Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

Product configurators have evolved to include more sales, marketing, and financial functions (please see The Essential Components of Quote-to-order Applications. Configurators have become critical to the sell side of business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-consumer (B2C) e-business applications. To serve clients better and ensure that customers are able to purchase complex products over the Web, quote-to-order (Q2O) configurators are playing integral roles.

For more background, please see The Basics of Quote-to-order Systems and The Complexities of Quote-to-order and Possible Solutions.

The Goals: Accurate Quotes and Pricing

As the name suggests, Q2O systems revolve around quotation management—a description of the products and services that a company delivers and that are accurately priced in a way that enables customers to buy. A quote is a statement of price, terms of sale, and description of goods or services offered by a supplier to a prospective buyer. When a quote is given in response to an inquiry, the quote is usually considered an offer to sell. The ability to turn quotes into sales is what distinguishes the industry leaders from their competitors.

Although close rates on quotes range dramatically among industries, all successful quoting systems share common attributes. Namely, only quotes that comply with all pricing and other rules applicable to a particular product or service should be generated by Q2O solutions. Procedures make sure that all quotes accurately reflect the business rules with respect to the quoted product or service. The benefits of accurate quotes include a reduction in the need to inform disappointed customers that the company cannot live up to its promise (quote), and the elimination of the need for quotes to be reviewed, time and again, by internal compliance teams.

Most enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems offer quoting modules that provide both Web-based and desktop form–based user interfaces (UIs), allowing for easy creation, management, and personalization of customer quotes. Once a quote is created, a salesperson can add products (including configurable products) to the quote by searching the product inventory. When a configurable product is selected for addition to a quote, a dynamic hypertext markup language (DHTML) configurator user screen can be seamlessly invoked to provide guidance in matching the needs of the customer with the product options and ensuring more complete and accurate quotes. Upon completion of the configuration session, the configured product is added to the quote. After a quote has been converted to an order, any configurable models can be reconfigured before the order is booked into the ERP order management module.

However, due to some functional gaps, many ERP quoting modules still permit users to enter inaccurate orders into their systems. Because these ERP systems are often linked directly to manufacturing, this can result in products which either cannot or should not be assembled. Accurate quotes enable enterprises to avoid costly order rework by ensuring that only feasible orders are entered into the ERP systems. This also prevents or reduces reworks or write-offs by the sales force to compensate for cancelled or delayed orders.

All of these benefits can significantly enhance profitability and customer satisfaction. Specialized quoting and proposal solutions are thus designed to handle any sales model, whether a sales representative's model, an independent dealer's model, or a reseller's model. Specialized quoting and proposal products have to seamlessly integrate with ERP solutions to provide uninterrupted sales automation and tracking, from lead creation and distribution, to quoting and proposal generation, to order placement and post-order service.

In addition to increasing the accuracy of orders (and thereby saving money in rework and rejected orders), focused quotation management solutions' benefits and opportunities come from improving the quote-to-close ratio and from trimming off the significant amount of time required to develop quotes for manufacturers of complex products. Also, integrating quoting systems with ERP and supply chain management (SCM) systems should result in able-to-promise (ATP) and capable-to-promise (CTP) checks. These checks can be performed during a configuration session to provide an estimate of product availability based on material and resource constraints to assist a user in making buying decisions.

Last but not least, since manufacturers have complex pricing requirements, pricing configuration engines can be used to automate pricing and quoting processes. Price management tools enable the definition of complex pricing rules and allow modeling of pricing scenarios. The pricing engine executes the pricing rules to determine the price dynamically based on the supplied rule factors. These rule factors are all designed to eliminate stock-keeping unit (SKU) proliferation by bundling intelligent pricing rules. Such systems help capture and automate pricing at the point of sale, and allow users to manage sophisticated pricing logic across the enterprise to accelerate the introduction of new pricing schemes.

Advanced pricing can also be enabled to assist in implementing sophisticated pricing strategies beyond base pricing to meet rapidly changing e-business requirements. Dynamically updated list prices are provided for product models, option classes, and options during the configuration session, while selling prices and extended prices can also be provided for all selected items. Pricing systems leverage pricing data in ERP systems to deliver more sophisticated pricing information with customer- and partner-specific rules, discounts, and controlled access to pricing information. This allows companies to extend ERP pricing data throughout an enterprise e-business environment with contract-based pricing, promotional pricing, cost-plus pricing, price breaks, combination pricing, segment-based pricing, coupon management, and other needed capabilities.

At the heart of pricing configuration is a company's ability to manage pricing at three levels: the industry price level, the product and market strategy level, and the transaction level; each of these levels builds upon the other (please see The Case for Pricing Management). To that end, Q2O software suites help companies ensure that all orders conform to specific criteria. For example, if a company had a minimum gross margin requirement for a given product, the pricing solution could ensure that the features and options chosen will result in a product that meets the company's margin objectives.

Pricing configuration systems have to provide best practices to handle the execution and enforcement of pricing through each of the above-mentioned levels to maintain price integrity and margin control. Pricing configuration systems should allow for any level of pricing and presentation flexibility while permitting the enterprise control of and visibility into field quoting practices.

Potential pricing configuration benefits and opportunities originate from

  • reduced unit costs (through more accurate pricing options within base product designs);
  • increased accuracy of pricing, resulting in reduced billing cycle times; and
  • reduced overall quoting errors, leading to more accurate quotes and increased customer satisfaction (and, eventually, an increased quantity of sales orders).

In addition to the previously mentioned distributed order management (DOM)—please see The Essential Components of Quote-to-order Applications—and asset management modules, an optional Q2O suite module is enterprise contract management software. This suite includes the ability to aggregate and analyze enterprise-wide contract information, automate and accelerate contract-related business processes, enforce contract and relationship compliance (according to the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act [SOX]; please see Important Sarbanes-Oxley Act Mandates and What They Mean for Supply Chain Management), and automate the contract process from request to signature. The addition of these capabilities creates Q2O solutions that are then able to manage the contract life cycle, from request, to signature, to execution.

To avoid possible confusion, Q2O systems are also called interactive selling systems (ISSs) by Gartner, and they are defined as the integration of a marketing encyclopedia system, sales configuration system, proposal generation system, and order management system under a common UI. ISSs are used to streamline and enhance the selling process. With an ISS, a salesperson can sit with the customer and pull up data to prove product value, configure a quote, and create a proposal, and then turn the proposal into an order and book it.

In summary, Q2O software bundles enable salespeople to suggest solutions based on a buyer's needs, configure proposed solutions based on a buyer's requests, and provide accurate quotes for complex products and services. These solutions also enable enterprises to extend their business rules to the sales channel by restricting the sales force from presenting quotes that do not fall within enterprise parameters. These enterprise parameters can run the spectrum, from manufacturability of a product to the required margins on any given product or service. Q2O products must allow these business rules to be easily modified, and then provide almost instant dissemination of the updated rules throughout the organization.

Different Q2O Strokes for Different Manufacturing Folks

Although Q2O systems, and especially configurators (as the pivotal modules), seem ideal for complex products and services that include many options and accessories (that are oftentimes mutually exclusive), they are still not universally applicable to all manufacturing environments. As seen in Product Configurators Pave the Way for Mass Customization, early configurators used a programming paradigm, known widely as the production rules, to provide dynamic and runtime decision-making that is essential for obtaining a valid configuration. These tools use a uniform mechanism for representing both domain knowledge and control strategy, and embed the knowledge about a single entity over several rules. This makes the knowledge maintenance task for large rule-based systems extremely difficult.

To overcome the drawbacks associated with rule-based systems, a generic, domain-independent model for configuration tasks was suggested in the form of a constraint satisfaction problem (CSP). The configuration problem is defined by a finite set of variables, with each variable taking only certain values from a domain of finite sets of possible values, guided by constraints that restrict the variable combinations and the variable values allowed in such combinations. The configuration task is designed to find a domain value for each variable in such a way that all the constraints are satisfied.

To illustrate the applicability of rules and constraints, the product configuration strategies within various manufacturing environments need to be looked at. The next step, in terms of complexity, after make-to-stock (MTS)—where product configuration is not needed by default—would be an assemble-to-order (ATO) production environment. An ATO product environment is one where a good or service can be assembled after receiving a customer's order. The key components (bulk, semi-finished, intermediate, subassembled, fabricated, purchased, packed, and so on) used in the assembly or finishing process are planned, and they are usually stocked in anticipation of a customer order. Therefore, receipt of an order initiates assembly of the customized product. This product configuration strategy, which focuses on taking manufactured components or subassemblies and creating a finished product, is useful when a large number of end products can be assembled from common components.

ATO product configuration strategies are often rule-based and define the interrelationships and compatibilities among components, subassemblies, and parts of a product. ATO is thus best suited for volume purchases, where quotes should be automatically generated and a quote engine is an option selector. An example of an ATO strategy is the definition of components in a laptop computer, where the product is assembled from a series of stock components. In other words, the ATO strategy is found most often in high tech and electronics. These industries provide high-volume, low-margin products that require minimal assembly, while new product introduction strategies have to consider rapidly declining pricing.

Furniture, retail (including do-it-yourself [DIY]) stores, packaging, printing, health care, and insurance are other areas where an ATO configuration strategy is used. The early product configurators, which could cater to ATO environments, were internally oriented (within the enterprise's four walls). They were typically an extension of the ERP system, with simple bill of material (BOM) selection rules, and their output was typically a proprietary BOM.

In configure-to-order (CTO) environments, manufacturers of complex products are using this product configuration strategy to customize their products to an exacting set of specifications from their manufacturing customers. CTO products are comprised of both standard and custom components, with the majority being customized to the needs of the customer. Industries relying on CTO require intelligent product constraints within product configurators. Guided selling strategies for these products might not work because it is not that easy to define a data model and an underlying constraint engine. Vertical industries that rely on CTO include telecommunications, heavy industrial equipment, turbine and pump production, elevators and escalators, and complex cabling systems.

Further, make-to-order (MTO) and built-to-order (BTO) are production environments where goods or services can be made after receipt of a customer's order. The final product is usually a combination of standard and custom-designed items to meet the special needs of the customer. Manufacturers that have an MTO strategy customize smaller portions of the larger customized product, with the majority of the products' content being based on MTS or standardized products. When options or accessories are stocked before customer orders arrive, the term ATO is frequently applicable as well.

Examples of MTO strategies include auto manufacturers that offer several options on engines and interiors. High tech, automotive, medical, and financial services are several other verticals where this strategy can be useful. Product interrelationships and model BOMs are created automatically for prospective customers, and guided selling makes the most sense here as a lead generation tool. MTO environments can take advantage of pervasive integration with SCM, customer relationship management (CRM), and ERP systems when best practices have been attained across all departments. These environments might also be suitable for online and indirect channels, although, to get the most from this strategy, extensive product training within the channel is required.

The last, and most complex system (from mass produced, to configured, to one-off products) is engineer-to-order (ETO) environments. Here, products require unique engineering design, significant customization, or newly purchased materials. Each customer order results in a unique set of part numbers, BOMs, and routings (please see ERP Systems and the ETO Manufacturing Market). Thus, where the majority of product components are specifically created to a customer's unique requirements, it is referred to as an ETO strategy.

Complex ETO manufacturers produce products that are of high variation, have complex features and options, and vary in end user configuration. Products manufactured as a result of an ETO strategy are defined with highly specific engineering documents, and often require that the sales configurators delivering quotes from these products have the ability to generate multilevel computer-aided design (CAD) drawings and specifications.

Products that are manufactured using an ETO process include aircraft; aerospace and defense (A&D) products; power generators; heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) equipment; specialty-use engines; and manufacturing equipment that is purposely built to support a specific manufacturing process. Sophisticated customer interactions (such as order and contract definition, and management applications) are required, while customer service needs are also oriented toward hands-on contract management and cost reporting.

Frequent changes force contract supplier's engineers and original equipment manufacturer's (OEM's) engineers to be in constant, collaborative communication throughout the design and production cycle of the unit. One of the traditional manual functions in a supplier organization has been the sell side request for quotation (RFQ) management. This function usually revolves around a few key experts that have direct knowledge of the product or who can manually pull together the diverse sources of information into a unified document, including quotes, pricing, detailed product information, data sheets, and CAD drawings. These manufacturers invest a significant amount of money in product design and have lengthy sales and manufacturing business processes. This often requires collaboration between the customers, salespeople, and critical back-office experts, making the integration of CAD applications and product data management (PDM) workflows essential.

Developing a contract proposal requires many levels of checking and rechecking customer process requirements and facility capabilities, as well as preliminary design work and sourcing of specific components or materials. The process typically goes through many revisions every time the customer uncovers a new requirement or constraint. The labor-intensive nature of this process has often resulted in lengthy estimating cycles, which have in turn often translated into lost business opportunities. Even more than in CTO setups, guided selling strategies for highly customized products are often inappropriate because there is no reliable data model and underlying constraint engine.

Less complex MTO configuration strategies typically use a set of predefined component types while taking into account a set of well-defined restrictions on how the component types can be combined. Interactive guided selling systems that are externally focused, stand-alone, or interfaced to ERP systems can help here. These systems typically have separate engines for engineering BOM (leveraging selection rules) and sales BOM (leveraging constraint rules), with some wizard-based capability to create and maintain rules. The typical output from these systems is quotes, orders, and BOMs, with a data-level integration with other systems.

The ETO configuration, by contrast, extends well beyond the MTO configuration. Here, each component type is also associated with a predefined set of parameters, where each parameter has a predefined set of possible values to choose from in order to satisfy all constraints among those parameters. Certainly, in almost all industrial manufacturing segments, the pressure to reduce lead times has become a constant concern. Depending on product complexity, some parts and subassemblies might be quoted immediately, while others have to be highly specified.

Configurator technology has been helping manufacturers improve their productivity by shortening lead times, eliminating the possibility of order errors, and reducing the need for training costs and expertise of the various design and service personnel. Still, while the needs of ETO organizations are different from other manufacturers, many ETO companies can benefit from the mind shift of “everything is unique” to CTO principles.

However, traditional options, such as constraint and rule-based configurators and interactive and guided selling solutions, provide no effective search solution for solving most complex ETO product configurations. In traditional sales, companies still have to rely on trained salespeople to interact with customers, address customer needs, explain product features, and ultimately complete the sale. In other words, enterprises that strive to provide solutions with high value at a low cost have been constrained by a lack of captured condensed knowledge (intellectual property).

This is part four of the series The Basics of Quote-to-order Systems. In part five, knowledge management vendors and their solutions are discussed in detail.

For more information and to start your own custom solution comparison, please visit

TEC's Customer Relationship Management Evaluation Center

 


 
comments powered by Disqus


Federal Contract Management and Vendors' Readiness Part Two: Dealing With the Federal Government | Federal Contract Management and Vendors' Readiness Part One: Entry of Small Vendors into Federal Contracts | MRO and Spare Parts Management Considerations | JDA Portfolio: For the Retail Industry Part Six: ERP Vendors and User Recommendations | JDA Portfolio: For the Retail Industry -- Part Five: Analysis of Market Impact | JDA Portfolio: For the Retail Industry Part Four: More JDA Portfolio 2004.1 and Microsoft Alliance | JDA Portfolio: For the Retail Industry Part Three: JDA Portfolio 2004.1 Continued | JDA Portfolio: For The Retail Industry Part Two: JDA Portfolio 2004.1 Components | JDA Portfolio: For the Retail Industry Part One: Event Summary | Glossary of Enterprise Applications Terminology Part Two: Just-in-Time to Extensible Markup Language | Glossary of Enterprise Applications Terminology Part One: Accounts Payable Through Internet | Understanding SOA, Web Services, BPM, and BPEL Part Two: BPEL and User Recommendations | Understanding SOA, Web Services, BPM, BPEL, and More Part One: SOA, Web Services, and BPM | Epicor's Mid-Market Pitch Becomes Higher For (One) Scala Part Five: More Challenges & User Recommendations | Epicor's Mid-Market Pitch Becomes Higher For (One) Scala Part Four: Merger Synergies and Challenges |
Epicor's Mid-Market Pitch Becomes Higher For (One) Scala Part Three: Market Impact | Epicor's Mid-Market Pitch Becomes Higher For (One) Scala Part Two: How Scala Complements Epicor | Epicor's Mid-Market Pitch Becomes Higher For (One) Scala Part One: Event Summary | Understand J2EE and .NET Environments Before You Choose | When Is It Time to Re-implement? | ICICI-Infotech's North American Strategy for Success Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | ICICI-Infotech's North American Strategy for Success Part Two: Customer Focus and Innovative Pricing | ICICI-Infotech's North American Strategy for Success Part One: Company Background and Market Focus | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part Five: Challenges and User Recommendations | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part Four: Market Impact | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part Three: QRS Background | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part Two: QRS Marketing | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part One: Event Notes | Not All Acquisitions Happen: JDA and QRS Part Two: Market Impact | Not All Acquisitions Happen: JDA and QRS Part One: Event and Market Impact | The Name and Ownership Change Roulette Wheel for Marcam Stops at SSA Global Part Three: Last-Ditch Effort by Invensys | The Name and Ownership Change Roulette Wheel for Marcam Stops at SSA Global Part One: Event Summary | Master Requirement Planning and Master Production Scheduling Software: Hard Facts Part Two: Materials Requirement Planning and Master Production Scheduling | Intentia: Stepping Out With Fashion and Style Part Four: Movex Case Study Continued With User Recommendations | Intentia: Stepping Out With Fashion and Style Part Three: Movex, a Case Study of Fashion Industry Software | Intentia: Stepping Out With Fashion and Style Part Two: Software Challenges in the Fashion Industry | The Trap of Accountancy Systems; When to Move on to ERP | Fed Warms Up to ERP Spending, but Will Contractors and Their ERP Vendors Comply? Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Feds Warms Up to ERP Spending, but Will Contractors and Their ERP Vendors Comply? Part One: Event Summary and Market Impact | Retail Market Dynamics for Software Vendors Part Two: Progress | Retail Market Dynamics for Software Vendors Part One: Software Requirements for Retail | TEC Talks to the Compiere ERP/CRM ProjectFree and Open Source Software Business ModelsPart Three: Compiere/ComPiere | TEC Talks to the Open For Business ProjectFree and Open Source Software Business ModelsPart One: OFBiz | Enterprise Process Improvement (EPI) Software: Customer and Software Vendor Collaboration | PeopleSoft Revamps World for Its Mid-Market "Express" Conquest Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | PeopleSoft Revamps World for Its Mid-Market "Express" Conquest Part Three: Strengths | PeopleSoft Revamps World for Its Mid-Market "Express" Conquest Part Two: Market Impact | PLM Coming of Age: ERP Vendors Take Notice | Future Compatible | Buy, Build, or Somewhere Between | Mid-market Getting the Taste of Some Emerging Technologies | ROI for RFID: A Case Study Part Two: Implementation and Results | ROI for RFID: A Case Study Part One: Company Background | Nonprofits and Public Sector: The Latest Hot Market | Intuitive Manufacturing Systems Shows Maturity in Adolescent Age Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Intuitive Manufacturing Systems Shows Maturity in Adolescent Age Part Three: Market Impact Continued | Intuitive Manufacturing Systems Shows Maturity in Adolescent Age Part Two: Market Impact | Intuitive Manufacturing Systems Shows Maturity in Adolescent Age Part One: Company Overview | ERP II Demystified | Rewrite or Wrap-Around Old Software? Part Two: Extending to the Web and Challenges | Rewrite or Wrap-Around Old Software? Part One: Event Summary | What's Wrong With Application Software? Business Changes, Software Must Change with the Business. | Process Manufacturing: Industry Specific Requirements Part One: Introduction | Encompix--Thriving on Encompassing Complexity Part One: Event Summary | Leveraging Technology to Maintain a Competitive Edge During Tough Economic Times -- A Panel Discussion Analyzed Part Six: Custom Development and Single-Vendor versus Multi-Vendor | Leveraging Technology to Maintain a Competitive Edge During Tough Economic Times -- A Panel Discussion Analyzed Part Three: Applications Hosting | Leveraging Technology to Maintain a Competitive Edge during Tough Economic Times --A Panel Discussion Analyzed Part One: Introduction | SoftBrands to Institute Fourth Shift for SAP Business One Manufacturing Work-Plan Part Five: Challenges and User Recommendations | SoftBrands to Institute Fourth Shift for SAP Business One Manufacturing Work-Plan Part Four: SoftBrands | SoftBrands to Institute Fourth Shift for SAP Business One Manufacturing Work-Plan Part Three: Market Impact | SoftBrands to Institute Fourth Shift for SAP Business One Manufacturing Work-Plan Part Two: SoftBrands | SoftBrands to Institute Fourth Shift for SAP Business One Manufacturing Work-Plan Part One: Event Summary | ERP Systems and the ETO Manufacturing Market Part Three: User Recommendations | ERP Systems and the ETO Manufacturing Market Part Two: ETO versus Repetitive Differences | ERP Systems and the ETO Manufacturing Market Part One: Event Summary | Catering to Small and Medium-Size Enterprises | Fatal Flaws in ERP Software Create Opportunity for Niche Software in CPG Companies | Cookie-cutter Solutions Won't Cut It with the Mid-Market Part Two: Challenges and the Lower-End | Cookie-cutter Solutions Won't Cut It with the Mid-Market Part One: Historical Relationships | Integrating All Information Assets Part Four: What Approach Do You Take? | Integrating All Information Assets Part Three: What Constitutes Integration? | Integrating All Information Assets Part Two: Why is integration an issue? | Integrating All Information Assets Part One: Why is integration an issue? | ERP and SCM Implementations Part Two: Interfaces and Priorities | ERP and SCM Implementations Part One: Doing Too Much Too Soon | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Six: Looking to the Future | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Five: More on ERP Evolution | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Four: Another Step in ERP Evolution | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Three: 2000s--Back to the Future | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Two: 1990s--Enterprise Resource Planning | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part One: 1960s--Pre-Computer Era | The World Of Software Buying Has Changed; Will the Vendors Change With It? | BI Approaches of Enterprise Software Vendors | The Old ERP Dilemma--The Refresh Option | Exact Software--Working Diligently Towards the "One Exact" Synergy Part Two: Macola, the ERP and BAM Solutions | Usability | Justification of ERP Investments Part Four: Replacing or Re-implementing an ERP System | Justification of ERP Investments Part Three: Costs of Implementing an ERP System | Justification of ERP Investments Part Two: The Intangible Effects of ERP | Intentia's Movex for Food and Beverage: Gaining a Foothold in North America Part Three: Observations and User Recommendations | Comparison of ERP and CRM Markets' Life cycle Snapshots | PeopleSoft Gathers Manufacturing and SCM Wherewithal Part Three: The Manufacturing Industry | PeopleSoft Gathers Manufacturing and SCM Wherewithal Part Two: Market Impact | PeopleSoft Gathers Manufacturing and SCM Wherewithal Part One: Recent Anouncements | Fujitsu Poised to (Inter)Stage Glovia's Comeback Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Fujitsu Poised to (Inter)Stage Glovia's Comeback Part Three: Market Impact | Fujitsu Poised to (Inter)Stage Glovia's Comeback Part Two: Fujitsu's Support of Glovia | Fujitsu Poised to (Inter)Stage Glovia's Comeback Part One: Event Summary | Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Pull vs Push: a Discussion of Lean, JIT, Flow, and Traditional MRP Part 1: Tutorial | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part Six: Challenges and User Recommendations | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part Four: Deltek's Differentiators | Support for Old Releases-Good for the User but Is It Good for the Vendor? | Sales and Operations Planning Part Three: Game Plan Guidelines | Sales and Operations Planning Part Two: Common Scenarios | Sales and Operations Planning Part One: Identifying and Forecasting Demand | FRx Poised to Permeate Many More General Ledgers Part Four: Competitors and User Recommendations | FRx Poised to Permeate Many More General Ledgers Part Three: Market Impact continued | FRx Poised to Permeate Many More General Ledgers Part Two: Market Impact | FRx Poised To Permeate Many More General Ledgers Part One: Executive Summary | Financial Reporting, Planning, and Budgeting As Necessary Pieces of EPM Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Financial Reporting, Planning, and Budgeting As Necessary Pieces of EPM Part One: Executive Summary | Be Bold with Benefits but Subtle with Pains | Evaluating Enterprise Software-Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Three: Knowledge Bases and User Recommendations | Evaluating Enterprise Software - Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Two | Evaluating Enterprise Software - Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? | Has Consolidation Made the PLM Market More Agile? Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Has Consolidation Made the PLM Market More Agile? Part Two: Market Impact | Has Consolidation Made the PLM Market More Agile? | Audit Considerations for Enterprise Software Implementations Part 2: Applying Controls and Audit Emphasis | Audit Considerations for Enterprise Software Implementations Part 1: Project Planning and Management | The Different Evolutionary Stages of ERP and PLM | Trends Affecting Manufacturers and ERP Part Three: Four More Trends | Living And Thriving With Channel Master Customers | If Software Is A Commodity - Can You Still Win Some Competitive Advantage? | Customization Drives Complexity - Why It's Hard to Design, Sell, and Produce "Simple" Products | The Power of One | Product Configurators Pave the Way for Mass Customization | Has The BI Market Consolidation Been Crystal-Clearly Actuated? Part Three: Competition and User Recommendations. | Geac Gets Its Commonsense Share Of Consolidation, With Revolving Door CEOs No Less Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | Geac Gets Its Commonsense Share Of Consolidation, With Revolving Door CEOs No Less Part Two: Market Impact | Geac Gets Its Commonsense Share Of Consolidation, With Revolving Door CEOs No Less | Best of Breed Versus Fully Integrated Software: The Pro's and Con's | Commodity Software, Best Practice and Competitive Advantage | Can ERP Speak PLM? Part Two: Examples and Recommendations | If Software Is A Commodity...Then What? | Analyse This | Examples Of How Some Mid-Market Vendors Might Remain Within The Future Three (Dozen)? Part Three: Made2Manage Market Impact and User Recommendations | Examples Of How Some Mid-Market Vendors Might Remain Within The Future Three (Dozen)? Part Two: Agilisys Market Impact | Examples Of How Some Mid-Market Vendors Might Remain Within The Future Three (Dozen)? | Computerized Maintenance Management Systems: A Tutorial Part Two: Benefits and Interfaces | Computerized Maintenance Management Systems: A Tutorial Part One: Challenges and Features | Desktop Management's Dirty Little Secret | Software Selection: An Approach | What's Wrong With Enterprise Applications, And What Are Vendors Doing About It? Part Three: A New Approach and User Recommendations | What's Wrong With Enterprise Applications, And What Are Vendors Doing About It? Part Two: A New Framework Strategy | What's Wrong With Enterprise Applications, And What Are Vendors Doing About It? | Frantic Merger-Mania Spiced Up With Vendettas Leaves Customers Anxious Part Two: Analysis Continued | ERP and WMS Co-Existence: When System Worlds Collide | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Three: Market Impact Continued | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority Part Two: Market Impact | Software Giants Make Courting A Small Guy Their "Business One" Priority | A User Centric WorkWise Customer Conference | What You Should Know Before Selecting a WMS | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Part 5 - User Recommendations | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Part 4 - Comparing 3 Vendors | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Vendors Part 3 - A Timesaving Solution | Selecting PLM Software Solutions Part 2 - Problem Overview | Selecting PLM Software Solutions | Tier 3 And Tier 4 ... Where Do You Go If You Don't Know, What You Don't Know. | Invensys Production Solutions - Can Historic Strengths And The 'Protean Boost' Overcome Its Liabilities? Part Two: Liabilities, Strategy, and User Recommendations | Invensys Production Solutions - Can Historic Strengths And The 'Protean Boost' Overcome Its Liabilities? | What Does Vendor Consolidation Mean To The End User? | The Reinvention of Software Vendors and End-User Value | Can ERP Meet Your eBusiness Needs? Part Three: The Effect of eBusiness on Your Business | Can ERP Meet Your eBusiness Needs? Part Two: ERP is the Foundation | Can ERP Meet Your eBusiness Needs? | Inventory Planning & Optimization: Extending Your ERP System Part Three: Business Case for Inventory Optimization Solutions | Inventory Planning & Optimization: Extending Your ERP System Part Two: How It Works | Inventory Planning & Optimization: Extending Your ERP System | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Five: User Recommendations | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Four: Challenges | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Three: Market Impact | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Two: Geac & Baan | Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part One: Ross Systems & SSA Global Technologies | Caution! Will A Traditional ERP System Help You Deliver Projects? | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Will A Big Fish's Splash Cause Minnows' Flush Out Of The CRM Pond? | Top 10 Reasons For Having A Project Kickoff - Part II | Top 10 Reasons For Having A Project Kickoff - Part I | The Art Of Distributed Development Of Multi-Lingual Three-Tier Internet Applications | Requirements Definition For Package Implementations | Evaluating Alternatives: Key Questions To Ask When Considering An Alternative ERP/MRP System | Rapid Prototyping Or Simply Over-hyping | How Much Wisdom Will BRAIN Bring To Agilisys? Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | How Much Wisdom Will BRAIN Bring To Agilisys? | Why Systems Fail - The Dead-end of Dirty Data | PowerCerv Finally Overpowered By The '02 Hurricane Season Part 2: Strengths and User Recommendations | PowerCerv Finally Overpowered By The '02 Hurricane Season | Data Conversion in an ERP Environment | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT Part 2: Market Impact | Agilisys Continues Agilely Post-SCT | Fourth Shift's evolution Within SoftBrands' DemandStream Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Fourth Shift's evolution Within SoftBrands' DemandStream | Software Piloting: How Do You Fly This Plane | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 2: Market Impact | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 4: Other Vendors, CRM, SCP & User Recommendations | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 3: IBM | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard Part 2: Microsoft | Enterprise Applications Battlefield Mid-Year Scoreboard | Beware of Legacy Data - It Can Be Lethal | Adonix Grows Roots Against The Odds Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Adonix Grows Roots Against The Odds Part 1 | The Automotive OEMs Might Soon Contract “BRAIN” Damage Part 2: The Future and User Recommendations | The Automotive OEMs Might Soon Contract “BRAIN” Damage Part I | Scala Shows Far More Than A Bit Of A Backbone Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Scala Shows Far More Than A Bit Of A Backbone Part 2: Market Impact | Scala Shows Far More Than A Bit Of A Backbone Part 1 | Two Highly Focused Vendors Team For Their Markets' Good | Integration is the Name of the Game in Software Systems | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software | Team With Business Management to Drive Out IT Cost | Can 'Intuitive' And 'ERP' Words Be Associated? | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 4: User Recommendations | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 3: Causes of Failures | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 2: Implementation Key Success Factors | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 1: Inexorable Statistics | Fast-path Implementations - Are They Good or Bad? | Announcing Agilisys (Formerly SCT’s Process Manufacturing & Distribution Business) - Finally Fully Focused On Process Manufacturing | Datatex and Dan River Apparel Fabrics - Ten Years and Counting | Is Enterprise Market Consolidating? Exactly! | The Old ERP Dilemma - Should We Install The New Release? | Manugistics Indulges In The Open M&A Season. Part 2: Market Impact, Challenges, and User Recommendations | Manugistics Indulges In The Open M&A Season | Standardizing on One ERP System in a Multi-division Enterprise | Microsoft 'The Great' Poised To Conquer Mid-Market, Once and Again Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations | Microsoft 'The Great' Poised To Conquer Mid-Market, Once and Again Part 1: Recent Acquisition Announcement | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 2: Market Impact | INFIMACS Boasts MRP Relevant To MROs | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 1: Recent Announcements | Lawson Enforces Its Stronghold Part 2: Market Impact | Lawson Enforces Its Stronghold Part1: Recent Announcements | iProcess.sct Enters Golden Gate Opportunity | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 2: Market Impact | Mid-Market ERP Vendors Doing CRM & SCM In A DIY Fashion Part 1: Recent Announcements | Your ERP System is Up and Running-Now What? | Stratyc's Laser-Sharp Focused Tools Retrofit Legacy Systems | Adonix Expands X3 And Its "French Connection" Part 2: The Future | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 4: Challenges & User Recommendations | Baan Resurrects Multi-Dimensionally Part 3: Market Impact | Ross Systems – A Bright Spot On A Difficult Enterprise Application Landscape | PeopleSoft's Buying Momentum Goes On. Pageant Participants, Line Up Please! Part 2: User Recommendations | PeopleSoft's Buying Momentum Goes On. Pageant Participants, Line Up Please! Part 1: Market Impact | Feds Buckle Down on Customer Information Security | The Old ERP Dilemma: How Long Should You Pay Maintenance? | Made2Manage Offers New Functionality And A VIP Treatment Part 2: Market Impact | Made2Manage Offers New Functionality And A VIP Treatment Part 1: Announcements | Gosh, They Kill Partnerships, Don't They? | The 'Old ERP' Dilemma: Replace or Add-on | J.D. Edwards' CEO Retires Again; This Time For Good? | Lawson Software Braves IPO And Reports Strongly Against The Odds | PSI AG To Become More Germane Globally Via Relevant Partnership | J.D. Edwards On The Mend; This Time Might Be For Real | PipeChain Adds Pragmatism Onto Simplicity | Besieged By The CRM Throne Aspirants, King Siebel Delivers "The Magic No.7" Part 2: Market Impact | How Some ERP Vendors Demonstrated - Warts And All Part 2: Results | How Some ERP Vendors Demonstrated - Warts and All Part 1 | Should interBiz Mean Intelligence And Prediction Beyond ERP? - Part 2: Challenges and Market Impact | Is SCT And Logistics.com Partnership A Déjà vu? | Should interBiz Mean Intelligence And Prediction Beyond ERP? | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 3: Challenges & User Recommendations | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically - Part 2: Market Impact | Navision Enhances Its e-Vision And Looks To Expand Vertically | ERP Selection Facts and Figures Case Study - Part 2: Qualitative Assessments and Analysis | ERP Selection Facts and Figures Case Study Part 1: Business Model Scenarios | Soft Economy Dents SAP’s Armored Shield As Well | PRISM Users Get A Dedicated, Independent Web Community | Geac Awakens On Its Deathbed - Part 2: Geac's Response | What's With Oracle's And SAP's Differing Clairvoyance? | Geac Awakens On Its Deathbed - Part 1: Event Summary | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 5: Recommendations | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 4: Market Predictions | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 3: Rating The Vendors | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 2: Vendor Reactions | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Aging Gracefully With The ‘New Kids On The Block’ | Shall Bifurcated Tack Reverse J.D. Edwards’ Bad Spell? | E-Business Sell Side Success at H.B. Fuller | Business Intelligence Success at Biomet, Inc. | Sausage Producer Packs Out the Profit with Technology | Intentia’s Intents To Be More Fashionable | 'Collaborative Commerce': ERP, CRM, e-Proc, and SCM Unite! A Series Study: J.D. Edwards | E-Business Customer Service Success at H.B. Fuller Company | SCT Extends Into Business Intelligence | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 2: ERP Key Success Factors | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 1: ERP Trends | Single Source or Best of Breed - The Debate Continues | Can You Add New Life To an Old ERP System? | Lawson Software Means Business With PSA and IPO | NavisionDamgaard Reverts To Navision, But In Name Only | J.D. Edwards' QUEST To End Its String Of Pyrrhic Victories Part 2: The Implications | J.D. Edwards' QUEST To End Its String Of Pyrrhic Victories Part 1: The News | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 2: The Implications | PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 1: The News | ERP Selection Case Study Audio Conference Transcript | Fed Gives ERP A Shot In The Arm | IFS' Tamed Growth + Continued Losses + Increased Competitors' Lobby Talk = Decreased Customer Confidence | Latest Development on Epicor's Trying The Divestiture Tack | Is Ross Systems Up To A Hat Trick? | The Mid-Market Is Consolidating, Lo And Behold | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 4: ASP’s and New Pricing Models | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 3: E-Business and Mid-Market Shakeout | Geac Decomposes To Survive | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 2: Product Architecture and Web-Basing | Where Is ERP Headed (Or Better, Where Should It Be Headed)? Part 1: Functional Scope and Vertical Focus | Stalled Navision + Mixed Bag Damgaard = Satisfactory NavisionDamgaard | Small ERP Vendors Missing The ASP Boat | ERP Beginner's Guide In So Many Words | Will 2001 Be The Year Of Baan’s Miraculous Comeback?
Definitely Maybe.
| SCT Corporation: The Last Viable Process Manufacturing Vendor Standing? | QAD’s Costly eTransition Continues | Does NavisionDamgaard Merger Mark Further Mid-Market Consolidation? | Essential ERP - Its Functional Scope | The Essential ERP - Its Genesis & Future | Symix Starts New Year Under New Name, But Old Issues Remain | What On Earth Is Going On With SSA? | BEA Systems Has A Broad Vision For E-Business Infrastructures | Big ERP Players Courting Government Agencies | Geac Lives By Acquisitions; Will It Die By An Acquisition? | Lawson Software Expands Vertically As Well | Great Plains’ Latest Product Offering — Ready to Stampede the SME Market? | Great Plains' eEnterprise Solution 'N Sync with Microsoft's New Platforms | Navision Executes At a Slower Pace | Symix Systems Front-Steps Into Greener e-Commerce Pastures | Has SAP Found Magic Formula (One) To Learn The Ropes Of Marketing? | Is Baan Showing Signs of Life After Death? | Oracle – How to Disappoint Analysts by Doubling Profits | Ross Systems Ends Year On a Sour Note and Braces Itself For Survivor’s Game | Will Oracle’s Freebie Shot Hurt (Or Only Graze) Siebel? | Great Plains – An SME Market Leader, But At What Cost? | IFS Marches On, Although With a String of Losses | Siebel: Great Plans for Great Plains | Commerce One Holds Announcement Festival | Fourth Shift Corporation: Working Overtime To Provide Complete Customer Care | SynQuest Posts Mixed Results | J.D. Edwards’ Mixed Blessings | QAD Continues to Wade Through Red Ink | eConnections Expands Web With IPNet | Geac Trying Its Luck in Partnering | Ultimate Connection Seeking Its US Retail Connection Through Solomon Software Partners | New Release For Ariba’s Software | Thru-Put Announces Features For New APS Release | Oracle Applications - An Internet-Reinvented Feisty Challenger | American Software Has Been Starving While Delivering Innovations | Intentia Has Been Bleeding For Its Platform Independence | ERP Belle Époque Officially Ended With the Demise of Baan and SSA | PowerCerv Facing Another Stormy Season | The Pros and Cons of Collaborative Planning | MAPICS Back On Track, But Not Without Restructuring Pains | Global Vendor Negotiation Strategies | Winner Takes All – Siebel Ousts SalesLogix From Solomon’s Deal | PeopleSoft 8 Launched – Anything to Write Home About? | PeopleSoft: No More a Humble Kid From a Rough Neighborhood? | IBM Nabs Another Application Vendor | Epicor Software Corp.: How Far From Being 'One-Stop' Shop? | SCT Comes Back With a Vengeance | Lawson Software Marches Over $300M Milestone | SAP Remains Solid While Transitioning | They Can Run, But You Can’t Hide | How Has Made2Manage Systems Been Managing Itself? | Baan Defectors – Is This Only Tip of an Iceberg? | Is Fourth Shift Succeeding in Providing 'Complete Customer Care'? | SAP - A Leader Under Reconstruction | How Detrimental Can a 2nd-In-Charge’s Departure Be? | Can Geac Reshuffle the ERP Standings? | ERP Getting a New Breath of Fresh Air in Europe | Has Market Been Too Harsh On Great Plains? | J.D. Edwards Chooses Freedom to Choose EAI | Siebel Has Done It Again – This Time with Navision | American Software - A Tacit Avant-Garde? | Ross Systems, Inc.: In Process of Renaissance | How Has MAPICS Been Extending? | PeopleSoft Manufacturing - This Time For Sure?! | i2 Technologies’ Latest Offering: J. D. Edwards OneWorld™ | SAP to Become Leaner, Meaner and More Organized | J. D. Edwards FOCUSes on Active Supply Chain | Infinium Software, Inc.: Having All the Right Cards? | Access Commerce Spices Up North American CRM Fray | No More Mr. Nice Guy With J.D. Edwards | Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Audio Conference | IFS Far Cry From Running Out of Breath | ROI Systems, Inc.: Will Slow and Steady Remain in the Race? | Baan Yet Another ERP Vendor to Find a Sanctuary Under Invensys’ Wing | MAPICS Red Ink Stained While Extending Its Offering | Intentia’s Growing Pains | Ross Systems’ Renaissance Yet to Happen | Epicor Continues To Bleed | Symix Systems’ Slips Into Red During Its E-Commerce Transition | Will Solomon Finally Satisfy Great Plains’ Insatiable Appetite? | Baan Sinks Deeper into Red Quicksand | Lawson Software’s CRM and ASP Moves – Wise, Bold, Injudicious, Enforced, or Something Else? | Is SAP Stumbling? Perhaps. | Yet Another ‘Big 5 ERP’ CEO Casualty | Navision Software a/s: Mid-market iNvasion | Essential ERP – Current Market Trends – Part II | Will That Wretched ERP Finally Die? Possibly, But Only the Acronym! | Yet Another ERP/CRM Partnership | Oracle Flying High on Q3 Report: Is Gold All That Glitters? | Navision Becoming More Visible | Geac Announces Q3 Results and Acquires CRM Vendor | ERP Demand Being Re-heated | ERP Vendors Venturing into PSA | Solomon Software: Breaking Away from Perception as “Best-of-Breed-Accounting” Vendor | JD Edwards’ Alliances: Is It Too Much of a Good Thing? | GLOVIA to be Resuscitated (Hopefully) | JD Edwards Reports Strong License Revenue Growth in Q1 2000, but… | Intentia Attempts to Become ‘Lean and Mean’ | Vendors Begin to Round Out Their CRM Suites | J.D. Edwards Names SynQuest Preferred Solution | Oracle Integrates Front and Back Office with Applications 11i | PeopleSoft's CEO Steps Down | SSA Seeks Support from Synquest | SAP sets up Apparel and Footwear team | Geac and JBA Join Forces to Form New ERP Giant | Computer Associates, Baan Japan and EXE Announce Strategic Alliance to Provide Total Supply Chain Management Solutions | Oracle to Enlist BPA Systems in its Mid-Market Quest | SAP Lowers Revenue Expectations | Symix Maintains Consistent Profitability Despite Y2K Market Conditions | Software Leasing Trend Slams Baan Earnings | Intentia Americas Gains Momentum with 10 New Deals Inked During Last Two Weeks | MAPICS Reports Solid Profitability Despite Dismal Fiscal 1999 4% Growth | Baan Releases New Supply Chain Products | French Government awards ERP contract to Peoplesoft | Business Software Firms Sued Over Implementation - Lawsuits Bring ERP Problems to Light | Geac Metamorphosises JBA Into Gear, but Cuts 20% of Staff | J.D. Edwards Incurs Further Losses In Third Quarter | Intentia and Dash Associates Team Up | Key Product Delays Take a Toll on Oracle Users | ERP Packages For Midsize Firms in the Works | QAD Reports Third-Quarter--Revenue Rises 56 Percent | Pronto ERP 'Coming to America' | System Software Associates Announces Fiscal Fourth Quarter Results - The Agony Continues | Boeing Expands Baan Licensing Deal | Oracle Reports Strong Profits | QAD Offers Improved E-Commerce Applications with Greater Flexibility and Customization Capabilities | Heads Roll at Consulting Giant in Wake of SEC Investigation | Is Baan Clinically Dead? | Manhattan Associates Partners with Intentia | PeopleSoft Completes Acquisition of Vantive; Vantive CRM Applications Integrate with PeopleSoft and Other ERP Systems | SAP, PeopleSoft Earnings Look Brighter; ERP Strikes Back | Great Plains on a Shopping Spree | Geac Upgrades Accounting And Human-Resources Apps -- SQL Release 6.0 Simplifies Purchasing And HR Services For Midsize Companies | MAPICS, Inc. to Acquire Pivotpoint, Expanding e-business Offerings for Mid-Sized Manufacturing Establishments | PeopleSoft Takes Aim at Foods Industry | ERP Vendors Moving to Aerospace and Defense Markets | PeopleSoft Recuperating Slowly, Hoping to Sink 1999 into Oblivion Quickly | Baan Posts $236 Million Loss and Sells Off Coda for Nearly $40M Less Than It Paid | Symix Expands Its Product Offering While Remaining Profitable | IFS Continues to Blossom | SAP Declares Victory Over Manugistics, Takes Aim at i2 | Food Producer Files $20m Lawsuit Against Oracle | Oracle Loses Again | PeopleSoft Programs Cause Headaches at Number of Universities | Hummingbird Announces Extraction and Portal Strategy for ERP | SAP Posts Solid Q499, but Warns of Q100 | Analysis of Lawson Delivering New Retail Analytic Capabilities | ERP Vendor Lawson Software Extends to IBM's DB2 Universal Database | J.D. Edwards Teams with FRx Software to Improve Reporting Solutions | SAP and HP on the Web Together | Analysis of SAS Institute and IBM Intelligence Alliance | E-Commerce Lesson: Success Gets a Yawn, Failure Takes a Beating | SAP's New Level of e-Commerce: mySAP.com | BAAN Announces "Open World": Business-To-Business Collaboration Over The Internet | Lawson Plays Well With Others | The "S" in SAP Doesn't Stand for Security (that goes for PeopleSoft too) | Oracle Co. - Internet Paradigm Boosts Applications Growth | J.D. Edwards and Numetrix Ponder the Future as One | Symix Sytems: Shifting SME's Focus to Their Customers | MAPICS: Will Customer Satisfaction be Enough? | Intentia: Java Evolution From AS/400 | SSA: Evolving into systems integrator to survive | JBA: Will it remain "@ctive Enterprise"? | Marcam Solutions: Shifting its Focus to MES | Industrial & Financial Systems, IFS AB: Thriving on Product Flexibility and Incremental Deployability | Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) Market - Dismal 1999, the New Millennium to bring Relief (for Some) | Lawson Software: Self-Evidently Thriving on Innovations | QAD Inc.: The Art of Vertical Focus | Great Plains: Strong Channel and Microsoft focus for Dynamic(s) Growth | SAP's Dr. Peter Barth on Client/Server and Database Issues with SAP R/3 | Baan E-Commerce: a Wing, a Prayer & a Single Platform | J.D. Edwards - Creating OneWorld of Mid-sized ERP Users | Q: Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Billionaire? A: Baan -- Foster Care for Its Orphans Needed As Well | Geac Computer Corporation: Mastering Growth by Acquisitions |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google