Forgot password?
|
|
|
|
We were unable to sign you in.
Please verify your user name and password and try again. If you do not have a TEC account, register now.
Read Comments

If you’re a small to medium business looking to purchase a learning management system (LMS), you may not be fully aware of the standards out there for e-learning.

Many of us take for granted the fact that we can simply sign up for an e-learning course, whether it’s an online course, or a course offered through our own company’s LMS: We log in, start our training, breeze our way through the content and questions, and everything works smoothly and seamlessly. But what’s going on behind the scenes? Plenty! And it all starts with the way the learning content (or learning objects [e.g., videos, questionnaires, glossaries]) were written and compiled, as well as the way the course content is delivered.

This article is for you if you are

  • looking to purchase an LMS or learning content management system (LCMS) for the first time, or
  • looking to update your legacy LMS.

I'll help you understand the basics about e-learning standards and how they need to be applied in the context of your LMS purchase.

 

Why Are E-learning Standards So Important?

To help you understand e-learning standards, here's a great analogy provided by Rustici Software:

When you buy a new movie on DVD you don’t need to check to see if it works with your brand of DVD player. A regular DVD will play on a Toshiba the same as it will on a Panasonic. That’s because DVD movies are produced using a set of standards. Without these standards a studio releasing a new movie on DVD would have a big problem. They would need to make differently formatted DVDs for each brand of DVD player. This is how online learning used to be before SCORM [a set of e-learning standards] was created.

It’s important to note that some LMSs are not compliant with any content standards. Any content created in such LMSs will not be reusable for other LMSs.

 

Standards You Should Know About Before Buying

Depending on your e-learning initiatives, it’s important to know how the various existing standards will affect your company's LMS purchasing decision.

SCORM

SCORM, or Sharable Content Object Reference Model, is a set of technical standards for e-learning software products. It was originally developed based on the US Department of Defense's (DoD's) technology specifications for e-learning supplies. The DoD's goal was to define the smallest possible units of learning content that would allow consistent classification, "shareability," and wide reusability.

SCORM is important because it makes Web-based training content and the applications that control and display that content to learners interoperable in a standard way. If you have a SCORM-conformant LMS, you can be certain that any learning content that is also SCORM-conformant will integrate successfully with your system.

When SCORM 2004 (the most up-to-date version of the standard) was established, it introduced a complex idea called "sequencing"—a set of rules that specifies the order in which a learner may experience content objects. In other words, these rules constrain learners to a fixed set of paths through the training material, allow learners to bookmark their progress during breaks in learning, and assure that the test scores achieved by the learner are recorded.

SCORM also defines how to create sharable content objects (SCOs) that can be reused in different types of systems and contexts—i.e., it tells software programmers how to write code so that it can work properly with all types of e-learning software. More specifically, SCORM governs how online learning content and LMSs communicate with each other. All online or Web-based training needs to be SCORM-compliant: Your e-learning initiatives may be in serious jeopardy if your users can’t count on your LMS to deliver content well and consistently.

It’s important to note that SCORM governs online training only, and only interactions between a single user and an LMS. Offline or group training is not governed by these standards.

The advantages that SCORM compliance brings to e-learning are the following:

  • Portability: When your courses are SCORM-compatible, you can rest assured that they will "play easily" with most LMSs, and transfer between multiple LMSs when necessary.
  • Compliance: Many LMSs require that your courses meet the SCORM standard. In other words, non-SCORM-standardized courses just won't "play" on a SCORM-standardized LMS.
  • Tracking: SCORM compliance ensures that your courses can track learner performance, and enables managers to view that information.

Among all e-learning standards, SCORM has gained the most traction in the LMS industry, and I'll be referring to SCORM as the de facto e-learning standard throughout the rest of this article. That said, other standards exist, and you should be aware of them as well.

AICC Standards

In the context of e-learning standards, AICC stands for "Aviation Industry CBT Committee," an international association of technology-based training professionals. The AICC develops guidelines for the aviation industry for the development, delivery, and evaluation of computer-based training (CBT), Web-based training (WBT), and related training technologies. AICC specifications are usually designed to be general-purpose specifications (as opposed to being specific to aviation training) so that learning technology vendors can spread their costs across multiple markets, which in turn allows vendors to provide products to the aviation industry at a lower cost. This strategy has resulted in AICC specifications gaining broad acceptance among non-aviation and aviation users alike.

The standards developed by AICC have influenced SCORM standards, as well as those of other organizations such as IMS Global, IEEE, and Ariadne. While learning content creators generally prefer the SCORM format for creating e-learning content (since importing and deploying SCORM content is a one-step process), deploying AICC content is a little more difficult and requires a bit more overhead, as the import and upload of content is a two-step process.

Although some argue that AICC is a more reliable, robust, and unambiguous system specification, the more widely supported SCORM standard seems to be a better choice with some LMS applications for technical reasons (e.g., authoring tools, sequencing, and navigation). On the other hand, there are certainly valid reasons for using courses and management systems based on AICC specifications. For example, AICC allows content to exist on separate servers, and supports secure information transfers with HTTPS. With SCORM, the content and the LMS must be on the same server. This is just one of the reasons you might want to choose AICC over SCORM.

LETSI RTWS

LETSI RTWS stands for "Learning Education Training Systems Interoperability Run-Time Web Service." In a nutshell, LETSI RWTS is an enhancement to SCORM that came about through research related to scripting issues under the SCORM standard. Click here for more information on LETSI RTWS.

To understand which standards should be adopted and in what order of priority, I recommend this site.

 

How Do These Standards Affect My LMS/LCMS Purchasing Decisions?

LMSs allow instructors to create and deliver content, monitor learner participation, and assess student performance. LMSs also allow learners to use interactive features such as threaded discussions, Web conferencing, discussion forums, and other methods of communication. If you're looking to buy an LMS for the first time, there are certain things you’ll want to verify before you buy. A comprehensive and SCORM-conformant LMS should be able to do (but should not be limited to) the following:

  • centralize and automate administration
  • provide self-service and self-guided services
  • assemble and deliver learning content rapidly
  • consolidate training initiatives on a scalable Web-based platform
  • support portability and standards
  • personalize content and enable knowledge reuse

Today, SCORM has been widely adopted by many large organizations. Besides the US DoD, other industries are following suit, and the standard appears in the majority of today’s requests for proposal (RFPs) in the procurement of both training content and LMSs. It is generally recommended that all e-learning content and LMS purchases include SCORM-conformant products in the submitted proposals. If these standards aren’t mentioned as part of your RFP, make sure you add them.

Technology Evaluation Centers (TEC) offers RFP templates for companies that are looking to compare LMS products. Our LMS RFP template includes all the relevant e-learning standards to ensure that prospective software buyers cover the bases when gathering information from LMS software vendors.


What Can I Do to Ensure that the Content I Produce Or Deliver Is Compliant?

E-learning standards assure learning content developers that their content will connect to almost any LMS on the market. They also promise learners that the content they purchase in the LMS marketplace will be seamlessly delivered. These standards also provide organizations with the ability to analyze their return on investment (ROI) in learning through SCORM and AICC’s tracking features.

Sticking to one standard allows organizations to mix and match course providers and deliver all courses to their employees through a single LMS. With compliance comes the opportunity to buy off-the-shelf training packages, hire a consultant to write specific programs, and create content yourself (or any combination of the above).

Bottom line: If your LMS is compliant with SCORM, AICC, or other standards, learners can use the standard packages inside the LMS instead of your company having to create native LMS course content. This can be very convenient if users don't want to tie themselves to using one particular LMS. Moreover, courseware vendors often provide their course content in some of the widely used standards, so you can purchase ready-made courses instead of creating your own. Be sure to verify standards compliance before purchasing any courses.

 

What If My Existing LMS or Learning Content Is Not Compliant?

If we go back to the DVD analogy, one thing is for certain, if your LMS (or the content you produce or attempt to access) do not both conform to the SCORM standard, your employees/learners won’t be able to properly access the courses you’re providing. 

Whether you want to be able to export content from your system, or import other people’s content into your system, you need to make sure you’re covered in terms of SCORM standards. Period!

It’s important to note that conforming to one standard does not necessarily mean that you automatically conform to the others. Do your homework and ask your content and LMS provider if they’re up to date with these e-learning standards—before you buy!

 

Compare LMS Software Now!


 
comments powered by Disqus


The “Case-by-case Syndrome”: How to Make Sure Your New Business Processes Don’t Lead to a Nasty Case of Exception Management | Benefits and Pitfalls of Gamification for Consumer Marketing | 25% Less Learning Time? Find the Right Approach to Training | Assessing FinancialForce.com’s Early Years | When Is Talent Management Really Right for Your Business? | 4 Steps to Successful Succession Development Planning | What’s Up with xTuple—and Open Source ERP? | Why Your Organization Needs Succession Planning | The Path to Healthy Data Governance through Data Security | Business Process Simulation Technology from Lanner | Secure Mobile ERP—Is It Possible? | Dassault Systèmes—Expanding Product Development and the 3D Experience | Thinking of Outsourcing Your Entire Recruitment Process? Here's What You Need to Know | Sword Ciboodle—One More BPM-Centric CRM Provider | Role of In-memory Analytics in Big Data Analysis |
HR Compliance: 4 Things Your Company Can Do to Avoid a Lawsuit | The Power Behind SHL Talent Analytics | SAP HANA—One Technology to Watch in 2012 (and Beyond) | Two Vendor Execs Discuss the Current B2B Pricing Market (and its Future) | A Product Note: Attensity and the Voice of the Customer | Time Tracking and Attendance Primer: Beyond the Clock | Year in Review: Top Enterprise Software News and Trends for 2011 | How Mobile Technology Is Changing Talent Management | KronosWorks 2011: Beyond Time Clocks for Modern Workforce Management | PTC Windchill Version 9 versus Version 10: Is Version 10 the Most Significant Windchill Release in PTC’s History? | About Big Data | Human Capital Analytics: The Metrics That Matter | Human Capital Financials: Understanding the Value of the Human Assets within Your Organization | The Lesser-Known (Social) Facts about Microsoft Dynamics CRM | Demystifying SAP Solution Manager | Meet the New (Revolutionized) Progress Software | The Path to Healthy Data Governance | The (Underappreciated) Value of B2B Pricing Software | Unlocking the Value of Competencies: A Look at Competency-based Management | What All Sales Organizations Need to Know: An Up-close-and-personal Discussion with Blackboard and Salesforce.com | A Portrait of the Indian Enterprise Software User | Reconnecting with Cincom Systems | AuraPortal: A BPM Vendor Worth Checking Out | PegaWorld 2011 Revisited | An Interview with WorkForce Software: Why Your Organization Needs Fatigue Management | 3 Critical Considerations When Choosing Your SCM Solution | BI Software Implementation Success: The Human Factor | Has SAP Become a PLM Factor to Be Reckoned With? | Financial Reporting—Who Needs It? | Workforce Diversity: Meeting the Challenges Head On | Infor Gains Financials Elite Club Status | Sage ERP and CRM Portfolio Update: Clarity at Last | Cloud Assets: A Guide for SMBs—Part 3 | Mergers & Acquisitions: What Happens When the Company Whose HR Software You Just Purchased Gets Acquired? | What’s New at MCA Solutions? | Human Capital Supply Chains: Book Review | Cloud Assets: A Guide for SMBs—Part 2 | S&OP Newcomer Asserts Notable Domain Expertise | Why Should Enterprises Manage their Contracts Closely? | Cloud Assets: A Guide for SMBs—Part 1 | I Want My Private Cloud | Top Three Learning Management Trends for 2011 | A Candid Conversation with a Field Service Workforce Management Leader | Mobile Learning: Is Your Business Ready for It? | Why I Like Vanilla | Collecting Meaningful Data from the Web: Once an Impossibility, Now a Reality | Good Customer Service Is Simple | Busting the Myth of Commoditized Software Markets with the New TEC Focus Indicator | In Search of Sustainability with Dassault Systèmes | Are ERP Workarounds a Terrific Way of Shooting Yourself in the Foot? | BPM Product Review: SAP BusinessObjects Planning and Consolidation | How to Use Technology to Redefine Today’s Economy | Business Process Management in Free and Open Source: An Overview of the Demand and the Supply | Social Networks That Boost Your Business | (Forgotten) CRM and ERP Kingdoms in the Making? | Trends in LMS | The Truth about Data Mining | Who to Blame for Project Failure? Look Up—Not Down, Not Left, Not Right | Employee Training in a Recession | The Business Model for the 21st Century Is Project-centric | Learning Management Systems (LMS) Showdown: Saba vs. Sumtotal | Advanced Front Office Lean with Business Modeler Software | Is Your Enterprise Application on a Road to Nowhere? | Welcome to ERP Showdown! Infor SyteLine vs. Exact Software Macola ES vs. QAD Enterprise Application | 6 Specialists, 6 Industry Domains: Trends for 2008 and 2009 | Are Software Vendors Messing with Your Head? (The Art of Reading White Papers) | Improving Human Performance by Identifying the Gaps | E-learning Course Design | E-learning and Organizational Culture | Making the Team Work | Harness the Power of Your Virtual Sales Team | The Three Cs of Successful Positioning Part Two: The Channel | The Three Cs of Successful Positioning | Microsoft Axapta: Design Factors Shape System Usage Part One: User Interface and Customization | Critical Business Functions: Misunderstood, Underutilized, and Undervalued Part Two: Closing the Circle of Credit and A/R Management | Software for Real People Part One: MindManager Feature and Functions | Epicor's Mid-Market Pitch Becomes Higher For (One) Scala Part Five: More Challenges & User Recommendations | Epicor's Mid-Market Pitch Becomes Higher For (One) Scala Part Four: Merger Synergies and Challenges | Epicor's Mid-Market Pitch Becomes Higher For (One) Scala Part Three: Market Impact | Epicor's Mid-Market Pitch Becomes Higher For (One) Scala Part One: Event Summary | Vertical Marketing--What Is A Vertical? | SAP Bolsters NetWeaver's MDM Capabilities Part Four: SAP and A2i | Maximizer Enterprise 8: A Strong Competitor on the SMB Front Line | Future Compatible | Should Your Software Selection Process Have a Proof of Concept? Part Two: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Conclusion | Should Your Software Selection Process Have a Proof of Concept? Part One: Structures and the Selection Process | Buy, Build, or Somewhere Between | ROI: Are You Ready to Walk The Walk? | What's Wrong With Application Software? Business Changes, Software Must Change with the Business. | Managing Your Supply Chain Using Microsoft Axapta: A Book ExcerptPart One: Sales and Operations Planning | Exact Software--Working Diligently Towards the "One Exact" Synergy Part Three: Market Impact | 3M Wraps Up HighJump, While Retalix Shops OMI International Part Two: Market Impact | PeopleSoft Gathers Manufacturing and SCM Wherewithal Part Two: Market Impact | Fujitsu Poised to (Inter)Stage Glovia's Comeback Part Four: Challenges and User Recommendations | Fujitsu Poised to (Inter)Stage Glovia's Comeback Part Three: Market Impact | Fujitsu Poised to (Inter)Stage Glovia's Comeback Part Two: Fujitsu's Support of Glovia | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part Four: Deltek's Differentiators | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part Three: Company Background and Market Strategy | Deltek Remains the Master of Its Selected Few Domains Part Two: Product Announcements 2002 | Business Activity Monitoring - Watching The Store For You | A Case Study and Tutorial in Using IT Knowledge Based Tools Part 2: A Tutorial | A Case Study and Tutorial in Using IT Knowledge Based Tools Part 1: Decision Support Discussion | An Overview of the Knowledge Based Selection Process | Knowledge Based Selections | Texas Instruments Tells War Stories At i2 Planet | eMachines to Ship Appliance | Symix Systems Front-Steps Into Greener e-Commerce Pastures | i2 Will Come Out Ahead In Kmart Deal | What’s Up with Computer Associates? | Has SAP Found Magic Formula (One) To Learn The Ropes Of Marketing? | What’s in a Name? | Technology Hardware Maintenance-Acquiring and Managing Cost Effective Service | Clarus –Sprinting or Going the Distance? | IBM Server Line Redrawn | Now the Minnows are Eating the Minnows | J.D. Edwards Touts Leadership in Collaboration and Flexibility -- There Seems to be Some Notable Functionality Too | Onyx Thinks ASP Opportunities Are A Gem | i2 Technologies Lives Life In The Fast Lane | Demantra Secures More Venture Financing | Is Baan Showing Signs of Life After Death? | i2 e-Business Strategy Services Not For Everyone | Informix Decides to Start Analyzing Websites | DoubleClick Merger Good News For Privacy Advocates? | Commerce One Selects Entrada Software For Affiliate Program | Microsoft Kills a Flock of Birds with One Stone | Candle Releases New Command Center App for IBM MQSI 2 | Provia Software Rises To The Challenge | They Know When You Have Gas | Oracle – How to Disappoint Analysts by Doubling Profits | Ross Systems Ends Year On a Sour Note and Braces Itself For Survivor’s Game | Syncra Systems Helps Kimberly-Clark Clean Up | Walker Propelled by Winds of Change | Enterprise Intelligence Tools Tame Business Knowledge Glut | Will Oracle’s Freebie Shot Hurt (Or Only Graze) Siebel? | Commerce One: First SAP, then Microsoft. But What About Clarus? | Broadbase Continues to Expand | Great Plains – An SME Market Leader, But At What Cost? | Transmeta to Intel/AMD: Eat Our Dust | Great Plains ASP - Evolution, Revolution, Innovation | Razorfish: A Pure Play Offering Digital Strategy | IFS Marches On, Although With a String of Losses | Siebel: Great Plans for Great Plains | Strategy: What Digital Business Service Providers Mean When They Say It | Commerce One Holds Announcement Festival | Ariba Holds Announcement Festival | Fourth Shift Corporation: Working Overtime To Provide Complete Customer Care | Sun Buys Cobalt | Negotiating the Best Software Deal | SynQuest Posts Mixed Results | My Network Engineers are Talking about Implementing Split DNS. What Does that Mean? | J.D. Edwards’ Mixed Blessings | IBM PC Line Redrawn | VA Linux Releases NAS Server | Tired Of Losing Your Oil Derricks? | QAD Continues to Wade Through Red Ink | eConnections Expands Web With IPNet | How Do You Categorize Notebooks? | Customer Relationship Analysis Firm Extends Reach | IBM Tries to Take More Market Share from Oracle, BMC, and CA | BoldFish’s Opt-In E-Mail Delivery System ~ ‘Oh My That’s Fast!’ | Geac Trying Its Luck in Partnering | IBM and Partners Load the Guns in Europe | IMI Sees Red In Dawn Of Fiscal 2001 | Ultimate Connection Seeking Its US Retail Connection Through Solomon Software Partners | EXE and i2 Advance Relationship | The New Manugistics Faces A New Millennium | New Release For Ariba’s Software | Thru-Put Announces Features For New APS Release | Oracle Applications - An Internet-Reinvented Feisty Challenger | EAI - The 'Crazy Glue' of Business Applications | Turmoil in CPU-Land | American Software Has Been Starving While Delivering Innovations | Interelate: More on Tap Than Apps | Intentia Has Been Bleeding For Its Platform Independence | Mortice Kern Systems Goes Vertical (Sky, that is) | ICARUS Ends Solo Flight With Aspen | Traffic Audits Make Strange Bedfellows: Part II - The Audit Process | Red Hat’s Linux Domination Weakens | Traffic Audits Make Strange Bedfellows: Part I - The Why’s and What’s of Auditing | SAS Institute Shoots for the Two-Stop-Shop with new Release of Warehouse Administrator | PowerCerv Facing Another Stormy Season | The Pros and Cons of Collaborative Planning | Logility FY 2001 Comes In Like a Lamb | MAPICS Back On Track, But Not Without Restructuring Pains | Global Vendor Negotiation Strategies | Winner Takes All – Siebel Ousts SalesLogix From Solomon’s Deal | GNOME Will Try to Buff Up Linux | Aspen Technology Built Success From The Ground Up | New Internet Appliances Coming from Compaq | PeopleSoft 8 Launched – Anything to Write Home About? | Lipstream Speaks to Kana | The Wheres of Electronic Procurement | PeopleSoft: No More a Humble Kid From a Rough Neighborhood? | Merant Goes South on the Stock Market | How Do You Categorize Servers? | Human-Machine Interaction Company Ramps Up Firewall Product Line | Simplexis Says 'Watch Our (Chalk) Dust' | Security Information Market Heading for Growth | Implications and Attitudes As the Andersen's Split under the ICC Ruling: Consulting To Go for a Name Change | Compaq to Offer Co-Branded iPAQ BlackBerry Wireless E-mail Solution | Remedy Welcomes You To Your New Office. Now Get To Work! | Peregrine Welcomes Loran to Its Nest In Network Management Matrimony | i2 Paints Broad Strokes at eDay | Is Something Fishy Happening To Your Website? | Ensim to Host HP OpenMail as an ASP | Compaq Wins Supercomputer Contract, But Is It Enough? | SAP Remains Solid While Transitioning | Vendors Beware! It’s Not What You Say, It’s How You Say It. | Yahoo! Goes Mobile in Greece | Computer Manufacturers Shifting Their Focus to Start-Ups | Rackmount Server Sales Surge | Symantec Swallows AXENT; Takes on Network Associates | Back to the Future: Olde JWT Comes Back and Agency.com Feels the Pinch | Novatel Wireless and Diversinet Team Up to Provide Security for Wireless Modems | Baan Defectors – Is This Only Tip of an Iceberg? | When You Realized the Need for a Unified View of Your Customers, that is E.piphany | Concur Gives Up The Boast | Manhattan Associates Completes Second Quarter On Record Pace | Red Hat Releases Clustering Software | It’s All About User Experience But, How Can We Measure User Experience? | Windows 2000 Bug Fixes Posted | Is Fourth Shift Succeeding in Providing 'Complete Customer Care'? | SAP - A Leader Under Reconstruction | Baltimore Technologies Doubles Revenues, Offers World-Class PKI Hosting | GE and Commerce One Turn on the Lights - But You Ain’t Seen Nothin’ Yet | 80 Million Ways to be Agile | How Detrimental Can a 2nd-In-Charge’s Departure Be? | Microsoft Certified Fresh | OmniSky Selects WorkSpot to Develop Wireless Internet Services | e-Business Service Provider Evaluation & Selection | Jamcracker Dredges a New Channel | Microsoft Hopes to Win Over Consumer Privacy Advocates | Microsoft New Online Messenger ~ Dope Slaps AOL’s Instant Messenger | The Handspring Visor Goes Wireless ~Look out Palm VII! | Blink.com Takes Bookmarks Mobile | E&Y Spins-Off eSecurity Online and Unveils Security Vulnerability Assessment Services | The RIM 957 ~ Probably Your Next Pager (and a Whole Lot More.) | Fenestrae Offers WAP Support for Mobile Data Server | IFS Far Cry From Running Out of Breath | Mail.com to Join the Microsoft Exchange 2000 ASP GoldRush | Wireless Palm VII ~ Look Ma No Hands! | IBM Continues RS/6000 Performance Focus | IBM’s Newest NUMA-Q Server to Handle 64 Intel CPUs | Cisco’s Complete Network in a Box | What Good Is Information If Nobody Sees It? | BroadVision and Bank of America Erect Enterprise as Portal Purveyors | Caldera eDesktop Edges Out Microsoft Windows 2000 in Functionality – Part II | IA-64 Linux From Red Hat | Trend Micro Steps into PDA/Wireless AntiVirus Information Market | Novell Releases (Yet Another) Internet Messaging System | New Plan, 13% Layoffs, Mark Concur’s Third Quarter Disappointment | Gateway & AOL Follow Crusoe’s Footprints | Information Builders Announces New Release of WebFOCUS | Microsoft Tech Ed 2000 Win2K Attendee Network Fails Miserably | CryptoSwift Takes Rainbow Revenues Up 620% | Layer 3 or Bust | Bezos to McNealy: Drop Dead! | Eppraisals.com Gives Lante High Marks | Secure in a Foundry | IBM Loads Linux on Mainframes | MessageClick to Provide Unified Messaging to RCN’s Business Clients | Smart Shoppers Go Abroad for Affordable Information Security Programs | Anti-Virus Advisories: Rating Them | Qwest Cyber.Solutions: “A Number 3 Please, and Make It Grande” | IBM’s Marketplace Solutions: Is Ariba Not Enough? | Mirapoint Adds Web-Mail Client to Messaging Appliance Line | webMethods Gets Active (Software That Is) | Symix Systems’ Slips Into Red During Its E-Commerce Transition | They Test Web Sites, Don’t They? | Case Study: Service Provider Xcelerate Speeds CommerceScout Along New Trail | The Arrow Now Points To Cisco | SurfAid is Not Enough: IBM Partners with WebCriteria | Network Appliance to Ship Sub-$10K Caching Hardware | The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Security | 1 Little GB, 2 Little GB, ..., 10 Little Gigabit | i2 Technologies Gets Reporting Help From Hyperion | Fischer’s Prio! SecureSync ~ A Solution to Enterprise Directory Chaos | Dell Tops in Customer Satisfaction | Saltare.com Prepares LEAP Into B2B Fray | EAI Vendor Active Software Activates Transactions | Should PeopleSoft be Overly Happy? | EarthLink’s Pilot of Wireless Email via BlackBerry Handhelds | Intel Faces 820 Chipset Problems (Again) | Antidisintermediation | SAP Gives in to CRM (Part Time) Matrimony | Intel Small Server Market | Microsoft Windows Me -- The Millennium DOES Begin in 2001 | J.D. Edwards Names SynQuest Preferred Solution | Baan Acquisition Expands Product Set and Integration Issues | SAP Finds CRM Partner for Marketing Tools | SAP Highlights Supply Chain Management Tools | IBM and Deutsche Telecom Announce Plans for 100 Terabyte Data Warehouse | EMC to Buy Data General | Compaq, HP, IBM, Intel and Microsoft Create New PC Security Alliance | i2 Technologies at the Front of the Supply Chain | J.D. Edwards and Numetrix Ponder the Future as One | "Ads are us", boasts CMGI | J.D. Edwards - Creating OneWorld of Mid-sized ERP Users | Compaq's High-End Wintel-based Rack Servers - Working Hard to Stay #1 |


Use this index to search for white papers related to commonly used search terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others 
Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others
A: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
B: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
D: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
E: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
F: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
G: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
H: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
I: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
J: 1 2 3 4 5
K: 1 2 3 4
L: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
M: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
N: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
O: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
P: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Q: 1 2
R: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
U: 1 2 3
V: 1 2 3 4
W: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
X: 1
Y: 1
Z: 1
Others: 1 2 3


©2013 Technology Evaluation Centers Inc. All rights reserved. Search powered by Google