X
Software Functionality Revealed in Detail
We’ve opened the hood on every major category of enterprise software. Learn about thousands of features and functions, and how enterprise software really works.
Get free sample report

Compare Software Solutions
Visit the TEC store to compare leading software solutions by funtionality, so that you can make accurate and informed software purchasing decisions.
Compare Now
 

 p part 13


Microsoft’s Underlying Platform Parts for Enterprise Applications: Somewhat Explained - Part 1
I can partly understand analysts’ temptation to beat up on Microsoft’s forays into the enterprise applications space. To be fair,

p part 13  Applications: Somewhat Explained - Part 1 I can partly understand analysts’ temptation to beat up on Microsoft ’s forays into the enterprise applications space. To be fair,  the empire  has had its share of strategic and tactical miscues, as if it had wanted to give these naysayers some ammunition. For one, many analysts and market observers first criticized the giant for not having a unified enterprise resource planning (ERP) product line, but rather several diverse ones, coming from acquisitions

Read More


Software Functionality Revealed in Detail

We’ve opened the hood on every major category of enterprise software. Learn about thousands of features and functions, and how enterprise software really works.

Get free sample report
Compare Software Solutions

Visit the TEC store to compare leading software by functionality, so that you can make accurate and informed software purchasing decisions.

Compare Now

Software Test Tools

Tools exist to support software testing at all stages of a project. Some vendors offer an integrated suite that will support testing and development throughout a project's life, from gathering requirements to supporting the live system. Some vendors concentrate on a single part of that life cycle. The software test tools knowledge base provides functional criteria you might expect from a testing tool, the infrastructure that supports the tool, and an idea of the market position of the vendor.  

Start Now

Documents related to » p part 13

Eccentex-Enabling Do-it-yourself Case Management


Various types of vendors and products have taken hold of the business process management (BPM) software market. While there are mainstream BPM providers such as IBM, Oracle (see here), Pegasystems (see here), Tibco, etc., there is a crop of open source providers such as Bonitasoft (see here) and other relative BPM newcomers such as AuraPortal (see here). We recently came across Eccentex

p part 13   Read More

Resurrection, Vitality And Perseverance Of Former ERP 'Goners' Part Two: Geac & Baan


While not doing as well as Ross and SSA GT, Geac and Baan are certainly on the right track.

p part 13   Read More

Question: When is Six Sigma not Six Sigma? Answer: When it's the Six Sigma Metric!!©


Six Sigma Quality is a popular approach to process improvement, particularly among technology driven companies such as Allied Signal, General Electric, Kodak and Texas Instruments. Its objective is to reduce output variability through process improvement, and/or to increase customer specification limits through design for producibility. I don't like the Six Sigma metric. As you'll see, it fails to pass many of the empirical tests for "good" metrics. In particular, it's neither simple to understand nor, in most applications, an effective proxy for customer satisfaction. And, its definition is ambiguous and therefore easily gamed because th

p part 13   Read More

SSA Global Forms a Strategic Unit with an Extended-ERP Savvy Part One: Event Summary


SSA Global seems to be doing some proper thinking while continuing to acquire new software companies. Recent unification of its broadening collection of supply chain management (SCM) solutions under the SSA SCM brand and formation of a specialized Strategic Solutions division--which also includes other extended enterprise capabilities, such as customer relationship management (CRM), product lifecycle management ([PLM), and more—are both aimed at nurturing existing customers while attracting new prospects with products that exceed far beyond mere enterprise resource planning (ERP) capabilities.

p part 13   Read More

KANA Connect 2014—Morphing into Verint’s Engagement Vision: Part Two


In the second part of a two-part series about the KANA Connect 2014 conference, TEC's P.J. Jakovljevic takes a look at what has transpired since the KANA-Verint merger announcement and what we should expect from the actionable intelligence solutions vendor in the near future.

p part 13   Read More

Facing A Selection? Try A Knowledge-Based Matchmaker Part 3: Comparing Three ERP Vendors


This part illustrates how selecting the right ERP product depends on each client's requirements. Epicor, QAD, and Ramco Systems' rank can change with different sets of client requirements.

p part 13   Read More

SAP Keeps Traction On Some Tires Of Its Omni-Wheel-Drive Part 1


Although SAP’s recently announced tamed results for Q1 2002, which fit within the current market milieu, may add to some challenges moving forward, particularly seen from sharply reduced license revenue, and while some may question SAP’s justification of assimilating its two former subsidiaries, SAP has meanwhile become much more alert and diverse to spar with difficulties.

p part 13   Read More

Up Close and Personal: Martin Schneider, Senior Director of Communications at SugarCRM-Part 2


In part one of my interview with Martin Schneider, Senior Director of Communications at SugarCRM, we discussed the history of SugarCRM and the open source customer relationship management (CRM) space. Part 2 describes SugarCRM’s approach to development, their partner ecosystem, and how social media has changed CRM.Q: About development—most of it is done by your team of programmers

p part 13   Read More

The (NA)Vision of Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009 - Part 3


Part 1 and Part 2 of this blog series went through the five previous generations of the Microsoft Dynamics NAV (formerly Navision) product. In late 2008, at the European Microsoft Convergence user conference, attendees saw the sixth major release of the product, dubbed Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009. The product’s subsequent launch in the US was in February 2009 (the replay can be seen here). But

p part 13   Read More

The (NA)Vision of Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009 - Part 2


Part 1 of this blog series went through the first three generations of the Microsoft Dynamics NAV product, which at the time was called Navision and was owned by the formerly independent namesake company. How has new parent Microsoft treated the product since acquiring it in 2002? Well, ongoing feedback from customers, partners, and market observers shows that Microsoft Dynamics NAV

p part 13   Read More