Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

Summary

When a company contracts work from another company, it is typically called outsourcing. Outsourced work is usually performed locally (onshore outsourcing), in other countries in roughly the same time zone (nearshore outsourcing,) in countries that are many time zones away (offshore outsourcing), or some combination of the above. Literally any activity that is performed by a company can be, and probably has been, outsourced.

A company contracts with an outsourcing provider to perform a defined scope of work, and the outsourcing provider charges the company a fee. The fee can take many forms: by the transaction, by labor hour, cost per unit, cost per project, or annual cost.

Companies choose to outsource for many reasons. It is common for companies to embark on an outsourcing effort in order to lower costs, improve service, obtain expert skills, improve processes, or improve focus on core activities.

Nevertheless, outsourcing is not right for every company. A company may be too small to effectively outsource. The company's culture may not appropriate for outsourcing or there may be customer reasons that limit or prevent the company's ability to outsource. Some government agencies do not allow their contractors to outsource anything to an offshore location or management leadership may not be prepared to manage an outsourcing relationship.

Although there are many potential outsourcing categorizations, the outsourcing market is often segmented into four broad categories:

  • Application software
  • I.T. infrastructure
  • Business process outsourcing (BPO)
  • Manufacturing

This is Part Three of a three-part note.

Part One discussed the history of outsourcing, described outsourcing pros and cons, and introduced offshoring concepts.

Part Two defined and described common types of outsourcing.

This part will recap outsourcing approaches and categories, and offer recommendations for firms looking to outsource and recommendations for outsourcing providers.

Recommendations for Companies Looking to Outsource Some of Their Operations

Companies that are interested in outsourcing some or many of their operations need to take a strategic look at their company and their operations. Selecting a process to outsource, selecting the right provider for your company, and establishing the new business processes required to support the relationship, are not casual efforts. In fact, they are significant undertakings that deserve senior management attention and devotion to ensure that your company does not embark upon a failed effort.

Companies must balance the potential benefits of outsourcing with the potential pitfalls, and develop programs that manage the risks and achieve the intended rewards.

It is quite easy to jump into an outsource relationship, only to learn that you have selected the wrong partner, your internal processes are inadequate or your employees are unprepared to support and manage the relationships with your outsource provider. Companies must make sure they undertake a focused change management process that educates all of the company's employees to the rationale behind the decision, the approach, and strategy going forward.

Unlike software that has features and functions that can be readily reviewed and compared, services (such as outsourcing) are much harder to evaluate and compare. When selecting outsourcing providers, companies should identify and prioritize the criteria that are most important to them. Each company's needs are unique, and no one provider is right for all companies. Additionally, no one provider is necessarily the best choice to outsource all of the various processes of a company.

Companies should define which performance criteria are important to them. These criteria become the basis for service level agreements (SLAs) in the contract.

Get help from an experienced consultant. The consultant can help you create a list of suitable providers, select a provider, and construct a solid contract with effective SLAs.

Start with a pilot. Outsourcing is not an all or nothing proposition. It is important to learn about your chosen provider, and about your own company. Both entities need to be open to learning and accepting different ways of communicating and doing business.

Recommendations for Outsourcing Providers

Outsourcing providers need to ensure that they deliver strong value and excellent service to their customers. The provider is providing a service, which means if the customer is dissatisfied, the customer can skip the service and do it themselves (barring contractual obligations). Outsourcing providers must invest in implementing the right processes, and not just providing cheap labor.

Smaller providers should consider specializing in a given vertical or set of vertical markets, as well as specialize in a given area within outsourcing. Once the provider builds its reputation in that vertical or area, it can then begin to expand into nearby verticals and outsource areas.

Larger providers should look for ways to leverage complementary strengths between their business units so as to provide one stop shopping and a synergistic benefit for their customers. Ideally, providers should ensure that customers receive added value when obtaining more than one type of service from a given provider.

There are literally thousands of outsourcing providers in the world today, and more are being launched everyday. Providers need to establish a solid reputation and brand, and should have very focused marketing efforts targeted at their core target market.

Unlike software that has features and functions that can be readily reviewed and compared, services (such as outsourcing) are much harder to evaluate and compare. Providers need to find ways to differentiate themselves from their competitors. Outsourced services that are not differentiated might be purchased as a commodity, with the provider selection based solely on price instead of value.

There are maybe a dozen larger players with outsourcing revenue greater $200 million (USD). Most of these providers are well known by the Fortune 500, but this group needs to differentiate their services for each type of project that their customers may wish to purchase.

There are hundreds of providers that have less than 500 employees, or do less than $50 million (USD) per year in revenue. Most of these providers are known only by their customers and current prospects. These providers need to focus on differentiation and gaining visibility in a crowded market.

This concludes Part Three of a three-part note.

Part One discussed the history of outsourcing, described outsourcing pros and cons, and introduced offshoring concepts.

Part Two defined and described four major outsourcing categories.

Part Three recapped outsourcing approaches and categories, and described recommendations.

About the Author

A.B. Maynard has over twenty years of technology, industry, management consulting and application software experience. He is an experienced executive with leadership experience in the software industry, Big 4 Consulting and Fortune 1000 industrial companies where he gained extensive experience in outsourcing, I.T. Services, and enterprise software solutions. In addition to the previous responsibilities and directing client outsourcing sites, he has managed offshore outsourcing provider selection, implementation and program management projects.

A.B. serves as the Outsourcing Specialist for Technology Evaluation Centers, and is President of Agilocity Consulting, a firm dedicated to helping companies improve their agility and velocity through technology, outsourcing and offshoring. A.B. can be reached at ab.maynard@agilocityconsulting.com


 
comments powered by Disqus


Meet the New (Revolutionized) Progress Software | Using ERP to Deliver E-commerce for Engineer-to-order Companies | Outsourcing in Latin America | Distinctions and Benefits of Strategic Sourcing | Should North Americans Send More Software Development Work to China? | Global Product Development Seen as a Boon for Product Lifecycle Management Vendors | A Semi–open Source Vendor Discusses Market Trends | Can ERP Speak PLM? | Human Resources for Small to Medium Businesses | The Challenges that Remain for One Aspiring Global Sourcing Vendor | A Retail Sourcing Suite Built on Experience | One Vendor's Quest to Garner a Global Sourcing Ecosystem | Zooming into the Clothing Retailer Conundrum | No One Said Sourcing Overseas Would Be Easy | The Anatomy of Retail Sourcing Processes |
The Promise (and Complexities) of Private Labels | The Blessing and Curse of Global Sourcing and Supplier Management | Microsoft Dynamics AX 4.0 for Manufacturing Environments | Supplier Relationship Management: Benefits and Challenges | Software as a Service's Functional Catch-up | Software as a Service: Not without Caveats | Off-shoring: Are You Getting Your Money's Worth? | Technology's Role in Strategic Human Resources | Application Portfolio Management: Are You Getting the Most from your Enterprise Software? | Outsourcing Supply Chain Planning Processes | Driving Factors in The Enterprise Applications Market | Enterprise Software Product Outsourcing: A Fresh Perspective for Mid-market Vendors | Selecting an Outsourcing Provider—Art or Science? | Offshore Outsourcing: Is There a Method to the Madness? Planning for Offshore Outsourcing | Remote Implementations--Why They Can Make $ense | Consumers Shop Everywhere: Understanding Multichannel Sales | Understanding SOA, Web Services, BPM, and BPEL Part Two: BPEL and User Recommendations | Understanding SOA, Web Services, BPM, BPEL, and More Part One: SOA, Web Services, and BPM | Understand J2EE and .NET Environments Before You Choose | Where Has All the Service Gone? | What's Your Global Market Price? | The Many Flavors of Application Software Outsourcing | International Trade Logistics Challenge Automated Global E-Trading | PLM Coming of Age: ERP Vendors Take Notice | Leveraging Technology to Maintain a Competitive Edge During Tough Economic Times -- A Panel Discussion Analyzed Part Three: Applications Hosting | Resilient Supply Chains: The Next Frontier | Understanding the True Cost of Sourcing | Supply Chain Portfolio 2004 | Outsourcing 101 - A Primer Part Two: Outsourcing Categories | Outsourcing 101 - A Primer | The Strategic Importance of Asset Management Part One: Changing Attitudes | Financial Reporting, Planning, and Budgeting As Necessary Pieces of EPM Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Financial Reporting, Planning, and Budgeting As Necessary Pieces of EPM Part One: Executive Summary | Has The BI Market Consolidation Been Crystal-Clearly Actuated? Part Three: Competition and User Recommendations. | Has The BI Market Consolidation Been Crystal-Clearly Actuated? Part Two: Market Impact | Has The BI Market Consolidation Been Crystal-Clearly Actuated? | BI Market Consolidation Compared to ERP Market Consolidation | Analyse This | Supply Chain Decisions - Make Sure You Understand the Dollars and Sense | BPM Weaves Data And Processes Together For Real-time Revenues | SCE Leaders Partner To See Beyond Their Portfolio Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | SCE Leaders Partner To See Beyond Their Portfolios | Inventory Planning & Optimization: Extending Your ERP System Part Two: How It Works | The Art Of Distributed Development Of Multi-Lingual Three-Tier Internet Applications | The Case of A Boutique Vendor's Benefits of Focus - IRM Corporation | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in ProcessPart 3: Process PLM Requirements | Why Systems Fail - The Dead-end of Dirty Data | Data Conversion in an ERP Environment | Continuous Data Quality Management: The Cornerstone of Zero-Latency Business Analytics Part 2: One Solution | Continuous Data Quality Management: The Cornerstone of Zero-Latency Business Analytics | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT Part 2: Market Impact | What Makes Process Process? | Beware of Legacy Data - It Can Be Lethal | A Definition of Data Warehousing | The Next Big Thing or Integration-The Interaction Server Part 2: Possible Solutions | Outsourcing Security Part 3: Selecting a Managed Security Services Provider | Outsourcing Security Part 2: Measuring the Cost | Outsourcing Security Part 1: Noting the Benefits | IPSec VPNs for Extranets: Not what you want to wake up next to | Shall Bifurcated Tack Reverse J.D. Edwards’ Bad Spell? | Enterprise Application Integration - Where Is It Now (And What Is It Now)? Part 2: Where Is It Now? | Enterprise Application Integration - Where Is It Now (And What Is It Now)? Part 1: What Is It Now? | Are ASP Applications Right for You? Part 2: Decision Criteria | Are ASP Applications Right for You? Part 1: Decision Factors | The SOAP Opera Progresses - Helping XML to Rule the World | Can You Add New Life To an Old ERP System? | BEA Systems Announces WebLogic Integration | New Era of Networks Gets Blinded By the NEON | J.D. Edwards' QUEST To End Its String Of Pyrrhic Victories Part 2: The Implications | J.D. Edwards' QUEST To End Its String Of Pyrrhic Victories Part 1: The News | The Application Server War Escalates | EAI Vendor MITEM Integrates Legacy Systems With Siebel | Knosys Seeks Clarity With A Name Change | Computer Associates Jasmineii - When Is A Portal Not Just A Portal? | Hewlett Packard Makes Multiple Moves in Middleware | SAPped Catalyst Warns in Wake of CEO Departure | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 2: Product Architecture and Web-Basing | EDI and XML Integration: Vitria Buys XMLSolutions | TIBCO Announces Results That Are 'Better Than Worse Than Expected' | Sagent Improves Its Image With SAS Partnership | Great Product: Too Bad The Architecture Doesn’t Fit | Seagate Software 'Crystallizes' Its New Name: Crystal Decisions | Informatica PowerCenter 5 Enables Enterprise Data Integration | EAI Market Consolidation Continues With Peregrine Acquisition of Extricity | IONA Purchases Netfish Technologies (And Much, Much More) | A New Era Dawns for Sybase | Evolutionary Technologies Does EAI (Always Did, We Just Didn’t Call It That) | Information Builders Did It iWay | GMAC Web-Enables Legacy Data With NEON Systems Shadow Direct | Business Objects Teams With TopTier For Analytics | New Dimensions in EC and SCM Part 4: Using E-Procurement to Leverage Volume | Sun’s Java Won’t Be In Microsoft’s .NET – Complicate Your Integration? You .BET | Metagenix Reverse Engineers Data Into Information | Hummingbird Smells Nectar In The Corporate Portal Market | SCT Corporation: The Last Viable Process Manufacturing Vendor Standing? | Mercator Continues to Suffer Turmoil - Can They Stay on the Map? | Tibco Takes a Pragmatic Approach to Multicasting | Talarian and NextSet Team for B2B Solutions | Informatica Powers Siebel’s New eBusiness Analytics | Implementation Acceleration Using Integration | BEA Systems Has A Broad Vision For E-Business Infrastructures | QueryObject Partners With Cognos | So You Want to Outsource Your Messaging? | Knosys "in the Kno" With ProClarity 3.0 Analytical Platform | SPSS Has A New ShowCase | Did Sagent Technology Pull the Old 'Pump and Dump'? | Data Mining: The Brains Behind eCRM | Tempest Creates a Secure Teapot | Optum’s ConnectStream: First the Pieces Now the Glue | What’s Up with Computer Associates? | Now the Minnows are Eating the Minnows | Informix Decides to Start Analyzing Websites | EAI - The 'Crazy Glue' of Business Applications | SAS Institute Shoots for the Two-Stop-Shop with new Release of Warehouse Administrator | System Software Suppliers Slip Seriously | EAI Vendor Mercator Drops to a Lower Place on the Map | The Necessity of Data Warehousing | Agilera: Making E-Business Agile | Intel Outside? | Syncsort Sigma Manages Database Aggregates | MicroStrategy 7 Hits the Street | CPortals Technologies Aims for the Middle | To BEA or Not to BEA: Is That the Question? | Informix Goes Vertical With Software Vendor ADRM | Evoke Software Releases Axio Data Integration Product | Vignette of an EAI Vendor (So to Speak) | United Messaging Extends Global Reach ~ Opens Offices in London and Amsterdam | Viador Teams With Business Objects | Applix Still Shows a Presence in the OLAP Market | Information Builders Announces New Release of WebFOCUS | webMethods Gets Active (Software That Is) | Sagent Technology Teams for Telco e-Business | EAI Vendor Active Software Activates Transactions | BMC Software Webs for the DBA | Business Objects Objects Again | E&Y+ASP=BSP: It’s Not Algebra, But It Adds Up To Something Big | Acta Gets Active | Parametric Technology Chills Out With Windchill Info*Engine V4 | Informix XML’s Its Metadata Transport Layer | Metadata Standards in the Marketplace – Why Do I Care? (And Where Does Godzilla Fit In?) | EAI Vendor Extricity Teams with Moai to Automate E-Commerce Systems | USi to Offer Managed Messaging for U.S. Feds | MCI WorldCom and Critical Path Power into Outsourced Messaging | Computer Associates Goes E-Business in a Big Way | IBM Moves into Enterprise Application Integration | Sybase Tag-Teams with Informatica | Mercator Software Extends EAI Solutions for Insurance with XML | EAI Vendor CrossWorlds Eases Middleware Customization | Brio Technology Expands Support for WML and XML | Ardent Software: Will Informix Merger Affect their Success? | PSINet and HP ~ OpenMail as an Outsourced Global Messaging | United Messaging ~ Ready…Set…Outsource! | MicroStrategy Hits a Big Speed Bump on the Information Superhighway | Aspen Follows Good Quarter With Internet Launch | Brio Technology Reports Record Second-QuarterEarnings | Sybase and MicroStrategy Team on Vertical Market Portal Applications | Informatica Conforms to Metadata Standard | Business Objects Outguns Brio Technology in Patent Dispute | Is There Finally a Metadata Exchange Standard on the Horizon? | Datawarehouse Vendors Moving Towards Application Suites | Microstrategy Moves Up with e-Business | Seagate Technology Refocuses its Software Business | The Market Rewards Ardent Software Initiatives | Hummingbird Announces Extraction and Portal Strategy for ERP | Sagent Technology Reports Strong Growth | Oracle8i Release 2 - Ready to Storm the Web | Sterling Software Sees the Light with Eureka:Intelligence | Brio Technology Enters the ETL Market | More Data is Going to the Cleaners | Informix to Acquire Ardent Software-Another Vendor's Attempt at End-to-End Data Warehousing | Informatica Heads for E-Business | Acta Technology Helps Add Business Intelligence Capabilities to Major ERP Vendors | Inprise/Borland Challenges Other Vendors to Open-Source Their Database Code | Informatica Goes Multinational With Support for Unicode | Concur's Customers Can Network Now | Rentable Procurement | Bus-Tech Speeds up Mainframe DB2 Access | NEON Systems Moves Further into Enterprise Application Integration | Hummingbird Releases Genio 4.0 With Improved Support for Oracle, Business Objects, Cognos, and NCR | Business Objects Launches WebIntelligence Extranet | Analysis of Novell and EAI Vendor Talarian Alliance | Informix Holds Fire Sale on Linux Database | Resistance is Futile: Computer Associates Assimilates yet another Major Software Firm | systemfabrik Releases an EAI Product? | Saga Continues Roll Out of EAI Tools | NCR's Teradata Database Meets Windows 2000. A Match Made in Redmond? | BMC Software Gets Slapped with Class Action Lawsuit | Software Technologies Corporation (STC) Prepares to go Public | SAS/Warehouse 2.0 Goes Live | Total Uptime Guarantees? It Must Be A New Millennium! | GE Comes to Lunch. Want to Guess Who the Appetizer Will Be? | Analysis of Critical Path's Alliance with yesmail.com for Permission Email | Computer Associates Splashes Into the Data Warehousing Market with Platinum Technology Acquisition | Informatica Morphs into Enterprise Decision Support Vendor | Enterprise Application Integration - the Latest Trend in Getting Value from Data |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google