Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

Introduction

Product Life Cycle Management is a series of business processes, enabled by application software, which has proven to generate business valuein a variety of industries. Discussion with end-user companies reveals a consistent list of benefits including reduced time to market, gains in engineering productivity, increased revenue, increased reuse, reduction of redesign activity and more. A review of vendor web sites supports this conclusion with a number of case studies about companies that have seen significant advantages from implementing PLM processes and software solutions. Many of the vendors are now offering collaboration solutions that allow multiple enterprises or locations to participate in a single, coordinated design project for great benefits.

The growth of a large number of software suppliers targeting the PLM needs of the discrete industries prove that the PLM market within discrete companies is hot. The "Discrete PLM" vendors are numerous with more joining the list. These vendors primarily come from a background in Computer Aided Design (CAD) and Product Data Management (PDM).

Proven Value - But What About the Process Industries?

Searching for users and reviewing the available case studies shows that few experiences are available that reflect the PLM value available to process companies. Some of the case studies that focus on process companies show the PLM products used to enable packaging design or plant engineering but few include the development of the basic recipes for products.

The development of a food, chemical, pharmaceutical or other process product is a complex and costly process. Process industry companies could benefit from many of the PLM concepts that have proven to reduced time to market, gains in engineering productivity, increased revenue, increased reuse, reduction of redesign activity in the discrete industries. But PLM has had minimum penetration into the process industries. Why?

Again, Process Requirements are Different

As in many application areas, the requirements for process companies are different from those of discrete companies. Process companies lacking the option to buy standard PLM packages, have been forced to build their own solutions. These solutions have often been built by individual departments and don't address the process across departments or enterprises.

Discrete PLM suppliers correctly provide a suite of products that support the needs of discrete companies, for example, Computer Aided Design (CAD), configuration management, parts and product structures and more. However, the process companies have different requirements. Their product development processes require different functions, for example, formulation, specification management, nutritional analysis, test/analysis procedures, processing procedures, batch manufacturing deployment, packaging and more.

In addition, the link into manufacturing within a process company is complex with the role of PLM stretching into the plant environment. Process companies require a standard process specification (based upon S88 and S95 standards) in order to create consistent product worldwide. While there appears to be overlap between some PLM functionality between discrete and process vendors, most PLM products are based on underlying discrete assumptions that don't work in process.

The Discrete PLM suppliers remain focused on the extensive needs and opportunities provided by the Discrete PLM market. The Discrete PLM vendors do not provide the process functions and therefore, their products have not been received well by process companies. Industry experts predict that the Discrete PLM vendors will be either slow to address the very different needs of the process industries or more likely not attempt to address the process needs at all - or possibly make alliances with the process PLM players.

The market is now seeing new PLM vendors focused on the process industries or "Process PLM" vendors. These companies are not working on the needs of the discrete companies. The Process PLM vendors are working towards suites of PLM products that address the specific needs of process companies. The founders of these companies come from a different background than their discrete PLM counterparts.

The process PLM vendors come from a laboratory or manufacturing execution background. Their views of the business requirements for a PLM application are different. The Process PLM market has two vendors with existing and extensive solutions available today, Formation Systems (www.formationsystems.com) and Sequencia (www.sequencia.com). With a release of its Recipe Manager product, SAP (www.sap.com) has joined the market with a starter product and extensive vision.

Discrete PLM Vendors
Process PLM Vendors
Alibre
Formation
Autodesk
SAP
Dassault
Sequencia
EDS / UGS
Enovia
eMatrix
eRoom
I2
Matix One
PTC
SAP
UGS

Summary

Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) techniques have proven of great value to many companies. The benefits include reduced time to market, gains in engineering productivity, increased revenue, increased reuse, reduction of redesign activity. However, the PLM products available from the vast majority of vendors must be considered Discrete PLM products, not suitable for process companies. Now, Process PLM solutions are becoming available.

Part two of this three part series will look at some actual experiences of process companies that are adopting PLM products. Part three will look at some of the issues that process companies should consider when looking at a PLM project and PLM vendors.

About the Author

Olin Thompson, a principal of Process ERP Partners, has over 25 years experience as an executive in the software industry with the last 17 in process industry related ERP, SCP, and e-business related segments. Olin has been called "the Father of Process ERP." He is a frequent author and an award-winning speaker on topics of gaining value from ERP, SCP, e-commerce and the impact of technology on industry.

He can be reached at Olin@ProcessERP.com.


 
comments powered by Disqus


TradeStone Software Presents Bamboo Rose | Waking Up to a “New Day” at Infor | Dassault Systèmes—Expanding Product Development and the 3D Experience | A Portrait of the Enterprise Software User in the Education Industry | Sword Ciboodle—One More BPM-Centric CRM Provider | Siemens Product Development Solutions for Process Industries | Reconnecting with a Tried-and-True Manufacturing ERP Vendor | The Lesser-Known (Social) Facts about Microsoft Dynamics CRM | Meet the New (Revolutionized) Progress Software | AuraPortal: A BPM Vendor Worth Checking Out | Deltek, We Hardly Knew Ye: New Deltek at Insight 2011 | PegaWorld 2011 Revisited | Perfect Orders: Improving Customer Satisfaction and Financial Results | In Search of Sustainability with Dassault Systèmes | TEC Vendor Note: Lectra, A Focused PLM Player |
Business Process Management in Free and Open Source: An Overview of the Demand and the Supply | PLM Migration: Migrate Your Mind First | Product Note: Aras Innovator | Top Business Objectives When Adopting PLM | A Two-layer Model for Fashion PLM Functionality | The Blurry Line between ERP and PLM in Engineer-to-order (ETO) Manufacturing | Product, Project, Process, and People: The Four Ps of PLM Analytics | Product Lifecycle Management: Expediting Product Innovation | Vendor Spotlight: Agresso | Preparing for Product Development in Process Manufacturing | Off-loading Some Green Compliance Burdens: Can Enterprise Applications Meet the Challenge? | The Best-kept Secret in the Product Lifecycle Management Mid-market | Two Origins, One Destination? A Look at the Two Main Genres of PLM Solution from the Integration Standpoint | Application Giants in Duel and Duet for Users’ Hearts, Minds … and Wallets | Global Product Development Seen as a Boon for Product Lifecycle Management Vendors | Can ERP Speak PLM? | Audit Your Message Strategy by Answering Three Questions | Quote-to-order: One Big, Lean Machine Adds High Tech to Its Mix | Quote-to-order: A Newcomer Causes a Stir in the Market | Quote-to-order: New Ingredients in the Recipe for Success | Quote-to-order Solutions and Key Performance Indicators | Quote-to-order: The Major Players in the Manufacturing Arena | Stemming the Loss of Knowledge Capital: A Business Fix for Manufacturers | The Secret of One Vendor's Success in the Retail Supply Chain | Zooming into the Clothing Retailer Conundrum | No One Said Sourcing Overseas Would Be Easy | The Promise (and Complexities) of Private Labels | BPM Showdown! Oracle's Hyperion System 9 vs. OutlookSoft vs. Cartesis Suite | Requirement Traceability—A Tester's Approach | Automotive Industry and Food, Safety, and Drug Regulations | Challenges and Future Plans of a Product Inventory Disposition Vendor | Zooming into an Inventory Free Flow | Is There a Smarter Way to Handle Excess Active and Obsolete Inventory? | Let the (Excess) Inventory Flow! | Vendor Reservations, a Full-fledged SaaS ERP, and User Recommendations | Software as a Service's Functional Catch-up | SOA From a Management Perspective: Part Two | SOA From a Management Perspective: Part One | Delivering Adaptive Discovery for Business Process Management | Business Process Analysis versus Business Process Management | Product Lifecycle Management Challenges: From Solution Evaluation to Kickoff | An Overview of Product Lifecycle Management Implementation Challenges | The Fashion and Apparel Retailers' Conundrum | Overcoming Chemicals Industry Challenges through Optimization of Distribution and Inventory | Acquisitions Fuel Vendor Growth in the Enterprise Applications Field | Vendor Articulates Message and Vision for Product Lifecycle Management | Product Lifecycle Management Agility Founded on Innovation | Vision Software Brings a Solid Business Process Management Solution to the Table | Acquisition Changes Product Lifecycle Management Landscape | Vendor Feels the Heat in Hot Product Lifecycle Management Market | On-demand Product Life Cycle Management: Not Just for Small to Medium Businesses Anymore | IDeWeb Provides Best-of-breed Product Portfolio Management Functionality for the Manufacturing Sector | Where is Oracle in the Product Lifecycle Management Software Market? | How Is Business Process Management Applicable to Financial Services? | A Unique Product Lifecycle Management Tool for Private Label Retail | If There's One Thing CRM Tells Us: Don't Do PLM the Same Way | Parametric Technology Corporation's Bold Vision Drives Growth and Innovation | Critical Components of an E-PLM System | Project Lifecycle Management Implies Long Term Value; Forget the Total Cost of Ownership Fuss | Business Process Management: How to Orchestrate Your Business | The Role of PIM and PLM in the Product Information Supply Chain: Where is Your Link? | The Pain and Gain of Integrated EDI Part Two: Automotive Suppliers Gain | How to Avoid Becoming Another CMMS Implementation Failure Statistic | JDA Portfolio: For the Retail Industry Part Six: ERP Vendors and User Recommendations | Mainstream Enterprise Vendors Begin to Grasp Content Management Part Three: Challenges | The Many Flavors of Application Software Outsourcing | Positioning Starts With A Message Strategy | Microsoft Business Network (MBN)--Coming of Age? Part Three: Challenges and Competition | Microsoft Business Network (MBN)--Coming of Age? Part Two: Market Impact | Microsoft Business Network (MBN)--Coming of Age? Part One: Event Summary | Selecting a PLM Vendor | Electronic Product Code (EPC): A Key to RFID | Business Strategy, Business Processes, and Business Systems | Is MAPICS Getting the Magic of PLM? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Is MAPICS Getting the Magic of PLM? Part Two: Strategy | Is MAPICS Getting the Magic of PLM? Part One: Recent Events and Market Impact | PLM Coming of Age: ERP Vendors Take Notice | Mid-market Getting the Taste of Some Emerging Technologies | Service Chain Information will Transform the Total Chain | Leveraging Technology to Maintain a Competitive Edge During Tough Economic Times -- A Panel Discussion Analyzed Part Two: Business Process Modeling | ERP Systems and the ETO Manufacturing Market Part Two: ETO versus Repetitive Differences | Integrating All Information Assets Part Two: Why is integration an issue? | High Performance Organizations Are Driven by the Power of Enterprise Business Events | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Six: Looking to the Future | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Four: Another Step in ERP Evolution | GXS Acquires HAHT Commerce for More Synchronized Retail B2B Data Part Two: HAHT Commerce | Outsourcing 101 - A Primer Part Two: Outsourcing Categories | Oracle Renders Its PLM Outline Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Oracle Renders Its PLM Outline Part One: Event Summary | The Many Faces of PLM Part Two: The Future of the PLM Suite | The Many Faces of PLM Part One: Event Summary | The PLM Program An Incremental Approach to the Strategic Value of PLM | Financial Reporting, Planning, and Budgeting As Necessary Pieces of EPM Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Financial Reporting, Planning, and Budgeting As Necessary Pieces of EPM Part One: Executive Summary | The Hidden Gems of the Enterprise Application Space Part Two: Sorting and Selecting SRM Software | The Hidden Gems of the Enterprise Application Space | Evaluating Enterprise Software-Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Three: Knowledge Bases and User Recommendations | Evaluating Enterprise Software - Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Two | Evaluating Enterprise Software - Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? | Has Consolidation Made the PLM Market More Agile? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Has Consolidation Made the PLM Market More Agile? Part Two: Market Impact | Has Consolidation Made the PLM Market More Agile? | Audit Considerations for Enterprise Software Implementations Part 1: Project Planning and Management | The Different Evolutionary Stages of ERP and PLM | Customization Drives Complexity - Why It's Hard to Design, Sell, and Produce "Simple" Products | The Power of One | Can ERP Speak PLM? Part Two: Examples and Recommendations | Generating Revenue from Service | Service Lifecycle Management - Tapping into the Value of the Product Aftermarket | BPM Weaves Data And Processes Together For Real-time Revenues | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Part 5 - User Recommendations | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Part 4 - Comparing 3 Vendors | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Vendors Part 3 - A Timesaving Solution | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Part 2 - Problem Overview | Selecting PLM Software Solutions | CRM Selections: When An Ounce Of Prevention Is Worth A Pound Of Cure Part One: The CRM Selection Challenge | What's Wrong With Application Software? Business Processes Cross Application Boundaries | PLM Is An Industry Affair - Or Is It? | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in ProcessPart 3: Process PLM Requirements | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in Process Part 2 Process PLM Motivation | CRM For Complex Manufacturers Revolves Around Configuration Software | 6 Immediate Business Improvements Offered by an Online SRM System | How Supply Chain Projects Morph Into Black Holes | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 2: Market Impact | Integration is the Name of the Game in Software Systems | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 2: Implementation Key Success Factors | Should E-Business Be Inside or Outside of IT? | Anatomy of a Technology Selection | Process PLM Vendor Sequencia Adds Portfolio Management | IPSec VPNs for Extranets: Not what you want to wake up next to | User-Focused Design Principles Shape the Customer Experience | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 3: Challenges & User Recommendations | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 2: Market Impact | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 2: ERP Key Success Factors | CRM is Busting Out Of Its Britches: Operational, Analytical, and Collaborative CRM Are Born | CPR on BPR: Practical Guidelines for Successful Business Process Analysis | CPR on BPR: Long Live Business Process Reengineering Part 1: A Primer | NavisionDamgaard Reverts To Navision, But In Name Only | Lawson Asserts Itself, Draws A Bead On Bigger Players | Formation Systems Pioneers Product Design Collaboration For The Process Industries | Essential ERP - Its Functional Scope | Implementation Acceleration Using Integration | E-Procurement Is Not Electronic Purchasing - Part II | Making Sure Your Service Provider Doesn't Fall Down on the Job | To BEA or Not to BEA: Is That the Question? | Question: When is Six Sigma not Six Sigma? Answer: When it's the Six Sigma Metric!!© | EAI Vendor Active Software Activates Transactions | E&Y+ASP=BSP: It’s Not Algebra, But It Adds Up To Something Big | EAI Vendor Extricity Teams with Moai to Automate E-Commerce Systems | Essential ERP – Current Market Trends – Part II | Getting Beyond the Development Stage | ERP Demand Being Re-heated | SAP and HP on the Web Together | JBA: Will it remain "@ctive Enterprise"? | Getting Strategic Planning and Financial Planning in the Same Bailiwick |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google