Home
 > search for

Featured Documents related to »  navision vs axpata


Dynamics AX
Microsoft Dynamics AX (formerly Navision Axapta) was created through the merger of Navision Software A/S and Damgaard A/S in December 2000, and it was acquired

navision vs axpata  Microsoft Dynamics AX (formerly Navision Axapta) was created through the merger of Navision Software A/S and Damgaard A/S in December 2000, and it was acquired in 2002 by Microsoft. Dynamics AX is a multilanguage, multicurrency enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for growing or midsize and larger companies. With applications for financial management, customer relationship management (CRM), supply chain management (SCM), human resource management, project management, and analytics, Dynamics AX Read More...
ERP System for Health Care
A U.S.-based regional healthcare support network turned to TEC for help selecting a distribution enterprise resource planning (ERP for distribution) solution for its medical supply and equip...
Start evaluating software now
Country:

 Security code
Already have a TEC account? Sign in here.
 
Don't have a TEC account? Register here.

Documents related to » navision vs axpata


Microsoft Lays Enforced-Concrete Foundation For Its Business Solutions Part 3: Challenges
MBS is both a threat and an opportunity for the most nimble vendors, and mid-market CRM vendors might have acquired another lease of life extension in the

navision vs axpata  With the addition of Navision 's array of applications, some of which had long been direct competition to the incumbent Great Plains products and with many products still leveraging proprietary toolsets, the division will have a challenge to figure out how to leverage the installed base and how to avoid impending products/geographies conflicts in over 4,000 combined partners, which have been savvy enough to know that customers do not migrate just to please their software provider. While the idea to Read More...
Microsoft Paints CRM Landscape On Lately A ‘Still Nature’ Business Applications Scenery Part 2: Challenges and User Recommendations
Microsoft’s ambition will be its greatest challenge, as the company is concurrently experiencing an almost disruptive technology transition from Windows to .NET

navision vs axpata  With the addition of Navision's array of applications, some of which had long been direct competition to the Great Plains products and with many products still leveraging proprietary toolsets, the division will have a challenge to figure out how to leverage the installed base of over 260,000 customers and how to avoid impending products/geographies conflicts in over 4,000 combined partners. While MBS gets distracted by its efforts to provide a clear and concise product roadmap for partners and prospects, Read More...
Competition Heats Up in ERP Market: Oracle Merger, and SAP and Microsoft Reacts
Although Oracle's product roadmap is beginning to take shape it does not include active marketing of the PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards product lines. As a result

navision vs axpata  former Great Plains and Navision (see Microsoft 'The Great' Poised To Conquer Mid-Market, Once and Again ) in its unveiled quest to create a $10 billion (USD) application business empire by 2010. Given that its current applications revenue is only about $700 million (USD) or so, plus the modest to dismal prospects of organic growth in a still docile economy, it is logical to deduce remaining $9 billion in revenues will be supplemented through acquisitions. This is especially probable given Microsoft's a Read More...
Solomon Stands the Test of Time Despite Changing Masters Part Three: Product Differentiators
Of all the MBS' products, Solomon is apparently the purest in terms of a standard Microsoft technology stack, and without any proprietary additions. Furthermore

navision vs axpata  Plains original Dexterity environment, Navision 's proprietary integrated development environment C/SIDE, which includes a proprietary Navision Server database and a proprietary 4GL programming language; Navision strong analytical features using Sum Indexed Flow Technology (SIFT) ; and the proprietary MorphX graphical development suite for Axapta ). It is also a single-code product, with the same look and feel for both small and midsize customers, which has long differentiated the product from its Read More...
CRM for Manufacturing vs. Regular CRM
A couple of weeks ago, I published a blog post called Customer Relationship Manufacturing. In this blog post, I described the symbiosis between the sales and

navision vs axpata   Read More...
Test Framework Architecture: Data vs. Code
Ensuring the quality of software can be difficult given the copious amounts of code that accompanies an application. Software quality automation, however, can

navision vs axpata   Read More...
Business Intelligence Solutions: Buy vs. Build
When an enterprise considers the benefits of a business intelligence (BI) solution, it must anticipate the questions involved in approval of any solution

navision vs axpata  Elegant MicroWeb,business intelligence,performance management,KPI,scorecard,BI,OLAP,Total Cost of Ownership(TCO),Return on Investment (ROI),ready bi solution Read More...
QLogic vs. Emulex 4Gb Fibre Channel HBA: Performance Benchmarking with Oracle Workloads
A critical element of storage area network performance is the selection and deployment of a host bus adapter (HBA) with the right architecture. But high

navision vs axpata   Read More...
ERP &; Distribution Showdown! Oracle's JD Edwards vs. TGI's Enterprise 21
Using our ERP - Distribution Evaluation Center, we compared Oracle's JD Edwards and Technology Group International head-on. For the overall rankings portion,

navision vs axpata  Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne,Technology Group International's Enterprise 21,ERP - Distribution Showdown!,ERP,Distribution Read More...
Team Technology, Inc
Team has two technology practices; reseller of Microsoft Dynamics® NAV (formerly Navision) and an information technology staffing practice. Team’s methodology

navision vs axpata  Microsoft Dynamics® NAV (formerly Navision) and an information technology staffing practice. Team’s methodology is consultative and collaborative. We work in tandem with our clients to identify a business need, design the approach, implement the solution and monitor the results. TEAM is a Microsoft Certified Silver Partner and has enjoyed a long term relationship with Microsoft since our inception. http://www.channelpro-digital.com/channelpro/200705/#pg22 Read More...
QLogic vs. Emulex 4Gb Fibre Channel HBA: Performance in Windows Environment
Organizations need lower ownership costs for hardware. But that’s not all. They also need a protected infrastructure investment, and applications that perform

navision vs axpata   Read More...
On-Premise vs. On-Demand CRM
When looking to acquire an initial customer relationship management (CRM) solution or replace an existing deployment, a host of considerations must be made, not

navision vs axpata  On-demand CRM,On-premise CRM,on-demand CRM pros and cons,On-premise CRM pros and cons,CRM delivery model considerations,CompareBusinessProducts.com Read More...
“Act Vertical” vs. “Go Extinct” Retailers - Part 2
Part 1 of this blog series set the historical background for the supply chain management (SCM) evolution and presented the advantages and shortcomings of

navision vs axpata   Read More...
Microsoft 'The Great' Poised To Conquer Mid-Market, Once and Again Part 1: Recent Acquisition Announcement
Having garnered cash amounting to the GDPs of many developed countries, software giant Microsoft has treated itself with another 'billion plus' acquisition of

navision vs axpata  an agreement to acquire Navision (CSE: NAVI), a Danish provider of enterprise business solutions for mid-sized companies. The acquisition is seen to bring together the complementary geographic and product strengths of Navision with Microsoft Great Plains Business Solutions , enhancing Microsoft's ability to deliver interconnected .NET business solutions for small and mid-market businesses. The acquisition is structured as a stock and cash purchase based on an offer to shareholders of 300DKK per share. Read More...

Recent Searches
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Others