Peoplesoft Navision

TEC Products

Peoplesoft http://www.technologyevaluation.com/ppc/evaluation-erp.asp

Enterprise Solutions Group

... FRx, FRx, FRx Maconomy, Maconomy, Maconomy Microsoft, Microsoft, Microsoft Navision, Navision, Navision Peoplesoft, Peoplesoft, Peoplesoft Targit, Targit ... http://directory.technologyevaluation.com/profile.aspx?vid=12141 - 3k

PeopleSoft Internationalizes Its Mid-Market Forays Part 2 ...

by P.J. Jakovljevic ... now at the SME level, PeopleSoft faces a phalanx of competitors spearheaded by Microsoft Business Solutions' (former Great Plains and Navision) offerings (see ... http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2002/09/news_analysis/NA_ER_PJ_09_27_02_1.asp - 21k - 2002-09-27 Summary: Despite the challenges, PeopleSoft has raised the bar in providing solutions for smaller enterprises, and Tier 2 and Tier 3 vendors might be in for a tough battle to defend their turf, especially as they are concurrently trying to expand and modernize their products with ever diminishing resources and wa

PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 4 ...

by P.J. Jakovljevic ... find many compelling reasons for a small or midsize enterprise to go for PeopleSoft as opposed to, eg, Lawson, Microsoft Great Plains, or Navision and an army ... http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2002/06/research_notes/EN_ER_PJ_06_25_02_1.asp - 15k - 2002-06-25 Summary: It appears that a real magic bullet to attract smaller enterprises is yet to be produced, although the company has successfully addressed marketing and selling to both large and smaller enterprises. All in all, although on the right track, PeopleSoft has to be careful that it does not overstretch itself

Stalled Navision + Mixed Bag Damgaard = Satisfactory ...

by P.J. Jakovljevic ... is not going to happen any time soon since Navision Financials has ... businessapplications/ 2001/02/news_analysis/na_ba_pj_02_01_01_1.asp">PeopleSoft Joins The ... http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/BusinessApplications/2001/03/news_analysis/NA_BA_PJ_03_27_01_1.asp - 13k - 2001-03-27 Summary: In February, NavisionDamgaard, a recently merger-formed Danish provider of enterprise business solutions for mid-sized companies, released its first semi-annual report. While the merger has produced satisfactory initial results, the future nevertheless bears challenges.

PeopleSoft Building Muscles To Overcome The Rough Patch Part 3 ...

by P.J. Jakovljevic ... which might become too much to cope with given PeopleSoft has lower ... an army of competitors spearheaded by Microsoft's Great Plains and Navision offerings (see ... http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2002/06/research_notes/EN_ER_PJ_06_24_02_1.asp - 28k - 2002-06-24 Summary: In PeopleSoft’s case, the fact remains that it is still the best-attuned offering (in terms of pricing, vertical extensions, customizability, professional service approach, etc.) to the needs of large, service-oriented enterprises, or for ‘greenfield’ sites. However, to put things in the right pers

SAP Keeps Traction On Some Tires Of Its Omni-Wheel-Drive Part 2 ...

by P.J. Jakovljevic ... indicate a loss of the supremacy aura against the backdrop of competitors' steady performance (eg, JD Edwards, PeopleSoft, IFS, Intentia, Navision, Baan, Scala ... http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2002/06/news_analysis/NA_ER_PJ_06_07_02_1.asp - 20k - 2002-06-07 Summary: SAP’s viability and its business applications market’s leadership remains unscathed, as the company remains rock-solid and will be the leader for a long time to come. While SAP has espoused one of the most compelling and promising collaborative-Commerce vision to-date, the ideal enablers of collabor

Competition Heats Up in ERP Market: Oracle Merger, and SAP and ...

by Olin Thompson and P.J. Jakovljevic ... migration, and from technical specialists skilled in PeopleSoft application conversion ... Microsoft's acquisition of former Great Plains and Navision (see research ... http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2005/05/research_notes/TN_ER_XOT_05_21_05_1.asp - 20k - 2005-05-21 Summary: Although Oracle's product roadmap is beginning to take shape it does not include active marketing of the PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards product lines. As a result of these products being seen as dead ends, many competitors have been scrambling to offer all sorts of incentives to switch to the still disconce

Microsoft 'The Great' Poised To Conquer Mid-Market, Once and Again ...

by P.J. Jakovljevic ... major technology development partners like Oracle, Siebel, SAP and PeopleSoft, given Axapta's ... and may continue to compete with Great Plains/Navision based on a ... http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2002/05/news_analysis/NA_ER_PJ_05_15_02_1.asp - 16k - 2002-05-15 Summary: Microsoft's reticence to comment on any timelines of product integration and operations mergers, to our belief, stems from their genuine inability to foresee it at this stage. Still, although the indications that the business will continue to be as usual are strong, Microsoft may eventually decide to str

Soft Economy Dents SAP’s Armored Shield As Well

by P.J. Jakovljevic ... Pacific market, might indicate a loss of market share against the backdrop of competitors' growth in these markets (eg, PeopleSoft, IFS, Intentia, Navision, etc ... http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2001/11/news_analysis/NA_ER_PJ_11_09_01_1.asp - 19k - 2001-11-09 Summary: Since the license revenue plunge in the US, a likely cascading economic slowdown worldwide, and SAP’s high stakes in struggling Commerce One happened much before the fatal September 11, one is only to wonder why SAP’s management woke up to reality and revised its projections so belatedly.

SalesLogix and ACT! Officially Branded As Best Software Part 2 ...

by P.J. Jakovljevic ... Interact will have given pause to Microsoft Great Plains/Navision, Epicor, as well as to Siebel Systems, Oracle, SAP, Baan, JD Edwards and PeopleSoft that have ... http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/Erp/2002/07/news_analysis/NA_ER_PJ_07_30_02_1.asp - 17k - 2002-07-30 Summary: The company must clearly articulate its plans and the timeline for integration for each of its products. Otherwise it may face confusion and/or anxiety amongst both its current and potential customers as well as within its VARs.