Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

The Company History

Tero Software is a private company that was originally founded as a consulting firm in 1979 with the aim of teaching organizations about preventative maintenance strategies and how to automate them through the use of computerized maintenance systems. In the mid-1990s, Tero began delivering its own Web-based request management system, which helped users deal with in-coming phone, fax, e-mail, and paper work requests. In 1997, based on the success of its first Web foray, it released its own Web-based maintenance management system, Web Work. Tero's systems now help clients manage maintenance facilities, fleet, and plant equipment. The company is headquartered in Coquitlam, British Columbia (Canada).

Business Background

Tero is a software development firm that also offers consulting expertise. While the company originally focused its attention on organizations in the forestry and mining industries, its current solutions address the education, military, and government sectors, as well as the property management and manufacturing industries. Tero's solutions are primarily used by many small and medium businesses (SMB), though the company is also gaining tier one customers that appreciate its slimmer solution. Most of Tero's target clientele have revenues of between $100 million (USD) to $500 million (USD). Tero resellers are based throughout North America, India, the UK, South Africa, Poland, Russia, Iran, and Asia.

Supporting the Customer

Tero's Web Work solution is available in an application service provider (ASP) hosting model with twenty-four hour a day, seven day a week support. However, some clients prefer to have their own on-site installations, for which Tero provides customer-specific service level agreements (SLA).

Web Work is a system system with robust work order management and equipment history functionality. However, Tero is particularly proud of its method for supporting data division. An organization may have many facilities and each facility may have many plants in separate data divisions. The Web Work solution allows clients to separate data from these various plants, so that people at a given plant can view only information related to their job functions, while maintaining one database and a common naming convention. This system allows, for example, a regional manager who runs four or five plants to get reports on, and see data for, all those plants. Moreover, because there is a parent/child relationship in the hierarchy going all the way up to the head office, it is possible to view reports on activities and costs from a national, regional, or local perspective.

Another of Web Work's strengths is its reporting functionality, which demonstrates Tero's ease-of-use philosophy. Tero believes that information technology (IT) personnel and analysts should not be the only ones capable of producing reports. In fact, according to Tero General Manager, Rob Saare, "By giving the report writing back into the hands of the maintenance manager or the maintenance folks they can now report on the littlest aspects or the largest aspects of their jobs." Thus, Web Work's reporting functionality enables maintenance personnel to readily create custom reports that drill-down and detail the work they have actually done.

These strengths are the basis for a Tero success story involving the Washington State Patrol (WSP), which runs the US State of Washington's police department. The department is responsible for maintaining approximately sixty buildings and facilities, as well as overseeing inventory that includes a fleet of about 1,600 vehicles. To complicate this, the WSP has several divisions, including a supply division and an electronic services division, and had to deal with the inefficiencies of maintaining separate databases for each division. Tero helped solve this problem through a series of meetings that got the divisions working as a team and that established that a single database and a common naming convention would enable the whole organization to work more efficiently.

In the year and a half since those meetings, the WSP has successfully moved from maintaining separate databases to having only one database. The WSP supply division uses Tero's purchasing module, and collaborated with Tero to incorporate several new features. The electronic services division is now able to manage all the organization's radios and electronics. At long last, all the divisions communicate with each other and follow the same business practices.

Challenges

One of the biggest challenges Tero faces is encouraging clients to overcome maintenance practices that have been ingrained over time and do not necessarily work as well as they could. Though many companies assert that this is not an issue with their practices, Tero has often found that it can refine and improve their practices once its consulting arm has the buy-in of people within the organization. As Rob Saare states, "We try to teach people that it's all about people, process, and tools. The software is merely a tool, it's a means to an end, a data-repository if you will. The process: if you follow the methodology in the software you inherently have immediately success."

The Future

The next important projects on Tero's roadmap include many interface improvements. Since Tero has built its product on Microsoft technology, it will take advantage of .NET and extensible markup language (XML) to provide drag-and-drop functionality, more user customization, and more user-defined screens and graphical user interfaces (GUI).

Tero also hopes to expand the applicability of its solutions, as it is seeing more interest in the area of IT asset management (ITAM). Tero has noted that IT assets can be maintained in the same way as facilities, fleet, and inventory, and so it is letting customers know that they can run all maintenance and asset management activities on one package.

Finally, the contribution analysis graph below demonstrates the degree to which each area of Tero Web Work contributes functionality to the overall solution. This graph is based on Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. (TEC)'s model of computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) and enterprise asset management (EAM) solutions.


 
comments powered by Disqus


Demystifying SAP Solution Manager | Financial Reporting—Who Needs It? | Infor Gains Financials Elite Club Status | A Leader in Service Management Tackles Multidimensional Growth | Cloud Assets: A Guide for SMBs—Part 1 | EAM versus CMMS: What's Right for Your Company | Off-loading Some Green Compliance Burdens: Can Enterprise Applications Meet the Challenge? | Use a Computerized Maintenance Management System to Improve Predictive Maintenance Performance | Acquisitive Vendor Expands Its Enterprise Asset Management Potential | "Once Bitten” Vendor Is Not “Twice Shy” about New Acquisition | The Convergence of ERP and Field Services—One Vendor’s Leadership | An ERP Vendor Poised to Overtake the Services Market | EAM Showdown! IFS vs. Mincom vs. CHAMPS | Challenges and Future Plans of a Product Inventory Disposition Vendor | Zooming into an Inventory Free Flow |
Is There a Smarter Way to Handle Excess Active and Obsolete Inventory? | Let the (Excess) Inventory Flow! | An ERP Vendor, with its Powerful Parent Backing, Tackles Software as a Service | Software as a Service's Functional Catch-up | Resilient Enterprise Solutions Vendor Displays Sociability and Pragmatic Product Development | Supply Chain Management Systems for Service and Replacement Parts: Players, Benefits, and User Recommendations | Avoid the Perils of Service Parts Planning in Supply Chain Management | Supply Chain Management: Morphing the Functional Scope of Service Parts | Lucrative but "Risky" Aftermarket Business—Service and Replacement Parts SCM | Serving up EAM Integration | Lean Maintenance—Does It Impact Reliability? Lessons Learned and Best Practices | Selecting a CMMS System | CMMS in the Aviation Industry | The Perfect Order--Inside-Out or Outside-In? | Implementing an Enterprise Content Management System What is in it for the organization? | How to Avoid Becoming Another CMMS Implementation Failure Statistic | Smaller Vendors Can Still Provide Relevant Business Systems Part Four: MRO and Spare Parts Management | Smaller Vendors Can Still Provide Relevant Business Systems Part Two: Market Impact | Smaller Vendors Can Still Provide Relevant Business Systems Part One: Event Summary | Reliability Driven Maintenance--Closing the CMMS "Value Gap"? Part Two: Reliability Driven Maintenance | Reliability Driven Maintenance--Closing the CMMS "Value Gap"? Part One: Trends and Definition | Lean Asset Management--Is Preventive Maintenance Anti-Lean? | Automated Enterprise: Many High-ROI Opportunities | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Three: 2000s--Back to the Future | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part Two: 1990s--Enterprise Resource Planning | Enterprise Applications--The Genesis and Future, Revisited Part One: 1960s--Pre-Computer Era | EAM versus CMMS: What's Right for Your Company? Part Four: IFS and Intentia Responses | EAM versus CMMS: What's Right for Your Company? Part Three: Analysis of IFS and Intentia | EAM versus CMMS: What's Right for Your Company? Part Two: Integration Concerns | EAM Versus CMMS: What's Right for Your Company? Part One | Maintenance Software--How to Negotiate Successful Contracts with CMMS Vendors | Continuous Improvement Offers CMMS Maintenance Benefits | Maintenance Software--Plan Ahead to Maximize CMMS Vendor Web Site Visits | Use CMMS to Improve PdM Performance | The Strategic Importance of Asset Management Part Three: A New Framework | The Strategic Importance of Asset Management Part Two: Implications | The Strategic Importance of Asset Management Part One: Changing Attitudes | Geac Gets Its Commonsense Share Of Consolidation, With Revolving Door CEOs No Less | Best of Breed Versus Fully Integrated Software: The Pro's and Con's | The Total EAM Vision Strategic Advantages in Asset Management | CMMS Templates for Effective Implementations Part Two: The CMMS Industry and ERP | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 3: Challenges and User Recommendations | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' Part 2: Market Impact | Geac Hopes To See System21 Shine Again Like 'Aurora' | Geac Awakens On Its Deathbed - Part 2: Geac's Response | Geac Awakens On Its Deathbed - Part 1: Event Summary | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 5: Recommendations | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 4: Market Predictions | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 3: Rating The Vendors | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Part 2: Vendor Reactions | The ERP Market 2001 And Beyond – Aging Gracefully With The ‘New Kids On The Block’ | Geac Decomposes To Survive | The Essential ERP - Its Genesis & Future | Infrastructure Management Wunderkind Divides And Integrates | Geac Lives By Acquisitions; Will It Die By An Acquisition? | Tired Of Losing Your Oil Derricks? | Geac Trying Its Luck in Partnering | Peregrine Welcomes Loran to Its Nest In Network Management Matrimony | Peregrine Polishes the Old In-Out-and-In-between | Intraware Acquires Janus for its Extranets | Peregrine Exits Quiet Period Making Noise | E&Y+ASP=BSP: It’s Not Algebra, But It Adds Up To Something Big | JBA: Will it remain "@ctive Enterprise"? | Marcam Solutions: Shifting its Focus to MES | Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) Market - Dismal 1999, the New Millennium to bring Relief (for Some) |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google