Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments
Featured Author - Laura Taylor - January 14, 2002

Introduction

A security vulnerability assessment service is a risk management process. Interliant's security vulnerability assessment service enables its clients to understand what risks their online transaction systems and network infrastructure face. Relevant Technologies has taken an in-depth look at Interliant's security vulnerability assessment service to find out what their tactical strategy is in helping organizations minimize risk, how this strategy evolved, and what IT decision makers can expect to gain from using their services.

As businesses continue to put their critical systems, data, and applications online, the importance of security and privacy become increasingly critical. Financial loss is only one of the many online losses a company can fall victim to. A Security Vulnerability Assessment (SVA) has become a crucial service to any company with valuable online data or infrastructure connected to the Internet.

Product Background

Interliant is a leading global application service provider (ASP), and, according to Gartner Group, is the third largest ASP in North America. With the purchase of Triumph Technologies in November of 1999, Interliant became a leading provider of security and managed security services. According to Giga Information Group, security outsourcing services are growing at a rate of 35% compared to 25% for other corporate information technology outsourcing services. Security vulnerability assessment services are just one segment of the security outsourcing marketing. Interliant's INIT Security Vulnerability Assessment (ISVA) service has matured significantly in the last few years, and continues to be one of its most popular security outsourced services.

Interliant's ISVA service does a lot more than evaluate the security of a website or perimeter network. Physical access controls of the facilities are reviewed, as well as both the hardware and software configurations of the firewall. The firewall rules, the router access lists, and the security of individual hosts are reviewed and tested for potential security exposures. If virtual private networks (VPNs) and authentication systems are in place, these are tested to see if they are configured correctly and are protecting the infrastructure as expected. Remote access systems and passwords are also tested for weaknesses and exploitability.

It is important to note that a security vulnerability assessment service gives you the security posture of your network for a single snapshot in time. In order to understand the appropriate corrective action to take to secure the exposures, you need this security snapshot in order to formulate your security agenda going forward.

Allowing inappropriate access to your backend systems, or exposing your customers' credit card numbers, could prove costly and lead to resource depleting litigation. Since your infrastructure changes daily, Relevant Technologies recommends businesses with highly sensitive and confidential corporate and customer information perform a third-party security vulnerability assessment once a quarter.

In addition to quarterly assessments, Relevant recommends that internet-based penetration tests be performed on a monthly basis. Interliant's ISVA service offers best-practice penetration testing capabilities that are able to substantially mitigate future security exposures. Other significant contenders in the SVA market that compete with Interliant include @Stake, TruSecure, and Predictive Systems. With the security market approaching $6 billion USD a year and growing at a rate of about $2 billion USD for the foreseeable future, Relevant Technologies expects Interliant to be able to grow and sustain its ISVA service in spite of the competitive landscape.

Figure 1. Corporate Information
Headquarters  Purchase, New York
Trading NASDAQ: INIT
2000 Total Revenues $158 million
1st Quarter 00 Revenues $26.9 million
1st Quarter 01 Revenues $39.6 million 
2nd Quarter 00 Revenues $38.6 million
2nd Quarter 01 Revenues $31.2 million
Employees as of June 30  1,058
Contact Information 781-756-3700

Service Strategy and Trajectory

Interliant's security services serve global organizations that have local networks in varying locations. Interliant assists organizations of all sizes with security vulnerability assessments in order to:

  • Protect revenue streams Safeguard customer and corporate information

  • Reduce site outages and performance problems 

  • Test responsiveness of intrusion detection systems 

  • Create secure and seamless information access 

  • Prevent or deter denial of service attacks

  • Meet customer contractual obligations

  • Prevent unauthorized financial transactions 

  • Risk mitigation in mergers and acquisitions 

  • Understand corporate risks to meet SEC criteria 

  • Protect infrastructure against cavalier engineers 

  • Help organizations gain competitive advantage 

  • Build customer loyalty 

  • Assist in setting security IT agendas

  • Enable corrective action 

  • Assist organizations in qualifying for Information Protection Insurance 

Having a security vulnerability assessment done by an independent and outside authority shows that an organization has taken due diligence and objectivity in working towards a secure infrastructure.

Interliant performs this service directly and has considerable success doing so. As a result, Interliant's SVAis not available through any reseller channel, and we expect that a channel strategy will not be necessary for future positioning.

Figure 2. Product Information
Service Name INIT Security Vulnerability
Assessment Service
Service Scope Small to large sized businesses
Industry Focus Internet
Technology
Financial sectors
Key Features Risk management
Security remediation
Consolidated reports,
Security roadmap
Report card 

Product Strengths

Interliant has a proprietary formula for identifying an organization's level of risk. By applying this formula to an organization's network infrastructure, it is possible to calculate a numerical statistic from which an organization can base future security assessments. For carrier-class organizations, this means that Interliant can measure the risk of a group of networks, or measure the security of different divisions, assign a risk exposure grade, and find out which networks or corporate divisions are creating the greatest exposure for a company. Once a risk grade has been applied to different divisions in an organization, if the same methodology is used consistently, trends can be noted.

Interliant does not rely on any one particular vendor or network-scanning tool to assess a client's web site or network. They use multiple assessment tools, some commercial, some open source, and some home-grown, which all have strengths in different areas. Their experience has shown that one tool will not accurately identify all vulnerabilities. Additionally, they make use of protocol analyzers, intrusion detection sensors, and port listeners if the situation warrants it.

Since all scanning tools turn up false positives from time to time, the first thing Interliant does is to confirm a detected vulnerability. If the customer requests it, they can further exploit the vulnerability, and penetrate the customer's network, if further verification is required. However, once vulnerability is verified, Interliant's primary concern is always to resolve the exposure as soon as possible in order to help their clients minimize risk.

Product Challenges

As the security vulnerability assessment market grows, so does the number of ASPs that offer competing services. Currently, other ASPs that offer security vulnerability assessment services include Exodus, Genuity, and Digex.

Aside from the ASP competitors, other reputable security vulnerability assessment services are being conducted from consulting firms like Ernst & Young, Foundstone, IBM, Netigy, and Vigilinx. Some of the security services provided by these other vendors do not have the years of refinement that Interliant's security services offer, however, it should be noted that these vendors are competing for the same customer base that Interliant is targeting.

With many of their competitors having large customer bases distributed nationally and internationally, there will be significant challenges for market share in this segment. Interliant will need to expand their regional strength to other cities on the East Coast, like New York, and Washington, D.C., in order to create a more national presence. Replicating their focus on security to other major markets, and hiring new staff to ramp up these strategic geographic locations, will increase Interliant's ability to remain competitive.

Bottom Line

Vendor Recommendations

In order to leverage the growing need and market for security vulnerability services, Interliant will need to step up its marketing campaign in order gain name recognition in the security service provider category. Interliant's strength in security comes from its years of experience and being well entrenched in the New England market. The necessity to communicate to a multi-national market its depth of expertise is critical to Interliant's success. Partnerships and strategic alliances will increase Interliant's ability to obtain a national presence.

There remains considerable disparity between best and worst-practice security vulnerability assessment services today. Interliant's service is well-defined, and has withstood the scrutiny of many years of customer implementations. The challenge for Interliant will be to educate the market of their expert capabilities. With sufficient marketing resources, Interliant will be able to more clearly differentiate itself as a premiere leader in a competitive landscape.

User Recommendations

Outsourcing an organization's security vulnerability service is a reasonable solution, and is often more cost-effective than doing it in-house. The costs associated with performing a security vulnerability assessment include a substantial investment in scanning and penetration tools, and often times multiple tools are required to do a thorough job. As well, knowledgeable security staff resources are required, and it may not make sense from a cost perspective for some companies to have a person dedicated for this task alone. Finding knowledgeable security employees is difficult, and, once found, they are expensive to keep on board. Leveraging the skills and resources from Interliant shows that an organization is taking steps to improve its security posture, and safeguard their customer data and networks.

Most of the vendors offering security vulnerability assessment services are technically competent to address technical risks, but are not knowledgeable in regards to the business impact of their actions. Unlike other security service providers, Interliant, through its unique risk management formula, is able to align technical risks with business risks, and come up with an approach that balances technical security with appropriate countermeasures and a comprehensive conclusive report. Interliant's final security vulnerability assessment report includes an executive summary, a report card, security profiling, vulnerability findings, a topology and infrastructure review, a summary of recommendations, and a security roadmap to use moving forward.

Measuring risk is critical to the long-term success of most organizations with moderate to large-sized budgets. Businesses have a limited amount of resources, and eliminating high-risk exposures can prevent a total collapse of a corporate infrastructure moving forward. Understanding the relationship of security risks to other areas within the organization can act as a starting point for a corporate-wide risk management framework.

By using Interliant's security vulnerability assessment service you are purchasing a proven pre-defined service. With impressive capabilities and references, this service is ideal for businesses and organizations of all sizes that are not able to justify dedicated in-house resources to develop specialized technical security auditing capabilities.

About the Author

Laura Taylor is the Chief Technical Officer of Relevant Technologies (http://www.relevanttechnologies.com) a leading provider of original information security content, research advisory services, and best practice IT management consulting services. You can contact her by e-mail on ltaylor@relevanttechnologies.com.


 
comments powered by Disqus


Secure Mobile ERP—Is It Possible? | SAP HANA—One Technology to Watch in 2012 (and Beyond) | Demystifying SAP Solution Manager | Cloud Assets: A Guide for SMBs—Part 3 | I Want My Private Cloud | The Sum of All Malware Fears: Siemens on Stuxnet | Managing the Overflow of E-mails | Security Risk Assessment and Management in Web Application Security | Are You Adequately Protecting Your IT Infrastructure Components Inside the Firewall? | Enterprise Resource Planning Giants Eye the Shop Floor | The Pain and Gain of Integrated EDI Part One: The Pain of Integrated EDI | The Next Phase of Supplier Performance Management in the Retail Industry | Who Else is Using Your Wireless Network? | Information Security Firewalls Market Report Part Two: Current Market Trends and User Recommendations | Information Security Firewalls Market Report Part One: Market Overview and Technology Background |
The Instant Supply Chain Challenge | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part Five: Challenges and User Recommendations | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part Four: Market Impact | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part Three: QRS Background | Inovis Delves into PIM by Snatching QRS Part Two: QRS Marketing | Automated Enterprise: Many High-ROI Opportunities | Secure Transfers of Large Files Over the Internet Using YouSendIt | Fed Warms Up to ERP Spending, but Will Contractors and Their ERP Vendors Comply? Part Two: Challenges and User Recommendations | Feds Warms Up to ERP Spending, but Will Contractors and Their ERP Vendors Comply? Part One: Event Summary and Market Impact | International Trade Logistics Challenge Automated Global E-Trading | Product Review: GFI's LANguard Network Security Scanner | The Best ACT! Is Still to Come | HIPAA-Watch for Security Speeds Up Compliance Part Two: Phase III and IV, and Product and User Recommendations | HIPAA-Watch for Security Speeds Up Compliance Part One: Vendor and Product Information | EAM Versus CMMS: What's Right for Your Company? Part One | GXS Acquires HAHT Commerce or More Synchronized Retail B2B Data Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations. | GXS Acquires HAHT Commerce for More Synchronized Retail B2B Data Part Three: Market Impact | GXS Acquires HAHT Commerce for More Synchronized Retail B2B Data Part Two: HAHT Commerce | Using PKI to Protect Your Business Information | Sales and Operations Planning Part One: Identifying and Forecasting Demand | The CyberAngel: Laptop Recovery and File Encryption All-in-One | Evaluating Enterprise Software-Business Process or Feature/Function-Based Approach? All the above, Perhaps? Part Three: Knowledge Bases and User Recommendations | InsideOut Firewall Reporter Unravels the Mysteries of Your Firewall Logs | SCE Leaders Partner To See Beyond Their Portfolio Part Three: Challenges and User Recommendations | When the Bigger Fish Eats the Smaller to Become a Bigger Fish | The Future of Secure Remote Password (SRP) Part Two: Overcoming Obstacles to Success | The Future of Secure Remote Password (SRP) | Integrated Security: A New Network Approach Part Two: The Shift Toward Integration | Integrated Security: A New Network Approach | Vendor Analysis: Kaspersky Anti-Virus Products Examined | Increasing the Value of Your Enterprise Through Improved Supply Chain Decisions Part 3: Conclusion | 6 Immediate Business Improvements Offered by an Online SRM System: Part 3: Other Points to Consider | Hosting Horrors! | Legacy Single Sign-On: Novell, Evidian, IBM, PassGo, or Computer Associates? | Fourth Shift's evolution Within SoftBrands' DemandStream | The Intranet Has Come a Long Way: Where is it Going Next? | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 4: User Recommendations | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 3: Causes of Failures | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 2: Implementation Key Success Factors | The 'Joy' Of Enterprise Systems Implementations Part 1: Inexorable Statistics | OKENA Brews Up a StormSystem that Secures All Applications | Appointment Scheduling - Achieving the Positive Ripple Effect Part 2: A Solution | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 2: Market Impact | Siebel Rallies Its Integration Alliance Troops Part 1: Recent Announcements | Incident Handling and Response Capability: An IT Security Safeguard Part 2: Establishing the Capability | Incident Handling and Response Capability: An IT Security Safeguard Part 1: Are You Ready to Support an Incident Response Capability? | Outsourcing Security Part 3: Selecting a Managed Security Services Provider | Outsourcing Security Part 2: Measuring the Cost | Outsourcing Security Part 1: Noting the Benefits | Vendor Review: SecureWave Protects Microsoft Operating System Platforms | Thanks to a Smart Little Company called Lexias, CIOs Can Now Empower their Users to Assist in eBusiness Security | Feds Buckle Down on Customer Information Security | Identix Leads Biometric Authentication | Bootcamp for the Pros; Why Ernst & Young Will Lead Security Auditing Standards | OKENA Pioneers Next-Generation Intrusion Prevention | PipeChain Adds Pragmatism Onto Simplicity | Social Engineering Can Thwart the Best Laid Security Plans | Application Single-Sign On: Netegrity, Securant, or Evidian? | Lost Your Laptop? The CyberAngel® Brings It Back | InsideOut Makes Firewall Reporting Useful | Optimizing The Supply Chain Network And Reducing Distribution Costs - Part 2 An Andersen Point Of View | The Retail Industry: Improving Supply Chain Efficiency Through Vendor Compliance - An Andersen Point Of View | Optimizing The Supply Chain Network And Reducing Distribution Costs - An Andersen Point Of View | PRISM Users Get A Dedicated, Independent Web Community | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 2: ERP Key Success Factors | ERP Trivia - Every Why Should Have Its Wherefore Part 1: ERP Trends | The SOAP Opera Progresses - Helping XML to Rule the World | Nortel and Clarify: Was There Ever Synergy Enough to Support this Marriage? | New Era of Networks Gets Blinded By the NEON | SCT Corporation Means (e)Business For Process Manufacturing | EAI Market Consolidation Continues With Peregrine Acquisition of Extricity | A New Era Dawns for Sybase | Performance Management Simplified by MSPs | Tibco Takes a Pragmatic Approach to Multicasting | Talarian and NextSet Team for B2B Solutions | Manugistics Lays Groundwork For Talus Integration | QueryObject Partners With Cognos | Quantum Snaps Off Its NAS Group | Tempest Creates a Secure Teapot | E*Trade Ignores Private Security Warning, But Public Hullaballoo Gets Response | Navision Executes At a Slower Pace | eMachines to Ship Appliance | Sun Buys Cobalt | My Network Engineers are Talking about Implementing Split DNS. What Does that Mean? | VA Linux Releases NAS Server | eConnections Expands Web With IPNet | New Internet Appliances Coming from Compaq | Lipstream Speaks to Kana | Human-Machine Interaction Company Ramps Up Firewall Product Line | Security Information Market Heading for Growth | Alibris Charged with Intercepting Email | Remedy Welcomes You To Your New Office. Now Get To Work! | Peregrine Welcomes Loran to Its Nest In Network Management Matrimony | i2 Paints Broad Strokes at eDay | Cart32 in Need of Duct Tape | More Marketplace Success For Manugistics? | Deutsche Telekom to Acquire VoiceStream Wireless | Study Shows: FBI Alienates Industry Security Experts | Firewall Cowboyz Set the Stage to Free Innocent Convict | Lasership.com Looks To Descartes For Same-Day Delivery Help | Symantec Swallows AXENT; Takes on Network Associates | Novatel Wireless and Diversinet Team Up to Provide Security for Wireless Modems | Concur Gives Up The Boast | Red Hat Releases Clustering Software | Windows 2000 Bug Fixes Posted | Baltimore Technologies Doubles Revenues, Offers World-Class PKI Hosting | The Whys and Hows of a Security Vulnerability Assessment | Earthlink Leads the Way in DSL Security | PKI and Biometrics Ready for Take-Off | AT&T Has a Thing for Media | Secure Transport of EDI and XML for Trading Exchanges | Compaq and IBM Alliance for Storage | Can You Trust Entrust? | Marketing and Intelligence, Together at Last | Standard & Poor's Announces Security Certification | Evaluating the Total Cost of Network Ownership | Check Point Leads Firewall Market | Dell Snags Motorola’s Grzelakowski to Lead Wireless Business Unit | Fighting Cybercrime on the Internet | NetWare for Small Business – NetWhy? | Let Your Hard Drives Tell You Where they Are! | New Storage Array from Sun | E&Y Spins-Off eSecurity Online and Unveils Security Vulnerability Assessment Services | Technology Project Selection and Management in Community Banks | ASP Infrastructure: The Party Has Started | With Record Revenues, AXENT Puts Down a Solid Fist | NAI Will Pay Trend $12.5 Million Resulting from Law Suit | Sub7 Tells Chat Rooms All Your Stuff; F-Secure Leads the Battle | Cobalt Releases Linux "Clustering" Software | E-Cash Rollout Replaces Amex | More Infrastructure Support for CyberCarriers | Intranets: A World of Possibilities | GSA Schedule Partnership Gets Network-1 in the Door | Los Alamos Loses Top-Secret Information, Again! | Standard & Poor's Exposes Customers' Security | The AS/400 Takes You Securely Where You Want to Go | Multi-mode ADSL Heads for the Mountain | Applix Still Shows a Presence in the OLAP Market | Cisco’s Complete Network in a Box | Trend Micro Steps into PDA/Wireless AntiVirus Information Market | Manugistics To Help Amazon.com In Global Expansion | Gateway & AOL Follow Crusoe’s Footprints | Microsoft Tech Ed 2000 Win2K Attendee Network Fails Miserably | CryptoSwift Takes Rainbow Revenues Up 620% | Layer 3 or Bust | Ariba Gains Legs Courtesy of Descartes | Eppraisals.com Gives Lante High Marks | Secure in a Foundry | Smart Shoppers Go Abroad for Affordable Information Security Programs | Anti-Virus Advisories: Rating Them | The Arrow Now Points To Cisco | Network Appliance to Ship Sub-$10K Caching Hardware | The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Security | Compaq Reorganizes Again | 1 Little GB, 2 Little GB, ..., 10 Little Gigabit | Fischer’s Prio! SecureSync ~ A Solution to Enterprise Directory Chaos | Just One Hop Away From San Jose | Will Solomon Finally Satisfy Great Plains’ Insatiable Appetite? | Abandon All Insecurity, Ye Who Enter Here | Extreme Networks BlackDiamond Product of the Year | Top 10 Excuses For Not Securing Your Website or Network | AMD Server Plans De-Railed | Ernst & Young Leads Big 5 in Security | 6 Days After Advisory Posted, AboveNet Gets Hit | Cisco to Become a Player in the DWDM | Napster Cooks up Soup-to-Gnutella Network Management Challenges | Voice-Over-Broadband Standards on the Horizon | A Firewall is Cheaper Than a Lawyer | Gigabit Transceivers ~ the Next Generation | USinternetworking and AT&T are Working the System | NeoModal Launches Corporate Ship On Promising Journey | Analysis of TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. Release of Menu Driven Wireless Web Capability For SMS | Navision Software a/s: Mid-market iNvasion | MCI WorldCom: “It’s not an age, it’s an attitude” | Fixing Security Backdoors:
Red Hat 1, Microsoft 0
| WAP Forum Specifies RSA’s RC5 Encryption For Wireless | Netpliance Responds Quickly to Hardware Hack | SynQuest, Ford Deliver a Novel Application for Inbound Logistics | Strategic Partners or Merger on the Horizon? | SynQuest Teams With InterWorld for Internet Sales and Fulfillment | USi to Offer Managed Messaging for U.S. Feds | Security Stocks Burn Rubber | Mirapoint ~ ISP Messaging Solution in a Box? | Navision Becoming More Visible | A Forum for Wireless Standards…About time isn’t it? | DSL Provider Scoops up Netscreen Firewall Goldmine | Cyclone Untangles Digital Partnerships | Security Begins on Your Desktop | Network Associates Hopes to Rekindle the Flame | Novell Uses XML, LDAP, NDS to Manage AD, IOS, etc. | Hacker Publication Gets Top Defense Attorney | HP Reorganizes Storage Group, Addresses NAS-cent Market | Concur eWorkplace Projects Vision Onto Desktop | How 3Com, Became 1Com | Saudi Arabian Network Security Provokes Local Considerations | Cisco: IPv6 is Coming, Eventually | Gosh, There’s a Bug in Windows 98 | Robust Systems are Built from the Bottom Up | IBM is Not Enough; Ariba Announces Strong Partnership with Amex | USinternetworking: One Suite ASP | DOJ Keeps Low Profile on Curador; Protect Your IIS Server Today! | Information/Internet Appliances | Agilera.com – A new era for the web? | Security Breach: Now What? | PeopleSoft's CEO Steps Down | Descartes Evolution Yields Revenue Growth But No Profits | PeopleSoft, Lawson To Resell Integration Tools | MAPICS, Inc. to Acquire Pivotpoint, Expanding e-business Offerings for Mid-Sized Manufacturing Establishments | Microstrategy Moves Up with e-Business | Seagate Technology Refocuses its Software Business | The New Manugistics Debuts eBusiness Products | Concur's Customers Can Network Now | AT&T's Ecosystem | E-commerce Grass Getting Greener | Commerce One Meets GM: Web Now Has A Really Big Parts Department | Dynamic Ariba Trades Up | AMERICAN EXPRESS Selects TRADEX To Build New Business to Business Commerce Network | So Does your e-Business Provider have Internationally Recognized Tools in its Digital Business Consulting Toolkit? | 3Com Will Route Customers to In-house Web Design Firm | Total Uptime Guarantees? It Must Be A New Millennium! | Adsmart Blazes Vertical B2B Trail | Expedia Relaxes Registration Requirement | Be There or Be Square? David and Goliath Team on bCentral Auction Site | Ariba to Leave Integration to Specialists | Bank is First Mover in Canadian E-Commerce | Concur Scores A Bingo | Commerce One: Connectivity Improved | GE Comes to Lunch. Want to Guess Who the Appetizer Will Be? | News Analysis: Dot.Coms Getting Bred By Scient: Will Scient Spawn Into a Giant or Will Andersen Have the Edge? | Why Not Take Candy From Strangers? More Privacy Problems May Make Ad Agencies Nutty | Sendmail, Inc. and Disappearing, Inc. Team Up to Add Enhanced Security | Dell to Acquire ConvergeNet International | Palm Tries to Take the Desktop in Hand | Cisco Tries to Cache In By Buying Software Start-Up Tasmania Networks | Is Your Financial Transaction Secure? | Compaq, HP, IBM, Intel and Microsoft Create New PC Security Alliance | Expect Boom in Electronic Signatures | Secure Your Search Engine | President Proposes Security of Medical Records | Sendmail Takes Security to the Next Level with Version 3.0 for NT | CheckPoint & Nokia Team Up to Unleash a Rockin' Security Appliance | Trend Micro Anti-Virus Server for Microsoft Exchange ~ A Secure Choice For Enterprise Wide Anti Virus Protection. | Security Snafu at NetBank | Freeware Vendor's Web Tracking Draws Curses | The "S" in SAP Doesn't Stand for Security (that goes for PeopleSoft too) | Content Technologies releases MIMEsweeper PolicyPlus | Hackers Will Be Out in Full Force On New Year's Eve | Analysis of Virgin Net's Hacker Scare | Network Associates RePositions Itself as a Security E-Village | Lexiguard™: The Coming "Adobe Acrobat" of Encryption | CyberPeepers from Korean Sites Peek at U.S. Networks | Would You Hire a Hacker? What Would Your Mother Say? | @Home Scans Own Customers | CIOs Need to Be Held Accountable for Security | New Market for Security Insurance | At Least Your Boss Can't Read Your Home E-mail, Right? Wrong! | PrettyPark Virus Litters Cyberspace | Compaq and Samsung in Deal to Save Alpha | Packard Bell / NEC Leads Secure Etoken Deployment | Congress Acknowledges Outdated Banking Laws | SSA: Evolving into systems integrator to survive | JBA: Will it remain "@ctive Enterprise"? | Advanced Planning and Scheduling: A Critical Part of Customer Fulfillment | WorldCom SPRINTs, Nokia/Visa Pays Bill, & Service Providers Gear for Wireless Tsunami | How Secure is Your E-Mail? | Trend Virus Control System - A Centralized Approach to Protection | An Analysis of Trend Micro Systems - Who They Are and Where They're Going | Network Engines, Inc. - Double the CPUs for Web Serving | Server Appliances - "Caching" In on Internet's Growth | VPNs Are Hot, but What Are They? | ATM Machines Hacked in Moscow | How To Mitigate Holiday Cybercrime | Surf's Up at Akamai |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google