Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
  • E-Mail Article
Rate this article
Average Reader Rating 0.00
You may also be interested in:
White Papers related to this article:
Other articles written by Olin Thompson:
Perfect Orders: Improving Customer Satisfaction and Financial Results
The Four Ps of Food Safety
Good Customer Service Is Simple

Featured Author
Read Comments

Introduction

In the TEC article "Find the Software's Fatal Flaws To Avoid Failure", we explored the concept that software can have fatal flaws that can result in anything from discomfort to disaster. Fatal flaws are defined as the gap between what a software product offers and the critical functions that a company needs. Many fatal flaws are the result of a company's industry. The process manufacturing industries, including food, CPG, chemical, pharmaceuticals and others have some potential fatal flaws that are common among this group and some that are unique to the actual industry (not the broad category of process or food but diary, meat, vegetable process, etc.) See "What Makes Process Process".

How many Fatal Flaws should you expect?

Within the process industries, the potential for fatal flaws is related to two elements:

  • The business function

  • The company's position in the Supply Chain.

The business function impacts your potential fatal flaws. In general, the closer you are to the CFO's office (general ledger for example), the more uniform the functions become across all industries and therefore, most vendors can handle most of your issues. The closer you are to the plant floor, the greater the variation and therefore the greater the potential for fatal flaws.

Your company's position in the Supply Chain also impacts your potential fatal flaws. The closer you are to the natural resource (the farm, the mine, the oil field, etc.) the greater the variability of your incoming material. Greater variability requires functions to track, plan and execute in a way that accounts for the variability. This variability results in potential fatal flaws. As your position in the supply chain approaches the consumer, the variation in materials becomes minimized and product becomes standardized, reducing the potential for fatal flaws.

The sources and examples of Fatal Flaws

The characteristics of material yield some potential for fatal flaws. Bulk materials are more difficult to manage with software than packaged materials (a rail car of chemicals versus a case of paint). The predictability of both the materials and the process yields some potential for fatal flaws. If material is inconsistent (quality specifications) or the process is not predictable (quality, yield) then it is more difficult to manage with software.

Production processes also give rise to the potential for fatal flaws. If you change the formula or recipe when you move from line to line, this may be a fatal flaw. If you vary the types of raw ingredient you use due to price or quality variations on a daily or even run-by-run basis, this may be a fatal flaw. In both these cases, will the product you select handle multiple formulas for the same end-item in planning, in costing, in execution?

Your relationship with your customers shows some potential for fatal flaws. If you have complex pricing (deals and promotions in CPG) or must provide customers with extensive documentation (certificate of analysis, Material Data Safety Sheets) fewer software products will have the features you need.

The vendors and process Fatal Flaws

Today, most vendors claim to "focus on process". Many of these vendors are generalists who focus on many different markets. (Question - How many markets can one vendor focus on and still be allowed to use the word "focus"?) When looking at vendors, a good rule of thumb is, the broader the market aims of the vendor, the greater the potential for fatal flaws. A vendor with broad market ambitions must spread their R&D dollars around to cover multiple markets. They also design products that work in many markets; that often forces compromises in some of those markets. Both of these lead to a lack of the detailed features required satisfying many process company's needs and therefore the software product's fatal flaws.

At the other end of the spectrum are vendors who specialize in a smaller market. These can be vendors who focus exclusively on process or are even more focused on a specific process (vendors exist that do only fish processing for example). These boutique vendors must satisfy the needs of specific markets because that is their only business. (see "Boutique Vendors Can Bring Big Value").

The "process fatal flaws" stated above should be easy to find with a process only vendor. Some generalist vendors will have these features, but you must proceed with caution to insure that the generalist vendor you select has what you need and that it works in a way that satisfies your specific needs — remember the devil is in the detail. At a lower level of detail (not process, not food but meat, dairy, etc.) exist more potential fatal flaws that also must be considered.

Looking for the Fatal Flaws

To determine where your potential fatal flaws are, look at the details of your industry. Variations in business that may create fatal flaws may include items like:

  • Specialty vs. commodity products

  • Batch vs. continuous operations

  • Industrial vs consumer market

  • Natural resources as raw material vs. preprocessed materials

  • Assembly vs. disassembly of raw materials into end products

For each of these trade-offs, different potential fatal flaws exist. You need to seek out the fatal flaws that may lurk due to your business's specific needs. Ask others in the industry. Seek out consultants with hands on experience in your industry. Ask the vendors to tell you what they consider your fatal flaws. A truly focused vendor will know the issues.

Summary

Every piece of software you consider holds the potential for fatal flaws. Miss the fatal flaws and it is difficult to project what the future holds for you. As a process company, you have greater odds of running into Fatal Flaws than other companies. Look at the details; ask yourself the hard questions, more importantly, ask the vendors the hard questions. Get the proof that the vendor you select has the details you need and not fatal flaws.

About the Author

Olin Thompson, a principal of Process ERP Partners, has over 25 years experience as an executive in the software industry with the last 17 in process industry related ERP, SCP, and e-business related segments. Olin has been called "the Father of Process ERP." He is a frequent author and an award-winning speaker on topics of gaining value from ERP, SCP, e-commerce and the impact of technology on industry.

He can be reached at Olin@ProcessERP.com.


 
comments powered by Disqus


Perfect Orders: Improving Customer Satisfaction and Financial Results | The Four Ps of Food Safety | Who to Blame for Project Failure? Look Up—Not Down, Not Left, Not Right | What Makes Process Process? | So What’s the Big Deal with Chemicals? | The Post-implementation Agility of Enterprise Systems: An Analysis | The CEO, CFO, and TCO | User Recommendations for the Food and Beverage Industry | Fatal Flaws and Technology Choices | Competing Globally—Predicting Demand and Delivering Optimally | Dealing with Food Industry Pressures | Food Safety, Government Regulations, and Brand Protection | Margin Squeeze and Globalization in the Food and Beverage Industry | Food and Beverage Industry Trends and Issues | Food and Beverage "Delights" |
The Modelling Approach to Post-implementation Agility in Enterprise Systems | CIO Horror Stories and What They Mean For Vendors | SAP for the Chemicals Industry: Challenges and User Recommendations | SAP for Chemicals Functionality | SAP for Chemicals: A Packaged Solution for Mid-market Companies | Yes, We Have No Bananas: Consumer Goods Manufacturers Serve Demanding Customers | SAP Industry Solutions for Mid-market Companies | Continuous Improvement Case Study: Taking Baby Steps towards Tangible Benefits | Managing Demand: Considerations for the Chemicals Industry | Overcoming Chemicals Industry Challenges through Optimization of Distribution and Inventory | User Recommendations for Pricing Management | The Retail Battleground for Pricing Management | Applications Giants Bolster Their Pricing Management Capabilities | Aligning Information Technology with Corporate Strategy | The Rise of Price Management | The Case for Pricing Management | Extending Quality's Reach to Manage Quality in the Supply Chain | The Fragile Consumer Packaged Goods Market and Private Label Products | Prepackaged SAP Best Practices—Are They for You? | The Why of Data Collection | Looking For Software—The Expectations of Small and Medium Enterprises | Technology Hurdles Plus Retailer Consolidation Yield a Fragile Market for Consumer Packaged Goods Manufacturers | Supply Chain Management Systems for Service and Replacement Parts: Players, Benefits, and User Recommendations | Avoid the Perils of Service Parts Planning in Supply Chain Management | Supply Chain Management: Morphing the Functional Scope of Service Parts | Lucrative but "Risky" Aftermarket Business—Service and Replacement Parts SCM | Business Intelligence Status Report: Recommendations | Access to Critical Business Intelligence: Challenging Data Warehouses? | Business Intelligence Vendors | Business Intelligence Corporate Performance Management Market Landscape | Attaining Real Time, On-demand Information Data: Contemporary Business Intelligence Tools | Contemporary Business Intelligence Tools | Business Intelligence Status Report | Project Failure—The Numbers, Why, and What It Means | How to Cope When Your Service Provider is Acquired | Enterprise Software Migration Alert: Is SAP the Alternative? | Oracle's Product Future: What Can the Past Tell? | Battle Booty from Oracle's Victory Over PeopleSoft | The Oracle/PeopleSoft Reality Check | What's Ahead for Users on the Enterprise Infrastructure Battlefront? | Competition Heats Up in ERP Market: Oracle Merger, and SAP and Microsoft Reacts | While Oracle and PeopleSoft Are to Fuse, Competitors Ruse--Leaving Customers (Somewhat) Bemused | The Perfect Order--Inside-Out or Outside-In? | The Future of SOA-based Applications and Infrastructure | SOA as a Foundation for Applications and Infrastructure | SOA-based Applications and Infrastructure--The Next Frontier? | Customer Choices for Achieving Growth | Competitive Advantage in a Saturated Market: How Will the Big Few Do It? | Achieving Growth: New Accounts versus Up-selling to Existing Accounts | Application Erosion: More Causes and Cures | Application Erosion: Eating Away at Your Hard Earned Value | Reliability Driven Maintenance--Closing the CMMS "Value Gap"? Part Two: Reliability Driven Maintenance | Reliability Driven Maintenance--Closing the CMMS "Value Gap"? Part One: Trends and Definition | Production Intelligence--Improving Production by Filling a Traditional Gap | Lean Asset Management--Is Preventive Maintenance Anti-Lean? | Vertical Marketing--What Is A Vertical? | Knowing Your Prospect's Influencers | SSA Global--The Right Product Strategy | Business Intelligence Success, Lessons Learned | Find the Software's Fatal Flaws to Avoid Failure | Process Manufacturers--Great Batch, Every Batch | The CIO's Agenda--Make IT Affordable, Workable, and Credible | Business Strategy, Business Processes, and Business Systems | What's Wrong With Application Software? Business Changes, Software Must Change with the Business. | Process Manufacturing: Industry Specific Requirements Part Three: Textiles | Process Manufacturing: Industry Specific Requirements Part One: Introduction | Technology Vendor--Can You Afford Credibility? | The World Of Software Buying Has Changed; Will the Vendors Change With It? | BI Approaches of Enterprise Software Vendors | The Old ERP Dilemma--The Refresh Option | Business Activity Monitoring - Watching The Store For You | Support for Old Releases-Good for the User but Is It Good for the Vendor? | Evaluating Enterprise Software-Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Three: Knowledge Bases and User Recommendations | Evaluating Enterprise Software - Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Two | Evaluating Enterprise Software - Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? | Poor Data Quality Means A Waste of Money | Living And Thriving With Channel Master Customers | If Software Is A Commodity - Can You Still Win Some Competitive Advantage? | Profit Optimization - Can We Possibly Argue With The Objective? | Commodity Software, Best Practice and Competitive Advantage | If Software Is A Commodity...Then What? | What's Wrong With Enterprise Applications, And What Are Vendors Doing About It? Part Three: A New Approach and User Recommendations | What's Wrong With Enterprise Applications, And What Are Vendors Doing About It? Part Two: A New Framework Strategy | What's Wrong With Enterprise Applications, And What Are Vendors Doing About It? | Frantic Merger-Mania Spiced Up With Vendettas Leaves Customers Anxious Part Two: Analysis Continued | Frantic Merger-Mania Spiced Up With Vendettas Leaves Customers Anxious | A User Centric WorkWise Customer Conference | What's Wrong With Application Software? - A Possible Solution? What Is It, Why And How Does It Fit Into Your Future | What Does Vendor Consolidation Mean To The End User? | The Reinvention of Software Vendors and End-User Value | The Demand-Driven Supply Chain and Demantra | HighJump Grows in a Period of Low Growth Through Adaptable, Broad Function Products Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | HighJump Grows in a Period of Low Growth Through Adaptable, Broad Function Products Part Three: Highjump SCE Solutions | HighJump Grows in a Period of Low Growth Through Adaptable, Broad Function Products Part Two: Market Impact | HighJump Grows in a Period of Low Growth Through Adaptable, Broad Function Products | What's Wrong With Application Software? Businesses Really Are Unique - One Size Can Never Fit All | Application Vendors - Avoid Sabotaging Sales With Marketing | What's Wrong with Application Software? It's the Economics | Overcoming The Roadblocks To Hearing YES On New Projects | The Case of A Boutique Vendor's Benefits of Focus - IRM Corporation | Should You Modify an Application Product? | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in ProcessPart 3: Process PLM Requirements | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in Process Part 2 Process PLM Motivation | Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) in Process Part 1 Proven in Discrete, Ready to Blossom in Process | Why Systems Fail - The Dead-end of Dirty Data | Who to Blame for Project Failure? Look Up - Not Down, Not Left, Not Right. | What Makes Process Process? | Enterprise Energy Management Software - The Key to Effective Energy Utilization | Supply Chain Planning – Issues for Continuous Chemical Companies | Is ROI King In Evaluating IT Investments? Part 2. Measuring the Impact of IT Investments | Is ROI King In Evaluating IT Investments? Part 1. Should We Make the Investment? | Yantra - Leader in Distributed Order Management, But Wait There’s More | Fast-path Implementations - Are They Good or Bad? | The Old ERP Dilemma - Should We Install The New Release? | Standardizing on One ERP System in a Multi-division Enterprise | Build versus Buy - A Long Term Decision | Boutique Vendors Can Bring Big Value | The Benefits of Focusing on a Niche and Serving it Well: EcFood - A Dot-com Making It | Process PLM Vendor Sequencia Adds Portfolio Management | Programs, Processes and Practices: Planning Implementations and Evaluating Systems | The Old ERP Dilemma: How Long Should You Pay Maintenance? | The 'Old ERP' Dilemma: Replace or Add-on | E-Business Sell Side Success at H.B. Fuller | E-Business Customer Service Success at H.B. Fuller Company | E-business Buy Side Success at H.B. Fuller | Single Source or Best of Breed - The Debate Continues | ecFood Approaches Profitability - An Internet Trading Exchange Bright Spot | MAPICS XA Expands BI Offering Through Partnership With Vanguard |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google