PeopleSoft - Catching Its Second Wind From The Internet
Part 2: Strengths and Challenges
P.J. Jakovljevic -
6/6/2001
Part
2: Strengths and Challenges
P.J.
Jakovljevic
-
June
6, 2001
Executive
Summary
PeopleSoft, Inc. is one of the leading developers of enterprise
business applications, which helps governments, higher education institutions
and large-to-medium sized corporations manage human resources (HR), financials,
supply chain management (SCM), customer relationship management (CRM),
e-Business and business intelligence data from a wide range of operating
systems and hardware platforms.
From
its founding in 1987 PeopleSoft grew at a breakneck pace with a number
of consecutive years of doubled sales until 1998, when its sales all but
stalled due to increased competition and a saturated market. 1999 and
2000 were years of changes and adjustment culminating in a company with
a pure Internet platform, a new set of products, and a new assertive attitude.
Indisputably,
the most prominent event and the turning point for the company was the
delivery of PeopleSoft 8 in September 2000. The product is an Internet-based
collection of 160 applications, with 59 new applications in the 8 release,
that span well beyond PeopleSoft's HR stronghold into e-business collaborative
applications, CRM, SCM, professional service automation (PSA), and analytics
to name but a few.
PeopleSoft's
announcement of pure Internet connectivity with the elimination of required
client side software represents a new twist. Not only should it speed
application deployment time (browsers are free and often pre-installed),
it should also allow access to anyone with a cell phone, hand held or
browser equipped machine, which is an attractive prospect for remote offices,
sales teams, and business partners.
This
part examines the strengths and challenges PeopleSoft now faces in today's
cutthroat competitive environment.
About
This Note
This
is a three-part note:
Part 3 contains
links to Parts 1 and 2.
ANALYSIS
PeopleSoft Strengths
HRMS/Payroll
Software Leadership: PeopleSoft is indisputably one of the best, the
earliest-to-market and the most comprehensive human resource management
system (HRMS) applications available. As it was the first application
that the company developed, it drove the rest of development of PeopleSoft
enterprise applications suite. This was in a sharp contrast to its ERP
counterparts for which HR application was only a necessary add-on, and,
subsequently, these competitive HR applications often display a financial
and/or manufacturing approach to HRMS and use terminology that is not
user-friendly to human resources and/or payroll staff. As a result, PeopleSoft
can often compete with 'best-of-breed' HRMS applications with its product
depth in areas such as performance reviews, benefits management, salary
planning, complex payroll calculations (and transactions reversals if
need be), pension administration, employee and managerial self-service,
etc.
PeopleSoft
HRMS is also delivered with a number of Business Process Graphical Maps
for the users to easily navigate and process key functions (i.e., new
hire process, termination process, performance review process), which
include integration with email online alerts and automated work lists
('to do' lists) creation. Moreover, the PeopleSoft 8 product features
architecture that may improve the ability to support internal and external
enterprise processes, which will increase the need for employee and managerial
self-service functionality and access to e-HR communities.
By
delivering PeopleSoft MarketPay and PeopleSoft MarketPlace products, the
company has extended its HR and financial systems expertise and taken
a thought leadership over its direct competitors, which are currently
only at early planning stages of developing these capabilities. Handling
payment settlements and HR requirements are the next hot issues in the
digital marketplaces frenzy, given the fact that ways of trading goods
via Internet have mainly been resolved.
Also,
PeopleSoft 8 Financials functionality is one of the strongest and broadest
in the market. It features a high degree of flexibility (e.g., daily periods
in the calendar, unlimited account key, etc.) and offers treasury management,
as well as strong expense self-service module that is tightly integrated
with Accounts Payable and Payroll modules. Having garnered strong HR/Payroll
and recently financial functionality, PeopleSoft offers a strong and comprehensive
vertical industry solution for non-manufacturing industries like government,
utilities, financial, insurance, healthcare and higher education.
Sound
Corporate Viability: PeopleSoft has restored a sound financial situation
during the last 18 months (See Figures 1 - 2) in terms of growth and profitability,
with exorbitant investment in R&D (27% of revenue, 26% of workforce),
and a strong and efficient direct sales force (measured in revenue per
sales employee ratio), and a traditionally congenial corporate culture
that nurtures creativity and initiative of employees. In addition, having
been able to provide a complete solution with a minimum reliance on 3rd-party
products (and, consequently, with a lesser cost of software license),
PeopleSoft should continue to post high margins and solid profits provided
sustaining revenue stream. These impressive results coincide with the
final phase of integrating the acquired Vantive CRM product within its
flagship PeopleSoft 8 product suite and with the winding down of its ambitious
and over two years long R&D endeavors.
Figure
1.

Figure
2.

Figure
3.

Further,
PeopleSoft has a large and loyal HRMS (over 60% of global HRMS market
share) and financial modules customer base, which could provide a significant
recurring revenue stream through sales of new components and/or product
upgrades. The blessing in disguise for the company is the stronghold within
the service industries that have been much less affected by the current
economic slowdown than their manufacturing or telecommunications counterparts.
Advanced
Product Architecture and Technology: While we have strong reservations
towards companies utilizing bombastic words like "technology leap", there
may be a point in PeopleSoft's suggestion that its competitors' (read
Oracle and SAP) products were initially (or currently) only Web-friendly,
rather than an Internet-only application. Early Web enabled releases from
both Oracle and SAP were a mere porting of client/server architecture
to the Internet (in other words, basically rejuvenated versions of the
existing, proprietary Windows-like screens and forms) through a number
of Java applets and/or intermediary architectural layer.
Therefore,
PeopleSoft's announcement of pure Internet connectivity with the elimination
of required client side software represents a new twist. Not only should
it speed application deployment time (browsers are free and often pre-installed),
it should also allow access to anyone with a cell phone, hand held or
browser equipped machine, which is an attractive prospect for remote offices,
sales teams, and business partners. To that end, PeopleSoft currently
offers an impressive range of mobile applications.
Also,
PeopleSoft's architecture will challenge competitors' offerings with advanced
XML messaging and application programming interfaces (APIs) options that
promise to ease bi-directional integration. Other indisputable advantages
of a browser are the ease of training and use, as well as a broad-scale
deployability. The new architecture should also enable release independence,
allowing upgrades of a single module without the need to upgrade the full
suite.
Furthermore,
PeopleSoft has possibly the strongest product technology in terms of support
for almost all industry relevant OS and DB platforms and/or middleware
standards and in terms of scalability & performance metrics, system monitoring
& load balancing (e.g., by using BEA Systems' Tuxedo Monitor tool), backup
& recovery issues, authentication, and authorization & transaction security
issues.
Product
Flexibility: Owing to an early modular approach of the design of PeopleSoft
applications, its suite can be implemented in phases as required. This
allows for critical functions to become operational without having to
undergo a risky and harrowing big-bang approach. Also, given that PeopleSoft
enterprise applications have been developed and added incrementally to
the suite, the company has long had to rely on product flexibility and
integration to 3rd-party products or tools. As an example, PeopleSoft
features a set of embedded powerful and easy to use reporting tools like
nVision, Crystal and Cognos Powerplay. Further, PeopleSoft Workflow integrates
with any VIM, MAPI, or SMTP compliant email system.
Also,
all PeopleSoft applications use effective dating and not only the applications
where effective- and back-dating are generally accepted ways of doing
business. In other words, it is not only limited to detailed transactions
like journal entries or employee personnel transactions, but also to the
supporting and edit tables (e.g., translate values). Also, with PeopleSoft
8, the Unicode language standard is supported which should grant the products
strong global capabilities.
Product
Horizontal Breadth: PeopleSoft 8, offering non-proprietary browser
looking user interface, a completely redesigned Internet architecture,
and notable additional functionality, places the company as one of the
frontrunners in the next generation of e-business applications. It stands
a chance to currently be the only vendor, other than SAP and Oracle, that
can deliver a majority of the components of a complete e-business solution
with its PeopleSoft 8 suite including CRM, SCM, HR, professional service
automation (PSA), data warehousing, e-procurement applications, business
intelligence, and enterprise resource planning (ERP) applications.
Consequently,
PeopleSoft offers its integrated product suite as a solution that could
bundle necessary application components within a single integrated product
(a "one-stop shop"), thereby avoiding the middleware porting and connectivity
standards issues. Avoiding the need for integration between disparate
components reduces the cost and risk associated with implementation and
maintenance and the product can be implemented more quickly. The approach
can also lead to more effective customer relationship management since
the customers should obtain the identical response from the business application
regardless of which communication channel they use (Internet, call-center,
direct mail, etc.).
Moreover,
in some instances, PeopleSoft may be able to offer best of both worlds
(one-stop shop and best-of-breed). In addition to a leading HRMS product,
the company's pervasive Business Intelligence (Analytics) components are
impressive, with dedicated complex analysis and reporting around almost
all crucial business areas including several new CRM components. Although
the marketing, so far, of its Vantive CRM product acquisition has not
matched the efforts of rivals such as Oracle or Siebel, PeopleSoft's huge
potential advantage is the integration of its Vantive product to the back-office
ERP system that handles the vital internal processes so important to customers.
The
new system should allow manufacturers to get a 360-degree view of all
their customer relationships. It provides tracking and management of marketing
campaigns, the entire sell cycle, the fulfillment cycle, and customer
service. This kind of knowledge only comes from integrating CRM software
with back-office systems. Additional advantages of the Vantive product
are its ability to easily integrate with other 3rd-party ERP systems as
well as improved scalability (the company claims to be the first vendor
to support 20,000 CRM users).
Also,
supplier-facing applications have long been a strength of PeopleSoft,
with over 1,200 existing customers. With PeopleSoft 8, new additional
collaborative applications have led to the launch of a supplier relationship
management (SRM) solution. PeopleSoft 8 SRM is designed to help organizations
effectively evaluate the strategic value of their suppliers and leverage
their relationships accordingly. It is envisioned to integrate the design,
sourcing, procurement, manufacturing, and replenishment processes within
a company. Since the solution offers an array of both direct and indirect
materials procurement processes, it might provide PeopleSoft with the
opportunity to sell its SCM products into some non-manufacturing industries
such as healthcare, telecommunications and utilities, where it already
has a large user base.
Furthermore,
integration of SCM and CRM products should result in a convergence of
these traditionally disconnected business processes (e.g., campaign-to-order,
order-to-cash, service-to-profit, design-to-acceptance, plan-to-service,
request-to-resolve, agreement-to-profit, etc.) through information at
every touch point, and every channel across the expanded enterprise. To
enable effective collaborative commerce, PeopleSoft has delivered role-based
portals that encompass business applications, transactional data, workflow
and analytics to make employees more productive. This approach has also
been extended out to address specific industry needs as in the example
of the broker portal for the consumer goods industry.
Partnerships
and Service & Support Infrastructure: PeopleSoft has been adept in
forming alliances with industry leaders to deliver a full range of Internet
based solutions. From ASP/hosting and infrastructure to joint development
initiatives, continued strategic alliances will contribute to the company's
success. PeopleSoft seems to understand the benefits of effective channel
management and of limiting channel conflict, the importance of developing
vertical, industry-specific products, and the integration of the ASP delivery
model as an upfront option during the sales cycle.
PeopleSoft
has positioned the ASP business in a right manner - rather as a viable
option for delivering PeopleSoft products, as opposed to a cheap, deal-striking
alternative. Owning all elements of ASP business and/or selectively partnering
with viable, vertically focused ASP service providers, along with its
readiness to accommodate some degree of customization have reduced customers'
initial reticence to venture into the uncertain land of ASP.

PeopleSoft
Challenges
Product Immaturity, Functional Holes and Integration Work-In-Progress:
PeopleSoft 8, achieved through a radical rewrite of over 14,000 PeopleSoft
7.5 enterprise suite panels and/or program sessions and through acquisition
of Vantive CRM product, is still an unproven product in its infancy and
adopted mainly by a number of early adopters.
PeopleSoft
has yet to resolve integration issues and reworking disparate CRM and
ERP pieces into a unified data model. If one wants to be nit picking he/she
may also notice that the entire PeopleSoft 8 product suite does not exhibit
an identical look and feel across the board. Namely, its Vantive CRM suite
still requires Java virtual machine and will supposedly be re-architected
for the Internet and fully integrated within the suite in the 2nd half
of 2001. This can prove to be a drawback at this stage, given that CRM
is often the driving force behind e-business projects. In addition, while
all PeopleSoft transactions are processed through the Web applications,
part of its development tools, PeopleSoft Tools (e.g., administrative
functions) are still WIN32 based.
In
addition, SAP's recently renewed joint development alliance with Commerce
One may derail PeopleSoft's own technology alliance with the same marketplace
vendor. PeopleSoft MarketPlace is its e-procurement suite for which Commerce
One's MarketSite technology is used to power content management, auctioning,
and searching, with the initial target markets to be professional services,
educational, and financial services. Future collaborative services are
said to include direct procurement, travel, benefits, resource management
and recruiting. PeopleSoft may now be forced to develop its own marketplace
technology as a result of the SAP deal.
It
also appears that Oracle and SAP have seriously closed the HR functionality
gap with their latest product releases and have jeopardized PeopleSoft
invincibility in the realm of HR. Both vendors have long provided better
global features and integration to non-HR processes, which may be a decisive
factor in some global selections within manufacturing industries. Furthermore,
Lawson Software, Great Plains, Infinium, etc. are becoming ever more competitive
in the HR mid-market, while the niche non-ERP HR vendors like Concur exhibit
stronger vertical focus, alliances with major HR consultancies, and competitiveness
for organizations that have older HR systems (e.g., Cyborg) or older versions
of ERP HR packages.
Cutthroat
Competition: PeopleSoft faces almost internecine wars from formidable
competitors like SAP, Oracle, Siebel, and i2. Primarily service & maintenance
revenues have driven PeopleSoft's revenue growth in the last two years
(over 70% of total revenue), and one should note that PeopleSoft's license
revenue in 2000 was still 25% less than the corresponding revenue in 1998
(See Figure 1), back when the company was only a mere ERP player. Therefore,
one should not be too overly impressed with the magnitude of recent quarterly
improvements that compare to the worst quarters in the company history
during 1999/2000.
Despite
a significant growth of PeopleSoft's license revenue in the last quarter,
a more detailed look reveals things to not appear quite so rosy. Namely,
Vantive CRM products have been the major license revenue contributor,
which means that PeopleSoft traditional breadwinners' (HR and financial
systems) revenues have shown below the market average growth year over
year. Moreover, the overwhelming impression is that Vantive has not been
utilized to its full potential either despite the fact that the CRM market
has been experiencing stellar annual growth. PeopleSoft has recently recognized
the issue though, and has taken the steps to address it by concentrating
on delivering integrated CRM modules within its product suite and seeking
acquisitions that would boost its CRM offering. However, replacing the
Vantive brand with PeopleSoft CRM brand may disconcert current Vantive
non-PeopleSoft users and may also confuse the marketplace.
The
company has a reputation of squandering very promising acquisitions away
- the Red Pepper purchase from a few years ago being one. A similar mistake
with Vantive could be ruinous, particularly since CRM is part-and-parcel
of the new IT trends giving PeopleSoft a golden opportunity. Its competitors
will actively sow fear, uncertainty & doubt (FUD) in the market based
on the above-mentioned PeopleSoft missteps and the lack of awareness about
the enhancements of the Vantive product since the acquisition. One is
to expect the likes of Siebel to counterattack users of Vantive products,
particularly those that do not run on PeopleSoft back office, given that
switching to PeopleSoft's next generation product would require spending
more money and tinkering with the systems. In case PeopleSoft CRM 8 does
not break any new ground, current Vantive users may opt to switch to still
a deeper and broader leading CRM product.
While
PeopleSoft now has strong management with an invigorated stance, and is
running a profitable business, it may be short-lived without sustaining
license revenue. PeopleSoft has lower license revenue (expressed both
as a percentage of total revenue and in raw dollar amounts), market share,
global presence, and resources compared to SAP, Oracle and, in part, Siebel
Systems. Also, the great part of its revenue comes from its existing customer
base, which may be reluctant to jump on a heavily involved product upgrade
both because of current economic conditions and because of their contentment
with the current product release in use. On the other hand, potential
users that might be attracted to the new release, may postpone the software
acquisition until economic conditions improve.
While
PeopleSoft's international expansion has been impressive during the last
few years, it still lags the international diversifications of its peers.
There is also an indication that the most of its international accounts
are the divisions of US-based corporations where the company already had
an instance of its product. Given that these markets are likely to feel
the economic slump echoed from the US, PeopleSoft's further international
expansion efforts may be seriously hampered.
Low
Mind Share within the Manufacturing Industries and Insignificant Number
of Full-ERP Reference Sites: PeopleSoft is still not regarded as a
full-fledged ERP solution provider, owing to lagging main competitors
in complex manufacturing functionality and with only a few hundreds full-ERP
reference sites overall. While the number of additionally released applications
is impressive, the product portfolio still shows serious functional holes
or unproven new functionality, particularly in its proverbial 'bogey'
areas like manufacturing and supply chain management, where its competitive
position is not going to improve dramatically very soon (see Vendor Predictions
in Part 3).
While
there is significant new supply chain execution (SCE) functionality (e.g.,
directed put away and/or picking, steamlined fulfillment, wedge-based
parcel packing, available-to-promise (ATP) reservations, tolerance-based
over picking, etc.) and in supply chain planning (SCP) functionality such
as promotion planning and collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment
(CPFR), vendor managed inventory (VMI), transportation management and
warehouse management system (WMS), the company is still mainly doing the
catch-up with the major SCM players. Also most industry-based templates
have not been revised from the 7.5 release and will only be delivered
with PeopleSoft 9 release.
Nonetheless,
while PeopleSoft has so far failed to exploit its purchase of Red Pepper
several years ago, its new tack of addressing manufacturers' needs may
result in far greater success. Namely, for the last two and a half years,
PeopleSoft has focused its manufacturing and SCM solutions on only consumer
packaged goods (CPG), high tech/electronics, and wholesale distribution
industries. It already has a strong customer base within these industries,
primarily with its financial and HR applications, but also to a degree
with its manufacturing and supply chain modules.
During
the above mentioned period, the company has built out functionality specific
to these industries and has become a competitive force therein. A good
example in that regard would be its new promotions management module,
which offers CPG manufacturers a flexible, comprehensive way to manage
and optimize trade-spending funds. As a closed-loop solution, PeopleSoft
promotions management integrates with existing supply chain management
and financial systems for efficient promotions and forecasting, planning
tracking, reporting, and execution. It is designed to capture information
across the entire supply chain and to reveal both visible and hidden costs.
What
may also help PeopleSoft in this particular endeavor is the change in
both the business applications climate and the users' mindset. The times
when features and functions (bells and whistles) were the order winners
are over. The new selections fights are fought on the peripheries of ERP,
in the CRM, the SCM and e-collaboration arenas, with very sharp vertical
focus. Assuming solid flow manufacturing functionality, bundled with CRM
capabilities and with traditionally strong analytic applications developed
in house, PeopleSoft may turn out to be an adequate contender in future
manufacturing and material management software selections.
The
company's biggest challenge, without doubt, lies in creating marketing
awareness, promoting its new products, and the Web architecture as well
as in crisp sales execution.
Dubious
Early Adoption of Pure Internet Architecture: Another impediment to PeopleSoft's
short-term success may be the market's generally low awareness of the
Internet-only architecture advantages. At this stage, users mainly require
the look and feel of the Internet and, therefore, other only Web-enabled
products may not be seriously disadvantaged while competing against Web-based
PeopleSoft 8. Besides, Oracle, J.D. Edwards, Baan and SAP have already
significantly improved their latest product releases and there is every
reason to believe that they may eliminate the PeopleSoft architectural
advantages very soon. And this is aside from Lawson Software that has
long been acclaimed for its advanced product architecture and superior
user interface.
Furthermore,
the client/server architecture is still far from being dead. There is
a great likelihood that client/server and Internet architectures will
coexist for a long time until interruptions and Internet instability are
tremendously curbed.
Moreover,
PeopleSoft's decision to offer only an Internet browser look-and-feel
interface has, in some instances, initially met the power-user resistance
and resentment for not being given the choice. While the HTML-like interfaces
are perfect for casual and task-specific users with minimum training requirements,
power-users may still prefer the functionality and drill-around capability
of Windows-like user interfaces (drop-down menus, right-click menu, etc.).
Some power-users cite the awkwardness of conducting more complex transactions
only via hyperlinks, jumping to and fro among a number of screens, which
defeats the purpose of simplicity. In that regard, the Web-enabled user
interfaces of its competitors (e.g., Oracle, SAP, J.D. Edwards, Lawson
Software, etc.) that either still contain many Windows features or offer
different interfaces for casual and power users, may be the better approach
at this stage.
Some
prospective customers who have seen the new Internet UI in demonstrations
use words like "complicated", "flimsy", and even "tedious" to describe
it. For starters, the browser-based client lacks the cohesiveness and
predictability of the Windows-metaphor version. Users have become accustomed
to Windows-like GUIs that respond to mouse clicks in a timely fashion,
while the browser often fails to load quickly or accurately. Another complaint
is the search feature that seems to wipe out the users' work environment
while in use rather than appearing in a frame or separate dialog window.
Availability
of Upgrades: Timeliness and availability of upgrades have always been
a concern for PeopleSoft clients, but that is particularly true with migration
to PeopleSoft 8, which might require a considerable effort, one that feels
like a new implementation. As the system is responsible for a company's
mission critical data, upgrades must be scheduled in advance and PeopleSoft
will have to work closely with its customers to provide a detailed upgrade
timeline.
Like
SAP and Oracle, PeopleSoft should also carefully reevaluate its product
migration strategy from current product instances (7.5 and earlier), in
order not to alienate and disillusion its loyal customer base. PeopleSoft
8 has allegedly disconcerted some users because its licensing model requires
that existing customers re-license its older software, rather than pay
a lower upgrade charge as with previous updates. Some customers may see
this as only another hefty investment with little added value other than
improving the user interface. The competitors are only begging for a surge
of similar news.
Sales
and Consulting Force Orientation: The PeopleSoft sales and consulting
force will need to embrace a "service" sales model as the company begins
supporting hosted applications and Internet solutions. This is a departure
from the license-based architecture the company has traditionally sold.
Also, one should expect a significant effort to train the sales force
in the new product and to change their mindset from a Windows-like to
a browser-like metaphor. In either case, the fact remains that PeopleSoft
is not simply a basic and easy-to-use enterprise application.
Perhaps
more disappointing is that the PeopleSoft 8 Web interface seems to have
lost the intuitiveness that was a hallmark of its past releases. The natively
supplied menu is difficult to navigate for novices and even PeopleSoft
presales representatives are reluctant to use it, preferring instead to
streamline their demos by setting up Internet Explorer-like "favorites"
in advance.
Performance:
Dynamic pricing, Personalization, real-time Collaboration, Complex Product
Configuration and Virtual Live Caching all require high bandwidth, efficient
networks and hardware optimization. This challenge is not only PeopleSoft
pertinent though. Any application run on a network or across the Internet
is limited by its narrowest point. Additionally, by shifting much more
processing power to the application server side, PeopleSoft 8 may require
much more hardware processing power of the application server compared
to its preceding releases. The company will have to work with each customer
to establish appropriate performance benchmarks in an effort to set customer
expectations.
Conclusion
of Part 2
This concludes Part 2 of a three-part note on PeopleSoft. Part
1 contains a summary of the history of PeopleSoft, its current trajectory
and strategy, and major developments during the past two years. Part 3
contains the bottom line information with predictions, and recommendations
for both PeopleSoft and users.