer visits and purchase histories X X
Speeds checkout with built-in credit or debit card processing services X X
Assigns role-based security to employees X X
Suspends and resumes transactions X X
Tracks employee hours with time clock X X
Manages inventory and customer information across multiple stores X
Designs custom sales and inventory reports X
Integrates sales information with Microsoft Dynamics GP Peachtree, MYOB, Blackbaud, and other accounting programs. X
Tracks work orders, quotes, back orders, and layaways X
Manages customer accounts receivables X
Connects point-of-sale software with e-commerce software through third party add-ons X
Manages multiple item dimensions, including color, size, and style X
Manages gift card, assembly, weighed, and gasoline item types X
Automatically breaks down cases into single units X
Assigns field-level security to employees X
Improves cashier accountability by tracking tasks performed X

Source: http://www.microsoft.com/businesssolutions/retailmanagementsystem/product/product_comparison.mspx

Product Strengths

Microsoft's retail solutions gains competitive advantage due to its ease of use, integration capabilities, and vendor partners, which allows Microsoft to serve many retail verticals.

Microsoft RMS includes the main core functions and features of a POS system. Moreover, it has the look, feel, and ease of use that is common to Microsoft products. The graphical user interfaces (GUIs) of RMS and POS have the same look and feel as Microsoft Outlook. A user who is not technically savvy but who uses Outlook can easily enter a sales transaction without any training. Moreover, Microsoft POS has a very descriptive nomenclature that follows user functionalities. For instance, within the application, visual icons such as sales or transfers are clearly marked. Furthermore, if a question arises regarding certain features or functions, the help module integrated into the POS solution is user-friendly and complete, thus reducing training time.

In addition to easy navigation throughout the system, and a well-organized help module, Microsoft POS installation is relatively easy. The software offers step-by-step instructions during the installation process. Similar to the Microsoft Office Suite, the installation of POS can be done by non-technical users. This is an advantage for Microsoft, compared to Synchronic's Counterpoint SQL Express solution. The Synchronics solution is available through its resellers, which will only provide the solution as a package with its implementation services.

Due to the full integration of all of Microsoft's products, its retail solution implementation and configuration is relatively effortless. There are two approaches to setting up data within an enterprise solution: importing the data, or manually entering data into the application. Microsoft POS allows an import of data just by having inventory, customer, and supply information available on an Excel spreadsheet. Thus, instead of keying in all the information manually, or going through a lengthy process for data conversion, retailers can import the information and be ready to enter transactions within a few hours.

In contrast to Microsoft POS, Intuit's POS and accounting solutions for small retailers (QuickBooks Point of Sale and QuickBooks Financials) do not integrate with one another. Depending on the country where QuickBooks Financials was purchased, the POS solution from Intuit may not integrate, due to the different financial structure of each country. Other strengths of Microsoft integration capabilities include the remote access features; with the help of Windows XP Remote Access, owners can easily connect to the stores remotely, unlike products from certain vendors such as Fujitsu that need a third party solution.

Many verticals exist within the retail industry. Microsoft has many partners such as Elypsis (the wine and liquor vertical), RubinBrown IT Group (the hospitality vertical), Computeration Inc. (the entertainment vertical), or retail automation systems (the convenience store and gas pumps verticals). Not only are these partners trained on Microsoft retail products, they are usually experts within the verticals. They understand the unique business needs of the retailers and can suggest best-practice approaches.

Product Challenges

The pricing structure for support of both Microsoft products is very complicated. Moreover, the upgrade from Microsoft POS to Microsoft RMS is tedious compared to its competitors. Also, there are a few compatibility issues with POS hardware, along with functionalities that certain competitors offer, and that Microsoft does not.

There are many plans available for support on Microsoft POS and RMS. Therefore, before comparing the pricing structure between QuickBooks Point of Sale and Microsoft POS, it is useful to look at an explanation of the different support and maintenance plans for Microsoft POS and Microsoft RMS, as provided in table 2 (please note that all prices are in US dollars).

Table 2. Microsoft maintenance and support fees (as of August 2006)

Plan Fee
Annual maintenance fee
Includes software upgrades and service packs
18 percent of the total list price $143.82
Flex 5-pack support
Includes five support incidents with a three-hour guaranteed response time
Customers enrolled in the annual maintenance plan $300.00
Customers not enrolled in the annual maintenance plan $450.00
Flex per incident support
includes one incident with a response time of eight business hours
Customers enrolled in the annual maintenance plan $65.00
Customers not enrolled in the annual maintenance plan $95.00

The Microsoft annual maintenance plan comprises only the software upgrades and service pack; it does not include any technical support. The other packages (Flex 5-pack Support and Flex per Incident Support) include support from a Microsoft technician.

Microsoft POS and Intuit's QuickBooks Point of Sale have the same initial purchase price of $799 (USD). As for the QuickBooks Point of Sale support plan, the first thirty days of support are free, and then there is a monthly fee of $49 (USD). The comparative total costs of ownership (TCOs) for one year are compared in table 3 (all prices are in US dollars).

Table 3. Microsoft versus QuickBooks TCO (as of August 2006)

Microsoft QuickBooks
Price Price
Annual maintenance fee $143.82 $49 per month (for eleven months) $ 539.00
Flex 5-pack support $300.00
Total $443.82 $ 539.00

Assuming that on average, five support interventions are needed in a year, the TCO for Microsoft is $443.82 (USD) while QuickBooks' TCO is $539.00 (USD) for an unlimited number of support calls. Based on the scenario mentioned above, Microsoft POS is approximately 55.5 percent of the list price and QuickBooks Point of Sale is 67.4 percent. In this scenario, Microsoft is less expensive. However, if a retailer needs more than six support calls, it becomes more expensive than its competitor. This is where retailers need to anticipate the number of calls they might require. With all the decisions that retailers already have to make when implementing a business solution, it might be more advantageous for Microsoft to offer an all-inclusive support plan, as with the QuickBooks strategy.

Not only are the support and maintenance plans complicated, but upgrading the Microsoft POS system to RMS is difficult and complex compared to QuickBooks Point of Sale. QuickBooks Point of Sale offers three versions to its customers: Basic, Pro, and Pro Multi-store. Thus, when a retailer purchases QuickBooks Point of Sale Basic, it can easily upgrade, since it's only a matter of calling a sales representative, entering the provided code, and unlocking the features. Moreover, retailers are not monetarily penalized, since Intuit only charges the difference of price between the Basic, Pro, and Pro Multi-store versions. As for Microsoft, the upgrade is not as simple: retailers need to contact a Microsoft partner and go through the whole software implementation project to have Microsoft RMS installed. Thus, retailers need to prepare data, schedule a project plan, and check for infrastructure capabilities for the upgrade.

Microsoft POS is only at its first release. Although the software includes the main core functionalities of a POS system, its late arrival into the retail industry has many consequences. For example, Microsoft is competing in a mature market space, and other vendors already have a head start. Unlike Synchronics, it does not offer the ability to integrate automatically with e-commerce capabilities. Due to the increased demand for an online presence, it would be to Microsoft's advantage to offer e-commerce features in future releases within its base product. Moreover, since Microsoft's product is at its earliest version, the compatibility of its retail solution with third party software is not mature. For example, Microsoft Point of Sale can communicate with Excel to a certain extent only: the import or export of important data such as the supplier information is not available. In addition, the integration of Microsoft Point of Sale with popular accounting software such as Peachtree Complete Accounting or MYOB Business Essentials Pro is not possible. Another consequence of its late arrival, there is no method for data validation within many modules of the application. Therefore, users can enter erroneous and duplicated data.

User Recommendations

Although Microsoft has introduced its retail solutions late into the market, it has provided the principal necessary functions and features for retailers. With its partners, Microsoft has the ability to target a larger market and to satisfy many retail verticals such as the hospitality, wine and liquor, and entertainment industries. Retailers may feel more secure about investing in a Microsoft product, due to its good reputation and brand recognition. However, since the retail industry has many verticals, the likelihood of customization of the solution is high. Therefore, implementation and support of the Microsoft Retail Management Solution requires engaging its sales partners, as Microsoft does not directly offer customization. Since engaging a reseller requires a long business process analysis, other vendors such as Fujitsu or Retail Anywhere with similar sales strategies should not be overlooked.

As for Microsoft POS, Microsoft expanded its relationship with Best Buy for Business to promote its offerings to small retailers. For single-location retailers that are not technically savvy, Microsoft POS delivers what it promises. By having a solution that is easy to purchase, to install, to use, and to learn, Microsoft kept its business strategy simple for its POS product. However, there are some inconsistencies within its strategy, as once the software is purchased, the support pricing plan is relatively unclear Moreover, upgrading from POS to RMS is also complex.

Microsoft Point of Sale is likely a good avenue for retailers which are convinced that business will remain a single location. For retailers that might eventually expand business to between two and ten locations, other vendors such as Synchronics or Intuit should be evaluated. Finally, for retailers needing a solution for over ten locations, Microsoft RMS, Fujitsu, Retail Anywhere, or any other retail system vendors, should be evaluated according the retailer's business needs.


 
comments powered by Disqus


Integration and Consolidation of Business Intelligence within Business Performance Management | Business Intelligence Status Report: Recommendations | Access to Critical Business Intelligence: Challenging Data Warehouses? | Business Intelligence Vendors | Business Intelligence Corporate Performance Management Market Landscape | Business Process Management: How to Orchestrate Your Business | New Data Triggers for International Supply Chain Finance | Manufacturing Environments and Integration with Other Functions | Managing Your Supply Chain Using Microsoft Navision | Attaining Real Time, On-demand Information Data: Contemporary Business Intelligence Tools | Business Intelligence for SMBs: MBS Excel Applications and Competitive Analysis | Vendors Harness Excel (and Office) to Win the Lower-end of Business Intelligence Market | Unifying Global Trade Management: Challenges and User Recommendations | Dealing with Global Trade Management Complexity | Market Leaders of Global Trade Management |
Managing Global Trade Flows | Fighting Terrorism with Global Trade Management | Selecting a CMMS System | Global Trade Solutions: Competition, Challenges, and User Recommendations | Confronting Core Global Trade Problems: Order, Shipment, and Financial Settlement | Tackling the International Supply Chain | Confronting International Regulatory Compliance: Web-based GTM Solution | TradeBeam Keeps on Rounding Out Its GTM Set | How to Cope When Your Service Provider is Acquired | Enterprise Software Migration Alert: Is SAP the Alternative? | Oracle's Product Future: What Can the Past Tell? | Battle Booty from Oracle's Victory Over PeopleSoft | Offshore Outsourcing: Is There a Method to the Madness? Planning for Offshore Outsourcing | When Small Business Packages Have Enterprise Appeal | Employee Performance Management Problems | The Oracle/PeopleSoft Reality Check | What's Ahead for Users on the Enterprise Infrastructure Battlefront? | Competition Heats Up in ERP Market: Oracle Merger, and SAP and Microsoft Reacts | While Oracle and PeopleSoft Are to Fuse, Competitors Ruse--Leaving Customers (Somewhat) Bemused | A New Development Framework on iSeries or i5/OS: Architecture | GTM Solutions--Always Watch Out for SAP | Global Trade Regulatory Software: Vendor Obstacles and User Recommendations | Navigating Global Trade Waters | The Future of SOA-based Applications and Infrastructure | SOA as a Foundation for Applications and Infrastructure | SOA-based Applications and Infrastructure--The Next Frontier? | Customer Choices for Achieving Growth | Competitive Advantage in a Saturated Market: How Will the Big Few Do It? | Achieving Growth: New Accounts versus Up-selling to Existing Accounts | Merging Disparate IT Systems and Exploiting Multichannels | Challenging the Competition: Mega-mergers and Supply Chain Technology | Enterprise Application Alternatives: What You Should Be Asking Oracle and SAP | Enterprise Application Players Keep Refining Value Propositions | Why Open Source is Important to You | Linking Planning and Execution Systems for Retailers’ Nirvana--Improved Visibility and Fulfillment | One Product for Large and Small Manufacturers: Challenges and User Recommendations | When EDI Goes Native, Everything Falls in Sync with IQMS | Benefits of a Single Database Solution: Improved Enterprise Quality Management from IQMS | Solving Enterprise Problems: The Fully-integrated Solution of IQMS | Why Service Matters: Enterprise Solutions, Market Differentiation, and IQMS | IQMS Prospers by Helping Enterprises Work Smarter | The Players of Software-as-a-Service Business Models and Finding the Best Value Propositions | Disruptive Innovations? On-demand Pricing Models and Vendors | Get on the Grid: Utility Computing | Trends in Delivery and Pricing Models for Enterprise Applications: Pricing Options | Oracle Further Orchestrates Its SOA Forays Part Six: Weaknesses and User Recommendations | Channels to the Hearts and Minds--On-line 2005 | Oracle Further Orchestrates Its SOA Forays Part Five: Collaxa Acquisition | Oracle Further Orchestrates Its SOA Forays Part Four: SOA and Web Services | Oracle Further Orchestrates Its SOA Forays Part Three: Strategy Shifts | Oracle Further Orchestrates Its SOA Forays Part Two: Strategy | Oracle Further Orchestrates Its SOA Forays Part One: Event Summary and Market Impact | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part Four: Strategies and Case Study | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part Three: Achieving and Maintaining the Competitive Edge | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part Two: Creating Your Strategy | Customer Relationship Management Strategies Part One: Changing Your Approach | A Spoonful of SugarCRMCase Study and Review of an Open Source CRM Solution | Do You Know What Are the "Unintended Consequences" of Your CRM Project? | Knowing Your Prospect's Influencers | Atrion User Conference Highlights Need for Regulatory Compliance in PLM | CRM: Creating a Credible Business Case and Positioning It with the CEO Part Two: Linking CRM with Organizational Direction | CRM: What Is It and Why Do It? Part One: Historical Background | CRM, Success, and Best Practices: A Wake Up Call Part Two: Modeling Success with Senior Management and CRM Culture | CRM, Success, and Best Practices: A Wake Up Call Part One: Searching and Establishing the Business Parameters of CRM | The Name and Ownership Change Roulette Wheel for Marcam Stops at SSA Global Part Four: What SSA Global Gets | SAP's Approach to the Retail Market | Lawson's Approach to the Retail Market | Maximizer Enterprise 8: A Strong Competitor on the SMB Front Line | SSA Global Forms a Strategic Unit with an Extended-ERP Savvy Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | TEC Talks to OpenMFGFree and Open Source Software Business ModelsPart Two: OpenMFG | The Best ACT! Is Still to Come | Interface Software Expands Its CRM Functionality | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Eight: Challenges and User Recommendations | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Seven: WMS Market Impact | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Six: Market Impact | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Five: 3PL Support and SCE Optimization | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Four: Global Availability | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Three: Provia and Viastore Systems Alignment | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part Two: RFID Compliance | Provia Tackles RFID in a Twofold Manner Part One: Recent Annoucements | "Best" of the Three CRM Solutions | RFID Case Study: Gillette and Provia Part Two: Challenges and Lessons Learned | RFID Case Study: Gillette and Provia Part One: Background | PeopleSoft Revamps World for Its Mid-Market "Express" Conquest Part One: Recent Annoucements | CRM ROI: Creating a Business Case | The Importance of Server Robustness in CRM | Instead of Discounting, Back Some Value Out of Your Proposal | Encompix--Thriving on Encompassing Complexity Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Marketing Automation: Coming of Age Slowly | Can the Market Sustain a Stand-Alone EMM? | Technology Vendor--Can You Afford Credibility? | Data Quality: Cost or Profit? | What Does the Future Hold for PRM? | Exact Software--Working Diligently Towards the "One Exact" Synergy Part One: Event Summary | 3M Wraps Up HighJump, While Retalix Shops OMI International Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | CDC Software Wins the Pivotal Auction. Now What? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | CDC Software Wins the Pivotal Auction. Now What? Part Two: Market Impact | CDC Software Wins at the Pivotal Auction. Now What? Part One: Event Summary | Onyx/Pivotal Rivalry Through Thin Rather Than Thick | Comparison of ERP and CRM Markets' Life cycle Snapshots | I-Impact Predicts Your Customer Retention! | Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP Part 1: Tutorial | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part Five: Deltek’s Major Product Lines | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part 1: Product Announcements 2003 | PSA -- Still An Evolving Market | Microsoft Keeps on Rounding up Its Business Solutions Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Microsoft Keeps on Rounding up Its Business Solutions Part One: Event Summary | Autodesk to Bring Microsoft Business Solutions Closer to PLM | Lawson Software-IPO and Several Acquisitions After Part Five: Challenges and User Recommendations | Lawson Software-IPO and Several Acquisitions After Part Four: Strengths Continued | Lawson Software-IPO and Several Acquisitions After Part Three: Market Impact | Lawson Software-IPO and Several Acquisitions After Part Two: Retail and Professional Service Initiatives | Lawson Software-IPO and Several Acquisitions After | Ramco to Its Customers-Let's Get Personal! Part Two: Commitment and Recommendations | Ramco to Its Customers - Let's Get Personal! | Surado! A Rising Mid-market CRM Provider | Analyzing MAPICS' Further Steps After Frontstep Part Five: Challenges and User Recommendations | Analyzing MAPICS' Further Steps After Frontstep Part Four: Market Impact Continued | Analyzing MAPICS' Further Steps After Frontstep Part Three: Market Impact | Analyzing MAPICS' Further Steps After Frontstep Part Two: More Recent Events | Analyzing MAPICS’ Further Steps After Frontstep | chinadotcom in the "Process" of Acquiring Ross Systems Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | chinadotcom In The "Process" of Acquiring Ross Systems | SSA GT to EXE-cute (Yet) Another Acquisition Part Four: Challenges, and User Recommendations | SSA GT to EXE-cute (Yet) Another Acquisition Part Three: Impact on SSA GT | SSA GT to EXE-cute (Yet) Another Acquisition Part Two: EXE | SSA GT To EXE-cute (Yet) Another Acquisition | QAD Pulling through, Patiently but Passionately Part Six: User Recommendations | QAD Pulling Through, Patiently But Passionately Part Five: Challenges | QAD Pulling Through, Patiently But Passionately Part Four: Market Impact Continued | QAD Pulling through, Patiently but Passionately Part Three: Market Impact | QAD Pulling Through, Patiently But Passionately Part Two: Company Background | QAD Pulling Through, Patiently But Passionately | PeopleSoft Strategy a Good Deal for JD Edwards Customers | Battery Power Shakes Up Made2Manage Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Battery Power Shakes Up Made2Manage | IBM is Serious About SMB | Solomon Stands the Test of Time Despite Changing Masters Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Solomon Stands the Test of Time Despite Changing Masters Part Three: Product Differentiators | Solomon Stands the Test of Time Despite Changing Masters Part Two: Market Impact | Solomon Stands the Test of Time Despite Changing Masters | Scala and Microsoft Become (Not So) Strange CRM Bedfellows Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Scala and Microsoft Become (Not So) Strange CRM Bedfellows Part Two: Market Impact Continued | Scala and Microsoft Become (Not So) Strange CRM Bedfellows | Epicor Conducts Its Own ROI Acquisition Rationale Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Epicor Conducts Its Own ROI Acquisition Rationale Part Two: Market Impact | Epicor Conducts Its Own ROI Acquisition Rationale | Lose the Starry Eyes, Analyze: Reviewing the Ideal Candidate for EMR Innovations ProcessPro | RTI's CRM Applications Rivals The Major League Providers | IBM Express-es Its Candid Desire For SMEs Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | IBM Express-es Its Candid Desire For SMEs Part Two: Market Impact | IBM Express-es Its Candid Desire For SMEs | Best Software Delivers More Insights To Its Partners (As Well As To The Market) Part Five: Challenges and User Recommendations | Best Software Delivers More Insights To Its Partners (As Well As To The Market) Part Four: Market Impact Continued | Best Software Delivers More Insights To Its Partners (As Well As To The Market) Part Three: Market Impact | Best Software Delivers More Insights To Its Partners (As Well As To The Market) Part Two: Event Summary Continued | Best Software Delivers More Insights To Its Partners (As Well As To The Market) | Baan And SSA GT Merge To Form A Mid-Market Empire With An ''Iron Side'' Part Four: Market Impact Summary and User Recommendations | Baan And SSA GT Merge To Form A Mid-Market Empire With An ''Iron Side'' Part Three: Market Impact On SSA GT | Baan And SSA GT Merge To Form A Mid-Market Empire With An ''Iron Side'' Part Two: Market Impact On Baan | Baan And SSA GT Merge To Form A Mid-Market Empire With An ''Iron Side'' | Generating Revenue from Service | To Gain Market Share in the Mid-Market, SAP Leaves No Stone Unturned | Should Uniqueness Vouch For Marketing Automation Niche Players? | Welcome to the CRM Mid-Market Abyss-PeopleSoft | Frantic Merger-Mania Spiced Up With Vendettas Leaves Customers Anxious | Lose the Starry Eyes, Analyze: Reviewing the Ideal Candidate for Metasystems ICIM | Epicor Reaches Better Vista From This Vantage Point Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Epicor Reaches Better Vista From This Vantage Point Part Two: Market Impact | Epicor Reaches Better Vista From This Vantage Point | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Three: Market Impact Continued | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Two: Market Impact | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority | A User Centric WorkWise Customer Conference | ROI Systems Defies The Odds Through Delighted Customers Part Three: Strengths, Challenges and User Recommendations | ROI Systems Defies The Odds Through Delighted Customers Part Two: Market Impact | ROI Systems Defies The Odds Through Delighted Customers | Adonix + CIMPRO = A Feature-Rich Process ERP Product, But With Challenges | BPM Weaves Data And Processes Together For Real-time Revenues | Professional Services Are Catching-up With CRM | SCE Leaders Partner To See Beyond Their Portfolio Part Two: Market Impact | PowerTrieve, A LEAP For CRM? | Baan Seeking A New Foster Home -- A Déjà vu Or Not Quite? Part Three: Market Impact and User Recommendations | Baan Seeking A New Foster Home -- A Déjà vu Or Not Quite? Part Two: Baan Under Invensys | Baan Seeking A New Foster Home -- A Déjà vu Or Not Quite? | Click Commerce Acquires Allegis | Who Alleges The PRM Market Consolidation? | Microsoft Convergence 2003 portrayed an Enterprise Solutions crossroad! | What CRM Should Have Taught IT (although not getting the message is not entirely IT's fault) | Commerce One Conducts Its Soul-Searching Metamorphosis Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Commerce One Conducts Its Soul-Searching Metamorphosis | Cincom Acknowledges There Is A Composite Applications Environ-ment Out There Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Cincom Acknowledges There Is A Composite Applications Environ-ment Out There | CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure Part Two: Using A Knowledge Base To Reduce The Time, Risk And Cost Of A CRM Selection | CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure Part One: The CRM Selection Challenge | When the Bigger Fish Eats the Smaller to Become a Bigger Fish | Lose the Starry Eyes, Analyze: Reviewing the Ideal Candidate for a Pronto Solution | Is J.D. Edwards's CRM 2.0 (With more than 200 Enhancements) Good News? | Ramco Ships Technology And Products. Part Two: User and Vendor Recommendations | Ramco Ships Technology And Products. Is This The Future Of Enterprise Applications? | Xchange Adds To The List Of CRM Point Solutions' Casualties Part Two: Market Impact & User Recommendations | Xchange Adds To The List Of CRM Point Solutions' Casualties | SYSPRO - Awaiting Positive IMPACT From Its Brand Unification Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | SYSPRO - Awaiting Positive IMPACT From Its Brand Unification Part Two: Market Impact | SYSPRO - Awaiting Positive IMPACT From Its Brand Unification | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? | SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry Part Two: Market Impact | SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' Part Three: Competitive Analysis | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' Part Two: Market Impact | Lilly Software - Product Enhancements Remain Its Order 'Du Jour' | Will Adonix Provide A Warmer Home To CIMPRO? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | CRM: The Truth, The Whole Truth And Nothing But The Truth(For A Change) | Will Adonix Provide A Warmer Home To CIMPRO? Part Two: Market Impact | Will Adonix Provide A Warmer Home To CIMPRO? | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye Part Three: Market Impact | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye Part Two: Announcements Continued | ACCPAC -- Being Much More Than Meets The Eye | Ramco Systems' Users - Winning Big And Speaking Out In Las Vegas | Made2Manage Affirms Its Technological Astuteness Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Made2Manage Affirms Its Technological Astuteness Part 2: Strategy | Made2Manage Affirms Its Technological Astuteness | The Case of A Boutique Vendor's Benefits of Focus - IRM Corporation | MAPICS To Leap Forward In A Frontstep Way Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | MAPICS To Leap Forward In A Frontstep Way Part 2: Market Impact | MAPICS To Leap Forward In A Frontstep Way | Why CRM Is So Hard and What To Do About It: Data is key to making CRM work | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay Part Four: Challenges & User Recommendations | CRM Analytics Brings More Profitability | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay Part Three: Market Impact | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay Part Two: Strategy | Best Software To Hold Competition At Bay | Ross Systems Shows Poise in 'Big Easy' | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations. | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? Part Three: Complementary Products | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? Part Two: Market Impact | Is SSA GT Betting Infini(um)tely On Acquisitions? | Epicor Picks Clarus' Bargain At The Software Flea Market Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Epicor Picks Clarus' Bargain At The Software Flea Market | Cincom Asserts Expertise In CRM For Complex Manufacturers Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Cincom Asserts Expertise In CRM For Complex Manufacturers | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 4: Competition and User Recommendations | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 3: Challenges | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically Part 2: Market Impact | MAPICS Moving On Pragmatically | CRM For Complex Manufacturers Revolves Around Configuration Software | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 4: User Recommendations | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 3: Challenges | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 2: Market Impact | Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions | How Supply Chain Projects Morph Into Black Holes | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation Part 4: Challenges and User Recommendations | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation Part 3: Market Impact | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation Part 2: FOCUS Announcements Continued | J.D. Edwards Finds Its Inner-Self Within Its 5th Incarnation | PeopleSoft Internationalizes Its Mid-Market Forays Part 2: Challenges & User Recommendations | PeopleSoft Internationalizes Its Mid-Market Forays | Frontstep Ups The .NET Ante Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Frontstep Ups The .NET Ante | Will Glovia Glow Again Through Its Hub And VARs? Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will Glovia Glow Again Through Its Hub And VARs? | Lose the Starry-Eyes, Analyze:An Ideal Customer for Relevant INFIMACS | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 4: Other Vendors, CRM, SCP & User Recommendations | Microsoft Paints CRM Landscape On Lately A ‘Still Nature’ Business Applications Scenery Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Microsoft Paints CRM Landscape On Lately A ‘Still Nature’ Business Applications Scenery | A CRM System Needs A Data Strategy | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 4: Challenges and User Recommendations | PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 3: Target Markets, Alliances, & Competition | CRM and Technological Solutions: Be the Customer | SAP Keeps Traction On Some Tires Of Its Omni-Wheel-Drive Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Keeps Traction On Some Tires Of Its Omni-Wheel-Drive Part 1 | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 2: Market Impact | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 1: Recent Announcements | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 2: Market Impact | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 1: Recent Announcements | Microsoft Throws .NET At SMEs, With CRM As Bait | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 4: Challenges & User Recommendations | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 3: Market Impact | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 2: Alliances & Support | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 1: Recent Announcements | Gosh, They Kill Partnerships, Don't They? | J.D. Edwards' CEO Retires Again; This Time For Good? | Lawson Software Braves IPO And Reports Strongly Against The Odds | PSI AG To Become More Germane Globally Via Relevant Partnership | PipeChain Adds Pragmatism Onto Simplicity | Besieged By The CRM Throne Aspirants, King Siebel Delivers "The Magic No.7" Part 2: Market Impact | Ramco Systems - Diversity Marshaled Through Flexibility Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP Farms More Business Out Amid Its Staff Reductions | Ramco Systems - Diversity Marshaled Through Flexibility Part 2: Market Impact | Ramco Systems - Diversity Marshaled Through Flexibility | SAP Opens The ‘Miss Congeniality’ Contest | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: PeopleSoft | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: Oracle | Lilly Software Visualizes Its eBusiness Offering, NOW. Part 2: Market Impact | PeopleSoft Remains Rock-Hard And Economy Proof | Lilly Software Visualizes Its eBusiness Offering, NOW | Glovia On B2B Reinventing Trail | Kewill And Microsoft Great Plains To Further Mutually Complement | Syspro Hatches 'Encore' IMPACT On SME Manufacturers. Part 2: Market Impact | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 3: From R to Z | INFIMACS Becoming Ever More RELEVANT For Project-Based Industries. Part 2: Market Impact and User Recommendations | INFIMACS Becoming Ever More RELEVANT For Project-Based Industries. Part 1: Recent Developments | Clarity of Vision: Clarify Sold to Amdocs by Nortel | Collaborative Commerce: ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: IFS - Part 2 of 2 | Way To Go, Ross Systems! | Collaborative Commerce: ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: IFS - Part 1 of 2 | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 2: From J to Q | The Lexicon of CRM - Part 1: From A to I | MAPICS Unifies The Brand And Interacts For CRM Solutions | IFS Glows Amidst The Mid-Market Gloom | Oracle Makes A U-Turn At The 'All Things To All People' Exit | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: SAP AG | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: Baan and Parent Company, Invensys | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: J.D. Edwards | Frontstep Still Awaiting Better Times | E-Business Customer Service Success at H.B. Fuller Company | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Procurement, and SCM Unite! A Series Study | Will V8 Help SSA GT Regain Lost Ground? | PeopleSoft Keeps Truckin’ On A Potholed Road Ahead | Pure-Play CRM Vendors: Choose an Integrated or Best-of-Breed Solution? | Epicor Shows Resilience When It Needs It The Most | J.D. Edwards Fires Siebel, Hires YOU | CRM is Busting Out Of Its Britches: Operational, Analytical, and Collaborative CRM Are Born | CPR on BPR: Practical Guidelines for Successful Business Process Analysis | CPR on BPR: Long Live Business Process Reengineering Part 1: A Primer | SAP Thrives On Competitors' Plight, In Part | Made2Manage Manages Throughout Soft Market | Microsoft Great Plains Procures eProcure At Last | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 5: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 4: SAP's Strategy | i2, SAP, Oracle Poised For Showdown in Q4 | SAP – A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 3: Market Impact | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 2: Expanding Functionality | SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 1: Alliances | Nortel and Clarify: Was There Ever Synergy Enough to Support this Marriage? | PeopleSoft Supply Chain Is Music To Mid Market Ears | It Is Possible - SAP And Baan Strange Bedfellows | Oracle Claims The Worst Is Over And Turns To KISS For A Boost Part 3: The Challenge of Gaining Competitive Advantage | Oracle Claims The Worst Is Over And Turns To KISS For A Boost Part 2: The Implications | Oracle Claims The Worst Is Over And Turns To KISS For A Boost Part 1: The News | Baan Achieves A Speedy Recovery Despite The Tough Times | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 2: The Implications | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 1: The News | Will QAD Finally Get The Break (-Even)? | ROI Systems - A Little ERP Fellow That Gets By | PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet Part 3: Predictions and Recommendations | PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet Part 2: Strengths and Challenges | PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet Part 1: About PeopleSoft | Epicor To Try The Divestiture Tack, Too | MAPICS Clings To Its Customers' Loyalty | SAP Remains One Of The Market’s Beacons Of Hope | SSA Acquires MAX Hoping To Leap From Its MIN | IBM Buys What’s Left of Informix | Invensys Announces New Division - Baan Process | SAP Acquires TopTier To Further Broaden Its Horizons | Oracle Sails Slower In The Low Tide, But Mayday Signal Is Quite Far-Fetched | IFS Aspires To Capture North American Market Against The Low Tide | Sagent Improves Its Image With SAS Partnership | Is Intentia Truly Industry’s First In Food Traceability? | QAD Finally Breaks The Red Ink Streak, But… | Epicor Software Corp.: Completing Painstaking "e"Volution Part 2: Evaluating Epicor | J.D. Edwards Saved By SCM, Narrowly, And Only For Now | Epicor Software Corp.: Completing Painstaking "e"Volution Part 1: About Epicor | Infinium Attempts To Better Gain Some Markets' Ear | MAPICS XA Expands BI Offering Through Partnership With Vanguard | Has Intentia Turned The Corner? Almost. | Ross Systems Closes Ranks For A (Possible) Turnaround | PeopleSoft Plays Hardball | Is Made2Manage Made2Survive? Seems So. | Business Objects Teams With TopTier For Analytics | Frontstep (Nee Symix Systems) A Step Closer To A Turnaround | SAP Defies Economic Slowdown, For Now | Can Lilly Software Get More VISUAL? | Fourth Shift Hopes To Thrive On China’s Greener Pastures | Wrong ERP Demise Predictions Have (Only Partly) Created Skills Shortage | PeopleSoft Joins The Hunt For SMEs | Extricity Makes a Move into IBM’s Sphere of B2B Influence | Customer Relationship Management for IT Professionals | Microsoft And Great Plains – A Friendship That Turned Into A Marriage | Oracle Sails Despite Market’s Low Tide; How Far Will It Go? | J.D. Edwards Reaches $1B Milestone In Another Losing Year | e-Catalysts Delivers Digital Marketplace | Made2Manage Systems, Inc.: M2M From A2Z For SMEs? | Ross Systems Continues To Slip, But Pledges to Fight Tooth And Claw | IFS Has A Magic Growth Formula; But What About Profitability? | SAP Claims Big Gains In The Low-End Battleground | MicroStrategy Manages Your Customer Relationships And Its Own | IBI + IBM = EAI | Baan – What Will The Future In Invensys’ Stable Bring? Part 2: Evaluating Baan | Infinium Ends Its Most Challenging Year | JuxtaComm And IBM Integrate Their Integration Products | Great Plains Unveils New E-Commerce Solution | Great Plains Taps The Web To Deliver Product Support | Epicor Delivers On Milestones, But Its Situation Remains Bleak | PurchasePro Acquires Stratton Warren | Onyx Software: CRM Vendor Battling For Viability | Baan – What Will The Future In Invensys’ Stable Bring? Part 1: About Baan | Intentia Possibly Seeing Daylight | eLoyalty Enhances Its Field Service And Logistics Services | SAP Q3 Results Cause Mixed Reactions | NetGenesis Predicts The Future From Mouse Trails | SPSS Has A New ShowCase | Fourth Shift Tightens Belt To Weather The Drought | PeopleSoft Delivers Oxymoron In 'Supply Chain in a Box' | PeopleSoft – Again A Force To Be Reckoned With? | Another Type Of Virus Hits The World (And Gets Microsoft No Less) | J.D. Edwards – A Collaboration Thought Leader Or A Disguised ERP Follower? Part 2: Evaluating J.D. Edwards | J.D. Edwards – A Collaboration Thought Leader Or A Disguised ERP Follower? Part 1: About J.D. Edwards | Cognos Unveils CRM Solution | ROI Systems Catching Up With e-Commerce | IBM Aims Renamed UNIX Server at Sun | CRM Vendors Cash In On The Financial Services Industry | Onyx Thinks ASP Opportunities Are A Gem | Commerce One Selects Entrada Software For Affiliate Program | Will Oracle’s Freebie Shot Hurt (Or Only Graze) Siebel? | Broadbase Continues to Expand | Great Plains – An SME Market Leader, But At What Cost? | Great Plains ASP - Evolution, Revolution, Innovation | Siebel: Great Plans for Great Plains | IBM and Partners Load the Guns in Europe | IMI Sees Red In Dawn Of Fiscal 2001 | Ultimate Connection Seeking Its US Retail Connection Through Solomon Software Partners | Oracle Applications - An Internet-Reinvented Feisty Challenger | Interelate: More on Tap Than Apps | PeopleSoft 8 Launched – Anything to Write Home About? | Lipstream Speaks to Kana | IBM Nabs Another Application Vendor | Catalyst International to Tread Water With SAP Through 2000 | Epicor Software Corp.: How Far From Being 'One-Stop' Shop? | Peregrine Polishes the Old In-Out-and-In-between | Mirapoint Launches Global Partner Program | Siebel Enters Smaller Markets in a Big Way | Baan Defectors – Is This Only Tip of an Iceberg? | More Vendors Bail on Oracle in Favor of IBM | Great Plains Supply Chain Series To Be Powered By Logility | Infinium and Elcom Walk Down ASP Aisle | Should PeopleSoft be Overly Happy? | SAP Gives in to CRM (Part Time) Matrimony | Oracle Corporation: Flying High for Being Jack-of-All-Trades and Master of Some | Lawson Software’s CRM and ASP Moves – Wise, Bold, Injudicious, Enforced, or Something Else? | Infinium Putting its Cards on the Table | Getting Strangers to Take Your Candy | Enlightened Self-interest Launches CRM Information Source | MATRAnet Converts Confusion to Cash | Intentia Attempts to Become ‘Lean and Mean’ | Vendors Begin to Round Out Their CRM Suites | Oracle Integrates Front and Back Office with Applications 11i | SAP Details CRM Plans | Key Product Delays Take a Toll on Oracle Users | Industri-Matematik Posts 2Q00 Loss But Sells CRM | SAP Finds CRM Partner for Marketing Tools | J.D. Edwards Closes Out Millennium on an Up Note | Is Baan Clinically Dead? | PeopleSoft Completes Acquisition of Vantive; Vantive CRM Applications Integrate with PeopleSoft and Other ERP Systems | PeopleSoft Recuperating Slowly, Hoping to Sink 1999 into Oblivion Quickly | Siebel Sees Farther on Shoulders of Giants | Sybase and MicroStrategy Team on Vertical Market Portal Applications | Oracle Loses Again | SAP Posts Solid Q499, but Warns of Q100 | Analysis of Lawson Delivering New Retail Analytic Capabilities | Analysis of SAS Institute and IBM Intelligence Alliance | Oracle is Word One at Ford | Intentia Floats Vaporware Agent to Replace Business Planning | BAAN Announces "Open World": Business-To-Business Collaboration Over The Internet | Remedy Makes CRM a Personal Matter | IBM Announces Netfinity 4000R Super-Thin Server | eMachines to Buy FreePC | SAP AG - ERP Leader with a "New Dimension" | Baan Company N.V. - Is the Worst Over? | QAD Inc.: The Art of Vertical Focus | Great Plains: Strong Channel and Microsoft focus for Dynamic(s) Growth | PeopleSoft on Client/Server and Database Issues | PeopleSoft - Are Business Intelligence and e-Commerce Enough? | Q: Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Billionaire? A: Baan -- Foster Care for Its Orphans Needed As Well |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google