Looking for content related to net to link |
Agresso + CODA, VITA + Link (+ CODA 2go): What's the Sum? – Part ...
... Link’s capabilities give financial executives’ applications’ change management capabilities ...
Query Language (SQL) batch uploads, Visual basic .NET and/or ...
|
|
| blog.technologyevaluation.com/.../2009/06/25/agresso-coda-vita-link-coda-2go-whats-the-sum-–-part-2/ - 61k - 2009-06-25 |
|
Frontstep Ups The .NET Ante
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... case, have managed to deliver a module or so on the .NET platform, while ... Frontstep is also
delivering its Frontstep Active Link backbone to provide end-users ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2002/09/news_analysis/NA_ER_PJ_09_23_02_1.asp - 23k - 2002-09-23 |
| Summary: While Frontstep has been tenaciously delivering a broad umbrella of products all under the '.NET roof', much work still remains
for the company to counteract the onslaught by Tier 1 vendors and mid-market juggernauts and to return to its erstwhile glory.
|
|
Made2Manage Systems 'One Year After': Reenergized and Growing Part ...
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... has resulted with M2M Business Intelligence and M2M Mobile Manager tools (in addition to M2M VIP and M2M Link)
all running on the .NET platform, while the M2M ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2005/02/research_notes/EN_ER_PJ_02_25_05_1.asp - 18k - 2005-02-25 |
| Summary: Made2Manage Systems pledges not to build technology for the sake of technology. Instead, the company plans to focus in on
the true needs of its customers and those of the prospective buyers in the target market, while applying forward-looking technology
enhancements that protect its customers’ investme
|
|
Liberty Alliance vs. WS-I; J2EE vs. .NET; Overwhelmed .YET? Part 1 ...
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... Toolkits to SQL Server 2000 and BizTalk Server 2002 that link Microsoft's respective database and
integration server software into Visual Studio .NET, and that ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/ExecutiveView/2002/03/research_notes/EN_EV_PJ_03_20_02_1.asp - 14k - 2002-03-20 |
| Summary: On one hand, some archrivals (e.g., Microsoft, IBM, and Oracle) are becoming strange bedfellows, while, on the other hand,
the others (e.g., Microsoft and Sun) remain set on irreconcilable differences between their technology camps. What are users
to do when torn between the hype/promise of Web services
|
|
Liberty Alliance vs. WS-I; J2EE vs. .NET; Overwhelmed .YET? Part 2 ...
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... Although Microsoft touts the advantage of delivering a toolkit to link MS Office applications to Web
Services and .NET, that might not be enough to convert Java ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/ExecutiveView/2002/03/research_notes/EN_EV_PJ_03_21_02_1.asp - 19k - 2002-03-21 |
| Summary: The battle for the dominance in Web services has so far largely been a war of words without the clear winner yet (and not
any time soon). While interoperability seems to currently be the motivation for bigger players to suspend hostilities and
focus on standards adoption, the desire for domination will t
|
|
Intuitive Manufacturing Systems Shows Maturity in Adolescent Age ...
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... Support of rich media files across the .NET-based system, as the user can link an unlimited number
of types of media, such as computer-aided design (CAD) files ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2004/06/research_notes/PN_ER_PJ_06_22_04_1.asp - 19k - 2004-06-22 |
| Summary: Having reached its first decade of existence, Intuitive Manufacturing Systems, a stealth mid-market ERP provider, has long
taken the plunge of rewriting its system onto the pure Microsoft .NET managed code framework, which might bear fruits in the
long run, if not immediately.
|
|
Microsoft .NET Enablement: Analysis and Cautions
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... The vendor has simply used .NET for the majority of the solution where it made sense, such as for client-side
dynamic link library (DLL) management, and ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/ERP/2006/10/research_notes/TU_ER_PJ_10_04_06_1.asp - 18k - 2006-10-04 |
| Summary: Using technologies that are intrinsically compatible should result in faster and less costly development. Thus, any application
suite rewritten in the Microsoft .NET managed code framework should not have to contend with inefficiencies resulting from
mixing or wrapping technologies.
|
|
Examples of Microsoft .NET Enablement
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... facilitating enhanced business process controls that link to third party or custom programs, or to Web
services with VBScript. SYSPRO e.net solutions continue ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/ERP/2006/10/research_notes/TU_ER_PJ_10_03_06_1.asp - 26k - 2006-10-03 |
| Summary: SYSPRO and Epicor are examples of .NET-enabled legacy software systems that have partly been componentized (rewritten), with
'wrappers' added to the rest so that the legacy functionality can be used and extended through Web services on the .NET Framework.
|
|
SAP Weaves Microsoft .NET And IBM WebSphere Into Its ESA Tapestry ...
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... ESA, nor the ability to wholeheartedly embrace both .NET and J2EE ... enterprise applications
integration (EAI) architecture called Application Link Enabling (ALE ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2003/03/news_analysis/NA_ER_PJ_03_06_03_1.asp - 30k - 2003-03-06 |
| Summary: With SAP NetWeaver and the Enterprise Services Architecture, SAP will have delivered the blueprint for turning Web services
from a concept into business reality of uniting hardware, information, and software platforms & applications.
|
|
What's Ahead for Users on the Enterprise Infrastructure ...
| by Olin Thompson and P.J. Jakovljevic |
... This platform product creates complex services that link programs, data, and scripts ... SAP,
however, has been more open to the Microsoft .NET framework (see ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2005/05/research_notes/TN_ER_XOT_05_24_05_1.asp - 42k - 2005-05-24 |
| Summary: The battle between Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, and IBM goes far beyond applications -- it goes right into the technology stack
or the enterprise infrastructure. As a result, these vendors are drilling down deeper to compete with each other.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|