Using our EAM Evaluation Center, we compared Mincom Ellipse, CHAMPS, and IFS head-on. For the overall rankings, we looked at the vendors in two basic configurations: with back-office (HR and financials) functionality, for a total of eight main modules, and without, for a total of six main modules. To eliminate any chance of bias, and to ensure a level playing field, all 3,146 criteria comprising the modules and submodules in the EAM request for information (RFI) were given equal weight and priority.
ms vs oracle
hand-held support, trigger and alarms, and asset and work identification (all part of the reliability module) are vital to your organization, then Mincom may be a better choice for you than IFS. Maintenance Management Module The same applies within individual modules, where the top-ranking vendor may not necessarily be the right one for your organizations needs. Although IFS placed first in maintenance management, CHAMPS was stronger in preventative maintenance and equipment history, as shown in the