Event
Summary
[Source: IBM] 10/16/2000
IBM
has introduced the eServer pSeries 680 - and announced it will ship the
UNIX-based system to customers beginning Nov. 17. Code-named "Turbo,"
the pSeries 680 has captured eight major performance benchmark records
using up to 24 copper microprocessors with IBM's Silicon-on-Insulator
(SOI) technology. (See IBM
Continues RS/6000 Performance Focus.)
Additional
features include:
- Capacity
Upgrade on Demand - A "pay as you grow" configuration option
- Built-in
service processor - the service processor monitors system operations
and takes preventive or corrective actions.
- Dynamic
CPU Deallocation - Automatically deallocates resources if impending
CPU failures are detected
IBM will
also make available the ability to cluster up to 16 servers.
Market
Impact
For those unfamiliar with the new product line names, the "eServer
pSeries" is the new name for the former RS/6000 UNIX product line.
IBM
is clearly continuing its assault on Sun. But that's to be expected, with
Sun still believed by many to be the leading Web server vendor. IBM's
take-no-prisoners attitude is exemplified by their publishing a wide range
of performance benchmark data (see Table 1 below), especially in those
sections of Table 1 where "Sun has not published" similar data.
The
pSeries has a few things to recommend it:
- High
performance
- IBM's
hardware reliability
- IBM's
breadth of products
Table
1.
| |
IBM |
SUN/HP |
Web
Serving
(1) SPECweb99 |
Fastest
Web server
7,288
simultaneous connections
|
Sun
has not published
HP
- 1,750 simultaneous connections
|
Transaction
Processing*
OLTP
(1) TPC-C |
Most
powerful OLTP server
220,807.27
tpmC
@$43.30 /tpmC
|
Sun
E10000 64-way
156,873.03 tpmC
@ $48.81 /tpmC
HP
V2500 32-way
102,025.50 tpmC
@ $63.21 /tpmC
|
|
Java
Performance
(2) VolanoMark
(1)
SPECjbb2000
|
Top
Java performance for UNIX
133,251 messages per second
56,834
operations per second
|
Sun
results no longer available
HP
has not published
Sun
has not published
HP
- 40,192 ops
|
SAP
performance
(1) SAP ATO (2-tier) |
Best
SAP performance
8,570
assembly orders per hour
|
Sun
has not published
HP
- 2,260 assembly orders per hour
|
Baan
performance
(2) |
Best
Baan performance
11,886
Baan Reference Users (BRU's)
|
Sun
has not published
HP
has not published
|
|
PeopleSoft
performance
General
Ledger
Payroll
|
Best
PeopleSoft Performance
15,584,416
journal lines
533,546
transactions per hour
|
Sun
has not published
HP
has not published
|
Sources:
(1) www.ideasinternational.com (10/16/2000)
(2) IBM News Releases (10/16/2000)
|
One
issue which detracts from these figures is the price/performance ratio.
This was accomplished with a five-year equipment cost listed in the TPCC
report at just under $7 million. Upon closer inspection: we think this
is a neat trick, considering that the base cost of the server hardware
(again, from the report, and without adding the costs for Oracle or for
client hardware) is over $9.3 million. The difference? Deep discount -
over $4.5 million. Now, discounts are certainly not un-American. We just
wish vendors would maintain an apples-to-apples outlook. (IBM is not the
only vendor to offer discounts, they just happen to be the vendor we're
writing about today.)
User
Recommendations
IBM continues to produce high-performing Unix systems. Customers already
using the RS/6000 will appreciate the upgrade path. Of course, these systems
aren't cheap, but we're talking about heavy-duty compute requirements,
so that's to be expected.
We
would not be surprised if Sun started offering discounts, just to steal
some of IBM's thunder. Sun's history does not indicate a concern about
what IBM does, though.
A
key issue for potential customers trying to decide between IBM and Sun
is that, currently, there are significantly more software apps available
for Solaris than for AIX (IBM's version of Unix). For many customers wanting
to have an enterprise-level system, this is a significant issue.
Editor's
Note:
This article has been modified from its original form since the original
publication date.