Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

Event Summary

Sequencia (www.sequencia.com), in partnership with Prosight (www.prosight.com), has extended its Process PLM solution with the addition of portfolio management. Portfolio Management is an enterprise app, and this increases the visibility of PLM at executive levels.

Market Impact

Sequencia is developing a very broad product. With this announcement, they are now strong at the highest level (portfolio), adding to existing function from idea generation, through the project team (projects, collaboration), through design (R&D, collaboration), all the way to the plant floor. The power of PLM is in the integration of the business processes across the different levels. Giving greater visibility within management, we expect this to increase the acceptance of PLM in the Process Industries (see Process PLM series).

Sequencia competitors Formation Systems (www.formationsystems.com) and SAP (www.sap.com) have not entered into the area of portfolio management. Formation is strong in the areas of idea creation and R&D while SAP is just entering the market with an R&D focused announcement. At this time, only Sequencia covers the entire spectrum of Process PLM functionality.

The management of an array of projects is complex. Often, thousands of projects exist in multiple project portfolios. These projects may be in multiple semi-independent business units in multiple geographies. It is difficult to compare "apples to apples" with the projects having varying value propositions and risk factors. The projects may be supporting different business objectives and being evaluated by different people. This complex management environment can be aided with a technology-based approach.

Portfolio management is a dynamic decision process that permits the management of multiple projects. Portfolio management allows executives and management to compare and contrast their project portfolio using objective and measurable criteria. A business's list of active product innovation projects is revised and updated through integration with the remaining portions of the PLM system. Using common scoring models, portfolio management supports the process of ranking projects according to multiple project metrics, for example Net Present Value (NPV), Expected Commercial Value (ECV), Productivity Index (PI) and Project Attractiveness Score (PAS). New projects can be evaluated against both existing projects and competing new projects, selected and prioritized. Existing projects may be accelerated, killed, or re-prioritized based upon how they relate with other projects against the objectives of the enterprise. By comparing projects, resources can be allocated or re-allocated.

Portfolio Management is a natural part of Process PLM. The benefits of portfolio management to the process company includes:

  • Value - Maximize Portfolio Value
  • Balance - Attain the right mix of projects
  • Alignment - Business Goals Reflected
  • Focus - Execute the right number of projects

Unfortunately, there is often conflict between these four high-level goals. With this announcement, Sequencia delivers interactive decision support so that executives can intelligently balance these competing goals The Sequencia / Prosight partnership makes sense for the Process PLM market. Sequencia will offer the processPoint Portfolio Management as an integrated part of the processPoint PLM solution. Sequencia is the leading provider of web-based PLM solutions for the process industries providing deep industry knowledge to develop business templates for process industry portfolios. ProSight is the expert portfolio management software, providing deep experience and expertise in automating portfolio management methodologies. ProSight has initially focused on implementing portfolio management for IT technology investments. Sequencia and ProSight have been working jointly on integration of the products

Jim Brown, Sequencia's Vice President of Marketing comments, "While working with the industry, it became obvious that a major problem was the ability to manage the wide array of projects that existed in many companies. We formed the Prosight partnership to allow the industry to automate this difficult management process. Better portfolio management leads to better decision making, increasing the power and effectiveness of innovation."

User Recommendations

Process companies with an emphasis on innovation as competitive weapon should consider Process PLM solutions in order to maintain and enhance their competitive position. Companies with many R&D projects or geographically dispersed R&D efforts should consider portfolio management as a key requirement.


About the Author

Olin Thompson, a principal of Process ERP Partners, has over 25 years experience as an executive in the software industry with the last 17 in process industry related ERP, SCP, and e-business related segments. Olin has been called "the Father of Process ERP." He is a frequent author and an award-winning speaker on topics of gaining value from ERP, SCP, e-commerce and the impact of technology on industry.
He can be reached at Olin@ProcessERP.com.


 
comments powered by Disqus


Dassault Systèmes—Expanding Product Development and the 3D Experience | Siemens Product Development Solutions for Process Industries | In Search of Sustainability with Dassault Systèmes | TEC Vendor Note: Lectra, A Focused PLM Player | PLM Migration: Migrate Your Mind First | Product Note: Aras Innovator | Top Business Objectives When Adopting PLM | A Two-layer Model for Fashion PLM Functionality | The Blurry Line between ERP and PLM in Engineer-to-order (ETO) Manufacturing | Product, Project, Process, and People: The Four Ps of PLM Analytics | Product Lifecycle Management: Expediting Product Innovation | Preparing for Product Development in Process Manufacturing | Off-loading Some Green Compliance Burdens: Can Enterprise Applications Meet the Challenge? | The Best-kept Secret in the Product Lifecycle Management Mid-market | Two Origins, One Destination? A Look at the Two Main Genres of PLM Solution from the Integration Standpoint |
Global Product Development Seen as a Boon for Product Lifecycle Management Vendors | Can ERP Speak PLM? | Audit Your Message Strategy by Answering Three Questions | Quote-to-order: One Big, Lean Machine Adds High Tech to Its Mix | Quote-to-order: A Newcomer Causes a Stir in the Market | Quote-to-order: New Ingredients in the Recipe for Success | Quote-to-order Solutions and Key Performance Indicators | Quote-to-order: The Major Players in the Manufacturing Arena | Stemming the Loss of Knowledge Capital: A Business Fix for Manufacturers | The Secret of One Vendor's Success in the Retail Supply Chain | Zooming into the Clothing Retailer Conundrum | No One Said Sourcing Overseas Would Be Easy | The Promise (and Complexities) of Private Labels | Requirement Traceability—A Tester's Approach | Automotive Industry and Food, Safety, and Drug Regulations | Challenges and Future Plans of a Product Inventory Disposition Vendor | Zooming into an Inventory Free Flow | Is There a Smarter Way to Handle Excess Active and Obsolete Inventory? | Let the (Excess) Inventory Flow! | Vendor Reservations, a Full-fledged SaaS ERP, and User Recommendations | Product Lifecycle Management Challenges: From Solution Evaluation to Kickoff | An Overview of Product Lifecycle Management Implementation Challenges | The Fashion and Apparel Retailers' Conundrum | Overcoming Chemicals Industry Challenges through Optimization of Distribution and Inventory | Acquisitions Fuel Vendor Growth in the Enterprise Applications Field | Vendor Articulates Message and Vision for Product Lifecycle Management | Product Lifecycle Management Agility Founded on Innovation | Acquisition Changes Product Lifecycle Management Landscape | Vendor Feels the Heat in Hot Product Lifecycle Management Market | On-demand Product Life Cycle Management: Not Just for Small to Medium Businesses Anymore | IDeWeb Provides Best-of-breed Product Portfolio Management Functionality for the Manufacturing Sector | Where is Oracle in the Product Lifecycle Management Software Market? | A Unique Product Lifecycle Management Tool for Private Label Retail | If There's One Thing CRM Tells Us: Don't Do PLM the Same Way | Parametric Technology Corporation's Bold Vision Drives Growth and Innovation | Critical Components of an E-PLM System | Project Lifecycle Management Implies Long Term Value; Forget the Total Cost of Ownership Fuss | The Role of PIM and PLM in the Product Information Supply Chain: Where is Your Link? | The Pain and Gain of Integrated EDI Part Two: Automotive Suppliers Gain | JDA Portfolio: For the Retail Industry Part Six: ERP Vendors and User Recommendations | Selecting a PLM Vendor | Is MAPICS Getting the Magic of PLM? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Is MAPICS Getting the Magic of PLM? Part Two: Strategy | Is MAPICS Getting the Magic of PLM? Part One: Recent Events and Market Impact | PLM Coming of Age: ERP Vendors Take Notice | ERP Systems and the ETO Manufacturing Market Part Two: ETO versus Repetitive Differences | Oracle Renders Its PLM Outline Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Oracle Renders Its PLM Outline Part One: Event Summary | The Many Faces of PLM Part Two: The Future of the PLM Suite | The Many Faces of PLM Part One: Event Summary | The PLM Program An Incremental Approach to the Strategic Value of PLM | Financial Reporting, Planning, and Budgeting As Necessary Pieces of EPM Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | The Hidden Gems of the Enterprise Application Space Part Two: Sorting and Selecting SRM Software | The Hidden Gems of the Enterprise Application Space | Evaluating Enterprise Software-Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Three: Knowledge Bases and User Recommendations | Has Consolidation Made the PLM Market More Agile? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Has Consolidation Made the PLM Market More Agile? Part Two: Market Impact | Has Consolidation Made the PLM Market More Agile? | The Different Evolutionary Stages of ERP and PLM | Customization Drives Complexity - Why It's Hard to Design, Sell, and Produce "Simple" Products | Can ERP Speak PLM? Part Two: Examples and Recommendations | Service Lifecycle Management - Tapping into the Value of the Product Aftermarket | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Part 5 - User Recommendations | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Part 4 - Comparing 3 Vendors | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Vendors Part 3 - A Timesaving Solution | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Part 2 - Problem Overview | Selecting PLM Software Solutions | PLM Is An Industry Affair - Or Is It? | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in ProcessPart 3: Process PLM Requirements | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in Process Part 2 Process PLM Motivation | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in Process Part 1 Proven in Discrete, Ready to Blossom in Process | Question: When is Six Sigma not Six Sigma? Answer: When it's the Six Sigma Metric!!© | SAP and HP on the Web Together |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google