Using our EAM Evaluation Center, we compared Mincom Ellipse, CHAMPS, and IFS head-on. For the overall rankings, we looked at the vendors in two basic configurations: with back-office (HR and financials) functionality, for a total of eight main modules, and without, for a total of six main modules. To eliminate any chance of bias, and to ensure a level playing field, all 3,146 criteria comprising the modules and submodules in the EAM request for information (RFI) were given equal weight and priority.
hr functional chart
EAM Main Modules without HR and Financials (Back Office) But, given that were looking at enterprise software solutions, its not that simple or clear-cut. Rankings, either overall or by module, do not tell you everything you need to know. What they do provide is a basic, high-level view of vendors general strengths and weaknesses. However, the fact is, no two businesses will use an EAM solutions in the exact same way. Businesses have unique requirements that need to be supported by the EAM solution they