Using our EAM Evaluation Center, we compared Mincom Ellipse, CHAMPS, and IFS head-on. For the overall rankings, we looked at the vendors in two basic configurations: with back-office (HR and financials) functionality, for a total of eight main modules, and without, for a total of six main modules. To eliminate any chance of bias, and to ensure a level playing field, all 3,146 criteria comprising the modules and submodules in the EAM request for information (RFI) were given equal weight and priority.
comparison dodge report vs cdc vs reed
constitute a true apples-to-apples comparison of pure EAM functionality. As the charts below show, with back-office features included, IFS and CHAMPS each finished first in three of the main modules, with Mincom finishing first in two modules. Without back-office functionality, CHAMPS again finished first in three of the main modules, with IFS placing first in two main modules, and Mincom finishing first in one main module. EAM Main Modules with HR and Financials (Back Office) EAM Main Modules without HR