Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

Introduction

In Part One of this series, we discussed Product Life Cycle Management as a proven concept in the discrete industries and as a growing concept in process. In this part, we explore the business motivations for PLM in process enterprises by reviewing business strategies. In part three, we will look at requirements for Process PLM decisions.

The business strategies reviewed are:

  • Accelerating Time-to-Market

  • Increasing the success rate of new products

  • Increasing the profitability of products

  • Increasing return on assets

Accelerating Time-to-Market

Time-To-Market is the delay between an idea, from the marketing department or a customer, to the general availability of the product. The compression of this time leads to greater responsiveness to market demand, greater market share and greater profitability. Time-To-Market can be broken into two periods, idea to final product design and the decision to commercialize the product to its availability on the market. Speeding Time-To-Market encompasses both time periods.

Time-To-Market is not only important for new products. The Director of R&D of a leading food company tells us that 50% of her R&D efforts are for new products. The remaining 50% are on changes to existing products. These changes are demanded from a variety of reasons including cost reduction programs and reacting to changes in raw material supply.

To speed Time-To-Market, a comprehensive approach is required. The business processes involved include many internal and external organizations. Internal organizations often include marketing, R&D, production, quality and others. External organizations may include third party R&D, testing facilities, customers, suppliers, outsourced manufacturing and others. These many organizations must be managed as a single entity sharing in a single process with a single view of the product and project (with the appropriate security concerns.)

Speeding Time-To-Market requires providing the creative team with appropriate productivity tools. Providing the chemist, flavorist, food engineer, nutritionist, and others with the right tools increases productivity and speeds Time-To-Market. These tools include the ability to identify existing materials or products with appropriate or similar characteristics, formula analysis and balancing tools that help to more efficiently develop the optimal formula, label generation tools to comply with regulatory labeling requirements, and more. In addition, the integration of administrative functions into the processes can minimize unproductive administrative workloads.

Once the final product is approved for commercialization, the task of transferring the product from R&D to full commercial viability is required. Much of this task is a transfer of technology. The product and processes must be transferred to the appropriate system or organization, be they internal or external. The appropriate plant or plants must be selected for production and the product data and processes transferred and implemented. This includes plant and corporate level systems like ERP, SCP, quality, MES and others. Automating the technology transfer is a key weapon in speeding Time-To-Market.

Increasing the Success Rate of New Products

In some markets, like CPG and food, the failure rate of new product introduction is very high, one source places it a 70%. A major motivation for Process PLM is decreasing the rate of failure or increasing the rate of success.

The most obvious way to increase the success rate is to not bring the failures to market. Actually, killing off products or projects that are doomed to failure as early as possible is a key to many objectives. This requires a management approach that looks at all projects and products as a portfolio to be managed together. It requires tools to evaluate the competing projects and products objectively.

These management tools must address the development process itself. Which projects are behind schedule? What are the steps to be initiated once a particular step in the process is approved and who approves. These management processes must be automated thought workflow approaches to define and ensure best practice, reduce handoff times and to allow for clear accountability and continuous improvement.

To be successful, a product must meet the needs of the customer. The marketing organization or customer defines these needs as a set of requirements. These requirements can include final product cost, physical or chemical specifications, customer perceptions and others. These requirements must be used continually to project the success of the product. A key is the early identification of "losers" to maximize the attention spent on the eventual "winners."

Increasing the Profitability of Products

Estimates state that up to 95% of the life cycle cost of products are determined in the product development cycle. Therefore, cost reduction must be a focus on this cycle. Process PLM allows people and processes to focus on those details that enhance profitability. Some examples include:

  • Least Cost Recipe and Packaging - Recipes and packaging can be developed with optimal costs or existing products can be re-designed to reduce costs. Since many industries show packaging cost to exceed the recipe cost, an integrated, total cost approach to recipe and packaging is required.

  • Material Substitution and Consolidation - By providing the ability to eliminate redundant materials and suppliers companies can reduce product costs; increase quality and lower overall inventory investment.

  • Design for Manufacturability - Total production cost can be optimized through comprehensive product design that includes production issues.

Increasing Return on Assets

The return on assets objective requires the intelligent and effective use of those assets. Where a product is produced impacts the return on manufacturing assets. The selection of the internal or external plants requires an understanding of the production needs of the product, the production capability of the plants and an intelligent matching of these two. With trends towards outsourced production, this ability becomes a key decision making tool.

Summary

The motivation to exploit Process PLM approaches is focused on competitive issues. By speeding Time-To-Market, increasing the success rate of new products, increasing profitability and return on assets, a company succeeds in beating their competition. In the upcoming third installment of this series, we will convert the enterprises' motivation for Process PLM into requirements.

About the Author

Olin Thompson is a principal of Process ERP Partners. He has over 25 years experience as an executive in the software industry with the last 17 in process industry related ERP, SCP, and e-business related segments. Olin has been called "the Father of Process ERP." He is a frequent author and an award-winning speaker on topics of gaining value from ERP, SCP, e-commerce and the impact of technology on industry.

He can be reached at Olin@ProcessERP.com.


 
comments powered by Disqus


Dassault Systèmes—Expanding Product Development and the 3D Experience | Siemens Product Development Solutions for Process Industries | In Search of Sustainability with Dassault Systèmes | TEC Vendor Note: Lectra, A Focused PLM Player | PLM Migration: Migrate Your Mind First | Product Note: Aras Innovator | Top Business Objectives When Adopting PLM | A Two-layer Model for Fashion PLM Functionality | The Blurry Line between ERP and PLM in Engineer-to-order (ETO) Manufacturing | Product, Project, Process, and People: The Four Ps of PLM Analytics | Product Lifecycle Management: Expediting Product Innovation | Preparing for Product Development in Process Manufacturing | Off-loading Some Green Compliance Burdens: Can Enterprise Applications Meet the Challenge? | The Best-kept Secret in the Product Lifecycle Management Mid-market | Two Origins, One Destination? A Look at the Two Main Genres of PLM Solution from the Integration Standpoint |
Global Product Development Seen as a Boon for Product Lifecycle Management Vendors | Can ERP Speak PLM? | Audit Your Message Strategy by Answering Three Questions | Quote-to-order: One Big, Lean Machine Adds High Tech to Its Mix | Quote-to-order: A Newcomer Causes a Stir in the Market | Quote-to-order: New Ingredients in the Recipe for Success | Quote-to-order Solutions and Key Performance Indicators | Quote-to-order: The Major Players in the Manufacturing Arena | Stemming the Loss of Knowledge Capital: A Business Fix for Manufacturers | The Secret of One Vendor's Success in the Retail Supply Chain | Zooming into the Clothing Retailer Conundrum | No One Said Sourcing Overseas Would Be Easy | The Promise (and Complexities) of Private Labels | Requirement Traceability—A Tester's Approach | Automotive Industry and Food, Safety, and Drug Regulations | Challenges and Future Plans of a Product Inventory Disposition Vendor | Zooming into an Inventory Free Flow | Is There a Smarter Way to Handle Excess Active and Obsolete Inventory? | Let the (Excess) Inventory Flow! | Vendor Reservations, a Full-fledged SaaS ERP, and User Recommendations | Product Lifecycle Management Challenges: From Solution Evaluation to Kickoff | An Overview of Product Lifecycle Management Implementation Challenges | The Fashion and Apparel Retailers' Conundrum | Overcoming Chemicals Industry Challenges through Optimization of Distribution and Inventory | Acquisitions Fuel Vendor Growth in the Enterprise Applications Field | Vendor Articulates Message and Vision for Product Lifecycle Management | Product Lifecycle Management Agility Founded on Innovation | Acquisition Changes Product Lifecycle Management Landscape | Vendor Feels the Heat in Hot Product Lifecycle Management Market | On-demand Product Life Cycle Management: Not Just for Small to Medium Businesses Anymore | IDeWeb Provides Best-of-breed Product Portfolio Management Functionality for the Manufacturing Sector | Where is Oracle in the Product Lifecycle Management Software Market? | A Unique Product Lifecycle Management Tool for Private Label Retail | If There's One Thing CRM Tells Us: Don't Do PLM the Same Way | Parametric Technology Corporation's Bold Vision Drives Growth and Innovation | Critical Components of an E-PLM System | Project Lifecycle Management Implies Long Term Value; Forget the Total Cost of Ownership Fuss | The Role of PIM and PLM in the Product Information Supply Chain: Where is Your Link? | The Pain and Gain of Integrated EDI Part Two: Automotive Suppliers Gain | JDA Portfolio: For the Retail Industry Part Six: ERP Vendors and User Recommendations | Selecting a PLM Vendor | Is MAPICS Getting the Magic of PLM? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Is MAPICS Getting the Magic of PLM? Part Two: Strategy | Is MAPICS Getting the Magic of PLM? Part One: Recent Events and Market Impact | PLM Coming of Age: ERP Vendors Take Notice | ERP Systems and the ETO Manufacturing Market Part Two: ETO versus Repetitive Differences | Oracle Renders Its PLM Outline Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Oracle Renders Its PLM Outline Part One: Event Summary | The Many Faces of PLM Part Two: The Future of the PLM Suite | The Many Faces of PLM Part One: Event Summary | The PLM Program An Incremental Approach to the Strategic Value of PLM | Financial Reporting, Planning, and Budgeting As Necessary Pieces of EPM Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | The Hidden Gems of the Enterprise Application Space Part Two: Sorting and Selecting SRM Software | The Hidden Gems of the Enterprise Application Space | Evaluating Enterprise Software-Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Three: Knowledge Bases and User Recommendations | Has Consolidation Made the PLM Market More Agile? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Has Consolidation Made the PLM Market More Agile? Part Two: Market Impact | Has Consolidation Made the PLM Market More Agile? | The Different Evolutionary Stages of ERP and PLM | Customization Drives Complexity - Why It's Hard to Design, Sell, and Produce "Simple" Products | Can ERP Speak PLM? Part Two: Examples and Recommendations | Service Lifecycle Management - Tapping into the Value of the Product Aftermarket | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Part 5 - User Recommendations | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Part 4 - Comparing 3 Vendors | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Vendors Part 3 - A Timesaving Solution | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Part 2 - Problem Overview | Selecting PLM Software Solutions | PLM Is An Industry Affair - Or Is It? | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in ProcessPart 3: Process PLM Requirements | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in Process Part 1 Proven in Discrete, Ready to Blossom in Process | Process PLM Vendor Sequencia Adds Portfolio Management | Question: When is Six Sigma not Six Sigma? Answer: When it's the Six Sigma Metric!!© | SAP and HP on the Web Together |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google